Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to challenge the school’s wording about pupils rolling skirts up?

965 replies

GreenSalon · 19/06/2026 17:50

Weekly newsletter today from DC’s secondary school contained a paragraph on uniform including the fact that there have been complaints from the public about “pupils who choose to wear skirts” rolling them up to wear them extremely short. It finishes with asking parents to speak to their children about why this is “not a good idea”.

Now, apart from the fact I assume that they must mean girls, is this not clearly implying that short skirts = making themselves vulnerable and if is, then if anything bad happens as a result it is their own fault? I thought we had moved beyond this kind of nonsense.

I only have boys at the school not girls but want to write to the head to point out how utterly sexist this is. DH agrees with me pov but thinks I shouldn’t write. AIBU?

OP posts:
Drivingselfmad · 21/06/2026 07:52

Some recent posters are getting to the heart of it.

Yes, clothing and fashion are a form of expression. Unfortunately curent ‘fashion’ is centred around a look driven by patriarchal norms and the male gaze. Incredibly short skirts, hot pants etc are part of that. Whether or not actual men are ogling them (and I agree that it is men’s’ responsibility not to be perverts and not to ogle children, however they are dressed), school should be a place where girls are exempt from the pressure to dress in a way designed to present their bodies for the male gaze. A place where their value and their social capital is not based on how closely they fit a patriarchal norm (see also rules about fake lashes, tan etc), but on who they are. In this sense, uniform can be seen not as restriction but as freedom from a society which values women and girls primarily on their appearance.

Also: I’m a teacher. You absolutely do see bum cheeks. Sadly. The wording of the email in the OP was very likely based on the fact that is really is ‘not a good idea’ to wear a skirt which reveals your bum, the wings of your sanitary pad, etc. not because of men but because it’s embarrassing and not smart and not appropriate!

CoffeeCantata · 21/06/2026 07:51

ChalkOutlines · 21/06/2026 07:42

While I agree with your last paragraph, it’s not that traumatising, if at all. Come on now. Exaggerations like that don’t help. Especially if you’re trying to educate the girls as to why it’s a bad idea.

I was trying to put a comic spin on it, I admit! But it was eye-popping, I can tell you. I was just feet away from these buttocks....and they were most definitely on deliberate display. It reminded me of primate behaviour when a chimp or baboon is ready for mating.

ChalkOutlines · 21/06/2026 07:42

CoffeeCantata · 21/06/2026 07:35

To all the (lucky!) pps saying they don't know what we're referring to and that teenage girls have been shortening their school skirts since the year dot...er, tell me you've never seen what I've seen, without telling me...etc etc

I (and I think other traumatised pps) are talking about the sort of skirts which are almost a thong with a frill attached. They are designed to reveal the buttocks to about half-way up. Sitting in my car near a high school once I looked up from my book to see 2 pairs of naked cheeks passing my window. Once seen, never forgotten. I though 'WHAT?"

Bad enough with tights, but revolting without. It is just the pressure of porn culture on young women who are too naive to understand that. Why is it that it's always (throughout history) women who feel pressured to reveal their erogneous zones? Boys and men don't seem to feel this pressure. I find the whole business annoying precisely because it's a demonstration of sexual politics. Some people interpret it as a feminist choice but it just isn't - it's unequal and it's a pandering choice.

While I agree with your last paragraph, it’s not that traumatising, if at all. Come on now. Exaggerations like that don’t help. Especially if you’re trying to educate the girls as to why it’s a bad idea.

CoffeeCantata · 21/06/2026 07:35

To all the (lucky!) pps saying they don't know what we're referring to and that teenage girls have been shortening their school skirts since the year dot...er, tell me you've never seen what I've seen, without telling me...etc etc

I (and I think other traumatised pps) are talking about the sort of skirts which are almost a thong with a frill attached. They are designed to reveal the buttocks to about half-way up. Sitting in my car near a high school once I looked up from my book to see 2 pairs of naked cheeks passing my window. Once seen, never forgotten. I though 'WHAT?"

Bad enough with tights, but revolting without. It is just the pressure of porn culture on young women who are too naive to understand that. Why is it that it's always (throughout history) women who feel pressured to reveal their erogneous zones? Boys and men don't seem to feel this pressure. I find the whole business annoying precisely because it's a demonstration of sexual politics. Some people interpret it as a feminist choice but it just isn't - it's unequal and it's a pandering choice.

Sadworld23 · 21/06/2026 07:23

Girls and boys should wear tailored shorts or long trousers in my opinion.

Yes I think arse cheeks hanging out is scruffy.

AmateurDad · 21/06/2026 07:22

padsi1975 · 19/06/2026 18:00

Having seen literal butt cheeks of girls going to the local comp here, I wish to God they'd sort it out. I don't want to see any kids bum on my daily commute. It is inappropriate and reflects poorly on the school. I'd feel the same if the boys had their bums hanging out.

The country outside London is truly a very strange place. This is a phenomenon unknown here.

ChalkOutlines · 21/06/2026 07:02

ProBonoPublico · 20/06/2026 22:45

There's one very good reason why these girls should dress more modestly, namely that they are influencing men to see young girls as sexually desirable. If the girls look like children and are dressed like children men will generally ignore them, but most men would be sexually attracted to a physically developed young woman in revealing clothing, even if they'd never admit it.

Once that thought has been planted it stays there. And even though the vast majority of men would never take any action it really can't be good for society that ordinary men, who wouldn't remotely consider themselves perverts, start seeing teenage girls as objects of desire.

Yeah. No. If you spend any time on here , or even in the real world you will realise that being a girl in uniform (regardless of skirt length) is enough to make men leer, whistle, make comments and worse. It starts as young as 11! Sometimes in primary school uniforms.

Don’t you dare put that responsibility on children(regardless of the length of their skirts).

Shoola · 21/06/2026 06:51

If you are happy to have your arse showing, don't want to be taken seriously and like having lecherous looks then very rolled up skirts are a great idea, otherwise they are not.

It is very unfair on girls to pretend the world is a different place to the one it is. They need to be able to make informed decisions.

Nel13f · 21/06/2026 06:47

Clonakilla · 21/06/2026 00:41

Lots of girls at my school did this in the 90s. Nothing new. We used to have to get our skirts measured to see they were the correct length below the knee. Extremely unhealthy misogynistic stuff, obviously.

Always amazed by how many people live in areas where girls’ skirts are so short they are routinely exposing their naked backsides. At nearly 50, I’ve never seen another females ‘bum cheeks’. Plenty of tradesmen bum cheeks, but zero women.

Well you clearly are not amongst state high school students as they walk to and from school.Some of us are, daily.

Nel13f · 21/06/2026 06:45

DearDenimEagle · 21/06/2026 00:46

Morphed into..it’s been going on since the 1960s ,..
it’s the norm

Edited

Absolutely not like this it hasn’t. I went to school in the 70s and 80s, girls were absolutely not showing their pants or pressurised to do so then.

SemiRetiredLoveGoddeess · 21/06/2026 05:56

I think it was a perfectly reasonable request. Yes, maybe could have been worded differently.

Not a great look for self respect and dignity.

PeloMom · 21/06/2026 03:40

I went to DC’s school last week. I was carrying something to the high school and in front of for me a girl was going up the stairs with the skirt really short. You could see the string of her tampon if you were on the lower stairs. I don’t think it’s the look she was going for.

PollyBell · 21/06/2026 02:03

Why are girls rolling them up? Not why we pretend it to be what message are they wanting by doing it

Are people genuinely that naive?

HelenaWilson · 21/06/2026 01:28

We were rolling skirts up in the 60s and 70s

We did not roll them up as short as girls do nowadays. And we didn't have the skin tight lycra that rides up over your bum that you have to be constantly tugging down.

And we often wore underslips, too.

SquirrelGG · 21/06/2026 01:23

Ponderingwindow · 19/06/2026 20:00

Pushing for trousers only is a bad idea. Skirts allow girls with extremely heavy periods easier coverage of bulky pads. A pair of uniform trousers with little choice is a great way to make a teen who already feels awkward about a heavy menstrual cycle even more uncomfortable.

plus there are children with other conditions that can benefit from the more forgiving drape of a skirt.

I live near a large secondary school. Trousers are an option for girls, but I have never seen more than two or three wearing them, ever. The girls seem to prefer skirts.

I would have hated to wear trousers myself, even though I do at the weekends.

SquirrelGG · 21/06/2026 01:12

I don't live in the UK and I have never seen any girl wearing a skirt as short as talked about on MN, or even those I've seen on TV programmes. We rolled our skirts up when I was at high school in the 70s, but only to mid thigh. Kilts are worn here a lot in winter, and some of them are ankle length. I imagine any girl here wearing such a short skirt would be immediately told not to, it just doesn't seem to be tolerated. I really don't understand why it seems to be so common in the UK.

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 21/06/2026 00:54

T1Dmama · 20/06/2026 21:32

Girls/women SHOULD be able to wear whatever they want and be safe, BUT sadly we can not!
it is never a woman’s fault if she is attacked, however let’s be honest this isn’t an ideal world and women do have to avoid putting ourselves at risk.
What I mean by that…. Is in an ‘ideal world’ we should be able to walk around naked at 2am, alone, through a poorly lit park…. BUT we know and appreciate that doing that would put us in danger, so therefore we wouldn’t do it!
We as women sadly do still and likely will forever more need to adjust our behaviours to keep ourself safe - safe from men!

I agree with all of this; but what does it have to do with refusing to follow clear rules about acceptable school uniform, and instead insisting on displaying your bum cheeks, knickers or worse to everybody?

This is not about the response of men or boys; it's about self-respect, respecting others by not showing your private areas and not blatantly ignoring rules just because you think you're too special or important for them to apply to you.

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 21/06/2026 00:50

Gloriia · 20/06/2026 20:10

Boys should be able wear shorts, why not? Or do you think the female staff would feel uncomfortable at hairy legs on show?

I agree that boys should be allowed to wear shorts. Knee-length 'bottoms' of whatever variety are smart and practical. Obviously, nobody is going to object to bare legs below the knee for either boys or girls; it's bum cheeks and pants on show that the whole issue is clearly about.

Unfortunately, at my DS's school, boys are not allowed shorts - and so none of them wear them; it's only (a large proportion of) the girls who seem not to be able to comply with the clearly-stated uniform requirements - even though the rules already allow them considerably more choice, freedom and comfort in the summer than the boys have.

CricketIsASport · 21/06/2026 00:50

Just because something has been going on for decades doesn't mean it's right

DearDenimEagle · 21/06/2026 00:46

Nel13f · 20/06/2026 22:26

Totally agree. Going by this thread, some parents are encouraging it! Just awful. It beggars belief that this is what school girl attire has morphed into. Feel so so sorry for the girls that feel uncomfortable dressing like this but feel they have to because it’s expected. Social media and phones, vapes, school uniform.. we continue to let children down.

Morphed into..it’s been going on since the 1960s ,..
it’s the norm

DearDenimEagle · 21/06/2026 00:43

Allseeingallknowing · 20/06/2026 22:54

School uniform is a good thing when worn according to the rules. It is a leveller and prevents jealousy and competition between those who can’t afford the latest clothes and shoes and those who wear designer gear. The schools need to be more rigorous when enforcing the rules, and parents should support the teachers.

It is not a leveller. You can always tell which kids have rich parents and which haven’t by their uniform. To tell yourself otherwise is delusional

Clonakilla · 21/06/2026 00:41

Lots of girls at my school did this in the 90s. Nothing new. We used to have to get our skirts measured to see they were the correct length below the knee. Extremely unhealthy misogynistic stuff, obviously.

Always amazed by how many people live in areas where girls’ skirts are so short they are routinely exposing their naked backsides. At nearly 50, I’ve never seen another females ‘bum cheeks’. Plenty of tradesmen bum cheeks, but zero women.

DearDenimEagle · 21/06/2026 00:38

Only read the first page. Laughing. We were rolling skirts up in the 60s and 70s . I am always amused when I drive through town and see the school kids looking just as they did when I was at school…except we were in class. Why, at any time of day. 10 am. 11 am or any hour , are the streets full of school kids? Don’t they have lessons any more? They dress in uniform to parade the streets till it’s time to go home?

thefourthbeatle · 21/06/2026 00:30

TrishM80 · 20/06/2026 20:58

While that fashion trend is ridiculous (I believe it stems from hip hop culture where boys were emulating the loose orange jumpsuit uniform that's worn in US prisons), at least their flesh is covered!

I don't understand "feminists" who insist that girls and women should be allowed wear anything they want, no matter if their arses are hanging out in a school or work environment.

Clothing is power. Look at any movies set in ancient Rome, the masters are robed but the slaves are practically naked. Look at hip hop videos, the rappers are fully clothed but surrounded by practically naked women tweaking their arse. Look at those Robert Palmer and Robin Thicke music videos, they're fully suited & booted but surrounded by practically naked women.

That's what feminists don't seem to get: Clothing is power, lack of clothing is subservience.

some decent points, but:

" what feminists don't seem to get: Clothing is power, lack of clothing is subservience."

Hijab? Burka? Head-to-toe sackcloth outfit? ✊🏾👍🏾🤯

truffleruffle · 21/06/2026 00:20

OMG the world is going mad. I recently sat at a brass band concert in a secondary school with a 4th year girl student showing her pants. Most people noticed and it was both embarrassing and distracting.
why do people not realise this. I don’t want my daughter wearing a skirt so short it’s showing her pants. A bit of self rest would be the most important thing here. Let’s stop blaming school for everything.

Swipe left for the next trending thread