Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to challenge the school’s wording about pupils rolling skirts up?

965 replies

GreenSalon · 19/06/2026 17:50

Weekly newsletter today from DC’s secondary school contained a paragraph on uniform including the fact that there have been complaints from the public about “pupils who choose to wear skirts” rolling them up to wear them extremely short. It finishes with asking parents to speak to their children about why this is “not a good idea”.

Now, apart from the fact I assume that they must mean girls, is this not clearly implying that short skirts = making themselves vulnerable and if is, then if anything bad happens as a result it is their own fault? I thought we had moved beyond this kind of nonsense.

I only have boys at the school not girls but want to write to the head to point out how utterly sexist this is. DH agrees with me pov but thinks I shouldn’t write. AIBU?

OP posts:
ChalkOutlines · 20/06/2026 21:03

TrishM80 · 20/06/2026 20:58

While that fashion trend is ridiculous (I believe it stems from hip hop culture where boys were emulating the loose orange jumpsuit uniform that's worn in US prisons), at least their flesh is covered!

I don't understand "feminists" who insist that girls and women should be allowed wear anything they want, no matter if their arses are hanging out in a school or work environment.

Clothing is power. Look at any movies set in ancient Rome, the masters are robed but the slaves are practically naked. Look at hip hop videos, the rappers are fully clothed but surrounded by practically naked women tweaking their arse. Look at those Robert Palmer and Robin Thicke music videos, they're fully suited & booted but surrounded by practically naked women.

That's what feminists don't seem to get: Clothing is power, lack of clothing is subservience.

Well they should …. Mostly. By that I mean dressing appropriately for the occasion.

TrishM80 · 20/06/2026 20:58

thefourthbeatle · 20/06/2026 20:31

boys have been doing so for years with the ludicrous 'sag' fashion 👎🏾

Edited

While that fashion trend is ridiculous (I believe it stems from hip hop culture where boys were emulating the loose orange jumpsuit uniform that's worn in US prisons), at least their flesh is covered!

I don't understand "feminists" who insist that girls and women should be allowed wear anything they want, no matter if their arses are hanging out in a school or work environment.

Clothing is power. Look at any movies set in ancient Rome, the masters are robed but the slaves are practically naked. Look at hip hop videos, the rappers are fully clothed but surrounded by practically naked women tweaking their arse. Look at those Robert Palmer and Robin Thicke music videos, they're fully suited & booted but surrounded by practically naked women.

That's what feminists don't seem to get: Clothing is power, lack of clothing is subservience.

Needmorelego · 20/06/2026 20:49

BlueFahrenheit · 20/06/2026 20:05

I echo this.

Schools are pandering to fashion requirements. Girls' uniforms are already sexualised.

Bring back traditional uniforms.

What do you mean by "traditional uniforms"?
That is part of the problem - schools HAVE gone back to the "traditional" blazer, tie, tartan/plaid skirt, white socks combo - which is basically the stereotype "naughty schoolgirl" uniform (🤮🤢).
Do you mean go back to the 90s style of loose polo shirts and casual trousers?

spicysalad · 20/06/2026 20:43

I disagree with school uniform ridiculous rules in general. But I don’t want to see anyone’s arse cheeks when going about my business.

Nel13f · 20/06/2026 20:41

herewegoagainonwednesday · 20/06/2026 20:39

In summer? Not here… in winter, yes, but for the last months it’s been socks, no tights. hence the problem.
And yes, their bum is on display, so is their thong. Which means their bare bum cheeks are on chairs, benches etc. Yuck

I wouldn’t want anybody’s sweaty arse cheeks on display or on seats - boys, girls, men or women. It’s really unpleasant.

herewegoagainonwednesday · 20/06/2026 20:39

Gloriia · 20/06/2026 20:09

'Sweaty arse prints'. The bile and vitriol aimed at young girls is absolutely appalling.

They all wear tights, usually thick black tights. These thongs and sweaty arse cheeks are maybe a figment of a rather fevered imagination?

In summer? Not here… in winter, yes, but for the last months it’s been socks, no tights. hence the problem.
And yes, their bum is on display, so is their thong. Which means their bare bum cheeks are on chairs, benches etc. Yuck

BlueFahrenheit · 20/06/2026 20:36

CoffeeCantata · 20/06/2026 20:31

Gloriia · Today 18:58
Teachers should stfu about shirts and trousers. Teach our kids, keep your unwanted and misogynistic opinions to yourself.

And maybe parents need to do the same, and parent a bit more??

I think teachers might have a more informed perspective on this than you.
And apart from the exposed flesh controversy, it's good for teenagers to understand what's appropriate in different contexts. They'll be at work one day.

What's fine for a party or club isn't necessarily OK in school - or any context where people have no choice about being there. I think covering you private parts is a basic consideration for other people. Perving, as you put it, doesn't come into it. It's not about 'perving', it's about dressing appropriately for the context.

Lazy parenting.

Astoundingly, many parents do not want to 'parent' their kids. Many wouldn't even know where to begin.

chirrupybird · 20/06/2026 20:35

I think it was quite clever to let the parents decide in what way it is a bad idea, some may think it's sluttish and gives men the wrong idea, others may think you may be bringing the school into disrepute (you are a role model for the school) or you are possibly revealing much more than you realise of your underwear and more, bending or climbing stairs etc. Or if the desired affect is to make you look more attractive a huge roll of material around your waist does nothing for you.

BlueFahrenheit · 20/06/2026 20:34

thefourthbeatle · 20/06/2026 20:31

boys have been doing so for years with the ludicrous 'sag' fashion 👎🏾

Edited

Absurd!

I witnessed this sight more times than I care to see while spending time in London.

BlueFahrenheit · 20/06/2026 20:32

B33cka8 · 20/06/2026 20:26

To an extent I do agree with this, but not ankle skirts they're absurd, uncomfortable and extremely warm. Girls should just be allowed to wear trousers if they want to.

Trousers or a knee-high skirt are perfectly fine. Boys in full uniform.

Any foul play with your uniform results in serious consequences.

It's an easy solution; however, schools do not want to deal with the backlash.

Nel13f · 20/06/2026 20:32

And this is a ridiculous thread .

Nel13f · 20/06/2026 20:32

Gloriia · 20/06/2026 20:09

'Sweaty arse prints'. The bile and vitriol aimed at young girls is absolutely appalling.

They all wear tights, usually thick black tights. These thongs and sweaty arse cheeks are maybe a figment of a rather fevered imagination?

They absolutely do not. I drive past 3 high schools on my way to work and all have girls wearing their skirts barely longer than their pants. It s really unsavoury and like many I don’t want to see it.All are ignoring the school dress code. Would love to see the reaction if boys wore voluminous shorts barely longer than their pants.

CoffeeCantata · 20/06/2026 20:31

Gloriia · Today 18:58
Teachers should stfu about shirts and trousers. Teach our kids, keep your unwanted and misogynistic opinions to yourself.

And maybe parents need to do the same, and parent a bit more??

I think teachers might have a more informed perspective on this than you.
And apart from the exposed flesh controversy, it's good for teenagers to understand what's appropriate in different contexts. They'll be at work one day.

What's fine for a party or club isn't necessarily OK in school - or any context where people have no choice about being there. I think covering you private parts is a basic consideration for other people. Perving, as you put it, doesn't come into it. It's not about 'perving', it's about dressing appropriately for the context.

thefourthbeatle · 20/06/2026 20:31

padsi1975 · 19/06/2026 18:00

Having seen literal butt cheeks of girls going to the local comp here, I wish to God they'd sort it out. I don't want to see any kids bum on my daily commute. It is inappropriate and reflects poorly on the school. I'd feel the same if the boys had their bums hanging out.

boys have been doing so for years with the ludicrous 'sag' fashion 👎🏾

AIBU to challenge the school’s wording about pupils rolling skirts up?
BlueFahrenheit · 20/06/2026 20:29

Allseeingallknowing · 20/06/2026 20:25

Enforce knee length skirts…which they then roll up…

Multiple detentions will unravel this.

B33cka8 · 20/06/2026 20:26

BlueFahrenheit · 20/06/2026 20:05

I echo this.

Schools are pandering to fashion requirements. Girls' uniforms are already sexualised.

Bring back traditional uniforms.

To an extent I do agree with this, but not ankle skirts they're absurd, uncomfortable and extremely warm. Girls should just be allowed to wear trousers if they want to.

CoffeeCantata · 20/06/2026 20:26

Gloriia · 20/06/2026 20:09

'Sweaty arse prints'. The bile and vitriol aimed at young girls is absolutely appalling.

They all wear tights, usually thick black tights. These thongs and sweaty arse cheeks are maybe a figment of a rather fevered imagination?

Oh no they don't!

You are being either very naive or disingenuous, and I don't know which.

Allseeingallknowing · 20/06/2026 20:25

BlueFahrenheit · 20/06/2026 20:24

Yes. Enforce knee-length skirts. An easy solution to a very simple problem.

Enforce knee length skirts…which they then roll up…

B33cka8 · 20/06/2026 20:24

As a 30yr old lass, I also don't wish to see teens with their bums out. Quite apart from them clearly being absolutely freezing.

BlueFahrenheit · 20/06/2026 20:24

Elsvieta · 20/06/2026 20:18

Why can't the school just forbid it? Skirts must be knee-length (or whatever), end of? The world's gone mad.

It wouldn't excuse anyone attacking us adults if we went to work showing our actual arses, but we'd be fools if we did that and expected to be taken seriously (and not disciplined). The idea of traditional UK school uniform has always been that it reflects adult professional attire. Nothing wrong with teaching kids of both sexes to have some respect for themselves and others, and to understand that the majority of people they meet do not wish to see their underwear (or even if they do, they shouldn't, in a place of work or education).

Yes. Enforce knee-length skirts. An easy solution to a very simple problem.

Elsvieta · 20/06/2026 20:18

Why can't the school just forbid it? Skirts must be knee-length (or whatever), end of? The world's gone mad.

It wouldn't excuse anyone attacking us adults if we went to work showing our actual arses, but we'd be fools if we did that and expected to be taken seriously (and not disciplined). The idea of traditional UK school uniform has always been that it reflects adult professional attire. Nothing wrong with teaching kids of both sexes to have some respect for themselves and others, and to understand that the majority of people they meet do not wish to see their underwear (or even if they do, they shouldn't, in a place of work or education).

menopausalfart · 20/06/2026 20:16

Of course, but unless the school is on board, nothing will change.

Gloriia · 20/06/2026 20:10

HumberSquid · 20/06/2026 20:06

I wonder if they'd all champion the right for men and boys to wear as little as they like too?

Boys should be able wear shorts, why not? Or do you think the female staff would feel uncomfortable at hairy legs on show?

PinkTonic · 20/06/2026 20:09

Gloriia · 20/06/2026 19:29

'Young boys will obviously look, and I don't blame them. It's in their DNA'

'It's in their dna' Confused. Enabling and excusing is the problem.

Short skirts should not cause such an attack of the vapours.

How do college boys and male college staff cope?! College kids don't bother with school regulation 2000 denier tights to hide those offensive gussets.

There are parts of our bodies which are not normally on display to anyone except intimate partners. For safeguarding reasons children are taught what is appropriate for revealing/touching. There is no acceptable or benign reason for wanting to erode or break down these norms. Somehow our young women and teenagers have been conditioned to think that showing their intimate parts is empowering. I wonder who this benefits?

I would include all the women parading around hotel swimming pools in thong bikinis in this absolute con too. It isn’t empowering to have your arse on display and quite frankly flashing your undercarriage whenever you move around on your sunbed should be an indecency offence.

BlueFahrenheit · 20/06/2026 20:09

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

There's no need to be so inappropriate.

Yes, perverts have always existed; however, ill-fitting school uniforms further add to the problem.

Mini-skirts are NOT suitable garments.