Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

DH stoping paying CMS

518 replies

donewiththistakemeaway · 29/06/2026 10:25

My husband told his ex-partner — the mother of his two oldest children — a year ago that he planned to leave his job within the next 12 months. She has never worked, and for the last 9 years he has paid her £1,500 per month voluntarily, even though the Child Maintenance Service calculates the correct amount should only be around £300.

The kids stayed with us for 10 nights a month, matching my husband’s days off. Between us, we did all school runs, clubs, meals, and bedtime routines — returning them to their mother around 8pm each evening. They couldn’t stay more nights because my husband’s shift pattern meant leaving at 5pm, driving 2 hours, working until 7am, and getting home by 9am. This would have left me alone caring for all 5 children while also working, handling all household tasks, and managing their activities. Meanwhile, their mother only had to put them to bed around 9pm, yet received far more money than required. We also take all five children to their clubs and activities every weekend.

My husband has now left that job — he was exhausted, and after 12 years of hard work, my own business has become successful enough for me to be the main earner. He reminded his ex repeatedly over the year that this change was coming and that his income would no longer support those higher payments.

He explained that he is now available full-time: he can offer full custody, 50/50 shared care, or flexible arrangements — whatever works for the children. He will be there for school runs, sickness, doctors’ appointments, school events, and anything else they need. The only change is that he can no longer make those payments.

This has caused a huge reaction. She is angry, calling him names and saying she won’t be able to afford her home. He asked her to consider getting a job, or for her new partner to contribute financially ( he does not work either) but she has threatened to involve a solicitor — claiming that if my husband stops paying, I must cover the cost because I’m so flush.

I do not believe this is my responsibility. To keep things calm, I offered to pay the £500 per month which sis still more that what the CMS says is the correct amount, but this is still not enough for her. She won’t stop us seeing the children, as she only cares for them a few hours a day and enjoys having her evenings free with her partner.

My main worry is whether there is any legal loophole that would force my husband to keep paying that higher sum just to maintain her lifestyle?

OP posts:
donewiththistakemeaway · 29/06/2026 15:35

i think this thread has got a bit out of hand I was only worried if there was a chance the ex could come after me for money.

a few posters really haven't understood well or read anything I’ve said and have just made things up.

to make it clear my DH isn’t just stopping work to sit on his ass he’s doing it so it’s my turn to sort my career out and he can be there for all his children.

I don’t think in any world it’s unreasonable for a grown healthy woman to finally get a job in her 40s to support her children that she has never contributed to in 14 and 16 years.

my DH has done his best 30 odd years working a physical job is enough. Yes he could get another job in an office or something but then I’m stuck doing all the childcare regardless. Him stopping working so he gets more time with all the children and helps me with my childcare responsibilities means I get to provide for all of us and have my sense of worth.

he never paid her £300 no idea where that came from he’s always paid her £1500. She has had 1 years notice and many reminders.

DH pays for all clubs and uniform and school trips.

the house she lives in is paid off. She will never be kicked out.

she has had £1500 a month for bills, food and luxuries.

the kids eat at our home 7/7 days, clothes washing, clubs and after school pick ups are 100 percent done in our home

the kids are in my home until 8pm every day of the year

10 nights a month the kids stay with us. On those days we also do the morning school run. it is 5 days short of 50/50. Ex gets £1500 a month for years for doing 5 nights more than in our home.

I have offered her £500

OP posts:
Woodfiresareamazing2 · 29/06/2026 15:29

donewiththistakemeaway · 29/06/2026 12:23

I just told her I would pay the £500 just to keep the peace possibly a stupid mistake but I’ve said it now

Hi OP.

Your DH has treated his ex exceptionally well.

She has responded by never working, and not really parenting their kids.

I would retract the offer of £500pm - you pay the vast majority of the kids' expenses anyway!
Your solicitor can find the best legal wording.

The solicitor can also write confirming that no further CMS payments will be made as her exP no longer earns any money.

He can also set out the new custody agreement going forward ie they will spend the majority of their time with you and their dad, at their request.
I really don't think she'll be that bothered, as having them with her is no longer going to come with a nice amount of cash every month.

You have done brilliantly building a successful company, and your DH can now enjoy more time with his children.

Good luck going forward!

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 15:22

Preeeeee · 29/06/2026 15:17

She isn’t entitled to benefits. Having autism does not entitle you to benefits, having extra care needs does - which she doesn’t have!

Having autism does notentitle you to benefits

You're wrong on this, too.

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 15:20

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 15:08

I think there’s a difference between believing everything that’s being posted and dismissing everything an OP says as a lie because you want to push your own agenda.

I never dismissed everything OP said. And I'm not pushing any agenda either.

I merely said that painting people in black and white is a symptom of a lie. Is that really so groundbreaking for you?

Wheresthebeach · 29/06/2026 15:19

No no no...stay right out of this. Do not pay a penny or you'll be dragged into this.Not your job to support his ex wife. Madness.

Preeeeee · 29/06/2026 15:17

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 15:16

So you deprived a disabled child of benefits that will affect her future entitlement?

wow.

She isn’t entitled to benefits. Having autism does not entitle you to benefits, having extra care needs does - which she doesn’t have!

fivepastmidnight · 29/06/2026 15:16

Beamsss · 29/06/2026 11:19

You're not responsible, but it's a shitty thing for a father to do. Just stop working with no plan to support his DC? Not a man I'd want to be married to.

I can only assume you rather being deliberately provocative Or can't read properly.

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 15:16

Preeeeee · 29/06/2026 14:56

Yes of course we did. But it’s how we discovered she’d been getting away not working for so many years. Step daughter also had no idea DLA was being claimed on her behalf.

So you deprived a disabled child of benefits that will affect her future entitlement?

wow.

CharlieEffie · 29/06/2026 15:16

Mangelwurzelfortea · 29/06/2026 15:10

I think it's pretty shit to decide to stop working so you don't have to pay any more maintenance for three of your kids.

Yes yes I know you've offered 50/50 blah blah but it still sounds very much like the old chestnut where the dad doesn't want to pay child support to the mother he perceives as feckless. I know quite a few women who've experienced this from their exes (usually with a new partner egging them on) who aren't feckless at all.

Its 2 kids. If that was the case why would he pay 1200 more than he "had" to for 9 years. Theyve offered 200 more than again they "have" too and by the sounds of it they already have them more than 50% of the time as it is. The mum (and her partner sound lazy asf

Preeeeee · 29/06/2026 15:15

Mangelwurzelfortea · 29/06/2026 15:10

I think it's pretty shit to decide to stop working so you don't have to pay any more maintenance for three of your kids.

Yes yes I know you've offered 50/50 blah blah but it still sounds very much like the old chestnut where the dad doesn't want to pay child support to the mother he perceives as feckless. I know quite a few women who've experienced this from their exes (usually with a new partner egging them on) who aren't feckless at all.

I think it’s equally as shit to never support your own children financially and instead rely on your ex and the state.

JFDIYOLO · 29/06/2026 15:14

See a solicitor.

Don't attempt to handle this yourselves.

offtocalifornia · 29/06/2026 15:13

I see it time and time again On Here that current partners of non-resident fathers say they pay 'lots extra'. Implying that they are the good guy, and the mother should be working fulltime, putting the 'lots extra' into savings for the future.

A former partner did this. It did no favours - of course it got folded into everyday spending. The mum worked part-time, which meant lower pension contributions, less seniority & lower salary when she was ready to go back fulltime. He liked to shake his head and judge her for not putting the 'extra' aside.

I can't see why they don't make the CMS payment plus a bit more to make sure it's not the bare minimum, and put the 'lots extra' into an ISA themselves for the child.

CharlieEffie · 29/06/2026 15:12

HermioneWeasley · 29/06/2026 10:38

The kids haven’t stopped costing money just because he’s decided to give up his job - that’s not a luxury you have when you have kids. It’s not your responsibility it’s his (or 50% he shares with their mother). Depending on what happened before they split up, if they jointly agreed that she would give up work and reduce her earning potential to be the main parent then she simply isn’t as able to cover 50% of the costs due to joint decisions.

£300 a month for 2 kids when he’s only had them 10 nights a month is laughable - he’s not a prince for paying £1500 which is the bare minimum for 2 kids to have bedrooms, water, food etc.

You clearly havent read the whole post...

Mangelwurzelfortea · 29/06/2026 15:10

I think it's pretty shit to decide to stop working so you don't have to pay any more maintenance for three of your kids.

Yes yes I know you've offered 50/50 blah blah but it still sounds very much like the old chestnut where the dad doesn't want to pay child support to the mother he perceives as feckless. I know quite a few women who've experienced this from their exes (usually with a new partner egging them on) who aren't feckless at all.

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 15:08

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 15:03

I'm actually astonished at the number of people that seem to believe everything that's being posted online 😂 You can sell anything to them! :)))

I think there’s a difference between believing everything that’s being posted and dismissing everything an OP says as a lie because you want to push your own agenda.

Butchyrestingface · 29/06/2026 15:05

He asked her to consider getting a job, or for her new partner to contribute financially ( he does not work either) but she has threatened to involve a solicitor ... claiming that if my husband stops paying, I must cover the cost because I’m so flush.I do not believe this is my responsibility.

If it's not YOUR responsibility, how did your husband arrive at the conclusion that HER (non-working) partner should contribute financially?

Out of 4 parents (two biological parents, and two step-parents) you appear now to be the only consistent worker bee adult in these kids lives. I wouldn't be paying £500 a month because your husband and his wife have decided not to work.

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 15:03

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 14:45

Nope. It’s more telling about posters who come onto the forum determined to disbelieve everything an OP says and put their own spin on things - mainly because the truth doesn’t support the narrative that all men are shitbags.

I'm actually astonished at the number of people that seem to believe everything that's being posted online 😂 You can sell anything to them! :)))

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 15:01

JHound · 29/06/2026 14:59

Why is it not fair that the mom “lives in reduced circumstances”? Of course they are reduced. She is no longer with her wealthy ex-husband. He has an obligation to his children. He should have none to his ex. If she wants elevated circumstances she can build a career to fund that.

Exactly this. And from what OP says, her DH’s kids don’t sound as though they are living in anything like reduced circumstances given the amount of maintenance he was paying for all those years.

JHound · 29/06/2026 14:59

Housebashing · 29/06/2026 14:17

The point is what lifestyle did these children have before their parents split?
At least one Mum at the school gets £700 to raise three children on which might sound an alright amount of money
But the Dad earns £350,000 a year and lives in a £4 million house and only sees his children every other weekend
So of course they live their best life for four days a month which is to the standard that they all lived pre-divorce
It’s not fair is it that Mum’s living in much reduced living conditions and buying food with Tesco’s Club card points whilst Dad gets the opportunity to feather his nest?
People are just far too quick to take things at face value and consider people lucky to get 15% of the declared income, which is never the true picture

Why is it not fair that the mom “lives in reduced circumstances”? Of course they are reduced. She is no longer with her wealthy ex-husband. He has an obligation to his children. He should have none to his ex. If she wants elevated circumstances she can build a career to fund that.

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 14:59

CardboardBoxesLily · 29/06/2026 14:53

What do you mean she has them 8pm-9pm Mon-Sun? Do you mean everyday?
Where do they go at 9pm? She has them for 1 hour a night? Surely they’d rather just sleep in yours where they’ve been settled all evening?
You/DH do all school runs or she does? If you, you go and collect them from her house and drive them to school in the morning, what’s the purpose of this if they’re with her?
The schedule is very confusing, could you lay it out more clearly?

OP has explained all of this in the OP and updates. She says OP and her DH have the kids every night from school as well as ten overnights a month. They collect them from school, give them dinner and drop them off at their mums at around 8-9pm every night so mum has them from then. They also do all school runs and all weekend clubs and activities. So according to OP mum’s total input is giving them breakfast on the days they don’t stay overnight with her and DH.

Preeeeee · 29/06/2026 14:58

Preeeeee · 29/06/2026 14:56

Yes of course we did. But it’s how we discovered she’d been getting away not working for so many years. Step daughter also had no idea DLA was being claimed on her behalf.

We also only found out once stepdaughter moved in and child benefit was transferred to my partner and we discovered these DLA payments were attached to it.

JHound · 29/06/2026 14:57

Brunchatstephanies · 29/06/2026 11:39

The CMS mandated amount is an absolute joke. £300 is absolutely nothing. It is a patriarchal scandal that this shit happens.

What should it be in your view given the child’s mother is choosing not to work and therefore is contributing £0.

Preeeeee · 29/06/2026 14:56

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 14:55

So did you stop the claim ?

Yes of course we did. But it’s how we discovered she’d been getting away not working for so many years. Step daughter also had no idea DLA was being claimed on her behalf.

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 14:55

Preeeeee · 29/06/2026 14:12

No, we don’t, I was just explaining how someone might get away with not working when their children are teens.

My stepchild has HFA but doesn’t need any input from us (she’s very capable, cooks, cleans, gets herself to school). It’s only when she moved in full time we found out about the mid rate DLA which had clearly been claimed through lies and exaggeration of her care needs.

So did you stop the claim ?

CardboardBoxesLily · 29/06/2026 14:53

What do you mean she has them 8pm-9pm Mon-Sun? Do you mean everyday?
Where do they go at 9pm? She has them for 1 hour a night? Surely they’d rather just sleep in yours where they’ve been settled all evening?
You/DH do all school runs or she does? If you, you go and collect them from her house and drive them to school in the morning, what’s the purpose of this if they’re with her?
The schedule is very confusing, could you lay it out more clearly?

Swipe left for the next trending thread