Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How can I divide my estate fairly between daughters and grandchildren?

479 replies

Ilikesundays · 03/07/2026 22:15

Would really appreciate your views! I’m in my 80s and have three dds and 7 gcs. All are over 20. Two dds are married: one has 3 DCs and one has 4. Youngest dd is unmarried and has no children. I want to make my will and be fair to all of them. I was thinking of leaving all my property (f/h house, no mortgage in London + fairly substantial savings) to the gcs + the unmarried dd and nothing to the two married DDs. But on reflection this seems very harsh and unfair to them . How would you manage it? They are all working, bar two gcs who are still studying p/g.

OP posts:
LoSlo3toGo · 05/07/2026 21:30

Ilikesundays · 05/07/2026 02:50

That’s what I’m going to do. That seems to be the consensus of your suggestions and the fairest way to do it. Thank you!

I think this is the right decision by far. Chances are your childless DD will also eventually leave her estate to her nephews/nieces as well as their parents doing the same for their children… so all the GC will eventually benefit but this saves ill feeling

Livemenot · 05/07/2026 20:56

In my opinion, the only fair decision is split equally between all 3 children.

SargeMimpson · 05/07/2026 20:52

Surely you split equally between your children and they decide what to do with their own children?

why would you split equally between your children and grandchildren? That doesn’t seem fair at all

If you are determined to include your grandchildren, then leave them each a token amount. It’s up to their parents to leave them an inheritance (or not)

IsYourTableClothed · 05/07/2026 20:47

Just split equally between your daughters. The grandkids can inherit from their own parents.

Mistymagic77 · 05/07/2026 20:41

PurpleLovecats · 03/07/2026 22:17

I would divide it in 4. A third to each dd and a third shared between the grandchildren.

This sounds very fair!

PyschodelicSoup · 05/07/2026 20:27

Floppyearedlab · 05/07/2026 14:00

Personally I would leave it in equal shares to all the living children and grandchildren alive at the time of your death.
If more are born later - you can't predict that.

I personally don't agree with leaving it all to your children, who all have houses, stable incomes etc. Your GC may need help getting on the property ladder - who is to say your children won't spend it on holidays/renovations/crap and the GC won't get anything until they are way older, or not at all.

Edited

Their GCs parents can help if they need financial support for a property or any such thing.

PyschodelicSoup · 05/07/2026 20:14

corkscissorschalk · 03/07/2026 22:22

I would divide everything equally between my 3 daughters.

This. The time for the grand children to inherit is when their parents die.

Although having said that I would want to leave a nominal amount to the grandchildren.

Grannalintab · 05/07/2026 20:05

With a London home plus savings. your estate will probably incur inheritance tax so try to reduce that by giving your daughters as much as you can spare asap!

Alex4646 · 05/07/2026 18:37

PurpleLovecats · 03/07/2026 22:17

I would divide it in 4. A third to each dd and a third shared between the grandchildren.

This is a lovely suggestion 💕

Heereforagoodtime · 05/07/2026 18:35

Divide equally between your own children. They were your choice and responsibility, not your grandchildren.

Coming from a mother with a childless sibling... I'd be mortified if my parents left more to my side of the family (i.e. me and my child) than to my sibling's side (i.e. single and childless).

Pallisers · 05/07/2026 18:19

pb97 · 05/07/2026 17:25

There's a world of difference between thinking logically about where an inheritance would do the most good and being vintictive.

I'm not talking about disinheriting someone over some silly tiff 40 years ago. Or purposefully trying to hurt someone. I'm talking about looking at where everyone is, and how they are doing, and then using your money to help the ones who need it.

The key thing is to discuss it with everyone first, so nothing comes as a shock.

My eldest child doesn't need anything. Anything she inherited would be swallowed up by taxes.

My middle child had some false starts in life, a moderate inheritance could really be put to good use.

My youngest child lives close by and will likely be the one to care for me when I'm too old to care for myself, and a large inheritance would be a well deserved reward for putting her life on hold to care for an elderly relative.

I do this out of love and logic, not vindictiveness. My children aren't equal and my relationship with them isn't equal. Each child is different and has different needs in life.

I guarantee you that your three children will not think "logically" about this but will see it as evidence of who you really loved. (and also a "pay per favour" scheme - which in fairness it is).

Many years ago when I worked as a solicitor I made a will for a woman. My boss was friends with her son. her son came with her to introduce her and himself said "she shouldn't leave anything to me, I'm well set up". he had his own professional practice, three kids in private school, a lovely home, plenty of savings.

A few years later I was catching up with my old boss and asked about him. he had died of a massive heart attack after being declared bankrupt. he had got involved with an investment scheme that ruined him - no practice, no house, no savings - nothing. Life changes. Not leaving anything to a child because they have done well presumes you have the full inside scoop on their affairs - you probably don't - there are many things I wouldn't have burdened my parents with as I got older - and has the potential to punish them for doing well.

Chilly80 · 05/07/2026 17:48

Depending on size of your estate small amount to each grandchild and bulk of estate divided between your 3 children

Peachie31 · 05/07/2026 17:30

pb97 · 05/07/2026 17:25

There's a world of difference between thinking logically about where an inheritance would do the most good and being vintictive.

I'm not talking about disinheriting someone over some silly tiff 40 years ago. Or purposefully trying to hurt someone. I'm talking about looking at where everyone is, and how they are doing, and then using your money to help the ones who need it.

The key thing is to discuss it with everyone first, so nothing comes as a shock.

My eldest child doesn't need anything. Anything she inherited would be swallowed up by taxes.

My middle child had some false starts in life, a moderate inheritance could really be put to good use.

My youngest child lives close by and will likely be the one to care for me when I'm too old to care for myself, and a large inheritance would be a well deserved reward for putting her life on hold to care for an elderly relative.

I do this out of love and logic, not vindictiveness. My children aren't equal and my relationship with them isn't equal. Each child is different and has different needs in life.

You have essentially admitted to an element of favouritism there. I'm glad I'm not one of your kids 😬

pb97 · 05/07/2026 17:25

Peachie31 · 05/07/2026 17:12

Aaaaand this is how you cause heartache and grief among your kids and grandkids by showing blatant favouritism.

We've just had this recently, and all it has done is shown that my grandmother preferred two of her grandchildren over the others and always has done from being kids, so 4 of us have come out with a token amount, the "favourites" are going to get upwards of £20k.

It takes a really vindictive person to do this IMO

There's a world of difference between thinking logically about where an inheritance would do the most good and being vintictive.

I'm not talking about disinheriting someone over some silly tiff 40 years ago. Or purposefully trying to hurt someone. I'm talking about looking at where everyone is, and how they are doing, and then using your money to help the ones who need it.

The key thing is to discuss it with everyone first, so nothing comes as a shock.

My eldest child doesn't need anything. Anything she inherited would be swallowed up by taxes.

My middle child had some false starts in life, a moderate inheritance could really be put to good use.

My youngest child lives close by and will likely be the one to care for me when I'm too old to care for myself, and a large inheritance would be a well deserved reward for putting her life on hold to care for an elderly relative.

I do this out of love and logic, not vindictiveness. My children aren't equal and my relationship with them isn't equal. Each child is different and has different needs in life.

Peachie31 · 05/07/2026 17:20

ilovemybluesharpie · 05/07/2026 12:33

The only fair way is to split it between the 3 DD. You could leave each grandchild a set amount, say £1K each.

It would be extremely unfair to leave your estate to just one DD and would cause a huge rift in the family once you are gone.

Totally agree with this.

I've seen it happen and we are experiencing a similar situation. It's awful and just proves to everyone who the favourites were/are

Peachie31 · 05/07/2026 17:12

pb97 · 05/07/2026 11:25

I would say the exact opposite.

My three rules are

  1. Each according to their need
  2. The ones who are closest get the most
  3. Think long term

In essence, if someone is already well off then giving them more won't help them very much, but it will help the ones who have the least much more.

If you're closer to one, for example if one of them helps you with the shopping every week, then it's perfectly OK to treat them a little more favourable.

With expensive items like a house, it may be better to put it in a managed trust that rents it out in exchange for a long term income that can be split up between the family for decades. It will give them some security rather than a big cash bonus that they might just spend right away. If things get desperate for one of them in the future they could always move in themselves. Property pays for itself thrice over if you think long term.

Aaaaand this is how you cause heartache and grief among your kids and grandkids by showing blatant favouritism.

We've just had this recently, and all it has done is shown that my grandmother preferred two of her grandchildren over the others and always has done from being kids, so 4 of us have come out with a token amount, the "favourites" are going to get upwards of £20k.

It takes a really vindictive person to do this IMO

GreenAlgae · 05/07/2026 17:08

Dd3 is hopefully going to university this year. I don't have a will yet and I know the fairest would be to divide equally but their needs are so different

Out of dh and his 4 siblings, 10 years ago we were by far the better off financially of all of us. 3 of the others were comfortable and one was much less well off financially than the rest.

Today, because of circumstances beyond our control, we are very much on the bottom rung and have the very least capital or assets of any of us. Not due to overspending or living beyond our means, but life complications that could happen to anyone. All married, the others have had inheritances from their in-law families. Mine had nothing to leave. All have gone on to higher paying jobs, whilst it was impossible for us due to family difficulties (a disabled child).

The inheritance from pil shared equally between all 5 has been really much more useful for us than the others, to whom it's a comparatively modest amount
by their standards. But it was equal, so it was fair.

Equal, in these cases I believe, is fair. The future isn't set in stone. Things could be very different in 10/20 years time.

flippinnorastights · 05/07/2026 17:03

DD’s only and if you want the GC to have anything immediately then maybe give them £10k each as a token

SurreyisSunny · 05/07/2026 16:35

My grandparents did the following:

  • split equally between their 2 DDs
  • gave £50k each to their GC x 4

My aunt gifted her entire portion to her 3 children. My mum needed the money but gave me about £150k towards my house which was incredibly generous

their estate wasn’t huge. About £800k from memory. I think what they did was very fair and if wouldn’t have been fair to give all to the GC as my mum has lived off that money for the last 10 years. As she gave me more money than anticipated I’ve said I’ll look after her in her older age financially

everynamewastaken · 05/07/2026 16:23

My grandparents had a similar conundrum on both sides. As grandkids we expected nothing and actually that's pretty much what the grandparents did because there were childless children on both sides (and unfair numbers of grandkids) so for fairness each grandparent split the money between the kids and the kids then gifted money to their children if they wanted. If you imagine when your DD's die the grandkids will each inherit again so effectively the grandkids are receiving more than your childless daughter (who will also likely have her niece's / nephews down for inheritance!) so it just feels fair in case other kids come along and to save any arguments between your DD.

MyMiniMetro · 05/07/2026 15:52

Whether they are working or not is irrelevant? In fact if they are on benefits and you give them an inheritance over a certain amount they may have their benefits stopped and they’ll have to live on your inheritance.

Just divide the estate equally between DC. It will prevent any bad feeling. If it’s a large estate you could give each GC an equal gift of a much smaller amount - relative to the estate.

RoseOliviaAu · 05/07/2026 15:35

Split it equally between your daughters. Their kids will eventually inherit from them.

Kpo58 · 05/07/2026 15:27

There is no fair way of doing this.

The DC probably don't "need" the money as much as the GC as they are likely to already own somewhere to live, whereas the GC will still need to save up for a deposit, may be struggling with uni debts or wondering how they can afford children of their own.

Also you can never guarantee that the DC will pass on any money on when the time comes. Some are selfish and will spend it all on luxuries and holidays for themselves and are happy to watch their own children struggle, but then if you don't give them some, they may not think that you love them.

I'd be tempted to split the lot by the number of DC X2 and the GC at time of death (or plus a few months just incase one of the DC happens to be pregnant at the time of your death) and give all GC a share and the DC 2 shares of inheritance.

FantasiaTurquoise · 05/07/2026 15:22

The only fair way is to split it equally between your three daughters as they are your next of kin. If the ones with children want to give some to them, they are free to do so. The last thing you want to do is leave them the legacy of a row over money because the one who didn't have children feels unfairly treated. That sort of thing can be devastating for families.

ApplesAreAmazing · 05/07/2026 15:17

Leave equally to you daughters, with a token amount to each grandchild. Your childless daughter doesn't have a partner to help them later on, they could have children still, and if they remain childless they will probably leave the money to their nieces and nephews.
Whatever happens your daughters need to feel equally important to you in your will or it may affect their relationship with eachother.