Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

DH stoping paying CMS

518 replies

donewiththistakemeaway · 29/06/2026 10:25

My husband told his ex-partner — the mother of his two oldest children — a year ago that he planned to leave his job within the next 12 months. She has never worked, and for the last 9 years he has paid her £1,500 per month voluntarily, even though the Child Maintenance Service calculates the correct amount should only be around £300.

The kids stayed with us for 10 nights a month, matching my husband’s days off. Between us, we did all school runs, clubs, meals, and bedtime routines — returning them to their mother around 8pm each evening. They couldn’t stay more nights because my husband’s shift pattern meant leaving at 5pm, driving 2 hours, working until 7am, and getting home by 9am. This would have left me alone caring for all 5 children while also working, handling all household tasks, and managing their activities. Meanwhile, their mother only had to put them to bed around 9pm, yet received far more money than required. We also take all five children to their clubs and activities every weekend.

My husband has now left that job — he was exhausted, and after 12 years of hard work, my own business has become successful enough for me to be the main earner. He reminded his ex repeatedly over the year that this change was coming and that his income would no longer support those higher payments.

He explained that he is now available full-time: he can offer full custody, 50/50 shared care, or flexible arrangements — whatever works for the children. He will be there for school runs, sickness, doctors’ appointments, school events, and anything else they need. The only change is that he can no longer make those payments.

This has caused a huge reaction. She is angry, calling him names and saying she won’t be able to afford her home. He asked her to consider getting a job, or for her new partner to contribute financially ( he does not work either) but she has threatened to involve a solicitor — claiming that if my husband stops paying, I must cover the cost because I’m so flush.

I do not believe this is my responsibility. To keep things calm, I offered to pay the £500 per month which sis still more that what the CMS says is the correct amount, but this is still not enough for her. She won’t stop us seeing the children, as she only cares for them a few hours a day and enjoys having her evenings free with her partner.

My main worry is whether there is any legal loophole that would force my husband to keep paying that higher sum just to maintain her lifestyle?

OP posts:
Speakeasier · 29/06/2026 13:33

whatonearthishappenin · 29/06/2026 13:17

But the husband in your scenario (i.e. the OP in this case) does not want to support the older two children who are not biologically hers. That is perfectly reasonable and appropriate.

But OP's DH cannot just forget about his own financial responsibilities to the older children when he (apparently) knows they do not have a mother they can rely on.

He isn’t. He’s prepared to have them living with him which is what they’re practically doing anyway. Or the OP is offering more than the CMS requires while her household pays most of the big expenses anyway.

THE EX SHOULD GET A JOB.

WhistPie · 29/06/2026 13:33

whatonearthishappenin · 29/06/2026 13:32

That would be perfectly fair if there were no "step-children" who the DH knows rely on him (and solely him by the sounds of it).

Poor kids... mother doesn't work and is not interested in supporting them and now the father is quitting his financial responsibilities to them as well.

He's offering to house them full time.

Or haven't you bothered to read the thread?

FrankSinatraonToast · 29/06/2026 13:32

Stompythedinosaur · 29/06/2026 11:01

It's not up to you to pay.

But I do think that a parent who optionally stops working without a care for the fact he is meant to be financially supporting his dc is a shitty dad.

And "tired from working for 12 years" is ridiculous. Most adults over the age of 30 have worked for 12 years, it's nothing to make a song and dance about.

But the mother has never worked so does that make her a shitty mum?

whatonearthishappenin · 29/06/2026 13:32

WhistPie · 29/06/2026 13:27

The sexism on this thread is pretty standard for Mumsnet, where a man, after working 30 years in a physically demanding job, isn't 'allowed' to stop work to enable his wife to push on with her career by providing childcare for the family.

I would have thought that the OP being enabled to build up her pension would have been cheered on from here!

That would be perfectly fair if there were no "step-children" who the DH knows rely on him (and solely him by the sounds of it).

Poor kids... mother doesn't work and is not interested in supporting them and now the father is quitting his financial responsibilities to them as well.

FloofyKat · 29/06/2026 13:31

You don’t have to pay. So don’t. So why are you? It quite literally is not your responsibility.

MrsKeats · 29/06/2026 13:31

WhistPie · 29/06/2026 13:27

The sexism on this thread is pretty standard for Mumsnet, where a man, after working 30 years in a physically demanding job, isn't 'allowed' to stop work to enable his wife to push on with her career by providing childcare for the family.

I would have thought that the OP being enabled to build up her pension would have been cheered on from here!

Exactly this.
The ex has had an easy ride.

WhistPie · 29/06/2026 13:31

Gettingbysomehow · 29/06/2026 13:25

When you have children you dont get to just give up your job it is your H's job to support his own children.

He does

Speakeasier · 29/06/2026 13:29

Mumof2wifeof1crazytimes · 29/06/2026 13:27

Paying more than the CMS recommend was his decision and whether he was right or wrong to do this, the fact remains he should still be working to pay for the kids he has had from a previous relationship. He doesn’t get to pre-pay child maintenance and then stop. I do agree the mum could get a job as both parents should support their kids financially.

She should be working and paying him child support. She has had a very easy ride and is miffed it’s coming to an end. Oh dear, never mind.

WhistPie · 29/06/2026 13:29

Mumof2wifeof1crazytimes · 29/06/2026 13:27

Paying more than the CMS recommend was his decision and whether he was right or wrong to do this, the fact remains he should still be working to pay for the kids he has had from a previous relationship. He doesn’t get to pre-pay child maintenance and then stop. I do agree the mum could get a job as both parents should support their kids financially.

He seems to be paying all their expenses as it is, and is offering to have them 100%

I assume that if that happens, their mother would be expected to pay him maintenance?

WhistPie · 29/06/2026 13:27

The sexism on this thread is pretty standard for Mumsnet, where a man, after working 30 years in a physically demanding job, isn't 'allowed' to stop work to enable his wife to push on with her career by providing childcare for the family.

I would have thought that the OP being enabled to build up her pension would have been cheered on from here!

Mumof2wifeof1crazytimes · 29/06/2026 13:27

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 12:58

He should be paying what the CMS have told him to pay and no more. By paying five times that he’s enabled their mother to have a nice life without working. Now she’ll have to get off her backside and work to support her kids, just as he has. And he is supporting his children - he’s offered 50/50 or full custody - mum doesn’t want that. She wants the money. Says it all really.

Paying more than the CMS recommend was his decision and whether he was right or wrong to do this, the fact remains he should still be working to pay for the kids he has had from a previous relationship. He doesn’t get to pre-pay child maintenance and then stop. I do agree the mum could get a job as both parents should support their kids financially.

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 13:26

TealDoors · 29/06/2026 13:22

Is housework work?

What is your point? 😂

It is volunteering work, yes.

It's not my point, it's the gov that pays NI credits for caring after your own children 🤷‍♀️

Speakeasier · 29/06/2026 13:26

D0RA · 29/06/2026 13:16

It’s based on his taxable income not just earned income. And not on household household income.

It’s based on the number of nights with each parent not the time they are collected or returned.

The fact that you take the children to their clubs and activities while they are with you is not a flex, it’s called being a parent .

You can’t expect the resident parent to change their whole pattern of life just because the non resident parent has quit his job. it has to be what’s best for the children, which 99% of the time is stability.

Your story that your husband has quit his job because he’s “ tired “ of working after 12 years is totally pathetic and doesn’t convince a single person reading this. It’s perfectly obvious to everyone here ( and it will be to everyone he knows) that he is doing this to avoid paying for his two children .

I know you think you are very clever and that he’s the first NRP in the Uk to have thought of this clever scam but it’s common as muck. yes it’s legal but it’s immoral.

I hope you are proud of being with a deadbeat dad. Remember he will do the same to you when you moves on to the next woman.

Once his children are old enough to understand what he has done, they will despise him for it.

As he is claiming no earned income, his ex will probably put in an appeal to CMS based on other types of income. I hope she does that and wins.

You’re obviously bitter but talking a load of rubbish. If you’d read the thread the OP is offering more money than CMS requires anyway with the £500 a month. The ex has a free house, a partner and £500 a month. She also palms off most of the big expenses: clothes, clubs, uniforms, evening meals etc onto the OPs household.

And if taking kids to clubs etc is just being parent why does the mother never do it?

He is not a deadbeat dad if he takes his kids to all their activities, provides most entertainment, food and clothes. She is a deadbeat mum if she can’t even be bothered to go to parents evenings or sports days when she doesn’t even work. No wonder he left her. And if anything they will despise the parent who didn’t do a thing with them not the one who paid for everything and supported them in all their activities.

Gettingbysomehow · 29/06/2026 13:25

When you have children you dont get to just give up your job it is your H's job to support his own children.

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 13:24

The OP is not answering the questions about title deeds. They're clearly preparing to through ex out of the house and starting to brainwash the children to get them on board against their mother. OP
is test running the narrative for proceedings to polish it.

Gettingbysomehow · 29/06/2026 13:24

DO NOT pay a penny out of your salary. These are not your children and you do not have to pay CMS for them legally. Your salary is not counted.
They are your husbands children and it is his job to pay for them.
Those two ex wife and partner sound like proper spongers. Get a fucking job.
Keep your money for your own children.

tuesday2am · 29/06/2026 13:22

Am I reading this right, that the mum only has her kids for 1 hour a day, so max 7 hours a week and that’s not even taking into account the 10 nights they spend at yours, OP?

And your husband, up until now, has been paying her £1500 a month… for what?!? By the sounds of things, you and your husband pay for almost everything for the kids anyway.

If that’s accurate, she’s been making a mug out of you guys. How utterly selfish and lazy of her. If the house is paid off then surely her benefits (or, you know, the lazy cow can get a job!) should pay for whatever bills she does have?

Absolutely shocking. Her equally lazy partner will be loving having his cake and eating it too.

Tell her to get stuffed, don’t pay her another penny. She has no leg to stand on.

And to the folk disagreeing with Dad giving up his job - it is perfectly fine for the other adult in the household to be bringing in the money while the other stays home to look after the kids and that absolutely does not have to mean Mum stays home! As long as they can make that work financially, then more power to them.

Good luck to you both, OP.

TealDoors · 29/06/2026 13:22

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 13:21

Ever heard about volunteering work?

Is housework work?

What is your point? 😂

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 13:21

TealDoors · 29/06/2026 13:20

I don’t get your point. I was replying to a poster who said that looking after children is work. It’s categorically not, or we’d all be paid a salary for it.

Ever heard about volunteering work?

ThreadGuardDog · 29/06/2026 13:21

Wishitsnows · 29/06/2026 13:17

Nice and easy for him them. Let a woman raise his children for 16 years and now that they will be reasonably independent and self sufficient he wants to be a stay at home dad.

Don’t be daft. Where has their mum raised them beyond getting their breakfast 20 days a month ?

TealDoors · 29/06/2026 13:20

Speakeasier · 29/06/2026 13:18

That’s not an excuse. It’s confirmation. Obviously she’s unemployed if she’s never applied for a job. The OP’s husband is contributing to the household by childcare. The ex is doing nothing except providing breakfasts 20 days a month. As they’re teens I bet they’re physically getting their own breakfasts anyway.

I don’t get your point. I was replying to a poster who said that looking after children is work. It’s categorically not, or we’d all be paid a salary for it.

44PumpLane · 29/06/2026 13:19

Man leaves the mother of his children high and dry and he's a shit Dad and shit Man.

Man leaves the mother of his children with financial security by way of a mortgage free house and there's something very suspicious about the whole thing!!!

Poor bloke can't win.

Sounds very much like you have been over subsidising the ex partner, it's reasonable to stop that now.

It doesn't matter that you said you'd give her £500 a month, it's not legally binding, you've now thought it through and obviously your 5 children household needs those funds more.

Their household, of 2 adults who could either work or claim benefits, need to figure their own shit out. She may have to get a job or sell the house.

She's had ample time to do volunteer work in order to prep her CV for this, charity shops are soften crying out for volunteers as a starting point.

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 29/06/2026 13:19

Beamsss · 29/06/2026 11:19

You're not responsible, but it's a shitty thing for a father to do. Just stop working with no plan to support his DC? Not a man I'd want to be married to.

Are you serious.
The father has worked hard for a long time.
The OP and the father sound like they do all care anyway and are barely with the mother.
The father has seriously overpaid maintenance to a massive degree.
The mother has never worked and has sat on her arse coining it in on cm and benefits.
You haven’t read anything beyond the first post have you.

Ubertomusic · 29/06/2026 13:19

TealDoors · 29/06/2026 13:13

No it isn’t.

The government disagrees with you and gives NI credits to protect your pension. Clearly they view looking after children as an equivalent of employment.

TealDoors · 29/06/2026 13:19

D0RA · 29/06/2026 13:16

It’s based on his taxable income not just earned income. And not on household household income.

It’s based on the number of nights with each parent not the time they are collected or returned.

The fact that you take the children to their clubs and activities while they are with you is not a flex, it’s called being a parent .

You can’t expect the resident parent to change their whole pattern of life just because the non resident parent has quit his job. it has to be what’s best for the children, which 99% of the time is stability.

Your story that your husband has quit his job because he’s “ tired “ of working after 12 years is totally pathetic and doesn’t convince a single person reading this. It’s perfectly obvious to everyone here ( and it will be to everyone he knows) that he is doing this to avoid paying for his two children .

I know you think you are very clever and that he’s the first NRP in the Uk to have thought of this clever scam but it’s common as muck. yes it’s legal but it’s immoral.

I hope you are proud of being with a deadbeat dad. Remember he will do the same to you when you moves on to the next woman.

Once his children are old enough to understand what he has done, they will despise him for it.

As he is claiming no earned income, his ex will probably put in an appeal to CMS based on other types of income. I hope she does that and wins.

“The whole pattern of her life” what, having her and her new partner financially provided for by her ex boyfriend; to the extent of a full time wage and a free house for nothing?

This was always going to end in four years time when the youngest ages out anyway. She should be grateful for what she got.

Swipe left for the next trending thread