Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to challenge the school’s wording about pupils rolling skirts up?

965 replies

GreenSalon · 19/06/2026 17:50

Weekly newsletter today from DC’s secondary school contained a paragraph on uniform including the fact that there have been complaints from the public about “pupils who choose to wear skirts” rolling them up to wear them extremely short. It finishes with asking parents to speak to their children about why this is “not a good idea”.

Now, apart from the fact I assume that they must mean girls, is this not clearly implying that short skirts = making themselves vulnerable and if is, then if anything bad happens as a result it is their own fault? I thought we had moved beyond this kind of nonsense.

I only have boys at the school not girls but want to write to the head to point out how utterly sexist this is. DH agrees with me pov but thinks I shouldn’t write. AIBU?

OP posts:
CricketIsASport · 22/06/2026 09:48

Gloriia · 22/06/2026 09:34

Never, ever seen 'bare buttocks' <improvement on 'sweaty arse cheeks' well done> below a blazer. It would seem unbelievable really to have such anatomy.

If only teachers paid as much attention to the curriculum!

Do you live in the real world?

CoffeeCantata · 22/06/2026 09:41

Gloriia · 22/06/2026 09:34

Never, ever seen 'bare buttocks' <improvement on 'sweaty arse cheeks' well done> below a blazer. It would seem unbelievable really to have such anatomy.

If only teachers paid as much attention to the curriculum!

How do you know how much attention teachers pay to the curriculum?

Gloriia · 22/06/2026 09:34

CoffeeCantata · 22/06/2026 09:23

I think the most ridiculous iteration of this fashion was when I saw a girl whose blazer was longer than her 'skirt' and from the back there was just the bottom of a blazer and then the bottom half of her bare buttocks.

Just ridiculous.

Never, ever seen 'bare buttocks' <improvement on 'sweaty arse cheeks' well done> below a blazer. It would seem unbelievable really to have such anatomy.

If only teachers paid as much attention to the curriculum!

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 22/06/2026 09:26

CricketIsASport · 22/06/2026 07:10

A girl removed her skirt?! Like who in their right mind goes to school with the idea that they'll show off their underwear

An awful lot of girls, judging by this thread and our collective experiences.

The social contract is simply shot to pieces when the basic common-sense assumption that of course you wouldn't want people to see your private body parts and underwear in public is suddenly far from universally accepted.

Not quite the same thing, but there was always a basic agreed understanding that, if you wanted things from a shop, you would pay for them; or if you were determined to steal them, you would at least be very careful and discreet about it, and frightened of the prospect of being caught and everybody finding out. Nowadays, there are lots of people who will shamelessly fill a massive bag in full clear view and just stride out with it - and, like the teachers, the store security guards just don't know what to do, as the basic social code has now just vanished.

CoffeeCantata · 22/06/2026 09:23

Lauzg90 · 22/06/2026 07:23

Although I know what you mean the school skirts are totally inappropriate.
Also a teacher. Their bum cheeks hang lower than their skirts. It’s then the job of their form tutor to make them correct this, so obviously could be a male or female having to explain it. Surely it would be better coming from their parents.
We have glass railings on the stairs and upstairs corridors. You can’t help but see everything.
It would be like your son declaring the new fashion was to put a massive slit in the crotch of their trousers and wear a thong underneath.
No one wants to see it!

I think the most ridiculous iteration of this fashion was when I saw a girl whose blazer was longer than her 'skirt' and from the back there was just the bottom of a blazer and then the bottom half of her bare buttocks.

Just ridiculous.

CricketIsASport · 22/06/2026 09:18

I've never gone and challenged authority by taking off my clothes?!

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 22/06/2026 09:15

Turntheswitch · 22/06/2026 06:18

And? What happened next?

She was told to put it back on and taken away 'to be spoken to'.

I guess schools know they are already on very shaky ground wrt child protection and protecting themselves from accusations, in a situation which ends up with teachers being close to to defiant adolescents who are standing there half-dressed.

I don't know the girl in question, but I'm guessing that, if she is so brazen in that act, she's clearly marked herself out as entitled and/or a troublemaker. It screams "Go on, I dare you to challenge me" - so I'd say the likelihood of her potentially following it up with allegations or deliberate misrepresentations of the facts must already be much higher. The well-behaved kids would never dream of doing that in the first place.

Turntheswitch · 22/06/2026 09:12

Biggles27 · 22/06/2026 09:06

That it was inappropriate for anyone to be wearing skirts so short their knickers were on display That it wasn’t a one off, it was a regular occurrence i I said it wasn’t short skirts it was inappropriately short. It wouldn’t be accepted in the work place. It did not reflect well on the schools image. As a woman I don’t want to see teenagers underwear flashing at me. I have a daughter so I understand they like to dress a certain way but it’s our job as responsible adults to guide them on appropriate dressing I acknowledged women should be able to dress how they want but within reason, not when buttocks are being shown. I also made it clear if the boys were showing their underwear and bum cheeks I’d be having the same conversation - teenagers should not be showing off their pants or buttocks

And this school simple came back and said essentially no biggie… the girls behave well?

Biggles27 · 22/06/2026 09:06

Turntheswitch · 22/06/2026 06:18

So how did you word your complaint about the length of the skirts? @Biggles27

Edited

That it was inappropriate for anyone to be wearing skirts so short their knickers were on display That it wasn’t a one off, it was a regular occurrence i I said it wasn’t short skirts it was inappropriately short. It wouldn’t be accepted in the work place. It did not reflect well on the schools image. As a woman I don’t want to see teenagers underwear flashing at me. I have a daughter so I understand they like to dress a certain way but it’s our job as responsible adults to guide them on appropriate dressing I acknowledged women should be able to dress how they want but within reason, not when buttocks are being shown. I also made it clear if the boys were showing their underwear and bum cheeks I’d be having the same conversation - teenagers should not be showing off their pants or buttocks

MissRaspberryRipples · 22/06/2026 08:08

I'm not sure I see the problem with the wording. It's up to the school to enforce the uniform rules and guidelines but surely it's up to the parents to have the talks to their kids about safety and dressing appropriately also. it's not about telling your kids they're asking to be attacked purely for how they dress it's about teaching your kids that in school they have to abide by their rules just like they'll be having rules and regulations when they leave school and get jobs

Lauzg90 · 22/06/2026 07:23

Although I know what you mean the school skirts are totally inappropriate.
Also a teacher. Their bum cheeks hang lower than their skirts. It’s then the job of their form tutor to make them correct this, so obviously could be a male or female having to explain it. Surely it would be better coming from their parents.
We have glass railings on the stairs and upstairs corridors. You can’t help but see everything.
It would be like your son declaring the new fashion was to put a massive slit in the crotch of their trousers and wear a thong underneath.
No one wants to see it!

herewegoagainonwednesday · 22/06/2026 07:14

@Gloriia count yourself lucky. its hard to believe if you haven’t seen it, but it is literally thong on display, including the boot third of the bum when standing up. not great.
I don’t mind when they wear boxer shorts underneath, but the thong or brazilian knicker is just too much

CricketIsASport · 22/06/2026 07:10

A girl removed her skirt?! Like who in their right mind goes to school with the idea that they'll show off their underwear

Fiddlesticks1 · 22/06/2026 07:08

Some schools changed to kilts in the hope of stopping rolling up skirts it didn’t.
In my day when mini skirts were the height of fashion our school would measure the length of skirt and if it was wrong length you were sent home the view being rules are rules. No one went to the papers to complain like they do every September.
To be honest I see the rolled up skirts every day and believe me rightly or wrongly it is very unfair for the opposite sex to have to negotiate the provocativeness of some girls.
In this day and age I don’t know why schools don’t just adopt trousers for all and shorts in the summer. Problem solved.

Gloriia · 22/06/2026 06:48

PrincessHoneysuckle · 21/06/2026 21:13

At the secondary i work at the girls have to wear opaque tights which means if they do roll them you cant see anything .

Yeah every school our dc have been to it's the same but apparently not everywhere and some posters have been subjected to 'sweaty arse cheeks' at every turn.

It isn't rocket science but we are talking about teachers here, either opaque tights like everywhere else or trousers then those walking upstairs can do so without been subjected to the horrors many describe in such fine detail. Repeatedly.

herewegoagainonwednesday · 22/06/2026 06:40

Part of the issues is that some (! by far not all!) women and girls confuse feminism with being a brat.
Not a teacher, but we have a lot of interns at work.
The guys are mostly ok,usually easy to weed out the not so great ones at interview.
The girls seem to fall in 2 grops: amazing, or bratty. The last 2 were the bratty category, full of “i’m a girl, I need help, can do what I want and if i get criticism, it’s because you are sexist”. That attitude is really doing some damage to all women!

Turntheswitch · 22/06/2026 06:18

Biggles27 · 21/06/2026 22:01

Told me the pupils behaviour is exemplary 🤷. Wasn’t what I complained about

So how did you word your complaint about the length of the skirts? @Biggles27

Turntheswitch · 22/06/2026 06:18

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 22/06/2026 01:29

A girl at my DS's school was told by the teacher that her skirt was ridiculously short, so she responded by simply removing it so she was just wearing her tights.

I think there are some girls who genuinely seem to believe that their uniform is effectively tights (at least those who bother with them) or (extremely short) cycling shorts - with the skirt being nothing more than a decorous accessory.

And? What happened next?

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 22/06/2026 01:33

Biggles27 · 21/06/2026 22:01

Told me the pupils behaviour is exemplary 🤷. Wasn’t what I complained about

Probably the same as when reports of nasty bullying are reframed by schools as 'friendship issues'.

You'd think (hope) they'd be mortified at their pupils, representing them and the school, dressing in such a way as the general public feel the need to complain; but apparently they just don't care.

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 22/06/2026 01:29

PrincessHoneysuckle · 21/06/2026 21:13

At the secondary i work at the girls have to wear opaque tights which means if they do roll them you cant see anything .

A girl at my DS's school was told by the teacher that her skirt was ridiculously short, so she responded by simply removing it so she was just wearing her tights.

I think there are some girls who genuinely seem to believe that their uniform is effectively tights (at least those who bother with them) or (extremely short) cycling shorts - with the skirt being nothing more than a decorous accessory.

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 22/06/2026 01:23

JoB1kenobi · 21/06/2026 21:13

The school were being pro-feminist - they were looking after their young women and girls by setting examples of appropriate attire. The OP thinks the newsletter was sexist to address this, I disagree - they’re looking out for all students.

Clothing (or lack of) should never be an excuse to assault a woman - but it still happens - so that’s why the newsletter says ‘it’s not a good idea’ it would never be the victims fault if an abuser attacked them because they wore a short skirt - but the fa t remains - there are sickos out there that still will and the school are right to say ‘it’s not a good idea’

it’s also not pleasant to see anyone’s underwear - in sick of seeing young girls (and women, but children as young as 7-8 also) on holiday wearing thong bikinis - horrid!

Thanks for clarifying - I agree with you, then.

However, I still don't see why "because we don't go around making other people look at our our bottoms and private areas in public" isn't enough in itself for some people on this thread - without all of the other concerns, justified as they clearly are.

KopAl · 22/06/2026 00:20

Basically, schools should move into the 21st century and alter the uniform so that it is no longer skirts. I’m not being sexist in any way and I speak as someone involved in education. Schools are under intense scrutiny and pressure on this issue across the whole country. I’m personally in favour of a sports type uniform that is unisex. Even gym leggings are better, in my personal view, than these hitched up skirts. Schools can’t win if they take a hard line or not, if pupils protest.

SquirrelGG · 21/06/2026 22:38

CoffeeCantata · 21/06/2026 13:07

Yes - I think skirts are the issue. My children are in their 20s now, so I'm not up-to-speed on teenagers, but I'm guessing that teenage girls would choose to wear jeans in their leisure time over a skirt or a dress?

It seems to be the need to wear a skirt which causes the rebelliousness, in various ways. So put them all in trousers - problem solved.

I know a pp mentioned that trousers were not great for all young women and cited thick sanitary protection as a reason. But - surely that would apply with skirts too? I mean, you'd have to wear a considerably longer skirt to conceal sanitary protection than is 'fashionably acceptable to you peers etc'.

There are plenty of different trouser styles and these could be offered: slim (but not tight), or looser, so that no-one is forced to wear something clingy and revealing.

I have already said this, but I live near a large high school with a gender neutral uniform. I have only ever seen two or three girls wearing trousers, they all seem to prefer skirts - which are not revealingly short btw. I wouldn't have wanted to wear trousers when I was at school, and didn't wear them to work.

TunnocksOrDeath · 21/06/2026 22:35

Once you bend at the hips to sit down, your skirt/trousers/shorts have further to go round your arse than when they're hanging straight down, so they'll ride-up massively. It's not particularly pleasant to have to work next to someone whose clothes barely cover their thigh-tops from the side, and flash their pants from the front if the desk isn't very wide - fine when WHF, but in schools and workplaces - no thanks.

SquirrelGG · 21/06/2026 22:34

HelenaWilson · 21/06/2026 11:42

This isn’t new. I have friends a bit older than me, who in the 60’s had to kneel down at school, and a teacher would measure the distance between the skirt hem and the knee. More than a certain measurement and you were in detention!

We didn't go around with our bums hanging out in the 60s!

And the motivation (I think) was different. Miniskirts had just come in and were mainstream fashion. Even Princess Anne wore skirts well above her knees. But school skirts were not designed by Mary Quant and most of us had had our school skirts since before miniskirts came in and they were knee length or even a bit longer if you were short. We rolled them up to be a bit more in line with what everyone else was wearing. Not in order to show our bums and knickers.

If you had half an inch of underslip showing, someone would tell you, never mind showing anything else!

Yes, we used to say "it's snowing down south".

From another who went to school in the 60s/70s, when we did indeed roll up our skirts in line with current fashion but most certainly not to show our bums and knickers - we would have been mortified to do so.

I've never seen skirts as short here (not the UK), and very much doubt it would be tolerated. Why are some schools allowing it there?

Swipe left for the next trending thread