Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to feel betrayed after protecting my son’s secret for years?

235 replies

Lovinggran · 11/07/2026 18:22

Hi everyone. I’ve just created this account because I am drowning in anger and carrying a secret that is starting to break me.

In December 2021, my son (who was 18 at the time, now 23) viewed and shared an indecent image of a minor. My husband and I knew absolutely nothing about it until the police turned up at our door at dawn with a search warrant. They knew exactly what they were looking for—they seemed keen to see Apple devices, which only my son had, and they ignored our Android devices. They took him into a room alone, and because he was an adult, they legally couldn't tell us what he said.

After they left, my son claimed it was "just an app," "just one picture," and that he "didn't know she was underage." The police ultimately took No Further Action (NFA). To protect him and keep the peace, we agreed to sweep it under the rug, pretend it never happened, and never speak of it again.

Fast forward to recently: my son and his partner had a baby. My husband and I stepped up as kinship carers and raised our grandson for his entire first year. Since then, the relationship has broken down, and they are now slowly and cruelly cutting us out of our grandson’s life.

The pain of being discarded after giving a year of our lives to that baby has made me incredibly angry. I started looking into how the police and search warrants actually work, and it seems it's unlikely it was "one-off accident" story he gave us was a lie to protect his own skin. The police apparently don't get warrants for single accidental click; they trace specific digital footprints and active sharing. The police knew it was his iPhone before they even knocked on our door.

I feel so betrayed. I compromised my own morals and peace of mind for five years to protect him based on a watered-down lie, and now he is weaponising our grandson against us.

I am just so full of rage. I don't want to carry his toxic secret anymore, but worry about the fallout it would cause.

OP posts:
laurini · 11/07/2026 22:31

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:25

The OP says that her son claimed it was “just an app”. I think it’s safe to assume it wasn’t a girlfriend who’d had a change of heart in this case.

None of us have any idea what the pic was or wasn't. All we know is that the police took no action. Indecent images are prosecuted on a strict liability basis so it's nothing like, say, rape - and it is actually quite simple to bring charges once the police have the device. I'm not sure what i would have done different to OP re the police investigation, given the information OP was given.

rwalker · 11/07/2026 22:30

there on it with online stuff so for there to be no charges there probably some truth in what he said
Could be something like when he was a 19 year old he went out with someone who said they were 18 but they lied and they were 17

but there obviously been heavy SS involvement so they would if been all over this if there was anything

it must be incredibly hard to have a baby for that long then to be taken off you and cut off
as hard as it is I think you just have to bide your time and see how it pans out as legally I think there little you can do

ThreadGuardDog · 11/07/2026 22:29

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:06

Do you know what the threshold is for charges? There’s a bit more to the Full Code Test than just how serious an offence is. Rape stats are a perfect example of that, with record low numbers being charged. That doesn’t mean they aren’t rapists.

The police know exactly who they’re intending to arrest before they come out, and they are not going to come knocking at dawn for an eighteen year old looking at a single photo of a teenager who could be mistaken for being 18+. That is why that poster was calling him a paedophile and I don’t think it’s an unreasonable assumption to make.

OP, I completely understand why you’d not want to keep his secret anymore. The fact that you ever swept it under the carpet is pretty disgusting. But that was the choice you made. So I think you now need to examine your motives and look at what you’re hoping to achieve. It sounds like your motive is revenge for cutting you out of your grandchild’s life. So what will speaking up achieve? It certainly isn’t going to be you having more access. It’s far more likely that you won’t see that little boy ever again if you alienate his father. And few people are likely to understand how you could have kept that quiet. Are you ready for people to judge you? Because it’s a realistic prospect that you’ll be judged equally as harshly once people realise that you knew what he’d done, but protected him.

Social services aren’t going to return this little boy to you unless his parents seriously fuck up. And something where the police took nfa isn’t going to change that. In your shoes, I’d try and show that I loved my grandson more than I resented his parents and do my best to build some kind of relationship with his parents, even if it stuck in my craw to do so.

The police know exactly who they’re intending to arrest before they come out, and they are not going to come knocking at dawn for an eighteen year old looking at a single photo of a teenager who could be mistaken for being 18+. That is why that poster was calling him a paedophile and I don’t think it’s an unreasonable assumption to make.

But they did come knocking at dawn. They did examine his devices, and ultimately took no further action. So there is no evidence that he is a paedophile. Without knowing the circumstances it’s a shocking assumption to make. Paedophilia is also specific. It’s not about ‘under age’ it’s about a specific age range and from what OP says it’s not even an appropriate term.

Harry12345 · 11/07/2026 22:28

bingo1922 · 11/07/2026 20:02

I feel like I'm viewing this situation quite differently to most other posters here. You said in your post that your son told the police that 'he didn't know she was underage' which suggests that the image was perhaps a picture he received (and subsequently shared with someone else) from a younger teenage girl. Before I get jumped on, I'm not suggesting at all that this is ok, but it is very different to 'viewing pictures of child abuse' as someone said up thread. It would also be consistent with the lack of action or arrest from the police. It also doesn't then follow that he's a danger to his child.

I also wonder about your decision to care for your grandson after the parents had decided to have him adopted. Putting myself in that position, I can't imagine making that very difficult decision, only to have it overturned by my parents. Could this be where the difficulty in your relationship stems from? I would be interested to hear your son and his girlfriend's take on this. People on here advise others to go NC for (IMO) really trivial reasons and this sounds to me like the same story but from the other side.

And also, I'm sorry to say, you're not covering yourself in glory by considering blowing your son's secret wide open. It just makes you sound vindictive.

I agree, I work in social work and this type of incident is very common

Harry12345 · 11/07/2026 22:26

Esmeraldathe3rd · 11/07/2026 19:42

A little boy is living with a paedophile who neglected him from the moment he was born. And you're whining because you covered up for this paedophile and he's not being nice to you now.... Priorities?

Does social services know he was arrested for viewing child abuse images? Insane the child has been given back to him but they're bloody useless quite frankly.

Of course they know. It’s most likely an image of a 15 year old which is awful but is very common and people think they’re older, especially 18 year old boys. If there was any evidence that he was a pedo there is no way SW would be ok with him being guardian

babyproblems · 11/07/2026 22:26

These two things are entirely unrelated…

Your son sounds quite abhorrent. I don’t think there is anything you can do, other than continue to be around for your grandson and when he is older I am sure he will seek a relationship with you.
Given what you have said here about his parents etc I doubt he’ll make it to 16/18 living with them. Sounds likely to me that he will need you again.

best of luck. I understand this is incredibly hurtful - beyond hurtful - from your son. Why on earth he thinks it’s ok to make these types of choices about his child and his parents is baffling. I think hold your nerve and stay strong- chances are your grandson will need you again. I’m sorry for the choices your son has made and its impact on you. Xxx

Backedoffhackedoff · 11/07/2026 22:26

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:15

Yes, I’m well aware that charges are unrelated. That’s very clearly what I said in my post. If you’d care to look at the post I was replying to, you’ll see why I mentioned charges.

And no evidence? Other than he admitted to his parents that he was in possession of a sexual image of a minor? Yeah, no evidence at all apart from that one little thing…

Paedophilia isn’t about minors. It’s about pre pubescents

8 is too late, as we used to say in the police

mumumental · 11/07/2026 22:25

It’s odd you only further looked into your sons offence when you were angry about something else.

Namechangefordaughterevasion · 11/07/2026 22:25

@Lovinggran

if you want to make 100% certain you never see your grandson again the best way to ensure it is to start stirring shit up for his dad. You'd be crazy yo make an enemy of him.

If you want a chance of being allowed back into your grandson's life at some point you have to play nice. Keep,the lines of communication open. Send little cards and gifts. Let the boys parents know that you will always be there to support them and him in any way you can.

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:25

laurini · 11/07/2026 22:19

They absolutely might if she regretted it and reported it, or if her parents found it and reported it. I know this because it happened with a friend's teenage daughter!

The OP says that her son claimed it was “just an app”. I think it’s safe to assume it wasn’t a girlfriend who’d had a change of heart in this case.

TheBlueKoala · 11/07/2026 22:24

@Lovinggran I think you're mixing things up. Your son was accused of sharing picture of a minor when he was 18- she might have been 17? Not saying it's not disgusting- just that it might have no bearing to who he is today.

Now to the most important thing; is your grandchild safe with his parents? If you have any reason to doubt this you contact social services asap. Focus on the things that matters; the wellbeing of your grandchild.

notatinydancer · 11/07/2026 22:22

User97463 · 11/07/2026 18:44

Exactly this. OP writes as if everyone already knows what a kinship carer should be. Have never heard of something like that in my life. In what circumstances do grandparents have to take care of an infant for their entire first year despite both partners presumably being alive and present?! Sounds royally messed up.

It’s when kin ie family look after the child so they don’t go into foster care. I should think most people have heard of it.

justasking111 · 11/07/2026 22:20

"Apply for information under Sarah's Law (Child Sex Offender Disclosure Scheme) | Police.uk" https://www.police.uk/rqo/request/ri/request-information/sarahs-law/triage/v2/ask-police-for-information-child-sexual-offences/apply-for-information-sarahs-law2/

@Lovinggran if you're truly concerned you can fill in the form to find out if your son is on the register.

laurini · 11/07/2026 22:19

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:17

I repeat, the police don’t come banging on your door at dawn and confiscating your devices because you’ve got a intimate photograph of your girlfriend who is only a year younger that you, and who could be mistaken for older.

They absolutely might if she regretted it and reported it, or if her parents found it and reported it. I know this because it happened with a friend's teenage daughter!

99bottlesofkombucha · 11/07/2026 22:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

This is so disgusting and hateful an accusation. Who among us wouldn’t want to see our grandchild cared for? Who hasn’t heard terrible things about children in care? Who knows if the baby would have been adopted? This is not an accusation anyone should make and I’ve reported it. Did you feel the need to hurt someone today?

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:17

laurini · 11/07/2026 22:15

But what if it was a 17 year old he'd met, and she'd misreported her age? OP doesnt know the context and the police won't share the information with her. In this case, he would technically have possessed an image of a minor but it wouldn't be in the public interest to bring charges.

I repeat, the police don’t come banging on your door at dawn and confiscating your devices because you’ve got a intimate photograph of your girlfriend who is only a year younger that you, and who could be mistaken for older.

fatphalange · 11/07/2026 22:17

From their viewpoint, they were for whatever reasons not equipped to cope with having a baby. Were in denial during the pregnancy, strongly wanted adoption and to subsequently move on with their lives and put it behind them. Then you stepped in, with the best intentions, but this meant that due to the proximity, they would never have their wish. They’ve either had a wake-up call or feel you’ve forced their hand, and that since their plan fell through and there is no getting away from the reality of this baby, they may as well attempt to raise him themselves. I can see why there could be anger and resentment towards you. If just keep communication as open as possible, try to let them come to terms with everything and go from there.

99bottlesofkombucha · 11/07/2026 22:17

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:15

Yes, I’m well aware that charges are unrelated. That’s very clearly what I said in my post. If you’d care to look at the post I was replying to, you’ll see why I mentioned charges.

And no evidence? Other than he admitted to his parents that he was in possession of a sexual image of a minor? Yeah, no evidence at all apart from that one little thing…

he was 18, couldn’t it have been a 15 year old?

SuddenLightbulb · 11/07/2026 22:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

She really didn’t. Even if she didn’t approach SS, they would have got in touch with her. Some form of kinship care within the baby’s biological family is nearly always the first choice, unless there are safety concerns. Terminating the parents’ legal ties to their child and freeing him for adoption would have been considerably down the line.

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:15

Backedoffhackedoff · 11/07/2026 22:10

Charges are unrelated. Being a paedophile is just what you are. It’s a sexual interest in pre pubescent children, you don’t need to be charged with a crime to be one.

and there is no evidence that OPs son is

Yes, I’m well aware that charges are unrelated. That’s very clearly what I said in my post. If you’d care to look at the post I was replying to, you’ll see why I mentioned charges.

And no evidence? Other than he admitted to his parents that he was in possession of a sexual image of a minor? Yeah, no evidence at all apart from that one little thing…

laurini · 11/07/2026 22:15

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:11

It wasn’t a case of mistaken identity, or a bit of shoplifting. He admitted to possessing an image of a minor.

But what if it was a 17 year old he'd met, and she'd misreported her age? OP doesnt know the context and the police won't share the information with her. In this case, he would technically have possessed an image of a minor but it wouldn't be in the public interest to bring charges.

tachetastic · 11/07/2026 22:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:11

laurini · 11/07/2026 21:58

You would disown your son if he was investigated by the police, and the police ultimately took no action against him? Meaning he has no conviction or caution???

It wasn’t a case of mistaken identity, or a bit of shoplifting. He admitted to possessing an image of a minor.

Backedoffhackedoff · 11/07/2026 22:10

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:06

Do you know what the threshold is for charges? There’s a bit more to the Full Code Test than just how serious an offence is. Rape stats are a perfect example of that, with record low numbers being charged. That doesn’t mean they aren’t rapists.

The police know exactly who they’re intending to arrest before they come out, and they are not going to come knocking at dawn for an eighteen year old looking at a single photo of a teenager who could be mistaken for being 18+. That is why that poster was calling him a paedophile and I don’t think it’s an unreasonable assumption to make.

OP, I completely understand why you’d not want to keep his secret anymore. The fact that you ever swept it under the carpet is pretty disgusting. But that was the choice you made. So I think you now need to examine your motives and look at what you’re hoping to achieve. It sounds like your motive is revenge for cutting you out of your grandchild’s life. So what will speaking up achieve? It certainly isn’t going to be you having more access. It’s far more likely that you won’t see that little boy ever again if you alienate his father. And few people are likely to understand how you could have kept that quiet. Are you ready for people to judge you? Because it’s a realistic prospect that you’ll be judged equally as harshly once people realise that you knew what he’d done, but protected him.

Social services aren’t going to return this little boy to you unless his parents seriously fuck up. And something where the police took nfa isn’t going to change that. In your shoes, I’d try and show that I loved my grandson more than I resented his parents and do my best to build some kind of relationship with his parents, even if it stuck in my craw to do so.

Charges are unrelated. Being a paedophile is just what you are. It’s a sexual interest in pre pubescent children, you don’t need to be charged with a crime to be one.

and there is no evidence that OPs son is

laurini · 11/07/2026 22:10

TheFormerMrsTruelove · 11/07/2026 22:06

Do you know what the threshold is for charges? There’s a bit more to the Full Code Test than just how serious an offence is. Rape stats are a perfect example of that, with record low numbers being charged. That doesn’t mean they aren’t rapists.

The police know exactly who they’re intending to arrest before they come out, and they are not going to come knocking at dawn for an eighteen year old looking at a single photo of a teenager who could be mistaken for being 18+. That is why that poster was calling him a paedophile and I don’t think it’s an unreasonable assumption to make.

OP, I completely understand why you’d not want to keep his secret anymore. The fact that you ever swept it under the carpet is pretty disgusting. But that was the choice you made. So I think you now need to examine your motives and look at what you’re hoping to achieve. It sounds like your motive is revenge for cutting you out of your grandchild’s life. So what will speaking up achieve? It certainly isn’t going to be you having more access. It’s far more likely that you won’t see that little boy ever again if you alienate his father. And few people are likely to understand how you could have kept that quiet. Are you ready for people to judge you? Because it’s a realistic prospect that you’ll be judged equally as harshly once people realise that you knew what he’d done, but protected him.

Social services aren’t going to return this little boy to you unless his parents seriously fuck up. And something where the police took nfa isn’t going to change that. In your shoes, I’d try and show that I loved my grandson more than I resented his parents and do my best to build some kind of relationship with his parents, even if it stuck in my craw to do so.

Is it disgusting to keep a secret that he was investigated? Who do you propose that OP should have told about it?

Swipe left for the next trending thread