Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Burnham has won. More turmoil?

816 replies

KatiePricesKnickers · 19/06/2026 05:51

Now Burnham has won, it will trigger a leadership contest, and if he wins, a new chancellor of the exchequer.

Surely this cannot be good for the country, or its finances?

YABU - Burnham is a true leader who will improve the UK for everyone and be a competent and respected leader.

YANBU - FFS, here we go again.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
SinicalMe · 19/06/2026 06:34

Settlersa · 19/06/2026 06:07

Hopefully Rachel will be a goner

But who will replace her?

Please not Ed Milliband.

WhatNextImScared · 19/06/2026 06:33

Teeheehee1579 · 19/06/2026 06:14

Ugh - I feel really down about this and I actually don’t agree that it’s better than reform winning - I think it makes Reform more likely to win in the next election because on top of the people who think Starmer (in less than 2 years) should have been able to fix decades of issues that have built up under several governments and a very unstable global economy over which he has very little control, we’ll now get the ‘he wasn’t voted in by us so has no mandate’ voices too. I find it utterly depressing. No one from any party would have done any better - the problems that we have cannot be fixed in less than 2 years and no one has anymore idea than Starmer (well I certainly haven’t heard any other party put forward any workable suggestions anyway) as how to fix all of this given the causes. I blame Streeting, not Burnham though for triggering the start of it all. The country desperately needs some stability and those two idiots are about to take it away from us in a depressing leadership contest where what we need is sensible. Once that has happened, all those they that seem to think someone can magically fix all of this, will bay for an election for the next 3 years because yuh know, we didn’t vote for Burnham so he has no right to make decisions in my name blah nonsense. I had hoped the World Cup might bring the country together over the next few weeks but no, we’re going to have to suffer through this now.

I agree with all of this BUT Burnham is so much better at communicating political messages to people who are only partially engaged on a ‘vibes’ basis that I have some slim hope that he will improve the general perception of government success. Plus there is a lot of time for Reform to trip themselves up badly too. A good World Cup, some economic growth (not impossible as we’re on the upswing) and things might be different. But your analysis is also highly possible

Firetreev · 19/06/2026 06:31

Luddite26 · 19/06/2026 06:06

A lot of the instability is being caused by the Reform leader pushing his narrative. If the Reform candidate had won they would be calling for a GE which is what they have been pushing for since day 1 of Starmer moving into Number Ten. Starmer has shown a strong leadership on the world stage. He has weaknesses which Reform have exploited . He left himself wide open for a lot of criticism too.
I doubt Farage even wants to be PM he wouldn't be able to earn all his extras and he would have to attempt to fulfill his pledges. He is no friend of the British people he is self serving.

Yes, Farage wants to be PM only to be able to say that he has been the PM. He would consider the job done on day one. The fact that people don't see this amazes me. He doesn't give a fuck about his average voter - he'd actively avoid most of them if he wasn't courting their vote. What does an upper class man who went to public school have in common with the average working /underclass white Brit? Absolutely nothing. He probably considers them to be idiotic proles. The only person Farage cares about is Farage, oh and maybe his donors too.

Settlersa · 19/06/2026 06:31

I am quite fascinated though by how Burnham is morphing into Starmer. They have the same looks and mannerisms

NoWordForFluffy · 19/06/2026 06:28

echt · 19/06/2026 06:27

Boris Johnson wasn't shit because he was Mayor of London, but because he was shit full stop.

Burnham never set the world alight when he was an MP before. Don't kid yourself he won't be shit!

echt · 19/06/2026 06:27

NoWordForFluffy · 19/06/2026 06:23

I know he was mayor but that doesn't mean he can run the country....I would feel the same if they said Sadiq Khan was going to be PM.

We've already tested 'do Mayors make good PMs?' with Boris. I think we all know how well that went.

Boris Johnson wasn't shit because he was Mayor of London, but because he was shit full stop.

NoWordForFluffy · 19/06/2026 06:26

tttigress · 19/06/2026 06:21

Obviously not a Starmer fan, but constantly changing leader is a bad sign for the stability of a country.

I imagine Burnham will get in and start doing things that were not in the Labour manifesto which got Labour into power.

Sticking to the manifesto isn't something Starmer's Labour has done either. And, frankly, some of the manifesto was always going to lead to problems, as they hobbled themselves economically.

Also, Labour's policies have killed growth and youth employment. Nobody expected miracles, but making things worse is really not the way to do it (this relates back to the hobbling).

CurlewKate · 19/06/2026 06:26

Swiss177 · 19/06/2026 06:15

I genuinely don’t understand how a single person votes Labour. I can only assume they are supportive of others subsidising them. There is no other rational answer. They simply have to be economically selfish.

Economically selfish? Isn’t that the people who oppose any tax increases for the rich?

Settlersa · 19/06/2026 06:24

I’m getting Boris vibes with this

NoWordForFluffy · 19/06/2026 06:23

I know he was mayor but that doesn't mean he can run the country....I would feel the same if they said Sadiq Khan was going to be PM.

We've already tested 'do Mayors make good PMs?' with Boris. I think we all know how well that went.

DreadedInn · 19/06/2026 06:23

Swiss177 · 19/06/2026 06:15

I genuinely don’t understand how a single person votes Labour. I can only assume they are supportive of others subsidising them. There is no other rational answer. They simply have to be economically selfish.

Or I am happy to subsidise others who I believe need it.

tttigress · 19/06/2026 06:21

Obviously not a Starmer fan, but constantly changing leader is a bad sign for the stability of a country.

I imagine Burnham will get in and start doing things that were not in the Labour manifesto which got Labour into power.

TigTails · 19/06/2026 06:19

TinaBeliever · 19/06/2026 06:07

Hang on, I thought a reform were going to wipe the floor with labour?

I demand a recount!

😂

Unfortunately for us all, there’s time for this yet.

SparklySparkle · 19/06/2026 06:18

CoffeeAndACroissant · 19/06/2026 05:59

It's because of things like Instagram, everyone wants instant wins. There were 14 years of Tory austerity and yet for some reason people thought Labour could magically fix everything in six months and then were shocked when that didn't happen.

I'm genuinely embarrassed to be British.

Starmer has made things worse - got rid of the 2 child benefit cap and the winter fuel allowance for pensioners not on credit etc. I don’t know anyone who likes him, whether they’re left or right wing.

moose62 · 19/06/2026 06:18

To me it is not really about the person but the fact that the party in Government can vote in whoever they want as PM without the people who voted for them having a say. This goes for all parties.
Perhaps Burnham will be good, perhaps he will be a shambles, but either way he wasn't voted in by the people.
I know he was mayor but that doesn't mean he can run the country....I would feel the same if they said Sadiq Khan was going to be PM.

Dragonscaledaisy · 19/06/2026 06:16

bozzabollix · 19/06/2026 06:08

And presumably you sit there writing that as a Tory voter?

The irony.

Actually no - but it's interesting you assume that.

Flyingintotheunknown · 19/06/2026 06:16

Watercooler · 19/06/2026 06:14

While farage toadies to trump. I'd take starmer any day.

lol! With the current state of this country and his “I don’t give a fuck” attitude, then good luck to you 😂

Swiss177 · 19/06/2026 06:15

I genuinely don’t understand how a single person votes Labour. I can only assume they are supportive of others subsidising them. There is no other rational answer. They simply have to be economically selfish.

Teeheehee1579 · 19/06/2026 06:14

Ugh - I feel really down about this and I actually don’t agree that it’s better than reform winning - I think it makes Reform more likely to win in the next election because on top of the people who think Starmer (in less than 2 years) should have been able to fix decades of issues that have built up under several governments and a very unstable global economy over which he has very little control, we’ll now get the ‘he wasn’t voted in by us so has no mandate’ voices too. I find it utterly depressing. No one from any party would have done any better - the problems that we have cannot be fixed in less than 2 years and no one has anymore idea than Starmer (well I certainly haven’t heard any other party put forward any workable suggestions anyway) as how to fix all of this given the causes. I blame Streeting, not Burnham though for triggering the start of it all. The country desperately needs some stability and those two idiots are about to take it away from us in a depressing leadership contest where what we need is sensible. Once that has happened, all those they that seem to think someone can magically fix all of this, will bay for an election for the next 3 years because yuh know, we didn’t vote for Burnham so he has no right to make decisions in my name blah nonsense. I had hoped the World Cup might bring the country together over the next few weeks but no, we’re going to have to suffer through this now.

Watercooler · 19/06/2026 06:14

Flyingintotheunknown · 19/06/2026 06:13

“Starmer has shown a strong leadership on the world stage.”

And that’s the issue. It’s all that prick cares about, how he is seen on the world stage. He doesn’t give a shit about the UK, he only cares about how the other world leaders see him. Because he has a grandiose sense of self worth and thinks he’s far better than he really is. Complete, selfish total utter narcissist more like.
Oh and btw he’s done nothing but make a fool of himself on the world stage. He’s a laughing stock and the other world leaders know it.

While farage toadies to trump. I'd take starmer any day.

Flyingintotheunknown · 19/06/2026 06:13

Luddite26 · 19/06/2026 06:06

A lot of the instability is being caused by the Reform leader pushing his narrative. If the Reform candidate had won they would be calling for a GE which is what they have been pushing for since day 1 of Starmer moving into Number Ten. Starmer has shown a strong leadership on the world stage. He has weaknesses which Reform have exploited . He left himself wide open for a lot of criticism too.
I doubt Farage even wants to be PM he wouldn't be able to earn all his extras and he would have to attempt to fulfill his pledges. He is no friend of the British people he is self serving.

“Starmer has shown a strong leadership on the world stage.”

And that’s the issue. It’s all that prick cares about, how he is seen on the world stage. He doesn’t give a shit about the UK, he only cares about how the other world leaders see him. Because he has a grandiose sense of self worth and thinks he’s far better than he really is. Complete, selfish total utter narcissist more like.
Oh and btw he’s done nothing but make a fool of himself on the world stage. He’s a laughing stock and the other world leaders know it.

ExtraOnions · 19/06/2026 06:10

You just have to read the langague on this thread to see why Politcs is so toxic, and more divided than ever.

Sunandsunshine · 19/06/2026 06:08

It's all very depressing.

If I thought a change of leadership would do any good I would be happy to see the back of Starmer. But I have absolutely no faith that a new leader will be any better.

And no faith either that a new leader will be long term. The role seems to have become akin to that of most football managers: just a revolving door.

Desperatelyseekinglazysusan · 19/06/2026 06:08

Dragonscaledaisy · 19/06/2026 06:03

That expectation was set by Labour themselves. Unless you voted Labour in the last election, you have no need to be embarrassed. The current shambles is entirely of Starmer's own making and sums up his entire short premiership with the party lurching from one psychodrama to the next, creating ongoing instability.

And actually of Labour MPs own making. They have been the most disloyal and unsupportive of all. Of course if the government tries to make decisions and are forced into u turn after u turn by their own party they are going to look completely incompetent.

bozzabollix · 19/06/2026 06:08

Dragonscaledaisy · 19/06/2026 06:03

That expectation was set by Labour themselves. Unless you voted Labour in the last election, you have no need to be embarrassed. The current shambles is entirely of Starmer's own making and sums up his entire short premiership with the party lurching from one psychodrama to the next, creating ongoing instability.

And presumably you sit there writing that as a Tory voter?

The irony.