AIBU to think RSE lessons should be separated by sex not gender identity?

Just asked my year five son whether his puberty lessons are separated and he said absolutely not and they weren’t last year either

Indeed.

Can you document where it has been stated that there is a safeguarding risk to mixed-sex RSHE???

There is no safeguarding risk to boys and girls being taught RSHE together, let alone a "massive" one. It's standard normal practice. It doesn't become a safeguarding risk just because the school have decided to separate them. There is no DfE recommendation for this segregation.

If they’ve separated the rest of the boys for these lessons, then he needs to go and sit with the other boys too.

He’s not a girl and never will be and making the girls accept his presence in their class where they’re likely to feel uncomfortable and embarrassed at the very least, is a massive safeguarding error of judgement.

I’d be there kicking up a huge fuss with the Head, if this happened in our school.

The full insanity of this movement is perfectly captured in this line ...

But to get back to the point: I agree this child needs to be taught about male puberty as this will be what she goes through

Can we put some bells on this and put it in neon lights please?

Why on earth should normal people be relabelled for the sake of those who have issues

Boys need to be taught about puberty in girls and vice versa but in a single sex setting so that they can ask embarrassing questions.
When my boys did sex ed they came home knowing all the ins and outs of periods but almost nothing about the things that happen to boys in puberty.

But again, with decades of teaching experience behind me, in some, few cases, a separate class is appropriate. Whether we as confident adult women like it or not, there is an embarrassment factor and a boy / girl dynamic in a classroom. If tje overall objective is for girls to be able to learn and ask questions, they are best served in a single sex group. That does not exclude additional mixed sessions or bots also being taught about it

It does benefit girls if periods are normalised for little boys though, which is the main reason for joint lessons in 2026

(Also fairly sure that pp was talking about a biological woman in ladies toilets, trans with a beard.)

Oh god. No that wasnt my reasoning. I do
Not think we should pander to children "identifying as". however I do think people shouldnt feel like sex and periods are something secret that can't be discussed with the opposite sex

Misogyny.
Girls benefit if they are separated for this.
Not separating them denies a benefit to girls that they need.
Why is preventing the sadness of one boy worth damaging 30 girls (assuming approx 50% of a 60-pupil cohort)?

Oh yes, it's because girls don't matter as much as boys.

I've already said they should be separated.

I think it would be best if they just weren't separated at all.

You don't think the boys would be embarrassed discussing this in front of girls?

Yes.

I think the talk should also cover the opposite sex but the focus is on their own sex.

And the people who suffer from this attitude are the girls, whose lessons about their own bodies get disrupted by jokes and teasing from the boys. Misogyny in action.

Girls and boys should be taught the same material. They all need to know the same things. But this is a scenario where everyone benefits if the teaching is provided separately for boys and girls.

The boy who wishes he's a girl is going to be less disruptive than the boys who want to show off their laddishness credentials but his presence will still change the usefulness and benefit of the teaching to the detriment of every girl in the yeargroup and including him in with the girls is sacrificing their wellbeing to avoid him being sad. More misogyny.

3 teaching groups, for girls, for boys and for anyone who is gender-diverse may be the way to go, but all 3 need to be taught the fact that sex is immutable and doesn't change ever no matter what your gender identity is.

Learn about wet dreams- boys only

Do the posters who think that the girls shouldn't be separated from the boys for sessions about periods also think that the boys shouldn't be separated from the girls when they discuss wet dreams?

This is an extremely odd addition to the thread - you had an encounter with a bearded man in the women's toilets, and he told you the majority of women wanted him to wash his hands in the women's toilets.

Apart from the question of how this bearded man gathered this unlikely information about the wishes of the majority of women, what on earth does it have to do with the thread?

As to your other point - around 1 in 4500 babies has genitals which are ambiguous or which later turn out not to match their chromosomes. These rare children need to know what is normal for the sex they believe they are so they know when it's appropriate to seek medical advice - there is increased risk of cancer from retained testicles, and of course fertility and other issues they may need support working through.

Children with more common disorders of sexual development like Turner's and Klinefelter are still distinctly male or female and also need to know what body they're living with and when to ask questions and seek medical advice if it's not developing as expected. Turners is usually diagnosed before puberty but not always - girls need to be offered treatment options in a timely fashion. Klinefelter's is often diagnosed late, and again boys need to know if puberty is not going as expected - they need the information pertinent to them!

It amazes me how many people appear think it is good parenting never to say ״No” to a child.

It equally amazes me that any man truly thinks women want him in the women’s toilets, and equally that any woman - or man - believes him.

He told me he was trans and was simply doing what the majority of women wanted him to do.

This is a lie.

It's intimidating and it's false to force women's compliance.

And even then it's one of those things which isn't about majorities. It's about protecting vulnerable minority groups who are distressed by his presence. Eg NOT FUCKING HIM.

I don’t think the point is whether children should learn about puberty in classes that are mixed, single sex or a combination of the two.
The OP posted about a situation where the school decided to provide single sex sessions; they may have also had further mixed sex sessions, we don’t know. But then allowed a boy to join in with the girls’ session. IMO this was discrimination against the girls; the boys got their single sex session but the girls got a mixed sex session. The boy has also been disadvantaged and possibly confused or misled as he has missed the session which applied to him and the puberty he will experience.

The school should not be doing this.

Our school did this for the year above my son. I know several girls who accepted the boy were very upset and uncomfortable by his presence during their puberty talk.

It will silence girls from asking questions because they are too embarrassed and leave the boy vulnerable and ignorant because he has not had the relevant talk to his sex.

This is precisely what the exceptions in the equality act were aimed at - a legitimate reason to exclude on the basis of sex for the benefit of that sex.

Any school doing this should be firmly challenged as failing to uphold the SC ruling and harming young children (both male and female in the process).

The transhausen parents can take the school to court and lose if they don't like it.

they are talking about a confused and probably unhappy child.
The child is going to be even more confused when he doesn't go through the puberty he's been told he will.

He told me he was trans and was simply doing what the majority of women wanted him to do.
If he's in England (not sure about the rest of the uk) then he's breaking the law.

And im glad you don't care that he was there. Some women would for many reasons including trauma.

That's perfectly reasonable but is left up to the school to decide, as has been discussed.

Separating the children by biological sex can be potentially be justified at the end of year 4 as some girls start puberty at 9 and may genuinely be embarrassed to ask questions about their own bodies in front of boys.

What isn't reasonable is putting one boy into the girls' group where he is then not taught about what will happen to his body and potentially misled to believe he will go through female puberty (you'd think he'd know this won't happen, but some 8 and 9 year olds still believe in Father Christmas, which puts expectations about all children this age understanding the difference between reality and polite fiction and things implied and left unsaid into perspective)...

Trans people have existed for centuries and many societies seem to be a lot more accepting of this. Generally, biological sex can be determined, bit it isn't always clear, and as with so many things, further discoveries show more and more that it isn't that simple.

It's more the intolerance that I find so disturbing - people saying 'I'm not calling a biological male 'she'' when they are talking about a confused and probably unhappy child.

I was in the ladies in a big store the other week and found myself washing my hands next to a bearded man. I'm not bothered, tbh, about the whole loo thing. As long as people keep the equipment clean and there are cubicles, I don't understnad the fuss. But I was curious and asked him if he knew this was the ladies. He told me he was trans and was simply doing what the majority of women wanted him to do. I had no reason to disbelieve him - I know a couple of trans men and I honestly wouldn't know they had been born women, I also know there would be an outcry if they were locked up in a women's jail as they have visibly male characteristics.

But to get back to the point: I agree this child needs to be taught about male puberty as this will be what she goes through ('she' because this is how this child wants to be addressed and I try to respect children's wishes), but I suspect she is subject to a fair bit of bullying from the confidently male children, especially given the attitudes of at least one parent in the school. Why separate them? They need to learn about each other.