Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think an annual property tax is incredibly unfair?

966 replies

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:06

I come from an area with low house prices. It is great! My friends can generally afford houses even with lower salaries as the earnings:house prices ratio is better. Rents are also lower so they have proportionately more disposable income.

I have moved to a more expensive area where house prices are higher and people have really had to push themselves to buy a property. Salaries are higher but not high enough to make up the difference. They have had to pay more stamp duty , pay more interest and have less disposable income each month.

I am really struggling to understand why my friends in the South should also automatically be paying more property tax under the new proposals being suggested by Burnham supporters? What is the justification? They would love to buy a large detached house for £300k like my friends from home but this isn't possible. It feels like they are being double penalised.

Just to add house prices haven't risen in real terms in the area in live in now for 20 years so the value of my friend's houses is simply money they have paid in.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Teenytinydot · 01/07/2026 10:53

I think it’s unfair. Not from a north/ south perspective.

From an owner / subsidised renter/ social housing perspective.

Whats going to happen is those renting on UC (getting their house paid) will be exempt. Same in social housing and same for private renters.

People who try to own secure housing even if they themselves are poorer on a take home basis than those on UC/ being subsidised will be penalised.

Gov gets a worker bee nation of work work work, pay for everything, own nothing.

Ineedanewsofa · 01/07/2026 10:52

0.48% would also mean a slight reduction on our current council tax bill if I take the top end Zoopla estimate, it would be a significant reduction if I take the lowest one. The devil is in the detail (should it ever actually appear) but on the face of it, it does seem like those who own small houses in expensive areas would see a disproportionate hike - but that’s mostly London and the South who have had all of the investment and advantages for the last 50 years so maybe a tax like this would work to rebalance the country

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:52

Coffeecakebakes · 01/07/2026 10:50

I think it would be fairer that the current system using house values from 1991. I would pay about £400 extra under the proposed property tax at 0.48%. I am happy to pay if public services are improved. It is costing me more that £400 pa to replace tyres damaged by potholes and private GP appointments.

The money raised would replace existing taxes. There would be no additional funding for improved services.

OP posts:
MidnightPatrol · 01/07/2026 10:51

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 01/07/2026 10:38

Well at the moment there are people living in £350k houses who are paying more CT than someone living in a £1m+ house. A new scheme based on % of worth may be fairer. Depending on the detail.

Thing is, that £1m house may well cost even less than the £350k house, if it happened to be in that part of the country.

Two-up two-downs in London sell for that. You have to spend far, far more on mortgage repayments to afford what would elsewhere be considered a very modest house.

So why pay huge amounts of additional tax for doing so too?

Coffeecakebakes · 01/07/2026 10:50

I think it would be fairer that the current system using house values from 1991. I would pay about £400 extra under the proposed property tax at 0.48%. I am happy to pay if public services are improved. It is costing me more that £400 pa to replace tyres damaged by potholes and private GP appointments.

DeedlessIndeed · 01/07/2026 10:50

Is it to replace stamp duty or council tax?

If it replaced council tax I could kind of get on board.
If it replaced stamp duty, then would it only apply to new sales, or people who already had to pay stamp duty have to pay again?

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:49

Lougle · 01/07/2026 10:47

There is a reason that houses sell for higher prices in some areas than others. If people don't want to pay higher prices, they can choose lower priced areas, but often the infrastructure isn't as good, which is why it's cheaper.

That's completely untrue as someone that comes from an area with better infrastructure than the place I've moved to. The former was much cheaper.

Lots of people are tied to their areas through support networks and employment. This is especially true when there are caring responsibilities and niche employment

OP posts:
Bellic · 01/07/2026 10:48

Veronyk · 01/07/2026 10:48

Maybe the plan is to have a property tax to replace stamp duty and council tax.

That is exactly the plan

Veronyk · 01/07/2026 10:48

Maybe the plan is to have a property tax to replace stamp duty and council tax.

Bellic · 01/07/2026 10:48

Wealth taxes where you take say 1% of someone’s wealth a year don’t work. They never have and never will. But this is a form of wealth tax that does work. It taxes the value of an asset (home) a person owns. Yes people may have a big mortgage and that’s les fair, but trying to build that into cal a makes the tax more complex and easier to game.

A revaluation of house prices would have to happen before the tax is brought in which is why this particular can has been kicked down the road for so long. But this is good. This is progress to a fairer tax system.

Lougle · 01/07/2026 10:47

There is a reason that houses sell for higher prices in some areas than others. If people don't want to pay higher prices, they can choose lower priced areas, but often the infrastructure isn't as good, which is why it's cheaper.

dtmf · 01/07/2026 10:47

I don’t think it’s unfair, to be honest.

A lot of people live beyond their means.

Veronyk · 01/07/2026 10:46

It's definitely a good idea to get rid of stamp duty which is a stupid tax that stops old people downsizing and puts people off moving for job opportunities.

A property tax seems like a sensible alternative. Using your .48 percent figure, most people where I live would be paying less than their existing council tax, so I fear it will have to be a much bigger percentage.

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:45

gotmyselfintoapickle · 01/07/2026 10:42

People don’t pay taxes according to how much of a service they use. We have this idea that council tax is linked to services but it’s not, it’s just a tax. I pay a lot of income tax, it’s not because I ‘use’ more government services, it’s because I earn more.

No, but my point is that Council tax is a local tax used to fund local services. It doesn't make sense that expensive areas automatically pay more Council tax if the cost to deliver their services isn't actually more at a local level.

OP posts:
muddyford · 01/07/2026 10:43

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 01/07/2026 10:38

Well at the moment there are people living in £350k houses who are paying more CT than someone living in a £1m+ house. A new scheme based on % of worth may be fairer. Depending on the detail.

They could just add more bands to take that into account.

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:42

SparklesWithSynergy · 01/07/2026 10:41

So the prices in London go down.

Its supply and demand - people want to live there so its expensive. My South East home would go down a bit

Also - depends on the calculation of house value, last sold? How will they do that, we are still paying council tax from a house valuation from years ago I think

Who said it was based on the value of the house when it was last sold? It's based on supposed current value.

OP posts:
gotmyselfintoapickle · 01/07/2026 10:42

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:29

Yes, but surely how it impacts you personally doesn't totally dictate your idea about what is fair?

Someone in my hometown with a family of four living in a detached home in a lovely area will be paying £1.5k a year. In my local area the equivalent would be closer to £6k. They wouldn't use more services or anything that would justify them paying more. They would have a higher mortgage, pay more interest etc already.

People don’t pay taxes according to how much of a service they use. We have this idea that council tax is linked to services but it’s not, it’s just a tax. I pay a lot of income tax, it’s not because I ‘use’ more government services, it’s because I earn more.

WaterBubblesWonkyFruit · 01/07/2026 10:41

As someone who lives in an expensive area, moving to a house like mine would cost over £200k in stamp duty alone- this is for a nice house but far from a mansion. I'd quite happily swap that for a 0.48% value tax, which works out at about £12k (which is only about £7k more than I pay in council tax).

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:41

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 01/07/2026 10:38

Well at the moment there are people living in £350k houses who are paying more CT than someone living in a £1m+ house. A new scheme based on % of worth may be fairer. Depending on the detail.

But I explained upthread that I'm from one of the areas where this is the case and it's generally a good thing that house prices are lower. They still use the same local services so why shouldn't they pay their way and they benefit massively from having smaller mortgages and better earning:house value ratios? Ultimately my friends at home have a relatively expensive and nice house in their local area so it makes sense they contribute the same as someone down south with a comparative house relative to their local community.

OP posts:
SparklesWithSynergy · 01/07/2026 10:41

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:26

London has one of the worst earnings:house prices ratios. It's literally double the North East so no, Londoners aren't being paid enough to absorb this new tax on top of cripplingly expensive house prices.

So the prices in London go down.

Its supply and demand - people want to live there so its expensive. My South East home would go down a bit

Also - depends on the calculation of house value, last sold? How will they do that, we are still paying council tax from a house valuation from years ago I think

21stCenturyNell · 01/07/2026 10:41

I was late teens when poll-tax was brought in, and I did initially object. But actually, it was the best solution imo. Discounted for disabilties and incomes as appropriate.
🤷‍♀️

gotmyselfintoapickle · 01/07/2026 10:39

Fairness is a totally nebulous concept.

What is ‘fair’ about paying CGT if you make money investing in a company but not if you make money on your PPR? What’s ‘fair’ about council tax or SDLT for example?

We tend to accept taxes we are used to and object to new taxes - it’s got little to do with fairness.

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 01/07/2026 10:38

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:33

What exactly makes it fairer though?

Well at the moment there are people living in £350k houses who are paying more CT than someone living in a £1m+ house. A new scheme based on % of worth may be fairer. Depending on the detail.

2dogsandabudgie · 01/07/2026 10:36

Well we would be £85 a month better off under the new scheme. The current council tax system isn't fair, we're band D my neighbour is band C, our houses are the same size but we are an end terrace and have a side gate which means our garden is 3 feet wider than theirs. So for that extra 3 feet we have been placed in a higher band!

I'm not sure the new scheme would work either, who will do the assessments every year, how much will that cost?

ComtesseDeSpair · 01/07/2026 10:36

Serenity75 · 01/07/2026 10:22

I think a wealth tax is entirely fair. You are taxed in your wealth, if you have more wealth you pay more tax. But I also thought that the poll tax was fairer than council tax.

That’s then complicated by equity. Somebody who owns a home worth £500K outright or with only a small amount of mortgage to pay off is wealthier than somebody with a property of the same value with a 90% mortgage and only a small amount of equity (or potentially, negative equity) - but I can’t imagine any property tax policy is going to take this into account.