Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

India – loved it, but I came back feeling so violated.

929 replies

LondonLass40 · 12/07/2026 19:18

Just back from the Golden Triangle with my husband (43) and 12yr daughter. Stunning forts, incredible food ( lucky no Delhi belly 😀) amazing history is genuinely breathtaking.

But I’m struggling to process the darker side.

One afternoon in Delhi, my husband stayed at the hotel. I took my daughter to a busy market near cannaught place in broad daylight, crowded. A man walked past and grabbed my breast. Right in front of my daughter. He just kept walking. I froze. My poor girl kept asking why he touched Mummy.

Then there was the constant selfie nonsense when my husband was there and men lining up, putting their arms around me, getting too close while my husband stood there awkwardly not knowing what to do.

And the worst part was at the Red Fort queue. This guy kept pushing into me from behind – clearly not an accident. I turned around and shouted at him. He didn't run, didn't even look embarrassed , he just walked away ignoring me like I was invisible. I spoke to a security guard who just pretend to do something and did absolutely nothing.

I know these issues aren't isolated to India and this could happen in London too. But this was so blatant, so frequent, so relentless that I simply cannot ignore it. I've been to so many tourist destinations around the world and have never experienced harassment on this scale. It felt inescapable.

I don't know – does this only happen to Western women? I'm sure men like this do the same to Indian women too. How on earth do they deal with this every single day? I honestly don't think I'd go back.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
Jane379 · 14/07/2026 17:26

InterIgnis · 14/07/2026 16:04

I can spot other Serbians abroad, and I can differentiate between Croats and Serbs, for example. Different countries have different phenotypes.

There is a difference between someone that was raised in France, by culturally French parents of culturally French parents, and someone that moved to France from another country, or is born there to parents who will raise them according to the cultural norms of another country. This can become problematic if those cultural norms are in direct opposition to the ones of the country they live in. I don’t believe it’s racist or xenophobic to acknowledge that.

As I said earlier in the thread, I’m an immigrant, and my parents are from two different countries, so my opinion hasn’t been formed without firsthand experience.

my opinion hasn’t been formed without firsthand experience.

  • interesting. Can I ask what countries they are from- Serbia is one? And do you feel they raised you according to their countries' norms, not British ones? Or a mix of both?

My grandfather was from Poland but my grandmother was English and I don't think my mother was raised according to non-British norms (maybe it would have been different if her mother had been the Polish one). Otoh she has friends (like the godmother I mentioned earlier) who were raised by 2 Polish parents (a lot of WW2 refugees came to our area) and they mainly live by British norms rather than other ones.

Persephonia1966 · 14/07/2026 17:25

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 17:20

The thing is though that as I said to pp, black French people came from the colonies en masse since the 1950s. So a black person in , say, 1990s-2000s France or later (not sure when this was) could well have been born & raised there, they wouldn't necessarily be an immigrant.

On the flip side, Haaland was born in the UK as his father was playing football there but went back to Norway after only three years so in addition to having Norwegian parents he was raised and spent the bulk of his childhood in Norway. Hence it makes sense he chose to play for Norway.

Its entirely possible, if his father had stayed for longer in England and he'd grown up here he might have chosen differently (although maybe not. I guess there was also his father's legacy to uphold). But if he had would people really be saying that even though he was born and brought up in England he would always be Nordic and never English? Ah, what might have been. But having Haaland and Bellingham on the England squad would have been awesome.

Pineapplewhip · 14/07/2026 17:23

I had to travel to India for work - they literally provided me with a security guard. He walked me door to door the entire trip. The only time he left me alone was in the hotel - it was a 5 star American branded hotel so security was incredible there.

However - I must say - the entire time I was there, I didnt so much as notice a creepy leer in my direction. The men (and women) couldn't do enough for me.

Maybe it was because we were constantly in 5 star places and they knew their tip would be cut if they acted inappropriately.

Your post has made me realise why they put on the security - just because I didnt see it - doesnt mean its not there.

ThisISmycircusandtheseAREmymonkeys · 14/07/2026 17:21

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 17:14

I have come across examples of white people born in the Middle East who integrated into the culture from birth (rather than living temporarily as expats) and were accepted as citizens of those particular countries.

Overall though, I think the ME is a poor example, since ethnic conflict is common there, as well as other kinds, so it's unsurprising kids with foreign born parents are less likely to be accepted.

My own example would be my godmother. Born & raised in London but both parents Polish refugees. Should she not be able to call herself British? She certainly still has connections to Polish culture but it would feel bizarre to say she is 'not British' or 'more Polish than British ' .

I was also thinking if by this argument icons of French culture like Charles Aznavour, Isabelle Adjani and Yves Montand are 'not French'. None had French parents : Aznavour's were Armenian refugees, Adjani is German-Arab Algerian, and Montand's were Italian.

It’s not always easy. My DH has lived in my country for 30 years, so more than half his life. When we go abroad and people ask where he is from (English is his first language) he now says the country he lives in (we live in) and people are always confused. Where do you draw the line saying which country you are actually from..

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 17:20

minimuffs2651 · 14/07/2026 15:00

This started with a poster alleging a group of people were not truly French due to skin colour. I disagreed with that.

I think it's fair enough to disagree with that. But also I don't think it's racist to agree. I'm an immigrant and say I have both worlds, not just one. It's different to someone born and bred in UK and been there for generations, for example. Perhaps you'd prefer another way to say it that you'll feel more comfortable with? Native vs not?

The thing is though that as I said to pp, black French people came from the colonies en masse since the 1950s. So a black person in , say, 1990s-2000s France or later (not sure when this was) could well have been born & raised there, they wouldn't necessarily be an immigrant.

5MinuteArgument · 14/07/2026 17:19

Persephonia1966 · 14/07/2026 16:57

But the majority of European heritage people in Argentinia came across in the 20th Century especially during a wave of migration in the 1950s and 1960s and later. Much like many of the players in the English or French squad have grandparents who came to the UK in the same time period. Indigenous culture is much less strong in Argentina than other South American countries anyway. Tango came from black slaves originally and is now part of Argentinian cultural identity. Which is fine, but it's then a bit rich to claim that black men in France are incapable of taking on French culture/identity/nationality. Again,.double standards.

(Besides which, and not to get too far of topic, the Falklands islands were settled a long long time before Messi's great grandparents came to Argentina. Yet, many in Argentina, consider this an occupation still. Therefore, even the few Argentinians (not Messi) who can also trace their ancestry all the way back to the Spanish arrivals 500 years ago, arent Argentinian.

Yes, if they're claiming that, then it's hypocritical.

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 17:17

minimuffs2651 · 14/07/2026 16:16

Can't say I'm with the "micro aggression" stuff. Call me old-school, but it's not like groping or being spat at on the street or being punched. A few hurty words is nothing.

It's the immigrants on this thread, including at least one actual Indian, that are the ones pointing out the obvious differences between cultures, and saying it's perfectly ok to do so!

Edited

Call me old-school, but it's not like groping or being spat at on the street or being punched. A few hurty words is nothing.

  • I see what you mean. Otoh I think at least some verbal aggression isn't simply 'hurty words'. Racial slurs for one, or slurs towards disabled people. Sexual harassment can also be verbal, I don't think that should be dismissed as 'just hurty words'
Jane379 · 14/07/2026 17:14

KlippityKloppity · 14/07/2026 16:37

There is no way in hell a white person born in the Middle East to British parents would be considered an Arab.

Why do you think that is?

I have come across examples of white people born in the Middle East who integrated into the culture from birth (rather than living temporarily as expats) and were accepted as citizens of those particular countries.

Overall though, I think the ME is a poor example, since ethnic conflict is common there, as well as other kinds, so it's unsurprising kids with foreign born parents are less likely to be accepted.

My own example would be my godmother. Born & raised in London but both parents Polish refugees. Should she not be able to call herself British? She certainly still has connections to Polish culture but it would feel bizarre to say she is 'not British' or 'more Polish than British ' .

I was also thinking if by this argument icons of French culture like Charles Aznavour, Isabelle Adjani and Yves Montand are 'not French'. None had French parents : Aznavour's were Armenian refugees, Adjani is German-Arab Algerian, and Montand's were Italian.

ThisISmycircusandtheseAREmymonkeys · 14/07/2026 17:06

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 17:04

Sorry, I don't mean to 🤣 It just sometimes happens when I quote someone and then hit enter.

Aha 😂, sorry again but I just had to ask for some reason.

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 17:04

ThisISmycircusandtheseAREmymonkeys · 14/07/2026 16:58

@Jane379 Sorry, I swear I am just curious, but what is with the dot before a question in your posts? I’ve seen it a couple of times today. 😅

Sorry, I don't mean to 🤣 It just sometimes happens when I quote someone and then hit enter.

Persephonia1966 · 14/07/2026 17:04

KlippityKloppity · 14/07/2026 16:37

There is no way in hell a white person born in the Middle East to British parents would be considered an Arab.

Why do you think that is?

So, is your take that only Arabs can be Middle Eastern? Because that's quite a hot take...

Apart from the very obvious 🐘 in the room that I'm not going to touch, while "Arab" is a sort of ethnicity (that gets complicated when people try to tightly define it), places like Lebanon and Jordan have a wide range of types of people and phenotypes all of which would consider themselves Lebanese/Jordanian and only some of whom would call themselves Arab. I think usually Iran is considered part of the Middle East but definitely not Arab. Then there's the Kurds...
It's hard to think of a worse example than "being born in the Middle East doesn't make you an Arab" if your point is being born in England doesn't make you English.

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 17:02

iniati · 14/07/2026 11:15

According to David Willets, they take up some of the spaces. And then do "assortative mating" a lovely term. But most telling about his views is that he obviously thought middle class men obviously deserve the spaces and opportunities and doesn't even consider working class women

www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/apr/01/david-willetts-feminism-lack-of-jobs

I suppose he's arguing that there was room before but that with both middle class women and men there, working class men didn't have room. A bit like house prices rising when women worked outside the home more and two salaries became more common.

But that doesn't mean middle class women should go to uni less, if that's what he wants.

And as you say, he ignores working class women totally.

ThisISmycircusandtheseAREmymonkeys · 14/07/2026 16:58

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 16:53

a husband finds his wife sexually attractive and makes it known

  • what do you mean?

@Jane379 Sorry, I swear I am just curious, but what is with the dot before a question in your posts? I’ve seen it a couple of times today. 😅

Persephonia1966 · 14/07/2026 16:57

5MinuteArgument · 14/07/2026 16:12

Yes, probably to do with time as well. South America was colonised by the Spanish and Portuguese 500 hundred years ago. The indigenous people were wiped out in large numbers but many have have assimilated and indigenous culture is still strong.

But the majority of European heritage people in Argentinia came across in the 20th Century especially during a wave of migration in the 1950s and 1960s and later. Much like many of the players in the English or French squad have grandparents who came to the UK in the same time period. Indigenous culture is much less strong in Argentina than other South American countries anyway. Tango came from black slaves originally and is now part of Argentinian cultural identity. Which is fine, but it's then a bit rich to claim that black men in France are incapable of taking on French culture/identity/nationality. Again,.double standards.

(Besides which, and not to get too far of topic, the Falklands islands were settled a long long time before Messi's great grandparents came to Argentina. Yet, many in Argentina, consider this an occupation still. Therefore, even the few Argentinians (not Messi) who can also trace their ancestry all the way back to the Spanish arrivals 500 years ago, arent Argentinian.

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 16:55

JHound · 14/07/2026 09:14

I wonder if those poorer men hold onto misogyny more tightly as it’s the one place they can have power: over women.

I saw a film years ago from Mali called “Moolade” about FGM. And it demonstrated quite clearly the distinction between rural areas and cities, the educated and less educated concerning attitudes towards FGM.

This, definitely. I would be interested in watching that film.

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 16:54

JHound · 14/07/2026 08:56

I believe Guadeloupe is still France even to this day.

Yes, that's right.

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 16:53

likelysuspect · 14/07/2026 07:19

Yes! Nearly every thread about some 'dick/twat/pervert/given me the ick/loser/creep' you name it, is because some bloke dared to ask someone out, or a husband finds his wife sexually attractive and makes it known

But entire populations of men who come from countries where women are quite literally rubbish, thats ok. Please dont criticise them.

a husband finds his wife sexually attractive and makes it known

  • what do you mean?
Jane379 · 14/07/2026 16:52

QuintadosMalvados · 14/07/2026 07:12

I don't know if you're correct or not, but I'm noticing something very strange about some feminists.

They will condemn- how can I say - native white British men for the relatively mild offence of wolf whistling all day long.

Yet an entire continent where women are treated badly is not condemned at all.

They'll also support widespread immigration of men from other cultures to the UK with a reputation for terrible treatment of women, too.

I have to phrase this carefully but my own take on this is that such women, deep down, wish the UK was overtaken by men from cultures (not race) who treat women like shit.

It's either that or suicidal empathy.

my own take on this is that such women, deep down, wish the UK was overtaken by men from cultures (not race) who treat women like shit.

  • why would they want that?
Jane379 · 14/07/2026 16:52

KlippityKloppity · 14/07/2026 04:53

Is someone born in France but with parents from another country less French?

Yes they are less French.
My little sister was born in the ME, trust me there's nothing Arabic about her!

Did your little sister grow up in the ME also?

Jane379 · 14/07/2026 16:51

Fredflinstoneswife1 · 14/07/2026 01:03

The predominant religion in Mexico, South America, Lesotho and DRC is roman Catholicism, which is not Christianity. If anything you further proved my point.

That's rather a bold statement, that Catholicism is 'not Christianity'!

By your logic, then, 50% of the world's Christians are 'not Christian'.

What about Orthodox Christians? Are they also 'not Christian' in your view?

InterIgnis · 14/07/2026 16:46

minimuffs2651 · 14/07/2026 16:16

Can't say I'm with the "micro aggression" stuff. Call me old-school, but it's not like groping or being spat at on the street or being punched. A few hurty words is nothing.

It's the immigrants on this thread, including at least one actual Indian, that are the ones pointing out the obvious differences between cultures, and saying it's perfectly ok to do so!

Edited

Honestly, and this I do stress is my experience, a lot of the the hyper awareness of each and every type of thing that could be considered problematic if you look at it upside down, from the left, and through a squint, is from
non immigrants wanting to be offended on our behalf.

The same type people of person that likes to co-opt us as allies for whatever their wider cause is, with no thought to us as individuals with our own agency. The same type that, when you disagree with them, will tell you you’re stupid, brainwashed, and uninformed; and that they are in fact better qualified to speak for on behalf of your immigrant self than you are. It’s at that point that you realize that this type are all about their own egos.

Tbh I prefer an out and out xenophobe, because they at least don’t pretend to be my friend.

ThisISmycircusandtheseAREmymonkeys · 14/07/2026 16:41

InterIgnis · 14/07/2026 16:04

I can spot other Serbians abroad, and I can differentiate between Croats and Serbs, for example. Different countries have different phenotypes.

There is a difference between someone that was raised in France, by culturally French parents of culturally French parents, and someone that moved to France from another country, or is born there to parents who will raise them according to the cultural norms of another country. This can become problematic if those cultural norms are in direct opposition to the ones of the country they live in. I don’t believe it’s racist or xenophobic to acknowledge that.

As I said earlier in the thread, I’m an immigrant, and my parents are from two different countries, so my opinion hasn’t been formed without firsthand experience.

I’m Scandinavian and can also very often spot where in Scandinavia/Europe someone comes from.

My DH who has worked all over the world for about 30 years is an expert in guessing exactly where people are from, or sometimes even which regions.

Speaking of Middle East I have never ever come across any harassment. North Africa, yes, and many other countries. I have had problems with Indian people in Dubai though. Just pushing and generally being way too close and I hate it.

KlippityKloppity · 14/07/2026 16:37

There is no way in hell a white person born in the Middle East to British parents would be considered an Arab.

Why do you think that is?

Cailleach1 · 14/07/2026 16:27

JHound · 14/07/2026 13:45

It’s not possible to tell ethnicity from skin colour.

This started with a poster alleging a group of people were not truly French due to skin colour. I disagreed with that.

I have no idea why so many have jumped in with “so what you really mean is” rhetorical devices to make arguments never made.

For the love of God if a comment is part of a quote thread….read the quote thread!

Edited

Do you mean nationality rather than ethnicity?

The modern nation state is about citizenship. Well in the west anyway. Ethnicity is about origins, I think. So, you can usually tell if someone has Asian, European, or African origins from appearance for example. Skin colour can certainly be a part of that. Of course, when people have a variety of ethnic origins, the recessive can be masked by a dominant phenotype. So, still there, but maybe not quite obvious.

Nationality in western countries is not dependent on skin colour, to be fair. Some other countries have processes that are so regulated, and so discretionary, it is very difficult for an outsider to become a citizen. Rather a FO if you don’t share their heritage/ethnicity.

5MinuteArgument · 14/07/2026 16:24

SpaceRaccoon · 14/07/2026 16:05

It's largely a Western phenomenon to give someone citizenship and then view them as somehow as much from/of that country as the natives, though.

I'm no blood-and-soil type and I'd absolutely view someone as English, Scottish or whatever if they were a couple of generations in and had fully integrated - but honestly communities that aren't well integrated, not so much.

Yes, it's quite a complex thing. A lot of it is to do with integration.