Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think an annual property tax is incredibly unfair?

966 replies

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:06

I come from an area with low house prices. It is great! My friends can generally afford houses even with lower salaries as the earnings:house prices ratio is better. Rents are also lower so they have proportionately more disposable income.

I have moved to a more expensive area where house prices are higher and people have really had to push themselves to buy a property. Salaries are higher but not high enough to make up the difference. They have had to pay more stamp duty , pay more interest and have less disposable income each month.

I am really struggling to understand why my friends in the South should also automatically be paying more property tax under the new proposals being suggested by Burnham supporters? What is the justification? They would love to buy a large detached house for £300k like my friends from home but this isn't possible. It feels like they are being double penalised.

Just to add house prices haven't risen in real terms in the area in live in now for 20 years so the value of my friend's houses is simply money they have paid in.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 01/07/2026 12:26

They have this in the Netherlands. There is also tax in relation to emptying bins/sewerage etc which is similar to council tax but lower.

1dayatatime · 01/07/2026 12:26

First the current stamp duty tax is a really bad tax - it taxes transactions rather than value or capital gains. It therefore discourages people from downsizing and takes no account of any wealth or value creation.

That said an annual property wealth tax on paper sounds like a great idea. However in reality it would be a nightmare to manage and enforce. Let's say the annual tax is 0.5%. Owner A has a property worth £1m but with a £900k mortgage. Owner B has a property that they bought for £500k as a doer upper on a 50% mortgage and spent £300k on renovations over the years and it's now worth £1m and Owner C that bought a £100k house in 1980 and it's now worth £500k with no mortgage.

Under this policy :
Owner A has a "wealth" of £100k (£1m - £900k) but will pay £5k a year in wealth tax
Owner B has a wealth of £450k (£1m - £300k renovations - £250k debt) but pays £5k in wealth tax.
Owner C has a wealth of £500k but only pays £2.5 k in wealth tax.

Of course you could try to amend the policy to take account of how much mortgage debt there is or how much has been spent on home improvements etc but the administrative cost of this will start to outweigh the revenue generated from the tax.

A far simpler solution would be to simply apply capital gains tax to all properties including primary residence.

nomas · 01/07/2026 12:24

Dufflecoats · 01/07/2026 12:20

Well because in 30 years time you both will have paid off your mortgages but your wealth will be substantial higher than your northern friends.

What guarantee is there that she will have paid off her mortgate?

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 12:24

Nowisthetimeforicecream · 01/07/2026 12:16

I think a regional wealth tax would be fine. Take the average salary and index a wealth tax to that.

Salaries aren't wealth though?

OP posts:
Flamingcoming · 01/07/2026 12:24

My council tax bill is approximately 0.48% of my house’s value. I’d be really angry if I had to pay the same again in some fake ass made up property tax, made up so the government can steal even more of our ALREADY TAXED income.

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 12:23

Dufflecoats · 01/07/2026 12:20

Well because in 30 years time you both will have paid off your mortgages but your wealth will be substantial higher than your northern friends.

Are we just pretending that they will pay their mortgage off much more easily than me and have surplus money to invest or buy a larger house with? I will also have paid a hell of a lot more interest and stamp duty than them.

I have a similar job to my friend up north and she earns about 20% less than me. Her mortgage payments are less than half mine. She can use the extra money she saves on her mortgage to invest in anything she likes which could easily be more rapidly growing assets.

OP posts:
LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 01/07/2026 12:21

WaterBubblesWonkyFruit · 01/07/2026 10:41

As someone who lives in an expensive area, moving to a house like mine would cost over £200k in stamp duty alone- this is for a nice house but far from a mansion. I'd quite happily swap that for a 0.48% value tax, which works out at about £12k (which is only about £7k more than I pay in council tax).

That’s great for people looking to move, not necessarily for those who’ve just bought and paid stamp duty. But I agree in general this sounds better than stamp duty as it also makes it easier for people to move and free up houses

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 12:21

goody2shooz · 01/07/2026 12:18

@Itchthescratch id love to know where you live if the property prices haven’t changed in 20 years. As far as I can see, house prices everywhere are up. Proportionally maybe, but definitely up.

I'm talking about real terms increases i.e. taking account of inflation. So a pint of milk now might be worth double what it was 20 years ago but the farmer isn't actually earning more if inflation has also increased. It's the same idea.

OP posts:
Mt563 · 01/07/2026 12:20

CanSeeClearlyNowTheRainHasGone · 01/07/2026 11:56

It's inherently unfair because:

Person 1:
£1m in savings, owns £500k house outright

Person 2:
£490k mortgage, resides in £500k house.

In accounting terms, one has assets of £1.5m, the other £10k.

Similarly taxing interest received is wrong since it takes no account of interest paid.

I have mortgage of £30k at 3%, and savings of the same amount at 2.5%. But I pay tax on that 2.5% interest. If I pay mortgage off I pay no tax.
But now I have no immediate safety net.
So perverse tax encourages me to organise my finances in a more risky way.

It's stupid

Use your ISA allowance. Can't blame the government if you're not using the tax avoidance schemes they provide.

Dufflecoats · 01/07/2026 12:20

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 10:24

Ok well I have less wealth than my Northern friends because I have a huge mortgage and less equity than them in my house. My house is worth more though on paper. Why am I being taxed more for having a big mortgage and less wealth?

Well because in 30 years time you both will have paid off your mortgages but your wealth will be substantial higher than your northern friends.

Mcdhotchoc · 01/07/2026 12:19

Ah well I expect they'll stuff it up before doing it and will get voted out.

nomas · 01/07/2026 12:19

pikkumyy77 · 01/07/2026 11:49

Its an asset! It is an asset! Are you pretending you don’t know that its “paper” value is something you get when you sell it?

Is the mortgage debt also an asset? Do you understand equity?

goody2shooz · 01/07/2026 12:18

@Itchthescratch id love to know where you live if the property prices haven’t changed in 20 years. As far as I can see, house prices everywhere are up. Proportionally maybe, but definitely up.

Mcdhotchoc · 01/07/2026 12:18

Ah, if it's in addition, then the 2 together would represent about 20% of our pension income. Bugger that.

palran · 01/07/2026 12:17

I haven't really had time to study the (proposed) proposal enough to comment yet. However, just thinking that other countries in Europe have property taxes AND Stamp Duty aswell as council type taxes in some cases.

I reckon there might be a combination of these in UK in the end. A vastly reduced SD maybe in addition to the land tax. As pp said, the SD yields billions, and that will have to be replaced somehow.

I'm reading the thread with interest!

Nowisthetimeforicecream · 01/07/2026 12:16

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 11:55

One thing I don't understand is how this tax would work with his devolution messaging which seems to be about empowering areas to raise and spend their own money. Surely this goes absolutely against this and would be the south east hugely subsidising other areas. It would create a huge dependency and disincentivise local councils from managing their costs as they know the money is coming from elsewhere

I think a regional wealth tax would be fine. Take the average salary and index a wealth tax to that.

Mcdhotchoc · 01/07/2026 12:15

I live in the south. House is worth £550000. I'd be quids in at 0.48% of value instead of council tax? My council tax is a breathtaking £4k a year. We moved about 120 miles from one 4 bed to another exactly the same size, smaller garden. We went from a D to an F.

banmusk · 01/07/2026 12:15

Some interesting discussion about property taxes on this podcast
Moving Home with Charlie |
https://www.podbean.com/ea/dir-gi8wx-2f1405a5

EasternStandard · 01/07/2026 12:15

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 11:55

One thing I don't understand is how this tax would work with his devolution messaging which seems to be about empowering areas to raise and spend their own money. Surely this goes absolutely against this and would be the south east hugely subsidising other areas. It would create a huge dependency and disincentivise local councils from managing their costs as they know the money is coming from elsewhere

He should just stick to the devolution stuff. In theory demand on London properties goes down and other areas get growth and associated house price rises.

maltravers · 01/07/2026 12:12

Rondayvu · 01/07/2026 12:08

What happens here is that if you are a pensioner you can defer the payment basically till you die and the house is sold OR the people who inherit pay the backlog of the payment so person dies, years of local property tax taken first then anyone who benefits from inheritance pays inheritances taxes plus whomever buys it pays stamp duty and all other taxes involved with purchasing a house.

How does this give the government money to spend now?

goplacidlyamidthenoise · 01/07/2026 12:12

PinkHairbrushClub · 01/07/2026 10:22

The answer lies in the detail around how the value is calculated. Is it at the last sale, the last mortgage valuation, will there be a whole department of valeurs being paid to value properties every x number of years. And how is the value calculated, based on mortgage expectations, sale expectation, other arbitrary number.

I don’t automatically think replacing council tax is unfair, but I’d love to see the detail before deciding how I feel.

It's not suggested that the property tax replaces Council Tax.

It would be in addition to Council tax and go into central government coffers, not local council funding.

WestwardHo1 · 01/07/2026 12:11

I do wonder how it would work in places like some parts of Cornwall, where people might have bought a house on a low to average salary, stayed in the house years and now the value has rocketed.

Lifeomars · 01/07/2026 12:09

TheLandlordsAreFrowning · 01/07/2026 10:14

The existing council tax scheme is hugely unfair. I can't say whether a replacement scheme would also be unfair as everything is speculation at the moment.

I agree about the councll tax. I live alone in a Band A two up two down in a rough area. I get the 25% discount and i pay more than if I shared a Band D house. Only a couple of quid more a month but it does illustrate how unfair council tax is. I know very little about the proposed land tax (has it even been proposed?) but I do think that council tax which managed to be the strange offspring of domestic rates and the poll tax in that it combined property value with an acknowledgement of a discount for lone home dwellers needs to change .

outdooryone · 01/07/2026 12:09

Itchthescratch · 01/07/2026 12:00

What are you talking about? I am ineligible for social housing so if I want secure housing for my family then I need to buy.

If I wanted to make money I wouldn't take out a mortgage with interest to pay each month on a property that is unlikely to increase in value in real terms.

So choose to move elsewhere, rent instead of buy and save instead...

Oh wait, we would not save and rent as it does not make as much money long term and is more expensive still...so the system, although expensive, favours those who can get onto the property ladder and even more so if you choose to move up that ladder...

Yes it is a practical necessity, but it is also a good long term wealth improver compared to other options.

Rondayvu · 01/07/2026 12:08

Jaxhog · 01/07/2026 12:04

Yes, you are right. But if this is the price to pay for the abolition of Stamp Duty, then so be it.

There are 2 misconceptions evident from the discussions here:

  1. That equity in a house can be liquidated easily to pay an additional tax. While this IS possible, it is very expensive and runs the risk of you losing your home. Pensioners tend to be asset rich and cash poor, so would find it difficult to raise extra cash from income any other way if they don't want to sell their home.
  2. That council tax gets spent locally. It doesn't. It all goes to the government who dish it out according to perceived 'need'. In the SE, councils don't get to keep most (or in some cases, any) of this tax. If AB plans to change this so it stays locally along with local control of it, he has my support. But I will be very surprised if he does, because 'Northern' councils will get less; unless they increase their local rates significantly.

What happens here is that if you are a pensioner you can defer the payment basically till you die and the house is sold OR the people who inherit pay the backlog of the payment so person dies, years of local property tax taken first then anyone who benefits from inheritance pays inheritances taxes plus whomever buys it pays stamp duty and all other taxes involved with purchasing a house.