Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to challenge the school’s wording about pupils rolling skirts up?

965 replies

GreenSalon · 19/06/2026 17:50

Weekly newsletter today from DC’s secondary school contained a paragraph on uniform including the fact that there have been complaints from the public about “pupils who choose to wear skirts” rolling them up to wear them extremely short. It finishes with asking parents to speak to their children about why this is “not a good idea”.

Now, apart from the fact I assume that they must mean girls, is this not clearly implying that short skirts = making themselves vulnerable and if is, then if anything bad happens as a result it is their own fault? I thought we had moved beyond this kind of nonsense.

I only have boys at the school not girls but want to write to the head to point out how utterly sexist this is. DH agrees with me pov but thinks I shouldn’t write. AIBU?

OP posts:
EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 21/06/2026 12:24

GreenSalon · 21/06/2026 12:16

@Drivingselfmad you’ve made me think more about why I initially reacted the way I did. The thing is the school does have a problem with bullying via social media (all genders as victims and perpetrators) and we never get letters home about that. I think that’s what irked me. There are much bigger issues impacting on pupil wellbeing that parents could talk to all their children about. School did a survey recently which showed the figures around this. But I guess as it’s happening outside school they won’t/can’t. It is talked about in lessons but could do with parental reinforcement. However it always seems to be letters about skirts and earrings which tend to almost exclusively seem to single out girls. And as I’ve said repeatedly the school doesn’t have a big issue with rolled up skirts so put teachers’ limited energy into the bigger issues.

Then complain about that. Ideally in a handwritten letter 😬

pouletvous · 21/06/2026 12:24

Girls have been rolling their school skirts up since biblical times!! just forget it

presumably they can’t stop boys wearing skirts

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 21/06/2026 12:23

ChalkOutlines · 21/06/2026 11:25

”Parents” won’t. Some parents will. Are there some rules I think are stupid or pointless ? Yes. Are they even more frustrating when certain behaviours go unchecked , but you can get a detention for not having your maths kit on a non maths day? Definitely.

I still tell DD to toe the line with some rules being absolutely non negotiable. Skirt length is one of them for the few months a year she actually wears one.

My son got a negative point for dropping a piece of stationary on the floor. We laughed about it. No one contacted the school. I think it’s the access to email that’s the problem. If every complaint required a phone call or a handwritten letter, the complaints would drop by 90%

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 21/06/2026 12:21

I wonder how these youngsters will fare when (and if) they reach the work place and realise that there are rules they need to abide by

Indeed. Even though, on the clothes front, women have a lot more freedom in 'traditional' workplaces, how is this mindset going to help to set girls up for their adult futures when they've gone all through school firmly believing and insisting that clear rules don't apply to them and they can go around at will with their private parts on show?

Are they going to turn up to job interviews barely dressed, whilst their male counterparts wear smart shirts and tailored trousers, and then wonder why he got the job and she didn't?

GreenSalon · 21/06/2026 12:16

@Drivingselfmad you’ve made me think more about why I initially reacted the way I did. The thing is the school does have a problem with bullying via social media (all genders as victims and perpetrators) and we never get letters home about that. I think that’s what irked me. There are much bigger issues impacting on pupil wellbeing that parents could talk to all their children about. School did a survey recently which showed the figures around this. But I guess as it’s happening outside school they won’t/can’t. It is talked about in lessons but could do with parental reinforcement. However it always seems to be letters about skirts and earrings which tend to almost exclusively seem to single out girls. And as I’ve said repeatedly the school doesn’t have a big issue with rolled up skirts so put teachers’ limited energy into the bigger issues.

OP posts:
GreenSalon · 21/06/2026 12:06

Drivingselfmad · 21/06/2026 11:34

@GreenSalon I mean this genuinely and non-combatively: if you agree that school is different from other contexts where very short skirts are worn, what would you prefer the school’s wording in the email to have been?

I’m not actually sure tbh. Maybe to explain that outside of school, all pupils can dress how they want but that in some settings such as schools or workplaces, different standards of dress apply for a variety of reasons specific to the location? For example … and list some examples?

OP posts:
JFDIYOLO · 21/06/2026 11:47

They're right to address this - or more appropriately, to ask their parents to address this.

Teen girls can be idiots with no more sense of survival than a baby bunny. I see this so often, acres of under age bare thigh and sometimes arse cheek ambling obliviously along the pavement.

Then as soon as they go into sixth form it's baggy jeans and tracksuit trousers.

There's a window of vulnerability plus lack of real awareness that mid teen girls seem to pass through with no sense.

So yes, asking parents to help them raise awareness of the fact that some men DO see girls this way and not giving them anything to look at is wise.

It's not sexist. It's safeguarding a particularly vulnerable and immature age group. And it's parents' duty to do that.

HelenaWilson · 21/06/2026 11:42

This isn’t new. I have friends a bit older than me, who in the 60’s had to kneel down at school, and a teacher would measure the distance between the skirt hem and the knee. More than a certain measurement and you were in detention!

We didn't go around with our bums hanging out in the 60s!

And the motivation (I think) was different. Miniskirts had just come in and were mainstream fashion. Even Princess Anne wore skirts well above her knees. But school skirts were not designed by Mary Quant and most of us had had our school skirts since before miniskirts came in and they were knee length or even a bit longer if you were short. We rolled them up to be a bit more in line with what everyone else was wearing. Not in order to show our bums and knickers.

If you had half an inch of underslip showing, someone would tell you, never mind showing anything else!

glaciercherry · 21/06/2026 11:40

Maybe it’s sexist — because if it was the boys who had their balls almost showing it would be called bordering on indecent exposure.

Drivingselfmad · 21/06/2026 11:39

Gloriia · 21/06/2026 11:27

'Yawn. For the hundredth time, it's not about people staring. It's about being forced to see things you really do not want to see. I know it may be hard for you to understand (because you keep coming back with the same insinuation that teachers and men in general are drooling as they follow pubescent girls up the stairs'

I walk up stairs all the time. I could not describe the attire of the people ahead of me. Folk need to look elsewhere, not at young girl's backsides. It shouldn't need saying but here we are.

@Gloriia do you actually think that it’s fine for girls - children going though puberty - to wear skirts that reveal their underwear/bum then? And neither school or parents should correct them?

MrCollinsandhisboiledpotatoes · 21/06/2026 11:37

Gloriia · 21/06/2026 11:27

'Yawn. For the hundredth time, it's not about people staring. It's about being forced to see things you really do not want to see. I know it may be hard for you to understand (because you keep coming back with the same insinuation that teachers and men in general are drooling as they follow pubescent girls up the stairs'

I walk up stairs all the time. I could not describe the attire of the people ahead of me. Folk need to look elsewhere, not at young girl's backsides. It shouldn't need saying but here we are.

You can't describe the attire of the people on front of you because they are attired.
If they were not, you would notice.

glaciercherry · 21/06/2026 11:37

Would you rather the school was perfectly
ok with pupils walking around with their bums or underwear showing?

Is that appropriate for a school?

Drivingselfmad · 21/06/2026 11:34

@GreenSalon I mean this genuinely and non-combatively: if you agree that school is different from other contexts where very short skirts are worn, what would you prefer the school’s wording in the email to have been?

Nel13f · 21/06/2026 11:29

Gloriia · 21/06/2026 11:27

'Yawn. For the hundredth time, it's not about people staring. It's about being forced to see things you really do not want to see. I know it may be hard for you to understand (because you keep coming back with the same insinuation that teachers and men in general are drooling as they follow pubescent girls up the stairs'

I walk up stairs all the time. I could not describe the attire of the people ahead of me. Folk need to look elsewhere, not at young girl's backsides. It shouldn't need saying but here we are.

Then you’re not looking where you’re going. If you want to look elsewhere then do so. Stairs are dangerous and I’ll look in front like I always have thanks.

Nel13f · 21/06/2026 11:27

Gloriia · 21/06/2026 11:20

The language used has been derogatory and sneery.

Fine, discuss welfare concerns but try to use appropriate language or else it all looks like total mockery. Taking the piss out of young girls 'sweaty arse cheeks' in the guise of concerns for men's 'uncomfortable feelings' is not a good look.

It’s not men’s uncomfortable feelings it’s women and other girls too.Also you do realise girls get pressurised and teased if they don’t fall inline and display themselves in the same way.

Bums and arse are the same thing, there is only one word for sweaty. Nobody wants to sit in a chair somebody else’s sweaty naked arse has previously sat on.

ChalkOutlines · 21/06/2026 11:27

CoffeeCantata · 21/06/2026 11:18

What on earth happened to the concept of giving guidance to young people? Surely this is especially important at puberty when youngsters are growing and developing in ways that they may not be psychologically ready for, or experienced enough to deal with?

It used to be called parenting. Are there really pps on here who think parenting stops when they go to secondary school? That's surely the really hard bit - but the bit that is crucial in helping teenagers to navigate the world successfully, even if it means you can't always be their friend.

I worry about kids whose parents want to be their mates...

You can see on this thread what happened.

Gloriia · 21/06/2026 11:27

'Yawn. For the hundredth time, it's not about people staring. It's about being forced to see things you really do not want to see. I know it may be hard for you to understand (because you keep coming back with the same insinuation that teachers and men in general are drooling as they follow pubescent girls up the stairs'

I walk up stairs all the time. I could not describe the attire of the people ahead of me. Folk need to look elsewhere, not at young girl's backsides. It shouldn't need saying but here we are.

ChalkOutlines · 21/06/2026 11:25

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 21/06/2026 11:17

Parents will fight the school over absolutely anything and everything. It’s not just the skirt it’s every single rule, the skirt is just one tiny aspect. I don’t know how today’s parents were raised but they cannot cope with authoritarianism at all.

”Parents” won’t. Some parents will. Are there some rules I think are stupid or pointless ? Yes. Are they even more frustrating when certain behaviours go unchecked , but you can get a detention for not having your maths kit on a non maths day? Definitely.

I still tell DD to toe the line with some rules being absolutely non negotiable. Skirt length is one of them for the few months a year she actually wears one.

Nel13f · 21/06/2026 11:24

Gloriia · 21/06/2026 11:20

The language used has been derogatory and sneery.

Fine, discuss welfare concerns but try to use appropriate language or else it all looks like total mockery. Taking the piss out of young girls 'sweaty arse cheeks' in the guise of concerns for men's 'uncomfortable feelings' is not a good look.

No what is derogatory is encouraging and saying it’s ok and normal for young girls to dress like this.

MrCollinsandhisboiledpotatoes · 21/06/2026 11:24

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 21/06/2026 11:17

Parents will fight the school over absolutely anything and everything. It’s not just the skirt it’s every single rule, the skirt is just one tiny aspect. I don’t know how today’s parents were raised but they cannot cope with authoritarianism at all.

I'm pretty sure the reason I only have two friends at the school gates is because most of the others mums conversations are just constant outrage at the school for the most trivial things and they think I am completely unreasonable for not agreeing. It's almost like they try to outdo each other over who can be more outraged.

One of them shouted at the headteacher because her child didn't have a good enough part in the nativity. And 100% thought she was justified on doing so.

Gloriia · 21/06/2026 11:23

CoffeeCantata · 21/06/2026 11:01

Unecessarily crude language to describe...er..well, not exactly.a vicar's tea party?

Unecessarily crude clothing will elicit crude descriptions, for sure.

How about 'the plump, peachy protuberant posterior portions of our young lasses peeping from a pretty peplum'. But that doesn't convey the unpleasant, crude and vulgar sight which the girls themselves have probably never seen unless they scrutinise themselves in a full-lenght mirror before leaving the house.

I'd like to know how you suggest the unpleasant sight is best described.

Bums or backsides would suffice? No need for the 'sweaty arse cheeks'.

'How about 'the plump, peachy protuberant posterior portions of our young lasses peeping from a pretty peplum' Why would anyone post that creepy description Confused.

Gloriia · 21/06/2026 11:20

MrCollinsandhisboiledpotatoes · 21/06/2026 11:02

I don't think people are being unnecessarily crude. They are simply trying to explain why the rule is so necessary and the extent of the problem.

Yes, there's a poll, but there's also a comment section.

The language used has been derogatory and sneery.

Fine, discuss welfare concerns but try to use appropriate language or else it all looks like total mockery. Taking the piss out of young girls 'sweaty arse cheeks' in the guise of concerns for men's 'uncomfortable feelings' is not a good look.

CoffeeCantata · 21/06/2026 11:18

ChalkOutlines · 21/06/2026 11:04

I actually find it quite strange/weird when grown adults are fighting for girls’ “right” to be as naked as they want , in any context. How does that actually benefit girls? Who does it benefit?

What on earth happened to the concept of giving guidance to young people? Surely this is especially important at puberty when youngsters are growing and developing in ways that they may not be psychologically ready for, or experienced enough to deal with?

It used to be called parenting. Are there really pps on here who think parenting stops when they go to secondary school? That's surely the really hard bit - but the bit that is crucial in helping teenagers to navigate the world successfully, even if it means you can't always be their friend.

I worry about kids whose parents want to be their mates...

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 21/06/2026 11:17

ChalkOutlines · 21/06/2026 11:04

I actually find it quite strange/weird when grown adults are fighting for girls’ “right” to be as naked as they want , in any context. How does that actually benefit girls? Who does it benefit?

Parents will fight the school over absolutely anything and everything. It’s not just the skirt it’s every single rule, the skirt is just one tiny aspect. I don’t know how today’s parents were raised but they cannot cope with authoritarianism at all.

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 21/06/2026 11:16

BritherPhil · 20/06/2026 21:33

This isn't exactly a new phenomenon: my Mum and her mates were doing exactly the same thing in the 60s. It's teenagers seeing how far they can push the limits. They did it in the days of the ancient Greeks, and they'll probably still be doing it in colonies on other planets, if we ever get there.

I was in secondary school in the nineties and our skirts had to cover our arses or we were sent home. Some girls did hitch their skirts up a little bit but absolutely nothing like what I see at my child’s secondary school. It’s positively St Trinian.

Swipe left for the next trending thread