Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Blended family finances

263 replies

PersephoneMidnight · 28/07/2026 01:15

Regular user who has name changed. I am in the process of purchasing my first house with my partner of 10 years. I have a large down payment which consists of a combination of my own savings and an inheritance from my grandfather who died 2 years ago. It’s about half the purchase price, my partner is also contributing to the deposit but only has around £50k. We are disagreeing about how the house will be owned. He is pushing for joint tenants 50/50 whereas I want to be tenants in common with our deposits ringfenced. For context He is 39 earning 52k, he has two teenage daughters who live with us 50% of the week. I am 32 earning 75k with no dependents. We currently rent and split everything 50/50 but I do pay for our holidays, takeaways and days out. I also treat my step daughters with clothes, makeup and give them pocket money £20 a week each and pay for the phones. My partner does pay his ex wife CM £150 a week and covers the kids extra curriculars as she is a low earner.

He thinks I’m being selfish by not agreeing to a joint tenancy and sharing finances after 10 years. I think he is being unreasonable to expect me to basically gift him half of my grandfathers money. We are not married and never will be that’s my choice, I also do not want children. We have never had a joint account or shared finances as he has children and expenses that I do not.

I’m aware that mumsnet normally tells people to have joint finances etc but I feel really uncomfortable about this. I do love my partner and step daughters and they are included in my will but this seems a step too far, aibu?

OP posts:
PurpleCoo · 28/07/2026 23:10

No no no! He is sponging off you. Why split the bills 50/50 when his children are there half the week. Why are you paying for holidays??

I wouldn't buy with this man, he is trying to get hold of your capital.

ThatMauveMaker · 28/07/2026 22:59

Speak to your solicitor about signing a Declaration of Trust. You both set out your shares in this Deed and both sign it. Keep the original in your records with a backed up electronic copy somewhere. No Deed, don't buy! £52k is a decent wage...why are you subsidising his kids so much?! You being the purse when you are out with him and for holidays is enough.

Sensiblesal · 28/07/2026 21:36

Liberancho · 28/07/2026 18:45

That is 10 years for him to observe OP's earning potential and coerce her into paying for his kids, while he and his ex wife take a back seat.

Thankfully, most on here can see through his manipulation. I don't think the OP has but she came here for opinions.

He is winning as it stands and wants to guilt OP into winning even more.

I have encountered chumps like this one. His kids phones and clothes and pocket money is taken care of, next it will be their share of the house.. University fees.. This man is all about taking. He will try to wear the OP down until he gets what he wants.

She is entrenched and will probably compromise to his favour. He will guilt trip her over his kids otherwise.

This post is repugnant.

The OP has said he has a brain injury. Making up narratives to suit your man hatred is bizarre and not helpful towards the Op

ClairDeLaLune · 28/07/2026 21:13

Sweetpea333 · 28/07/2026 01:20

Do not buy with him. You're being used.My legs and bank account would be closed!

Edited

Very often the first post nailed it, but never have I seen one that nails it so brilliantly.

You are being used and conned OP. Do NOT buy a house with this cocklodger.

indigox · 28/07/2026 20:36

I do pay for our holidays, takeaways and days out. I also treat my step daughters with clothes, makeup and give them pocket money £20 a week each and pay for the phones.

You're giving him praise for it being 50/50 whilst he was unable to work yet it never was 50/50 if you're paying for all the discretionary expenses?

FinallyHere · 28/07/2026 20:14

Lots of things you could do.

Yhe thing that jumps out at me is that he is the sort of man who accepts her paying way more than her fair share and responds .. by calling her selfish for not wanting to share a substantial inheritance

BebeBelle · 28/07/2026 20:12

Like others I also believe in joint finances and do with my husband.

However in your case, no. You say you do 50/50 but you seem to do a lot more re:holidays, takeaways, his kids, and giving him the ability to pay the CM.
Rather than look at it from the point of you ‘being selfish’, he should look at what you are already doing for his (your) family. I would say if he does not want any ring fencing put £50k deposit and carry on doing 50/50 bills and he will carry on paying more for the mortgage and that’s his choice.

AnneLovesGilbert · 28/07/2026 20:02

ArtforEveryone · 28/07/2026 19:21

It’s obvious that you should ring fence your deposit, as everyone is saying.

But my view is that there are much deeper issues here and it’s not quite as simple as the fact that he is taking advantage of you (although he is and has been). OP, I actually feel quite sorry for you - you’re only 32 and it sounds like you’ve had very little fun or freedom in your young life.

You were barely into proper adulthood (yes, I know you’re technically an adult at 18, but questionable if you can count being in full time education as fully-fledged adulthood) when you became involved with a man several years older with two young children.

You say you’ve never wanted your own children (and that of course is your prerogative) but from a very young age you took on the responsibilities of part time parenting and the attendant sacrifices for someone else’s children. That makes no sense to me if you weren’t interested in children. I also think that the constraints of the situation mean you’ve never even had a chance to explore the issues fully and possibly change your mind about having your own children or wanting to get married.

You state that when you met you lived in a flat share and earned minimum wage as if that somehow equalises your and his situations now. It doesn’t really. You were doing then what is normal for a recent graduate getting their career trajectory underway. At that stage it’s all about potential as you’ve since proven with your now decent career and income. He, by contrast, was several years older with heavy commitments that were not going to reduce for many years. I can’t imagine what attracted you to him or the situation, but obviously there were reasons.

Unfortunately I think the PP who mentioned the boiled frog analogy is spot on - you’ve spent almost your entire young adult life doing more than your fair share to support this man, his children and (indirectly) his ex-wife - emotionally, practically and financially. It’s gone on for so long you think it’s normal and now can’t see any other way your life could or should be. I have daughters in their early twenties and frankly would be very sad if one of them got into a similar situation and that was their whole future (even though it would of course be their choice).

My honest advice to you would be to extricate yourself completely from this situation before you get any older. I’m almost certain you won’t do that because you say you love him and his children, they are your family, and you’ve all been through a lot with his illness. No doubt you feel obligated to see it through because of loyalty but also because you are stuck due to the guilt that would ensue - you know that while you could walk away tomorrow and be fine, he would struggle hugely to pay his rent, provide for his children and continue to pay his ex-wife.

One final comment based on my own experience - taking on such a load for so many people might feel fine at 32 when you’re full of bounce and energy but becomes less easy at 42 and positively difficult at 52 when you’re menopausal and exhausted. I’d bet a large sum that in 20 years time you will be very fed up with the endless burden.

Do you plan to support his children through university and/or other life stages? He doesn’t earn enough without your input and his earning potential has prematurely stalled due to his health. How old is the ex-wife? If the same age as your partner, do you plan for him to be supporting her for decades, well beyond the children growing to adulthood, because she can’t work due to her own health issues?

I’m not saying you should leave him, and I’m pretty sure you won’t, but that being the case, these are things that you will have to factor in to your planning.

Reposting this excellent contribution which won’t be easy to read OP but is absolutely bang on the money, gentle and insightful. I hope you can see that the posters on here have your best interests at heart. I’m a stepmum and I have a stepmum and you haven’t chosen an easy path especially since you don’t want your own children. This is the ideal opportunity to step back in your own mind and think about what you want from the rest of your life.

Wingingit73 · 28/07/2026 19:30

You could be joint tenants but have a deed of trust drawn up lrktectkng each of your deposits being viewed as diviesable equity should you split. If its a hill he will die on then bow out.

FinallyHere · 28/07/2026 19:27

Completely agree with @ArtforEveryone

the need for someone to love appears to outweigh the drive to be loved. That’s the only way I can make sense of it for me.

ArtforEveryone · 28/07/2026 19:21

It’s obvious that you should ring fence your deposit, as everyone is saying.

But my view is that there are much deeper issues here and it’s not quite as simple as the fact that he is taking advantage of you (although he is and has been). OP, I actually feel quite sorry for you - you’re only 32 and it sounds like you’ve had very little fun or freedom in your young life.

You were barely into proper adulthood (yes, I know you’re technically an adult at 18, but questionable if you can count being in full time education as fully-fledged adulthood) when you became involved with a man several years older with two young children.

You say you’ve never wanted your own children (and that of course is your prerogative) but from a very young age you took on the responsibilities of part time parenting and the attendant sacrifices for someone else’s children. That makes no sense to me if you weren’t interested in children. I also think that the constraints of the situation mean you’ve never even had a chance to explore the issues fully and possibly change your mind about having your own children or wanting to get married.

You state that when you met you lived in a flat share and earned minimum wage as if that somehow equalises your and his situations now. It doesn’t really. You were doing then what is normal for a recent graduate getting their career trajectory underway. At that stage it’s all about potential as you’ve since proven with your now decent career and income. He, by contrast, was several years older with heavy commitments that were not going to reduce for many years. I can’t imagine what attracted you to him or the situation, but obviously there were reasons.

Unfortunately I think the PP who mentioned the boiled frog analogy is spot on - you’ve spent almost your entire young adult life doing more than your fair share to support this man, his children and (indirectly) his ex-wife - emotionally, practically and financially. It’s gone on for so long you think it’s normal and now can’t see any other way your life could or should be. I have daughters in their early twenties and frankly would be very sad if one of them got into a similar situation and that was their whole future (even though it would of course be their choice).

My honest advice to you would be to extricate yourself completely from this situation before you get any older. I’m almost certain you won’t do that because you say you love him and his children, they are your family, and you’ve all been through a lot with his illness. No doubt you feel obligated to see it through because of loyalty but also because you are stuck due to the guilt that would ensue - you know that while you could walk away tomorrow and be fine, he would struggle hugely to pay his rent, provide for his children and continue to pay his ex-wife.

One final comment based on my own experience - taking on such a load for so many people might feel fine at 32 when you’re full of bounce and energy but becomes less easy at 42 and positively difficult at 52 when you’re menopausal and exhausted. I’d bet a large sum that in 20 years time you will be very fed up with the endless burden.

Do you plan to support his children through university and/or other life stages? He doesn’t earn enough without your input and his earning potential has prematurely stalled due to his health. How old is the ex-wife? If the same age as your partner, do you plan for him to be supporting her for decades, well beyond the children growing to adulthood, because she can’t work due to her own health issues?

I’m not saying you should leave him, and I’m pretty sure you won’t, but that being the case, these are things that you will have to factor in to your planning.

OhYeahOhYeah · 28/07/2026 19:03

PersephoneMidnight · 28/07/2026 01:15

Regular user who has name changed. I am in the process of purchasing my first house with my partner of 10 years. I have a large down payment which consists of a combination of my own savings and an inheritance from my grandfather who died 2 years ago. It’s about half the purchase price, my partner is also contributing to the deposit but only has around £50k. We are disagreeing about how the house will be owned. He is pushing for joint tenants 50/50 whereas I want to be tenants in common with our deposits ringfenced. For context He is 39 earning 52k, he has two teenage daughters who live with us 50% of the week. I am 32 earning 75k with no dependents. We currently rent and split everything 50/50 but I do pay for our holidays, takeaways and days out. I also treat my step daughters with clothes, makeup and give them pocket money £20 a week each and pay for the phones. My partner does pay his ex wife CM £150 a week and covers the kids extra curriculars as she is a low earner.

He thinks I’m being selfish by not agreeing to a joint tenancy and sharing finances after 10 years. I think he is being unreasonable to expect me to basically gift him half of my grandfathers money. We are not married and never will be that’s my choice, I also do not want children. We have never had a joint account or shared finances as he has children and expenses that I do not.

I’m aware that mumsnet normally tells people to have joint finances etc but I feel really uncomfortable about this. I do love my partner and step daughters and they are included in my will but this seems a step too far, aibu?

Generally speaking, joint tenancy is for married/civil couples to mitigate IHT etc to their spouse.
It automatically means you both own the home 100%, so doesn’t matter who has put in what amount. In the event of either of you dying, your share will pass to the other person immediately and bypasses probate. The property would then be theirs fully.

Tenants in common would be the preferred route for your situation for the reasons you gave…..you can ring fence your contribution and protect your share of the home and equity.

It does raise a huge red flag though, and I feel you are putting yourself and finances in jeopardy if you agree to joint tenancy because you are being guilted into it. Please trist your gut!

Do it your way, or not at all, would be my advice (this is in my line of work and have seen some terrible set ups over the decades!)

Get a good SOLICITOR who specialises in conveyancing rather than a simple Conveyancer firm, as they will give solid advice here xx

BobbyBobkins123987 · 28/07/2026 18:54

BIossomtoes · 28/07/2026 18:36

No, fairness is fairness. They should both pay the same for a 50/50 split. The interest on OP’s money would be compensated for with the increase in capital value - if the housing market ever recovers.

So you believe it fair that she should pay interest on half the mortgage simply because he doesn’t have the same funds available? That might be your definition of fairness, but it isn’t everyone’s. Hence it being subjective...

BobbyBobkins123987 · 28/07/2026 18:53

So you believe it fair that she should pay interest on half the mortgage simply because he doesn’t have the same funds available? That might be your definition of fairness, but it isn’t everyone’s. Hence it being subjective...

JJBB22221111 · 28/07/2026 18:49

Not sure why you’re subsidising this leech to start with. He should be paying a larger portion of the bills as his kids spend so much time with you.
I definitely wouldn’t buy a property with him as he sounds extremely entitled, but if you do certainly protect your own interests legally!

Liberancho · 28/07/2026 18:45

parachutegirl · 28/07/2026 17:26

I think those saying he’s a cocklodger are being rather unfair - they’ve been together ten years!

I do think it’s reasonable for you to ring fence your deposit OP, but can also understand why he’s hurt by what he sees as your lack of commitment. I can see both sides.

That is 10 years for him to observe OP's earning potential and coerce her into paying for his kids, while he and his ex wife take a back seat.

Thankfully, most on here can see through his manipulation. I don't think the OP has but she came here for opinions.

He is winning as it stands and wants to guilt OP into winning even more.

I have encountered chumps like this one. His kids phones and clothes and pocket money is taken care of, next it will be their share of the house.. University fees.. This man is all about taking. He will try to wear the OP down until he gets what he wants.

She is entrenched and will probably compromise to his favour. He will guilt trip her over his kids otherwise.

BIossomtoes · 28/07/2026 18:36

BobbyBobkins123987 · 28/07/2026 17:58

Fairness is subjective. She would also lose the interest she currently earns on her savings by using them towards the purchase. Ultimately, it’s up to the OP how they want to structure it. Most people pay interest when buying a home because they need a mortgage, so it seems illogical to argue that paying interest should be a barrier for him when he wants to buy a property in excess of the funds he has available.

No, fairness is fairness. They should both pay the same for a 50/50 split. The interest on OP’s money would be compensated for with the increase in capital value - if the housing market ever recovers.

Pherian · 28/07/2026 18:12

PersephoneMidnight · 28/07/2026 01:15

Regular user who has name changed. I am in the process of purchasing my first house with my partner of 10 years. I have a large down payment which consists of a combination of my own savings and an inheritance from my grandfather who died 2 years ago. It’s about half the purchase price, my partner is also contributing to the deposit but only has around £50k. We are disagreeing about how the house will be owned. He is pushing for joint tenants 50/50 whereas I want to be tenants in common with our deposits ringfenced. For context He is 39 earning 52k, he has two teenage daughters who live with us 50% of the week. I am 32 earning 75k with no dependents. We currently rent and split everything 50/50 but I do pay for our holidays, takeaways and days out. I also treat my step daughters with clothes, makeup and give them pocket money £20 a week each and pay for the phones. My partner does pay his ex wife CM £150 a week and covers the kids extra curriculars as she is a low earner.

He thinks I’m being selfish by not agreeing to a joint tenancy and sharing finances after 10 years. I think he is being unreasonable to expect me to basically gift him half of my grandfathers money. We are not married and never will be that’s my choice, I also do not want children. We have never had a joint account or shared finances as he has children and expenses that I do not.

I’m aware that mumsnet normally tells people to have joint finances etc but I feel really uncomfortable about this. I do love my partner and step daughters and they are included in my will but this seems a step too far, aibu?

Never mix your finances.

Match his deposit and buy a house within his means. That’s the only way to do what he’s asking.

Then you both split the mortgage, bills and upkeep cost equally.

I would also stop paying for all the holidays, takeaways etc - unless it’s the occasional treat,

He isn’t a particularly low earner. It’s the CMS payments that are lowering his monthly take home. That isn’t your problem.

If he doesn’t agree to this, I wouldn’t buy with him.

Personally, I wouldn’t buy with him at all.

BobbyBobkins123987 · 28/07/2026 17:58

BIossomtoes · 28/07/2026 17:47

That’s equally unfair. A mortgage involves interest, he’d be paying more for his half. Far better that they both contribute 50% of the deposit and pay 50% of the mortgage.

Fairness is subjective. She would also lose the interest she currently earns on her savings by using them towards the purchase. Ultimately, it’s up to the OP how they want to structure it. Most people pay interest when buying a home because they need a mortgage, so it seems illogical to argue that paying interest should be a barrier for him when he wants to buy a property in excess of the funds he has available.

BIossomtoes · 28/07/2026 17:47

BobbyBobkins123987 · 28/07/2026 17:43

As you have your half of the property value in cash, I'd speak to a conveyancing solicitor and see if you can draw up an agreement where you are joint tenants. Yours is paid cash, his is partly funded via a mortgage (which he has to pay himself and is in his sole name) that way you have equal share of a property but when it comes to sell you receive half the value, as does he less his mortgage. If he doesn't agree to that, definitely question whether this is a money grab!

That’s equally unfair. A mortgage involves interest, he’d be paying more for his half. Far better that they both contribute 50% of the deposit and pay 50% of the mortgage.

BobbyBobkins123987 · 28/07/2026 17:43

As you have your half of the property value in cash, I'd speak to a conveyancing solicitor and see if you can draw up an agreement where you are joint tenants. Yours is paid cash, his is partly funded via a mortgage (which he has to pay himself and is in his sole name) that way you have equal share of a property but when it comes to sell you receive half the value, as does he less his mortgage. If he doesn't agree to that, definitely question whether this is a money grab!

Banabay · 28/07/2026 17:29

NewDogOwner · 28/07/2026 11:44

'We currently rent and split everything 50/50 but I do pay for our holidays, takeaways and days out. I also treat my step daughters with clothes, makeup and give them pocket money £20 a week each and pay for the phones.'
You don't split everything. You pay for most things including for his children.

Agree.
That most certainly isn't 50/50.

He has some cheek calling you selfish.

He completely takes you and your generosity for granted.

You are subbing him to the tune of thousands a year, and he calls you selfish?

I would be very wary of someone so entitled.

parachutegirl · 28/07/2026 17:26

I think those saying he’s a cocklodger are being rather unfair - they’ve been together ten years!

I do think it’s reasonable for you to ring fence your deposit OP, but can also understand why he’s hurt by what he sees as your lack of commitment. I can see both sides.

OneLimePombear · 28/07/2026 17:11

Would you consider matching his deposit and keeping the rest of your money invested elsewhere,

Sunshine99999 · 28/07/2026 17:10

As a parent surely he should want tenants in common otherwise there’s a risk he dies and his kids get nothing. He’s clearly banking on the risk being more favourable that you die and he gets it all!

I’m married but still bought as tenants in common as I have kids from a previous relationship and I wanted to protect their inheritance.