Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel uneasy about my partner's inheritance plan?

660 replies

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:02

My partner and I are planning on moving in together. We will each sell our separate properties and buy one together 50/50. He is a widow with 2 DC in their mid twenties. I don't have children.

We are starting to talk about how we would set up finances, and one issue that has come up is that if he dies first he wants his half of the house to pass to his children in trust, whilst I remain able to live in the property until I sell or die. They would then inherit their Dad's half when I die, or get their half if I sell. My half is for me to decide who inherits. FWIW, I would leave my half of the house to him.

This doesn't sit well with me. If he dies first, then half of my home is owned by others. I get on well with them, but I have no idea if they would want to maintain a relationship with me after their Dad's death.

Part of me completely understands why he wants to leave his children his share, but it leaves me in a really tricky position. I really don't like the idea of this at all. AIBU? What have others done in this position? I can't be the first person to have this problem!

OP posts:
Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:59

Thanks for all the points of view and some ideas.

I don't want anyone to think I am being difficult over this, I totally understand his kids come first. DP and I have roughly the same financial status in terms of pensions, equity, savings etc. I am very happy for his share to go to his kids, but not if I loose control over my own home.

Time to see a solicitor and get some advice. I think renting out one house, and living in another is good option. As is separate houses on the same street. We communicate well, so I am hoping we can work it out. For now I am going to put the plans on hold until we can figure out what works.

OP posts:
Velvian · 17/07/2026 10:59

Will the house you buy be roughly double the value of your current respective properties?

Could you plan to sell the shared property buy your own place within a couple of years? Would your DP be agreeable to making provision in his Will for solicitor and estate agent costs to enable this?

BuddhaAtSea · 17/07/2026 10:58

I know somebody who was in your position, the minute the husband died, his children, rightly so, wanted their share. It threw her over the edge. There was a clause in his will saying she can stay until her death, the children argued that she can have her share, they want theirs. She felt the war was not worth it, it turned really ugly.
My exMIL got married later in life, moved in with her new husband, their will stated she is to vacate his property which went to his children, she still had hers to move into. She got his very very substantial pension after his death.
Maybe try that?

SaySomethingMan · 17/07/2026 10:58

I think keeping one property and renting the other sounds good. How do you ensure they’re the same though?!
What he’s suggested feels reasonable. However, if he passed away and his children had to wait 10/20 years to inherit, that wouldn’t be great for them.

FinallyHere · 17/07/2026 10:57

Why would you want to invest in your own property to ensure it sells quickly on your death? The disruption and cost in your old age, possibly in your ill health ?

Your requirements are exactly opposite to those of his heirs. Just don’t buy together.

poetryandwine · 17/07/2026 10:56

OnGoldenPond · 17/07/2026 10:55

Yes I’ve just seen the update and posted a further reply. I agree the conditions he is trying to put on this are unreasonable and I wouldn’t agree to them.

Yes, this is awful. If correctly understood I would not complete the purchase.

aCatCalledFawkes · 17/07/2026 10:56

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:51

I understand there is a fairness issue here, but at the moment it doesn't feel fair to me. His kids being able to dictate to me what I can or can't do isn't fair at all.

The way he put it to me was they can have a say on when kitchens, bathrooms etc are done to maintain the value of the property so it doesn't become dated and will sell easily on my death / if I choose to sell. I would also be 100% liable for major repairs like new windows etc. They won't have to contribute to these upgrades or major repairs. It sounds like a recipe for disaster, especially as I get older.

Well. I would suggest that you organise an appointment with a solicitor, let him talk out his non starter ideas about new kithens and see what the solicitor says to that 😂.
In fact I would 100% just go to a solicitor so you are both very clear on the subject.

thereisnomeaning · 17/07/2026 10:55

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:53

@OnGoldenPond - This would be more reasonanble, but it isn't what he is asking for. He wants active involvement from them. Whether they would actually do that I am not sure, but I susecpt at least one of his DC would. I don't think I would get any peace.

It's not unreasonable they would want active involvement to make sure the home they have a big interest in is maintained and being looked after. The same as a landlord would. They are part owners, so of course they want to be involved with the home.

GloriousGoosebumps · 17/07/2026 10:55

It’s entirely unreasonable for you to want him to ignore his children and leave his share of the house to you. The fact that he has already gifted them house deposits makes no difference. The answer is for you to take out life insurance on him, sufficient to cover his 50% of the value of the property so that you can purchase his share from his children if he dies. You make the monthly payments not him. How much those payments will be will depend on his age and health.

OnGoldenPond · 17/07/2026 10:55

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:53

@OnGoldenPond - This would be more reasonanble, but it isn't what he is asking for. He wants active involvement from them. Whether they would actually do that I am not sure, but I susecpt at least one of his DC would. I don't think I would get any peace.

Yes I’ve just seen the update and posted a further reply. I agree the conditions he is trying to put on this are unreasonable and I wouldn’t agree to them.

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:54

QuoiQueTuFasses · 17/07/2026 10:51

What if you live together in one property and rent out the other? If he dies first, you stay where you are and the kids get the rental.

I like this idea much more. It feels more practical and workable all round.

OP posts:
OnGoldenPond · 17/07/2026 10:53

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:14

Thanks, this is why I can see his point. My worry is that the way he wants it set up is that they have a say in what I do to the property, I’m expected to pay for all upkeep and maintenance, which they can veto, or demand more if they want. I won’t have control over my own home. It just doesn’t sit right with me, although I can completely see his point. I think this could be a deal breaker for me.

I should have added he’s ready given them each a substantial lump sum to get them on the housing ladder

Ah OK, this further information does make a difference. Normally the only stipulation would be to keep the property in good repair and not make major changes. What he is proposing goes beyond that and you should push back on this part. Just sit down and try to reach a reasonable compromise. If he won’t, I’m not sure I would want to be moving in with him anyway.

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:53

@OnGoldenPond - This would be more reasonanble, but it isn't what he is asking for. He wants active involvement from them. Whether they would actually do that I am not sure, but I susecpt at least one of his DC would. I don't think I would get any peace.

OP posts:
thereisnomeaning · 17/07/2026 10:53

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:51

I understand there is a fairness issue here, but at the moment it doesn't feel fair to me. His kids being able to dictate to me what I can or can't do isn't fair at all.

The way he put it to me was they can have a say on when kitchens, bathrooms etc are done to maintain the value of the property so it doesn't become dated and will sell easily on my death / if I choose to sell. I would also be 100% liable for major repairs like new windows etc. They won't have to contribute to these upgrades or major repairs. It sounds like a recipe for disaster, especially as I get older.

They should contribute to work that needs doing (needs rather than want). However, that then becomes awkward when you want to do something, they want to go for the cheaper option or just can't afford it. In the same way you don't want them spending your money and telling you what to do, they won't want the same. And you can't get them to pay if they don't have it.

MrWaldonsLeg · 17/07/2026 10:52

The alternative is you still buy 50/50 and set up that same will with his half going to his children but with a stipulation that the house is sold within however many months, maybe 12 or 18 months so that the children get their share immediately and you sell and find somewhere else to live.

QuoiQueTuFasses · 17/07/2026 10:51

What if you live together in one property and rent out the other? If he dies first, you stay where you are and the kids get the rental.

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:51

aCatCalledFawkes · 17/07/2026 10:44

So you go to a solicitor and you explain you will be joint tenants, write new wills and agree terms between you. Doubtful they will be able to ask for a new bathroom every year or anything above just looking after the property.

I have children and wouldn't dream of doing anything less than what his he suggesting. Surely you knew he's children would have a vested interest in his estate? What happens is you remarry because he has died and his whole estate goes to your new husband in the event of your death. How would that be fair?

Edited

I understand there is a fairness issue here, but at the moment it doesn't feel fair to me. His kids being able to dictate to me what I can or can't do isn't fair at all.

The way he put it to me was they can have a say on when kitchens, bathrooms etc are done to maintain the value of the property so it doesn't become dated and will sell easily on my death / if I choose to sell. I would also be 100% liable for major repairs like new windows etc. They won't have to contribute to these upgrades or major repairs. It sounds like a recipe for disaster, especially as I get older.

OP posts:
Woodfiresareamazing2 · 17/07/2026 10:50

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:40

I think this is the answer. I suspect this may be a deal breaker for him. He wants to live together and get married. I do too, but not at a risk to my own financial security.

It makes me very sad that there doesn’t seem to be a resolution.

You don't have to buy somewhere together.

One of you can move in to the other's house.

The empty property could be rented out, and that income split (after deducting costs eg any existing mortgage, essential maintenance costs etc).

There are options...

travailtotravel · 17/07/2026 10:50

Its normal to leave the financial side to kids, really not normal on them having a say on what you do to the property eg can't do the garden etc. Yes to ensuring you don't devalue the home but negotiating over painting the kitchen pink, no way.

Terfarina · 17/07/2026 10:49

My husband & I have set up our wills like this - everything in trust for our kids but the remaining partner gets to have beneficial use of everything until they die. I don't think that the children get to dictate what happens to the house left in trust, it should be yours to do with as you see fit.

OnGoldenPond · 17/07/2026 10:49

This arrangement seems more than fair to me. You get to stay in the house for your lifetime then his children get their Dad’s share when you die and no longer need it. There are plenty of partners in this situation who have simply left their share outright to children on their death and the partner has had to sell up or buy them out.

I believe you would have an obligation to keep the house in good repair during your lifetime and, as long as you do this there shouldn’t be any need for involvement with his children if you don’t want it. They will have no right to enter the property without your permission during your lifetime as you would be the only one entitled to live there. There may be some limited rights for them to periodically inspect the property occasionally to make sure you are maintaining it, but this should be minimal.

Honestly, this seems an entirely fair arrangement. Anything else would unfairly put his children’s inheritance at risk and no caring father would do that.

poetryandwine · 17/07/2026 10:48

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:31

I don’t want the DC contributing financially as that would give them a say. It all feels very awkward to me.

I’ll happily write my will to leave them his and my share (I don’t have any family at all).

I will see a solicitor, but I suspect the answer is don’t buy a place together.

This is fine. Then I think you need a majority share of the house.

If you otherwise want to live with DP, I hope this works out. If you gave reservations anyway, it is a good reason to refrain from buying together.

laura246810 · 17/07/2026 10:48

If you hate the idea of his kids owning half your home, simply sell in the event of his death.

His kids get their half, you control your home 100 percent.

Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:47

OwlCalledSage · 17/07/2026 10:44

I would not buy a house with him. The leaving his share to his kids is not unreasonable, the caveats are entirely so. Don’t do it.

Thanks, it's the caveats that are the problem here.

OP posts:
Itisallgoingtobeok · 17/07/2026 10:47

MrWaldonsLeg · 17/07/2026 10:39

My house is 50/50 with Dh and we have children together. Should Dh die, his share of the house goes to the children in trust, same if I die first, my share goes to the children not to Dh.

Say if Dh dies first the children cannot force me out, cannot dictate anything about the house. It is mine to maintain, they have no say. This is how our will is worded. We saw a solicitor to talk all of these scenarios through. Go and see a solicitor and ask the questions.

Edited to add yes I have to keep the home in good repair, I can't just trash it, that is also in the will.

Edited

This sounds much more reasonable. I really don't mind the kids getting their share, please don't misunderstand me, it's the controlling interest in what I can do in the house when I am living in it. I also worry that they will try to force a sale if they want / need the money.

I plan to see a solicitor to get some advice. It sounds as though there is a way through, as long as he is willing to drop the kids having a controlling say in what I do.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread