Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to retire significantly before my husband

117 replies

Iampondering · 06/07/2026 12:42

So this is planning ahead as we are early 40s (he is 18 months older) but a bit of an argument came up last night and I genuinely don’t know if IABU.

Context, I am the main breadwinner and always have been. Currently I earn 3 x my DH’s salary but that has been more at some points. He is not ambitious at all and is very happy in his low paying job. I am very ambitious and have always had well paying but very high stress / long hours roles. Housework and childcare is split 50/50. All money goes into a joint pot, there is no mine vs his.

We are financially very comfortable due to my work (and generally not being big spenders) and should be on track to retire early, by 60ish. I’m feeling increasingly burnt out however and was musing about retiring earlier or going very part time at 55ish, but him continuing to work until 60 so we don’t eat into too much capital too soon.

He strongly objected to this and said we should retire together. I wondered what people thought? I appreciate it’s a very first world problem to have and we are very very lucky.

OP posts:
catspyjamas1 · 06/07/2026 18:41

JumpingJimny · 06/07/2026 18:25

So you’re also paying into a pension and an ISA for him?! Good lord, he’s being very selfish to take the hump at you retiring! You’re doing far more than I would!

I had to read that three times to make sure I didn't misunderstand.. Same / agree with you! OP is clearly a very nice woman because I am definitely not doing this.

KatiePricesKnickers · 06/07/2026 18:38

I don’t blame him for not getting into management. As the OP said herself, usually it’s salary based and the title comes with a shit load more responsibility, stress, and uncompensated hours, for often barely 30k before tax. Much, much less in retail
Having both parents working flat out achieves what?

JumpingJimny · 06/07/2026 18:25

Iampondering · 06/07/2026 18:05

Gosh getting heated. Thanks again for all the comments.
He isn’t lazy, nor is he a slacker. However he is happy to have an easier life at work. He has had many chances to step into a management position for instance and has chosen not to because he doesn’t want to. Totally his choice of course, but that means his salary will always be capped and his stress levels lower.

In terms of our financial split there is no “he pays for” or “I pay for” as everything goes into one joint account. From this we pay normal household bills (equivalent to half his salary) and the remainder goes on a holiday, my pension, adding to his SIPP, an ISA for me and an ISA for him.

In all likelihood if we weren’t together he would be working until state pension kicks in. Because we are together we should (hopefully!) be able to retire before 60. My AIBU was for me wanting to retire another 5 years earlier than that.

Hope that makes sense!

So you’re also paying into a pension and an ISA for him?! Good lord, he’s being very selfish to take the hump at you retiring! You’re doing far more than I would!

MidnightMeltdown · 06/07/2026 18:25

HaveYouFedTheFish · 06/07/2026 17:57

Would you tell a nurse married to a doctor that she was a shitty lazy slacker and should retire later than than her husband because she'd earnt less, despite both working full time?

What about a GP married to a stock broker? Lazy unambitious slacker - why wasn't she more ambitious - of course she should pick up the slack so and work five years longer than her stockbroker husband so that their ETAs would remain untouched.

Where did I say that he was a ‘shitty lazy slacker’? He could have taken in a higher paid job with more stress but chose not to because he preferred to have an easier life. He’s perfectly entitled to make that choice, but choices have consequences. Now he expects somebody else to fund his retirement.

MidnightMeltdown · 06/07/2026 18:21

HaveYouFedTheFish · 06/07/2026 17:53

She quite literally wrote that he pays for outgoings 50/50 and works longer hours outside the house.

He's in a lower paying career, not working less. She's telling him he has to work longer than her. He's not telling her he can't retire early - she's telling him he can't.

That’s not the same thing as contributing 50/50 to the family finances though is it? The savings, pensions and holidays are down to OP. It’s perfectly reasonable for OP to expect him to work longer because he hasn’t earned the money to retire early. He could have taken on a higher paying job and additional stress and he chose not to - and now he expects OP to fund his early retirement. He’s being very selfish.

Wiennetta · 06/07/2026 18:18

I don’t think it’s too early to have the conversation. I’m late 30s and DH is mid 40s. He loves his job and will retire at 65. We have already talked about me retiring or going part time at about 60 so we can retire together. And we’re planning financially around that. You can’t wait until retirement age to decide what you want to do!
I don’t think you’re unreasonable to want to retire early given your high stress job. The benefit of the high stress job is you earn well which allows you options that others don’t have. Your DH needs to understand that this is the trade off - yes you earn well but for a lot of people that’s not sustainable until full retirement age. He needs to take more responsibility in financial planning and not leave it all to you - this which might mean him pushing to earn more so he can retire early too.

Iampondering · 06/07/2026 18:05

Gosh getting heated. Thanks again for all the comments.
He isn’t lazy, nor is he a slacker. However he is happy to have an easier life at work. He has had many chances to step into a management position for instance and has chosen not to because he doesn’t want to. Totally his choice of course, but that means his salary will always be capped and his stress levels lower.

In terms of our financial split there is no “he pays for” or “I pay for” as everything goes into one joint account. From this we pay normal household bills (equivalent to half his salary) and the remainder goes on a holiday, my pension, adding to his SIPP, an ISA for me and an ISA for him.

In all likelihood if we weren’t together he would be working until state pension kicks in. Because we are together we should (hopefully!) be able to retire before 60. My AIBU was for me wanting to retire another 5 years earlier than that.

Hope that makes sense!

OP posts:
HaveYouFedTheFish · 06/07/2026 17:59

Iampondering · 06/07/2026 15:26

He is as happy in his current job as I’ve ever seen him, but would rather not be working if it were a choice.
Re childcare, one of the perks of my job / seniority is that I get to WFH 4 days a week. So I do most school drop offs, whack some food in the slower cooker in the morning etc as he is out of the home much longer hours than I am.

His salary pays half our living costs (mortgage free.) Mine pays the other half, holiday, then all the rest is split into 2 x ISAs for us both and pensions.

So whilst a drop in the ocean it would still be 50% of our living costs if I was retired.

For the poster claiming he doesn't pay 50% of living costs. edited to add: @JumpingJimny

HaveYouFedTheFish · 06/07/2026 17:57

MidnightMeltdown · 06/07/2026 17:47

He’s not contributing 50/50 though, OP has said that she’s been bringing home 3 x his salary and all the money has been shared. If OP had kept her money separate and insisted that everything was paid 50/50, then she would likely have been able to retire earlier. He has chosen to stay in a low paid job because he wanted an easy, stress free life, and has been perfectly happy for OP to pick up the tab for a lifestyle that he never would have been able to afford without her. He hasn’t contributed anywhere near what OP has to the family finances, and therefore, it’s his turn to pick up the slack.

Would you tell a nurse married to a doctor that she was a shitty lazy slacker and should retire later than than her husband because she'd earnt less, despite both working full time?

What about a GP married to a stock broker? Lazy unambitious slacker - why wasn't she more ambitious - of course she should pick up the slack so and work five years longer than her stockbroker husband so that their ETAs would remain untouched.

JumpingJimny · 06/07/2026 17:57

HaveYouFedTheFish · 06/07/2026 17:53

She quite literally wrote that he pays for outgoings 50/50 and works longer hours outside the house.

He's in a lower paying career, not working less. She's telling him he has to work longer than her. He's not telling her he can't retire early - she's telling him he can't.

She didn’t - she clearly says housework and childcare are 50/50 but that ALL money is pooled, she doesn’t keep back her own money. So if that pot is shared for the family outgoings she’s paying 3 times for than him for everything. She also explicitly states it is her working the long hours, and 60 hour weeks in a high stress job.

I’ve just reviewed her posts and can’t see her saying the opposite anywhere but feel free to highlight it if I’ve missed something?

Brunchatstephanies · 06/07/2026 17:54

Honestly you lost me at 50/50 split of household tasks when he earns 1/4 of the household income while you earn 3/4 and it is combined.

Plenty of people have unequal earnings but usually the overall situation is equitable even if it comes as you suggest at retirement.

I’d be getting out of that arrangement now not when I retire, he is a piss taker.

HaveYouFedTheFish · 06/07/2026 17:53

MidnightMeltdown · 06/07/2026 17:47

He’s not contributing 50/50 though, OP has said that she’s been bringing home 3 x his salary and all the money has been shared. If OP had kept her money separate and insisted that everything was paid 50/50, then she would likely have been able to retire earlier. He has chosen to stay in a low paid job because he wanted an easy, stress free life, and has been perfectly happy for OP to pick up the tab for a lifestyle that he never would have been able to afford without her. He hasn’t contributed anywhere near what OP has to the family finances, and therefore, it’s his turn to pick up the slack.

She quite literally wrote that he pays for outgoings 50/50 and works longer hours outside the house.

He's in a lower paying career, not working less. She's telling him he has to work longer than her. He's not telling her he can't retire early - she's telling him he can't.

OneLimePombear · 06/07/2026 17:53

This is the perfect time for these conversations.

My DH and I retired together a few years ago in our early/mid 50’s, I would have found it difficult if he had retired me before. If this had been the plan I would have liked to know sooner rather than later.

RVectensian · 06/07/2026 17:52

He's paid half the bills surely?

JumpingJimny · 06/07/2026 17:52

You’re not unreasonable at all. Everyone had decisions to make in life, one of them is career choice and ambition. You made choices and put effort in to your career, you work hard and you deal with extra stress and responsibilities to get the salary you earn. You say you also put ALL your money into a family pot, so he’s getting just as much benefit from your hard work as you are.

The least you deserve is to benefit from your efforts by being able to retire early. It’s not your job to earn money for him just because he wants an easy life.

I know for me personally, work can bring me down and I would love to retire early!! I certainly wouldn’t let lack of effort or foreplanning from my DP prevent me from doing so if it became possible. If he’s not planned for his future that’s his own lookout!

catspyjamas1 · 06/07/2026 17:52

MidnightMeltdown · 06/07/2026 17:47

He’s not contributing 50/50 though, OP has said that she’s been bringing home 3 x his salary and all the money has been shared. If OP had kept her money separate and insisted that everything was paid 50/50, then she would likely have been able to retire earlier. He has chosen to stay in a low paid job because he wanted an easy, stress free life, and has been perfectly happy for OP to pick up the tab for a lifestyle that he never would have been able to afford without her. He hasn’t contributed anywhere near what OP has to the family finances, and therefore, it’s his turn to pick up the slack.

Precisely - this is exactly why OP needs to consider herself and her life first. I get it's easier said than done.

MidnightMeltdown · 06/07/2026 17:47

HaveYouFedTheFish · 06/07/2026 17:25

How is he selfish paying working longer hours than she does, outside the home while she works from home and paying for family outings 50/50?

He's not asking her not to retire, he's disappointed that she doesn't want him to retire at the same time but to continue working. It sounds as though they could afford to both retire but she wants him to keep paying 50/50 from earnings rather than use his private pension and ETAs.

He’s not contributing 50/50 though, OP has said that she’s been bringing home 3 x his salary and all the money has been shared. If OP had kept her money separate and insisted that everything was paid 50/50, then she would likely have been able to retire earlier. He has chosen to stay in a low paid job because he wanted an easy, stress free life, and has been perfectly happy for OP to pick up the tab for a lifestyle that he never would have been able to afford without her. He hasn’t contributed anywhere near what OP has to the family finances, and therefore, it’s his turn to pick up the slack.

catspyjamas1 · 06/07/2026 17:42

I am shocked at the number of posters suggesting that 40's is too young to be having these discussions, and planning. WTF!!

OP, you should absolutely be having these discussions and planning for what you want for the next 20-30 years. I'm early 40's and started to plan for retirement a couple of years ago, having paid into a private pension a few years before that. I got an IFA to help me plan and be more tax efficient, savings, getting a will done this year for my house etc. etc. etc.

Please don't pay attention to questions and comments about your age. You're 100% doing the right thing and setting yourself up for a good few last decades irrespective of your husband / partner / boyfriend situation now and in years to come. Best advice I ever got was from my grandmother - never rely on a man financially. Keep going! I'll be here doing the same, like a smart woman that can in 2026!

WhatAMarvelousTune · 06/07/2026 17:41

I’d be royally fucked off if DH said “I’ll retire early, but I will need you to carry on working so that we don’t eat into the capital too much”.

HaveYouFedTheFish · 06/07/2026 17:38

banmusk · 06/07/2026 17:37

Retire by stealth, when you've had enough tell him you've been laid off, promise to find another job but dont actually look, lock all your money away somewhere & make him pay the bills.
In other words, think like a man.

Fucking hell. Are you being serious or is this just dark humour?

banmusk · 06/07/2026 17:37

Retire by stealth, when you've had enough tell him you've been laid off, promise to find another job but dont actually look, lock all your money away somewhere & make him pay the bills.
In other words, think like a man.

catspyjamas1 · 06/07/2026 17:36

Dweetfidilove · 06/07/2026 13:17

What's the appropriate age for these discussions?

Quite.

catspyjamas1 · 06/07/2026 17:35

UpDownAllAround1 · 06/07/2026 12:44

Far too early for these kind of discussions leading to arguments. Enjoy your 40s!

Terrible advice. Are you retired?

catspyjamas1 · 06/07/2026 17:35

Hi OP. Similar situation on the financial side. Do it. I got an IFA last year to help me plan to part-retire when I'm 50-55. I know full well that my partner cannot at the same time, and will likely be working low end jobs leading up to his state pension and paltry private pension when the time comes - such is life. I imagine at your level / wage, you've earnt it, so f*ck it, you do you and retire early and enjoy it. I plan too and hope you do too!

Soontobe60 · 06/07/2026 17:33

Backstop · 06/07/2026 17:31

As a breadwinner I think you plan more holistically for you both. It sounds your plan comes from a sense of pressure rather than a desire to punish your partner for not earning as much as you. The best plan would consider you both more centrally but it almost certainly hasn’t been made yet. On a good wage with good savings I would be looking to go earlier for both of you. Have a big overhaul - house, finance, lifestyle and listen to puts of pension podcasts then plan together.

Wise words