Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Rude old man shouted at 4 year old DS

456 replies

ThisOldThang · 27/06/2026 17:18

I was walking on a quiet residential road with both my sons (7 and 4). I was pushing the empty buggy. My eldest son was walking next to me and my youngest son was had fallen behind by around 10m.

I heard a man shout 'GET OUT OF MY WAY'. I turned around and an old man (65-70 years old) had passed my youngest son and was walking towards us.

When he passed he said 'You need to control your children.'

I replied 'He's 4.'

The rude old codger then started going on about how my son had been in his way, so I told him that he should have said excuse me, rather than shouting at a 4 year old.

Anyway, there was a bit more back and forth and I called him a rude old man and we went on our way. When I looked back, he was on the phone. Who to, I have no idea.

AIBU?
No and he's lucky that I'm not the sort of person that kicks off in front of my kids.

Yes. He's old and allowed to shout at young children in the street.

OP posts:
ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 13:43

As Lord Justice Collins said in the 1900 Court of Appeal case (Hickman v Maisey). :
"The right of the public to pass and repass on a highway is not restricted to a mere right to walk along it... A man may stand still for a reasonable time... and a child may play on the highway, and yet not be a trespasser."
The law views a street as a shared community space.

Owly11 · 28/06/2026 13:42

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 13:14

It's a community space. So long as people can pass, you can do whatever you like.

I think you will find that is not the case and if you had bothered to do even a cursory google search you would have been able to find that out for yourself. There are literally dozens of regulations specifying what people and children can and can't do on a pavement. And playing without regard to other users and causing a nuisance or obstruction or danger is not permitted.

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 13:36

The UK courts have explicitly backed this up. In a landmark case (Harrison v Duke of Rutland), the legal ruling established that the public right of way isn't strictly limited to walking in a straight line from point A to point B. It includes any "reasonable and usual mode" of using a highway. For a child, playing, scooting, or drawing with chalk is considered a completely natural and reasonable way to use that space.

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 13:32

sittingonabeach · 28/06/2026 13:30

@ImImmortalNowBabyDoll it’s really not a community space. It’s a means of getting from A to B safely.

You can believe whatever you want, but it doesn't make it true. Pavements are a space everyone gets to use, as they wish, as long as it's not obstructed. You can even apply to get your street closed down to through traffic at set times to protect children's play.

sittingonabeach · 28/06/2026 13:30

@ImImmortalNowBabyDoll it’s really not a community space. It’s a means of getting from A to B safely.

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 13:14

Owly11 · 28/06/2026 12:39

Where on earth did you get the idea from that a pavement can be used as you wish?

It's a community space. So long as people can pass, you can do whatever you like.

KrazyKatty · 28/06/2026 13:01

YABU. A 4yr old needs proper supervision, not allowed to lag behind unseen.

I remember my mum telling me about when she saw a little kid suddenly run into the road and was killed by a car, when the mum was dealing with her other child.

My poor mum was fairly traumatised by it and this has made me very vigilant with mine, especially if I was supervising a play date in the park.

Owly11 · 28/06/2026 12:39

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 10:52

Why should they not be playing on pavements? Why don't children have the same rights as anyone else to use the pavement as they wish?

Where on earth did you get the idea from that a pavement can be used as you wish?

TheIdlerReturns · 28/06/2026 12:28

ByCyanMoose · 28/06/2026 03:46

It would be a lot more charitable to assume the man is quite old, since then his behavior could be partially attributed to cognitive decline, rather than just being an unpleasant twat.

Yes, there is a point to be made about age and possible cognitive decline, but I find more and more when I'm wandering about outside, some random man or woman (of any age) will appear and start screaming their head off at nothing and to no-one. I this point I always do a risk assessment: are they armed, have they seen me, are they seeing anything, where is the nearest exit?

Letskeepcalm · 28/06/2026 12:24

Onmytod24 · 28/06/2026 10:05

I think the person behind you is you in about 10 years time you’ve had a glimpse of your future.

👌

TheIdlerReturns · 28/06/2026 12:22

Eachstepatatime · 28/06/2026 00:05

As I mentioned my DH in his 60s regularly takes part in 10k charity marathons. Having said that my niece when age 6 called my neighbour that old lady. She was in her 40s. 😆Perhaps it's just a case of comparatively speaking if much younger. It's a privilege to get old but late 80s 90s fits the description. Nowadays when you get icons like Madonna & Rod bouncing about the stage in their 60s & Rod at 81 we need to reflect on how we describe older people.

OP may have reacted differently if he'd come across Madonna...

TheIdlerReturns · 28/06/2026 12:20

Greenandyellowday · 27/06/2026 22:16

Yes, but he's six foot one! Swoon! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

And why is being six foot one of any relevance? Presumably because OP can bash old codger (who might be training for a Marathon) into a pulp. What weirdness.

TheIdlerReturns · 28/06/2026 12:14

ThisOldThang · 27/06/2026 19:57

I was just thinking that if I met somebody at a party and they corrected me using 'oldest' or 'youngest' I'd immediately turn my back and walk away.

Yeah, who wants that in their life?

EmeraldShamrock000 · 28/06/2026 11:50

Forgetting about the man for a moment. I know it has been said many times but you should never let a small child out of your sight, never let them walk behind you unless you are in a large field, never on a pavement.

C152 · 28/06/2026 11:34

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 10:52

Why should they not be playing on pavements? Why don't children have the same rights as anyone else to use the pavement as they wish?

No one has the right to use the pavement as they wish. Footpaths are to allow pedestrians to safely get from A-B.

Itscominghometoscotland · 28/06/2026 11:04

PistachioTiramisu · 28/06/2026 09:55

If she had three children, they would be referred to as 'eldest' or 'youngest'. As she only has two children, the correct terms are 'older' and 'younger'. Comparative and superlative - grammar.

The op is a bloke not a woman.

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 11:01

sittingonabeach · 28/06/2026 10:58

@ImImmortalNowBabyDoll a park is where they should be playing not a pavement

Don't be ridiculous. You don't own the pavement any more than children do so you have zero right to try to decide what they do on it.

sittingonabeach · 28/06/2026 11:01

Pavements are for pedestrians, like roads are for cars or other modes of transport

sittingonabeach · 28/06/2026 10:58

@ImImmortalNowBabyDoll a park is where they should be playing not a pavement

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 10:57

sittingonabeach · 28/06/2026 10:54

@ImImmortalNowBabyDoll pavements aren’t playgrounds, should they be able to play in the road too?

No, because the road is for cars. The pavement is for people. People can use the pavement however they wish as long as it's not obstructed and people can get past- which the man could easily have done by saying "excuse me." For children who don't have gardens , the pavement is exactly where they should be playing.

sittingonabeach · 28/06/2026 10:54

@ImImmortalNowBabyDoll pavements aren’t playgrounds, should they be able to play in the road too?

ImImmortalNowBabyDoll · 28/06/2026 10:52

C152 · 28/06/2026 10:00

That's unnecessarily rude. Children shouldn't be playing on pavements. A 4 year old should absolutely be in sight of their parent.

Why should they not be playing on pavements? Why don't children have the same rights as anyone else to use the pavement as they wish?

BiteSizedLife · 28/06/2026 10:40

It is really annoying when parents let their kids stray - the young ones have no spacial awareness, common sense etc of course - because they're young. Everyone has to side step this way, that way, back again, hold back, do a dance to get round the erratically moving buggers.

I had reins when i was a kid!

And I dont let my dog stray away too far - she would get in the way of other people. Same thing. Yes i am making the dogs and children comparison and I make no apology for it. It is appropriate for this context.

ETA - he should not have shouted rudely at a four year old but you shouldnt have let him stray so far either. I disagree with both voting options

ToKittyornottoKitty · 28/06/2026 10:06

PistachioTiramisu · 28/06/2026 09:55

If she had three children, they would be referred to as 'eldest' or 'youngest'. As she only has two children, the correct terms are 'older' and 'younger'. Comparative and superlative - grammar.

*He - reading the OPs posts

worldshottestmom · 28/06/2026 10:06

PistachioTiramisu · 28/06/2026 09:58

What a shame - you might even learn something if you were not aware of this grammatical comparison.

I mean I typically go to parties to have fun, not to be educated on pedantic grammatical rules. Plus, I've already learned now. It's a win win. Did you