Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Ex applied to deduct travel costs from child maintenance

119 replies

greentent86 · 11/07/2026 11:19

AIBU to be pissed, even though I know it’s technically allowed?

I live where I always have, with our child. I have never moved.

Ex lives a significant distance away now, his choice.

Has had sporadic involvement with our child since birth, now we have a court order that he has every other weekend.

Within days if the court order, he’s applied to CMS to vary the payment for “special expenses”… he’s claiming £70 a week in travel costs.

I do get a decent maintenance payment compared to many people, but a loss of over £300 a month is going to be very difficult. I work full time but my job isn’t well paid, and do all the day to day care of our child, pay for nursery etc.

Ex was financial controlling and harassed me over CMS for years, this all came out in court and was noted by the judge.

For what it’s worth, my ex is in a well paid job, has a house worth 7 figures, drives a large car worth 6 figures, has investment properties etc. he isn’t hard up.

I know there’s nothing I can do about it but AIBU to feel the system is really unfair on resident parents.

OP posts:
ThreadGuardDog · 14/07/2026 13:44

Ruth58d · 14/07/2026 13:37

Many, many, many men have no say in the matter. Until more mothers are prepared to switch roles and become the non-resident parent, EOW and half the school holidays is what Dads get.

Well if what OP says is true and he wanted nothing to do with his child for a long time and then had to be forced to pay maintenance, EOW is what I’d expect.

You only have to look on MN threads to realise there are a lot of non resident dads doing the bare minimum despite mum wanting and asking for more input.

Ruth58d · 14/07/2026 13:37

ThreadGuardDog · 14/07/2026 13:31

Heaven forbid Dad wants a bit of extra money to buy his child a pizza or an ice cream during his time. What a deadbeat he must be!!!

Well EOW isn’t great is it ?

Many, many, many men have no say in the matter. Until more mothers are prepared to switch roles and become the non-resident parent, EOW and half the school holidays is what Dads get.

Ruth58d · 14/07/2026 13:35

Brainworm · 12/07/2026 17:51

Based on a cap of 45p per mile, and 2 journeys EOW, £300 pcm equates to him living around 140 miles away. Is that right?

You can estimate what a reasonable claim by using the 45p cap, the distance, and toll charges. Is this close to £300 pcm?

It's not 2 journeys every other week though unless travel is being shared 50:50. It's 2 round trip journeys EOW which works out as 8 single journeys per month.

It's from his home to child's home, from child's home to his home on a Friday night. Then from his home to child's home on a Sunday, and from child's home back to his home. X2 per month.

That probably does amount to a fair amount of fuel if he lives 35 miles away.

ThreadGuardDog · 14/07/2026 13:31

Ruth58d · 14/07/2026 13:19

Except he is not taking money from his child. He is paying for the fuel, tyres, oil, tolls etc. out of his own wage. He has asked CMS to allow him to pay these essential costs needed for his children to spend time with both parents BEFORE they run their calculation for maintenance. The outcome will be maintenance will reduce by about a fiver. It's a token of acknowledgement of the costs that non-resident parents have to pay.

The alternative is resident parents agree to meet half way. I can assure you that will cost more than a fiver at the distances stated though.

Maybe he had to move there because it's what he could afford. Maybe it's nearer to his work. Maybe it's nearer to family support.

Heaven forbid Dad wants a bit of extra money to buy his child a pizza or an ice cream during his time. What a deadbeat he must be!!!

Heaven forbid Dad wants a bit of extra money to buy his child a pizza or an ice cream during his time. What a deadbeat he must be!!!

Well EOW isn’t great is it ?

Ruth58d · 14/07/2026 13:24

LaurieFairyCake · 11/07/2026 11:31

Why is he applying for weekly when he sees him fortnightly ?

Because this is the way CMS works.

He will have been asked to calculate his average weekly travel costs.

CMS is calculated on weekly income.

Ruth58d · 14/07/2026 13:19

Naunet · 12/07/2026 17:33

That sounds more like him actually. Imagine being a high earner and taking money from your child to pay for your travel because YOU decided to move away? Disgusting behaviour for a parent.

Except he is not taking money from his child. He is paying for the fuel, tyres, oil, tolls etc. out of his own wage. He has asked CMS to allow him to pay these essential costs needed for his children to spend time with both parents BEFORE they run their calculation for maintenance. The outcome will be maintenance will reduce by about a fiver. It's a token of acknowledgement of the costs that non-resident parents have to pay.

The alternative is resident parents agree to meet half way. I can assure you that will cost more than a fiver at the distances stated though.

Maybe he had to move there because it's what he could afford. Maybe it's nearer to his work. Maybe it's nearer to family support.

Heaven forbid Dad wants a bit of extra money to buy his child a pizza or an ice cream during his time. What a deadbeat he must be!!!

OhamIreally · 13/07/2026 15:20

My ex did this. Moved 400 miles away, left me to do all the work then sought, and got, a variation to cover his travel expenses for the high days and holidays he does have her. I’m thinking of challenging the ongoing need for it now as our child is older and travels there and back alone so costs are greatly reduced.

Housebashing · 13/07/2026 11:22

Thursday5pmisginoclock · 12/07/2026 22:39

That is surely evidence of child neglect in his care. I would be keeping evidence of that or reporting it to get sole custody.

You would be amazed, stroked horrified as to how high the threshold has to be to withdraw contact from father’s
Excuse after excuse after excuse is made for them.

All to the child’s detriment.

Thursday5pmisginoclock · 12/07/2026 22:39

That is surely evidence of child neglect in his care. I would be keeping evidence of that or reporting it to get sole custody.

RandomMess · 12/07/2026 21:28

Bloody hell if he let his child burn I’d raise it a child protection issue. I would send him the evidence that CMS is to cover costs whilst in your care and he has to provide whilst in his care and only send sun cream from now on.

Howdidlifegetsobusy · 12/07/2026 21:17

Ps, given he’s not seeing your child weekly, I would start with that as a challenge back (has to be costs that exceed £10 per week).

plus work out the mileage (but assume will be there and back twice). Base that cost on Hmrc mileage rate.

also make sure that he is declaring income from rentals, dividends and investments. X

greentent86 · 12/07/2026 21:15

Howdidlifegetsobusy · 12/07/2026 21:01

Sadly I think you only recourse is to check what is stated can be claimed as mileage and toll rates, and then evidence his journey yourself. Also if he only has care once a fortnight, this should be reflective of that too. It’s been a while since my husband went through all of this with his ex. In his case we were paying for phones, school trips, clothes and holidays, and regularly bailing out missed mortgage payments (never to be seen again), so we did seek a travel allowance deduction, as CMS don’t take that into account.

is he self employed or paye? Sadly he can throw extra money into pension pot reduce his income. If you know what time of year he may get paid bonus’s etc, then ensure you ask for a re-evaluation of income at that time of year.

I’m sorry you both went through that, it sounds rough.

I have never asked him for anything, all he pays is the maintenance, which I didn’t even claim for a significant portion of our child’s life. I pay for all other activities, like swimming lessons, football, and I imagine it will be that way going forward. I even have to send a bag with clothes, wipes, sunscreen, hat, spare pants, pjs etc as he refuses to provide these and says that it’s what he pays for! I know this isn’t true but I can’t see my child go without because of the way he is. Only mentioned the suncream as he previously sent them back burnt and said he wasn’t providing sunscreen and I should supply it.

OP posts:
greentent86 · 12/07/2026 21:12

JohnofWessex · 12/07/2026 21:06

From what I remember despite tghe fact that my ex moved away and point blank refused to have anything to do with DS's transport while I could claim minimal travel expenses that would mean that I could not claim a reduction for the nights he spent with me

I think it’s totally fair if the resident parent moves away, in this case I haven’t and it’s him that’s chosen to live where he is.

OP posts:
JohnofWessex · 12/07/2026 21:06

From what I remember despite tghe fact that my ex moved away and point blank refused to have anything to do with DS's transport while I could claim minimal travel expenses that would mean that I could not claim a reduction for the nights he spent with me

Howdidlifegetsobusy · 12/07/2026 21:01

Sadly I think you only recourse is to check what is stated can be claimed as mileage and toll rates, and then evidence his journey yourself. Also if he only has care once a fortnight, this should be reflective of that too. It’s been a while since my husband went through all of this with his ex. In his case we were paying for phones, school trips, clothes and holidays, and regularly bailing out missed mortgage payments (never to be seen again), so we did seek a travel allowance deduction, as CMS don’t take that into account.

is he self employed or paye? Sadly he can throw extra money into pension pot reduce his income. If you know what time of year he may get paid bonus’s etc, then ensure you ask for a re-evaluation of income at that time of year.

PissedOff2020 · 12/07/2026 20:51

Yep he’s an a*sehole.
How far away does he live? £70 a week is a lot

ThreadGuardDog · 12/07/2026 20:45

Brokentoes85 · 12/07/2026 20:37

How is it 70 a week if he's only seeing them every other week? Or is that it averaged out?

That’s what it costs him. It’s nowhere near what he’ll actually end up with. It comes down to a mileage allowance averaged out over the year, and then a minimum weekly threshold of £10 is applied, so he only gets the excess after another deduction according to the % maintenance he pays.

Brokentoes85 · 12/07/2026 20:37

How is it 70 a week if he's only seeing them every other week? Or is that it averaged out?

cornflakecrunchie · 12/07/2026 20:13

Courts, sigh. :-(

Housebashing · 12/07/2026 19:48

greentent86 · 12/07/2026 19:44

It it court ordered that he collects and drops off to nursery. Or school when dc starts. School holidays are covered by a third party. We can’t have any contact.

So for example, if he’s collecting at 9am on a Friday morning, I still pay for that whole day. If he decides to drop off at 3pm on a Monday to nursery, I’ve still paid for that whole day.

So in that example that you give Friday is your day in theory but I would talk to the nursery and just say look this lunatic tried to kill me. I need a safe space to do a handover. Can you just charge me for an hour? Cause he’s gonna pick her up at 9 o’clock you shouldn’t be paying the whole day and the nursery managers should facilitate that for you. Even half a day would be helpful to reduce your bill.
However Monday is his day and he needs to pay for that day just basically remove it from your contract you don’t need it.
And then if he wants to drop her at 9 am or 3 pm that’s up to him
Yeah, that might save you a few quid over the course of a year

themoirarosee · 12/07/2026 19:47

My ex did this, had the nerve to move 1.5 hours one way away. Then deduct travel
costs alongside a deduction for the new girlfriend’s menagerie of children 🫠

If I remember they deduct 13p per mile, and that comes off his gross income. Then maintenance is worked out from there, it actually ends up being not much at all. Pennies really.

He’ll have to provide evidence of his miles traveled and fuel costs forever and he’ll be spot checked. And of course you have the right to challenge it.

tanyatee · 12/07/2026 19:47

My ex did this. Had to provide receipts for ages. I think he still does get asked for receipts every so often. Gives him a 60p deduction every month. Petty.

greentent86 · 12/07/2026 19:44

Housebashing · 12/07/2026 19:33

What do you mean bill for his days? How is that not happening already ?
On the days that he has the child how he takes care of it is his business. It’s nothing to do with you. You need to get onto that tomorrow.

It it court ordered that he collects and drops off to nursery. Or school when dc starts. School holidays are covered by a third party. We can’t have any contact.

So for example, if he’s collecting at 9am on a Friday morning, I still pay for that whole day. If he decides to drop off at 3pm on a Monday to nursery, I’ve still paid for that whole day.

OP posts:
Housebashing · 12/07/2026 19:33

greentent86 · 12/07/2026 19:29

I don’t even know how I would go about it. We both have PR now, I guess I could ask nursery to bill him for his days and see what reaction it gets… there’s nothing anywhere that says I have to pay it and I always have. When the interim order was put in place, the judge did query it and said it needed careful consideration but at the time I was so exhausted I said let’s just sort it out for the final order (as didn’t 100% know what would happen at the time and I was worried about more conflict re finances as we’d had in the past). Anyway, totally forgot about it at court doing the final order…

What do you mean bill for his days? How is that not happening already ?
On the days that he has the child how he takes care of it is his business. It’s nothing to do with you. You need to get onto that tomorrow.

ByWildCoralMember · 12/07/2026 19:31

If the judge ordered him to travel you may be able to challenge this. My ex tried to do this but as it was court ordered he pay for half the costs he wasn't able to reduce his maintenance. I had to provide a copy of the part of the order that stated he was to pay so I imagine an order saying they are responsible for travel may have a similar impact?