Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to question no hosepipe ban exemption for people on benefits?

454 replies

Crosorbled · 14/07/2026 14:14

No hosepipe ban for people on benefits .

OP posts:
youalright · 14/07/2026 15:14

Ginmonkeyagain · 14/07/2026 14:51

Also what the hell is everyone suddenly so anxious to use a hosepipes for - I don't think i have ever even owned a hosepipe in 28 years of being an adult.

Same I've never owned a hosepipe

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 15:14

MellowZebra · 14/07/2026 15:13

Sad, but true. There are too many selfish arseholes in the world as we can see on this thread.

Hostile you say? Now using a hose pipe when there’s no ban fits this for you. Very angry stuff.

Sambucaandcoke · 14/07/2026 15:14

Why do people start threads about things they know nothing about and cannot be bothered to research? We'll have people frothing over benefit claimants getting free trips to the moon next!

ThreadGuardDog · 14/07/2026 15:13

Crosorbled · 14/07/2026 14:14

No hosepipe ban for people on benefits .

On what grounds ? Those who are on disability benefits or have a blue badge can usually get an exemption anyway - usually because they would have difficulty using a watering can instead of a hosepipe for essential things. So that leaves those who either don’t work, or are topped up by UC. Why would you think they would benefit from a hosepipe ban, given that they have no difficulty using a watering can instead ?

Squirrelsarecleverbastards · 14/07/2026 15:13

I looked it up and it’s not just for people with disabilities.

I’m very careful with my water but now I’m beginning to think I’m taken for a mug while so many households have lower bills and are exempt from restrictions.

MellowZebra · 14/07/2026 15:13

PosieNosie · 14/07/2026 15:10

Given how much rubbish and dog shit I see littering the roads as it is, it doesn't surprise me how many people are arseholes about hosepipes too. Some people can't be made to care about anything but their own convenience, they're lost causes.

Sad, but true. There are too many selfish arseholes in the world as we can see on this thread.

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 15:12

PosieNosie · 14/07/2026 15:10

Given how much rubbish and dog shit I see littering the roads as it is, it doesn't surprise me how many people are arseholes about hosepipes too. Some people can't be made to care about anything but their own convenience, they're lost causes.

Do you use a watering can too then even if no ban?

What’s with the scolding anyway?

Backedoffhackedoff · 14/07/2026 15:11

MellowZebra · 14/07/2026 15:07

That is a rather hostile response to a perfectly reasonable comment, if I may say so.

It is also easier to not bother sorting one's recycling, to drop litter rather than taking it home with one or to not bother scooping the hound's poop off the pavement. Small efforts to avoid the easier and often selfish option add up to big benefits for us all.

To be fair, it’s not about little things having impacts. Hosepipes don’t generally have an impact on water usage- they are simply an easy thing to turn off- unnecessary and high volume usage- and the only lever the water company has to reduce domestic water use.

Using a hosepipe doesn’t make you a high volume water user- you might only use it 6 times a year and have low usage inside the house for example. It’s just the only thing available to the water company

igelkott2026 · 14/07/2026 15:11

Is this the nonsense Telegraph disinformation? It isn't for people on any old benefits. Lets face it, child benefit and pensions are benefits but people may (and probably are with child benefit) be working.

PosieNosie · 14/07/2026 15:10

MellowZebra · 14/07/2026 15:07

That is a rather hostile response to a perfectly reasonable comment, if I may say so.

It is also easier to not bother sorting one's recycling, to drop litter rather than taking it home with one or to not bother scooping the hound's poop off the pavement. Small efforts to avoid the easier and often selfish option add up to big benefits for us all.

Given how much rubbish and dog shit I see littering the roads as it is, it doesn't surprise me how many people are arseholes about hosepipes too. Some people can't be made to care about anything but their own convenience, they're lost causes.

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 15:08

MellowZebra · 14/07/2026 15:07

That is a rather hostile response to a perfectly reasonable comment, if I may say so.

It is also easier to not bother sorting one's recycling, to drop litter rather than taking it home with one or to not bother scooping the hound's poop off the pavement. Small efforts to avoid the easier and often selfish option add up to big benefits for us all.

That’s great. Enjoy not using a hose even when there’s no ban.

MellowZebra · 14/07/2026 15:07

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 15:01

Fine use those. A hose is easier.

That is a rather hostile response to a perfectly reasonable comment, if I may say so.

It is also easier to not bother sorting one's recycling, to drop litter rather than taking it home with one or to not bother scooping the hound's poop off the pavement. Small efforts to avoid the easier and often selfish option add up to big benefits for us all.

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 15:05

Ginmonkeyagain · 14/07/2026 15:03

@EasternStandard Well of course it is, it also uses (and wastes) a lot of water. You may have noticed it has been extremely dry and hot lately, we are being asked to take some very low impact actions to preserve water so we have enough for more essential usage - you know like food crops rather than your begonias.

Honestly people behave like spoilt 5 year olds if asked to do anything the least bit uncomfortable.

Do what you want, use the watering can. You’ve never owned a hosepipe good on you.

angelos02 · 14/07/2026 15:04

Takes 3 hours to fill my pool. I couldn't do it without a hosepipe.

PosieNosie · 14/07/2026 15:04

OneAmberFinch · 14/07/2026 14:59

Substantively though, is this not another example of using benefit receipt as a blanket "gateway" to other advantages? Which has the effect of compounding the reasons to stay on benefits as long as possible, because they open the door to so much. Similar to the example from a few months ago about £4 zoo tickets.

I don't know anyone in real life who cares about hosepipe bans (certainly my neighbours haven't got the news) so I don't really care about this specific example but I dislike the trend of anything that entrenches the "benefits class" as a group that blanket receives advantages.

If there is evidence that a hosepipe ban exemption is encouraging people to stay on benefits when they have the option to earn sufficiently well to no longer need them, I'll happily consider whether the approach to exemptions remains justified. But if it's merely a theoretical possibility with no underlying data to support it, it's not something I'm concerned about.

TopPocketFind · 14/07/2026 15:04

OneAmberFinch · 14/07/2026 14:59

Substantively though, is this not another example of using benefit receipt as a blanket "gateway" to other advantages? Which has the effect of compounding the reasons to stay on benefits as long as possible, because they open the door to so much. Similar to the example from a few months ago about £4 zoo tickets.

I don't know anyone in real life who cares about hosepipe bans (certainly my neighbours haven't got the news) so I don't really care about this specific example but I dislike the trend of anything that entrenches the "benefits class" as a group that blanket receives advantages.

It is not a blanket gateway.

Read the Citizens Advice link provided on page 1

TooBigForMyBoots · 14/07/2026 15:04

FFS, Mnet benefit bashers will believe any old shit.🙄

Ginmonkeyagain · 14/07/2026 15:03

@EasternStandard Well of course it is, it also uses (and wastes) a lot of water. You may have noticed it has been extremely dry and hot lately, we are being asked to take some very low impact actions to preserve water so we have enough for more essential usage - you know like food crops rather than your begonias.

Honestly people behave like spoilt 5 year olds if asked to do anything the least bit uncomfortable.

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 15:01

MellowZebra · 14/07/2026 15:00

They are also extremely wasteful, regardless of a ban. Everyone should avoid using them if at all possible.

Ok go for it.

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 15:01

Ginmonkeyagain · 14/07/2026 14:58

Buckets and watering cans exist

Fine use those. A hose is easier.

MellowZebra · 14/07/2026 15:00

EasternStandard · 14/07/2026 14:57

Ok. They’re still useful for a long garden with many plants.

They are also extremely wasteful, regardless of a ban. Everyone should avoid using them if at all possible.

OneAmberFinch · 14/07/2026 14:59

PosieNosie · 14/07/2026 14:38

Before you all get too frothy, it's worth understanding the detail here and not just the click-bait headlines.

Water companies in England have announced that customers on their 'Priority Services Register' and 'WaterSure tariff' scheme, alongside Blue Badge holders, are exempt from the hosepipe ban. This is because people who meet the criteria for these registers/ schemes are more likely than the general population to have difficulty using watering cans, purchasing bottled water, etc. due to disability, low income and other things of that nature.

The water companies have advised that, rather than risking confusing messaging about who is and isn't exempt, which could result in someone vulnerable thinking they are banned from various water uses when they're actually exempt, they have taken the blanket approach of granting all those on the WaterSure tariff the exemption in order to ensure disabled people were not put at risk, and to avoid confusion.

This means that people who are on the WaterSure tariff by reason of their being on benefits are technically exempt from the ban, but that isn't the intended purpose of the exemption, which is to ensure that disabled or otherwise vulnerable people/ families can still access the water they need safely. Everyone is being encouraged by the water companies to use water mindfully.

I know that's MUCH less exciting than getting in a rage about perceived two tier bans and unfairness, but isn't it better to be truthful about these things?

Substantively though, is this not another example of using benefit receipt as a blanket "gateway" to other advantages? Which has the effect of compounding the reasons to stay on benefits as long as possible, because they open the door to so much. Similar to the example from a few months ago about £4 zoo tickets.

I don't know anyone in real life who cares about hosepipe bans (certainly my neighbours haven't got the news) so I don't really care about this specific example but I dislike the trend of anything that entrenches the "benefits class" as a group that blanket receives advantages.

Error404FucksNotFound · 14/07/2026 14:59

You could have taken a moment to get your facts straight before posting but hey, any chance to get your froth on, right?

Ginmonkeyagain · 14/07/2026 14:58

Buckets and watering cans exist

Eatingricecrispieswithafork · 14/07/2026 14:57

youvemadeyourpoint · 14/07/2026 14:40

It’s becoming a joke. I think it’s time to get Labour out!

Nothing to do with the government. Water companies are private.