Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think some people on here have no idea what 16-18 year olds are actually like?

528 replies

Twile · 25/07/2026 20:02

I’ve noticed that some posters on here seem to have no idea what parenting an older teenager is actually like.

Someone will post about their 16-18 year old being completely out of control - staying out all night, drinking, vaping, refusing school or college, being verbally abusive, getting involved with unsuitable partners or simply refusing to follow any rules.

Without fail, there are replies saying things like:

“Just stop them going.”
“Take their phone off them.”
“Ground them.”
“You’re the parent - just say no.”
“I’d never allow that”

It makes me wonder whether these people have actually parented an older teen.

A 16-18-year-old is not the same as a 10-year-old. They’re often physically bigger than you, legally have increasing autonomy, can leave the house if they choose, earn their own money and in many cases simply refuse to comply. You can’t physically force them to stay indoors, attend college, end a relationship or make sensible choices. And nor should you.

Of course boundaries still matter, and parenting doesn’t stop at 16. But the strategies change. You’re often relying on influence rather than control, and sometimes you’re choosing the least bad option rather than the ideal one.

OP posts:
MNLurker1345 · 25/07/2026 23:57

Ok, @Twile, you put forward that
some parents that give some forms of advice on MN do not have any idea and you put forward some reasons that older teenagers are beyond the influence of parents.

Do you think there are the many other causes for this? Do you think it is just down to personalities?

Obviously phones, the internet, SM, working parents and lack of extended family involvement to give just a few reasons are integral, but I do feel that we do have a parenting problem also.

Am I blaming parents? Yes some I am. And I think on threads like this, we skirt around causes and issues because we try to be seen to not bash and blame, but some of it is down to parenting.

Just see the number of threads about adults that have NC with parents. Threads that PPs describe narcissistic parents, about abuse and DV.

I think the problem starts in the home and is
not a result of the seemingly useless advice some parents give on MN, which yes can be annoying, but doesn’t address the problem of why some older teenagers are behaving in this way. And is not down to a perceived smugness or naivety of parents whose children are not like this.

And as many PPs are saying it isn’t all older teenagers. And the PPs that are saying it are not necessarily as you and some other PPs have said on here, parents of younger children. Why would a parent of a 7 year old profess to have knowledge and experience of bringing up a 16/17 year old.

Look at the figures for non school attendance, young children going into reception that are not ready for school, lack of discipline and so
much more that we see today.

MN covers a broad demographic, yes there are clusters of opinions and some advice is best suited on certain topics and not on others, but we all have a voice and as a result we are exposed to such a wide range of perspectives. Take from it what you will and discard the rest.

Twile · 25/07/2026 23:56

ProfessionalPirate · 25/07/2026 23:36

The joys of rural living - if my kids wanted to walk out they’d have nowhere to go to except a 30 minute walk to the neighbouring farm and I don’t think that option appeals to them!

In all seriousness though, it doesn’t matter if my kids are physically bigger than me, in my family none of us ever use physical strength to control anyone so it’s irrelevant.

I don’t give advice on the threads that ask for it because I have none to give, it blows my mind that behaviour can get to this stage at all and so obviously I wouldn’t know how to deal with it. I don’t know anyone with the sort of out-of-control teens you describe irl. Which makes me wonder what has happened (or not happened) to get to this point, it certainly doesn’t seem typical to me.

Obviously if a teenager really does want to walk out they will but surely it’s a pretty short sighted strategy? Most 16/17 year olds are going to be earning peanuts from their part-time jobs, they can’t afford to rent a place on their own, any friends they might be freeloading off will soon want them out. My kid’s comfortable lives are entirely dependent on me and DH and I think they are sensible enough to realise this without finding out the hard way. If I wanted to remove their phones or cars or deny them internet access (all of which I pay for) then I absolutely could do that! How would they stop me? They can have all the freedom they want when they earn a proper wage and pay their way in life.

I think you’ve answered your own question.

You say you’ve never known an out-of-control teenager and that it blows your mind behaviour could get to that stage. That’s exactly why I think some advice on these threads misses the mark. If you’ve never experienced it, it’s easy to assume there must have been something the parent did or didn’t do.
For many families, taking away a phone, car or internet works. That’s great. But it doesn’t follow that it works for every older teenager.

You ask, “How would they stop me?” The answer is that some wouldn’t. Others would simply leave, refuse to hand things over, buy another phone, stay with friends, or escalate the conflict. That doesn’t make them typical, but they’re not rare either.

As for the idea that they can’t afford to leave home, many know they can’t. That doesn’t stop some from walking out anyway. Teenagers don’t always make decisions based on long-term financial logic. Some will happily sleep on a friend’s sofa, move between houses, or accept a much lower standard of living rather than comply with rules they reject.

I’m not saying parents shouldn’t have boundaries. I’m saying that once a relationship has broken down to that extent, “just take everything away” is often far easier to say than to implement successfully.

Your family sounds functional, respectful and cooperative. That’s genuinely a good thing. But it isn’t the reality every parent who posts on those threads is dealing with.

OP posts:
Namechangee11 · 25/07/2026 23:55

Twile · 25/07/2026 23:07

That’s lovely for you but it completely proves my point.

Your rules work because your teenagers are reasonable, cooperative and willing to accept them. That is not the same as saying those rules would work in every household with every 16-18-year-old.

You can switch off the internet but you cannot physically stop an older teenager leaving the house, buying another phone, staying elsewhere or simply refusing to comply. The fact that your children have not seriously challenged your authority does not mean every parent dealing with a difficult, vulnerable or highly oppositional older teen has simply failed to be “in charge”.

Calling your home a “benign dictatorship” is easy when everyone broadly agrees to the dictatorship. It is not evidence that parents facing far more complex situations could solve them by being firmer.

You have reasonable teenagers and a system that works for your family. Good for you. But presenting that as proof that other parents can simply impose the same control is exactly the smug, simplistic attitude I was talking about.

I have in no way presented this as a model for anyone else, merely a description of what I do. That said, there are sensible tech hygiene stuff that likely we should all follow (said the sleepless middle aged woman on her phone in bed🙄). Two diagnosed, but likely three of my children are ND and my eldest was extremely challenging as she was undiagnosed and unmedicated for ADHD and it was a hellscape for a while. She made a LOT of noise and has incredible regret now about how she treated us because it was awful. But my point is I do stand firm, I do not waver. I will admit if I have made a mistake but I work from a position of strength and from the place of being the person that loves them the most. It is interesting talking to my oldest DD now and she is able to reflect on her teenage behaviour and she too thanks me for just standing firm. Vis a vis the internet, of course it should go off and noone here gives a shit enough to walk out or do anything dramatic. I do think in the not too distant future we will be amazed that we let our children have unfettered access to the Internet. And FYi,.every one of my children has smoked or vaped at some point... My eldest does still vapes (has her own home etc) but I have sanctioned the younger ones when they've got busted... (They have all grassed one another up as it's happening so I know it hasn't been restarted because they would do the same again). We aren't perfect, I'm just not taking any shit because for the most part, I know best and act only from a place of love but I don't need them to like me. So don't be all, 'good for you' snarky, I am just explaining how I do it and not prescribing it for anyone but me because it works in my family. As for running away because a phone and Internet was stopped... I cannot do that because they don't have it anyway... I have removed a phone from an older teen here because he said something truly awful on a chat thing, I had warned him before and he did it again and I confiscated it. I'm went to his school website, printed out his timetable and he took it, he knew he was wrong and it was gone for week and he sulked but he accepted it. If he had run away I would be terrified of course, but I wouldn't give the phone back. That's a who blinks first thing and a carte blanche if you back down. Yea it is different than when they're small undoubtedly but I'll be fucked if they can punish me for punishing them...

XelaM · 25/07/2026 23:53

So many examples of teenagers rebelling against strict parenting (especially when it's cultural/religious as well). The most famous porn star in the world Rocco Siffredi came from a super religious family who wanted him to become a priest. Many similar examples

Ffmffjjf · 25/07/2026 23:40

swqa · 25/07/2026 23:02

And yet there are so many gangs of Indian teenagers running riot in so many towns, and criminal gangs of Indian men.

Just as there are with other nationalities.

Perhaps their parents didn't discipline them enough

HowardsWahey · 25/07/2026 23:39

TheresMillionsOfGeoffreys · 25/07/2026 20:04

I’ve noticed that some posters on here seem to have no idea what parenting an older teenager is actually like.

Well yes... of course!?
Just like some posters have no experience of driving an electric car or going to Germany. Not sure it really needs a whole thread dedicated to pointing this out, does it?

What a pointless comment. If you don't find the topic interesting, move on. As for it not "needing" a thread, what does? There doesn't need to be a thread on any topic. And they're unlimited - it's not like OP took the last potatoes when she wasn't even hungry. If you want to start another thread, start one!

OP - I often think about this when we get those threads complaining about non-parents being on Mumsnet. If a thread is about a teenager, someone who has been one is surely equally as qualified to advise as the parent of two under-fives? Parenthood alone doesn't make them experts!

OvernightOats101 · 25/07/2026 23:38

How many times do you read "pick your battles" when it's about raising a teen, to justify giving up on imposing something you believe in ?

Some of us do not "pick our battle". If some parents want to let their kids get away with a lot because they can't be bothered to be consistent, it's up to them.
Others think differently.

Just don't come back later complaining that they don't listen because they are used to get away with everything anyway.

Ffmffjjf · 25/07/2026 23:38

MNLurker1345 · 25/07/2026 22:56

@Ffmffjjf, yours was a cultural specific upbringing. Very different from the culture that the OPs post comes from and none of us in the 21st century would endorse corporal punishment, would we?

One cultures corporal discipline is another’s abusive parenting.

When I grew up parents did smack their children but even then those on the receiving end knew it was abusive. In Indian culture you see it as discipline in other cultures it is abuse.

And there is nothing wrong with being radical and ridiculous.

I grew up in the 21st century! It's legal in England still (and from what I checked we're still in the 21st century). I'm not saying children should be beaten senseless. But the discipline I got (from a very young age) has led me to not to go off the rails to this extreme. I had no interest in alcohol till sixth form. It had never been introduced to me. I only started because I was surprised that everyone else was doing it and I wanted to fit in. I did experiment with it because I wanted to know what it was like to be "wasted". It was fun at time but would make me an emotional mess at uni. So no longer have any interest. Have never vaped or smoked or snuck out. Never done class A drugs even though "we all did it when young".

When I was 18 I did try and do a very "this is my life my decision, and I don't care what you think" kind of thing and yeah it didn't work out and I had to change it.

ProfessionalPirate · 25/07/2026 23:36

Twile · 25/07/2026 23:03

That’s a pretty poor argument.

The difference is that I’m not claiming all 16-18-year-olds are the same. I’m saying it’s unrealistic to assume you can simply “stop” an older teenager doing something, as though they’re still 10 years old.

The advice I’m talking about isn’t “this worked for my 17-year-old.” It’s people confidently telling struggling parents to “just don’t let them go”, “take their phone”, or “ground them”, as if that’s universally possible.

Many older teenagers are taller, stronger, legally far more independent and perfectly capable of walking out of the house if they choose. That’s reality. Pretending every parent has the same level of control they had over a primary school child isn’t helpful.

So no, this isn’t me extrapolating from a handful of teenagers. It’s pointing out that parenting changes as children get older, and advice needs to reflect that rather than assuming every problem can be solved by saying, “Just parent them.”

The joys of rural living - if my kids wanted to walk out they’d have nowhere to go to except a 30 minute walk to the neighbouring farm and I don’t think that option appeals to them!

In all seriousness though, it doesn’t matter if my kids are physically bigger than me, in my family none of us ever use physical strength to control anyone so it’s irrelevant.

I don’t give advice on the threads that ask for it because I have none to give, it blows my mind that behaviour can get to this stage at all and so obviously I wouldn’t know how to deal with it. I don’t know anyone with the sort of out-of-control teens you describe irl. Which makes me wonder what has happened (or not happened) to get to this point, it certainly doesn’t seem typical to me.

Obviously if a teenager really does want to walk out they will but surely it’s a pretty short sighted strategy? Most 16/17 year olds are going to be earning peanuts from their part-time jobs, they can’t afford to rent a place on their own, any friends they might be freeloading off will soon want them out. My kid’s comfortable lives are entirely dependent on me and DH and I think they are sensible enough to realise this without finding out the hard way. If I wanted to remove their phones or cars or deny them internet access (all of which I pay for) then I absolutely could do that! How would they stop me? They can have all the freedom they want when they earn a proper wage and pay their way in life.

EwwStew · 25/07/2026 23:34

Twile · 25/07/2026 23:07

That’s lovely for you but it completely proves my point.

Your rules work because your teenagers are reasonable, cooperative and willing to accept them. That is not the same as saying those rules would work in every household with every 16-18-year-old.

You can switch off the internet but you cannot physically stop an older teenager leaving the house, buying another phone, staying elsewhere or simply refusing to comply. The fact that your children have not seriously challenged your authority does not mean every parent dealing with a difficult, vulnerable or highly oppositional older teen has simply failed to be “in charge”.

Calling your home a “benign dictatorship” is easy when everyone broadly agrees to the dictatorship. It is not evidence that parents facing far more complex situations could solve them by being firmer.

You have reasonable teenagers and a system that works for your family. Good for you. But presenting that as proof that other parents can simply impose the same control is exactly the smug, simplistic attitude I was talking about.

Pretty much all of my family and friends run the same kind of benign dictatorship. It works because these expectations of respect and good behaviour have been in place since the children could first walk and talk.

They accept it because that is all they have ever known. It becomes part of who they are. The rules, which adjust as they age, help them feel secure and mean home is always a safe and predictable retreat.

There is one family who are having trouble, but the mum admits she was not consistent when they were little and cute, it was easier to give in and let thinhs go, and is sadly paying for it now.

OvernightOats101 · 25/07/2026 23:34

Twile · 25/07/2026 23:03

That’s a pretty poor argument.

The difference is that I’m not claiming all 16-18-year-olds are the same. I’m saying it’s unrealistic to assume you can simply “stop” an older teenager doing something, as though they’re still 10 years old.

The advice I’m talking about isn’t “this worked for my 17-year-old.” It’s people confidently telling struggling parents to “just don’t let them go”, “take their phone”, or “ground them”, as if that’s universally possible.

Many older teenagers are taller, stronger, legally far more independent and perfectly capable of walking out of the house if they choose. That’s reality. Pretending every parent has the same level of control they had over a primary school child isn’t helpful.

So no, this isn’t me extrapolating from a handful of teenagers. It’s pointing out that parenting changes as children get older, and advice needs to reflect that rather than assuming every problem can be solved by saying, “Just parent them.”

The difference is that I’m not claiming all 16-18-year-olds are the same. I’m saying it’s unrealistic to assume you can simply “stop” an older teenager doing something, as though they’re still 10 years old

it's unrealistic to assume you can stop ALL older teenagers you mean?
What make you think other parents have no authority on their own teen?

You struggling to impose discipline doesn't mean every other parent is struggling too.

OvernightOats101 · 25/07/2026 23:31

DancingNotDrowning · 25/07/2026 22:53

It was very clear what the OP meant and the the sentence you excluded from her OP:

Someone will post about their 16-18 year old being completely out of control

Not only evidences that she wasn’t talking about all teens but that you knew it too.

you can try to be as sweetly passive aggressive as you like, but it doesn't make my point untrue.

LBFseBrom · 25/07/2026 23:31

Yes, you are right. My only child is now going on 47 but I remember his teenage years very well indeed, I also remember my own. :-)

Great fun at times.......

Twile · 25/07/2026 23:27

Ponderingwindow · 25/07/2026 23:24

Also, some parents on here really do say that they don’t have the right to dictate rules with older teens.

While boundaries do need to be loosened, that should go hand in hand with earned trust. A responsible young adult can be treated as such. Someone who makes poor choices needs less freedom.

The issue is the assumption that setting a rule means an older teen will obey it.

Boundaries, consequences and earned trust all matter. But “less freedom” is not always something a parent can simply impose in practice. You can withdraw money, lifts, Wi-Fi and privileges but you cannot guarantee that a determined older teen will stay home, hand over a phone or stop seeing someone.

There is also a difference between saying, “This is the rule in my home,” and believing you can dictate every choice an older teen makes outside it.

So yes, responsible behaviour should lead to more freedom and poor choices should have consequences. But that still does not make parenting an older teen as simple as “just say no” or “don’t let them.”

OP posts:
thereisnomeaning · 25/07/2026 23:26

Some of the advice also seems to under estimate teens and view them as much younger than they are. 16-18 year olds are very capable. Sometimes I laugh a bit at the advice remembering that I was married and running a household at 18. Yet, somehow, the 18 year old in the thread can't possibly be expected to do some simple independent activity, like take themselves from A to B.

Twile · 25/07/2026 23:24

Franjipanl8r · 25/07/2026 23:19

I don’t agree. I was a 16 year old who was constantly grounded and trying to run away from home - completely off the rails staying out all night doing drugs etc. If a teen’s living at home and doesn’t have their own money, there’s leverage for consequences.

Your own example shows that consequences and leverage do not necessarily produce compliance. You were grounded and still stayed out all night, took drugs and tried to run away.

Yes parents can remove money, lifts, phones and other privileges. Nobody is saying there should be no consequences. The point is that consequences are not the same as control, especially with an older teenager who is prepared to ignore them.

A parent may have leverage over what happens inside their home, but they cannot physically make a determined 16 or 17 year old stay there. They also have to weigh up whether removing a phone, money or access to transport makes the situation safer or simply pushes the teen further away and makes them harder to locate.

So yes, there can be consequences. But “they live under my roof, therefore I can stop them” is still far too simplistic. Your own teenage behaviour is evidence of that.

OP posts:
Ponderingwindow · 25/07/2026 23:24

Also, some parents on here really do say that they don’t have the right to dictate rules with older teens.

While boundaries do need to be loosened, that should go hand in hand with earned trust. A responsible young adult can be treated as such. Someone who makes poor choices needs less freedom.

Twile · 25/07/2026 23:21

Ponderingwindow · 25/07/2026 23:17

Someone who posts, “my teen stays out until all hours and I don’t know what to do,” has not necessarily stated that their teen is veering towards juvenile delinquent. When every teen you know in real life would respond to a simple demand to stay home or at the very least the removal of the cell phone, why wouldn’t the first thought be that the parent did not do those things?

Because “every teen you know” is still only the teens you know, and assuming that a parent has not tried the most obvious response is both patronising and unrealistic.

A parent saying, “My teen stays out until all hours and I don’t know what to do,” does not mean they have never told them to stay home, imposed consequences or removed privileges. It usually means those things have not worked or have created a different and potentially more serious problem.

Removing a phone is not a magic reset button. Some older teens will hand it over and comply. Others will refuse, leave anyway, use another device, stay with friends or escalate the situation. They do not need to be “veering towards juvenile delinquency” to be beyond the point where a simple demand guarantees obedience.

The first thought should not automatically be that the parent is too foolish or weak to have tried the obvious. It could simply be that their teenager is not like the compliant teenagers in your own circle. That lack of imagination is exactly the issue.

OP posts:
Franjipanl8r · 25/07/2026 23:19

I don’t agree. I was a 16 year old who was constantly grounded and trying to run away from home - completely off the rails staying out all night doing drugs etc. If a teen’s living at home and doesn’t have their own money, there’s leverage for consequences.

ForeverNowWithin · 25/07/2026 23:18

Your rules work because your teenagers are reasonable, cooperative and willing to accept them. That is not the same as saying those rules would work in every household with every 16-18-year-old.
You can switch off the internet but you cannot physically stop an older teenager leaving the house, buying another phone, staying elsewhere or simply refusing to comply. The fact that your children have not seriously challenged your authority does not mean every parent dealing with a difficult, vulnerable or highly oppositional older teen has simply failed to be “in charge”.

Exactly. My 16 yo once behaved very badly. We punished him by removing his phone and removing the internet access in his room. He punished us back by running away in the middle of the night.

I went into his room to wake him for school the next morning and he wasn't there. Can you imagine what that felt like? We lived rurally as well so it's not as if he could easily just wander off down the street for an hour then wander back again. He was found pretty quickly, but that's when I realised what we were up against. It's a very different ball game to parenting a young child.

JulietBravo999 · 25/07/2026 23:18

I particularly enjoy the “but he’s an adult” comments when someone asks a question about their newly 18 year old. Sure, yes, legally an adult blah blah… but sometimes that hapless teenager hasn’t matured one bit the day they turn 18. They’re still at school, still living with you, still acting like a six foot toddler at times, but any mistakes they make could now have lifelong repercussions.

Mine have turned out ok after minor bumpy rides at times, but I have friends who’ve parented pretty strictly with high expectations whose kids have fallen in with the wrong crowd and pushed dangerous boundaries. If they’ve been conditioned to be a parent-pleaser, they may well go along with whatever makes them popular when it comes to alcohol, drugs, sex, driving, and taking risks.

Bigger kids, bigger problems.

Ponderingwindow · 25/07/2026 23:17

Someone who posts, “my teen stays out until all hours and I don’t know what to do,” has not necessarily stated that their teen is veering towards juvenile delinquent. When every teen you know in real life would respond to a simple demand to stay home or at the very least the removal of the cell phone, why wouldn’t the first thought be that the parent did not do those things?

Twile · 25/07/2026 23:07

Namechangee11 · 25/07/2026 23:04

Yes I'm afraid I run what I refer to as a 'benign dictatorship ' here... Internet does go off, no phones in rooms, no TVs and gaming in rooms... It's absolutely ok to say no to them if it doesn't not fit in with what we are doing... You can have a lift if we can do it and arrange a bus otherwise... We do compromise but ultimately, there are rules. They are all nice people... I've managed to get two more to adulthood and still had rules... My sons are almost 18, almost 16 and 14 and I am in charge here.. Happy to talk anything through but ultimately what I decide is the bottom line. It really hasn't been that much of a problem because I think they and we, their parents, are reasonable people.

That’s lovely for you but it completely proves my point.

Your rules work because your teenagers are reasonable, cooperative and willing to accept them. That is not the same as saying those rules would work in every household with every 16-18-year-old.

You can switch off the internet but you cannot physically stop an older teenager leaving the house, buying another phone, staying elsewhere or simply refusing to comply. The fact that your children have not seriously challenged your authority does not mean every parent dealing with a difficult, vulnerable or highly oppositional older teen has simply failed to be “in charge”.

Calling your home a “benign dictatorship” is easy when everyone broadly agrees to the dictatorship. It is not evidence that parents facing far more complex situations could solve them by being firmer.

You have reasonable teenagers and a system that works for your family. Good for you. But presenting that as proof that other parents can simply impose the same control is exactly the smug, simplistic attitude I was talking about.

OP posts:
SnipSnipMrBurgess · 25/07/2026 23:06

Ponderingwindow · 25/07/2026 23:03

Some of us actively are at that parenting stage and do not remotely relate to the version of parenting often described on this site.

THATS THE POINT OF THE THREAD!

If your kids dont act like that then why give advise to parents whose kids do?

Namechangee11 · 25/07/2026 23:04

Yes I'm afraid I run what I refer to as a 'benign dictatorship ' here... Internet does go off, no phones in rooms, no TVs and gaming in rooms... It's absolutely ok to say no to them if it doesn't not fit in with what we are doing... You can have a lift if we can do it and arrange a bus otherwise... We do compromise but ultimately, there are rules. They are all nice people... I've managed to get two more to adulthood and still had rules... My sons are almost 18, almost 16 and 14 and I am in charge here.. Happy to talk anything through but ultimately what I decide is the bottom line. It really hasn't been that much of a problem because I think they and we, their parents, are reasonable people.