Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would you apply for Clare’s Law check with no concerns about your partner?

86 replies

Latteapparel · 18/06/2026 22:55

I would appreciate some objective views on this please.

I have been with my new partner for around four months. He couldn’t be more different from the men in my past relationships. He is kind, gentle, emotionally available, a devoted father and, so far, has given me absolutely no reason to think he is violent, abusive or controlling. There are currently no red flags that I can see and this isn’t about any concerns regarding him.

However, I have been in three domestically abusive relationships in the past. In one of those cases, I applied for a Clare’s Law disclosure and the police asked to meet me in person. They told me there was information about him that they considered concerning, although they could not tell me what it was.

That experience has left me wondering whether I should now apply for a Clare’s Law disclosure in my current relationship, even though I don’t have any concerns at all.

Before anyone suggests I need to work on my boundaries or self-esteem, I left each relationship when the domestic abuse became apparent. My concern isn’t that I stayed in abusive relationships; it’s that none of them appeared abusive at the beginning, which is why I’m questioning whether a Clare’s Law check is simply a sensible safeguarding measure for someone with my history.

Part of me thinks it is a practical precaution. Another part of me worries it is unfair or unnecessary when someone has done nothing to make me suspicious.

If you had a history of domestic abuse but no concerns about your current partner, would you apply for a Clare’s Law disclosure as a matter of routine?

Thank you for reading.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Snaletrale · 19/06/2026 22:01

Sorry, I did say yes, better to be safe than sorry, earlier in the thread. But I still don’t think people are being as judgemental as you seem to think. You have noticed a pattern, so maybe you aren’t spotting the signs as well as some might. But you do get out as soon as you realise. That’s good, but it still means that it might be a good idea to do the check. I’m really not being judgemental or picking on you.

I’m trying to help, as are many others. It may well be bad luck as you say. That’s not impossible, but as others have said, you can use the knowledge of looking back to avoid it happening again. You said that looking back your ex didn’t speak highly of his mother etc. You’ll be instantly wary now if your next partner does the same. That’s come from this thread, so it’s useful to reflect and hear from others surely. Even if you don’t actually agree with all that’s said. We don’t actually know you. You can sift out the relevant bits and ignore the rest without being too defensive. People aren’t attacking you for the sake of it.

Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 21:53

Yetanotherone12 · 19/06/2026 21:32

There is no “threshold of concern”.

anyone can ask, for any reason. That’s the point.

it’s not much different from a DBS check, and anyone can request that, too.

they check the police databases. If anything flags up that would indicate a risk to you they will tell you. If it doesn’t, then there’s no disclosure.

o/p has recognised she has a pattern of picking seemingly nice men who later turn abusive. Seems a good enough reason to me. She can’t trust her own judgement, so she’s using the resource available to her.

I trust my own judgement - there’s simply an outrageous amount of men out there who are wankers (and women too let’s not forget, men get abused too) - if a disclosure helps gives at least some reassurance, albeit not entirely conclusive, then it’s worth doing I now think.

To be fair to me for all the commentators who seem to think it apt to focus on the problem being me, the first two incidents were 20+ years ago. Neither presented with red flags, they were one off heat of the moment anger-led events and a one-off was enough for me to say goodbye. My ex presented some red flags but towards others, not me, until the event. I wasn’t injured but it was enough for me to kick him out immediately in a controlled way with a family member there when he collected his things. Never spoke to him again.

Absolutely no red flags with new boyfriend (maybe an amber one for being a sports nerd) but the service is there to be used.

OP posts:
Unknown127 · 19/06/2026 21:44

I do one on every potential or new partner (that sounds like I’ve had a lot, I haven’t for clarification) but imo it’s better to be safe than sorry. Although with my children’s father, twice absolutely nothing has come back and he’s absolutely awful! It’s those ones you need to worry about. You wouldn’t be asking if you didn’t feel somewhere inside yourself that you needed to.

Yetanotherone12 · 19/06/2026 21:32

HangryBrickShark · 18/06/2026 23:06

Yes as a previous poster said, I'm sure there is a threshold and if your concerns don't meet the threshold they will not carry one out.
.
However, (and I really don’t mean this to sound judgy) but you are obviously drawn towards a certain type of person through either poor judgement, lack of self esteem or just a very unfortunate lack of fish in the local gene pool then it seems in your case it would be something to consider.

I wish you well in your current relationship x

There is no “threshold of concern”.

anyone can ask, for any reason. That’s the point.

it’s not much different from a DBS check, and anyone can request that, too.

they check the police databases. If anything flags up that would indicate a risk to you they will tell you. If it doesn’t, then there’s no disclosure.

o/p has recognised she has a pattern of picking seemingly nice men who later turn abusive. Seems a good enough reason to me. She can’t trust her own judgement, so she’s using the resource available to her.

Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 21:26

Snaletrale · 19/06/2026 18:42

I don’t think you are getting vitriol. You are taking it the wrong way. Most people aren’t judging you. They are actually trying to help you.
You are very defensive when really there is no need to be.
Pp’s are answering your question and just giving reasons why they are answering in the affirmative. Otherwise why would they say yes or no?

This is incorrect. Some people haven’t answered affirmatively - they have turned it on me for not spotting the signs. Read all the comments before making a sweeping, inaccurate statement. You’ve come here to stir up. I note you haven’t advised yes or no.

OP posts:
Snaletrale · 19/06/2026 18:42

I don’t think you are getting vitriol. You are taking it the wrong way. Most people aren’t judging you. They are actually trying to help you.
You are very defensive when really there is no need to be.
Pp’s are answering your question and just giving reasons why they are answering in the affirmative. Otherwise why would they say yes or no?

ChaToilLeam · 19/06/2026 08:05

If it will give you peace of mind (and you definitely deserve that) then do it.

Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 08:01

tiramisugelato · 19/06/2026 06:46

You should.

But I also agree with PP’s that you should explore why you’ve been in three violent relationships - not because you’re at fault but because it’s incredibly unlikely to be just “bad luck”.

Bad luck exists. I lost a friend to cancer this week (41) - she had three unrelated cancers from the age of 19 - it does happen! That’s why we get smear tests, mammograms, to understand the risks.

OP posts:
Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 07:58

Flailingaroundatlife · 19/06/2026 06:29

Sorry you're getting so many unqualified armchair psychologists giving you stick. I'd ignore their ignorance.

In answer to your simple question. Yes, I'd 100% check. I hope it works out well

Thank you - I’m glad others can see what vitriol I have been subjected to by asking a logical, practical, and rational question. I appreciate your kind and thoughtful reply. Some of the posters may well have typed “you must have deserved it” - beggars belief this site does at times!

OP posts:
Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 07:54

ktopfwcv · 19/06/2026 01:46

You keep using the word blame and that's a key takeaway here.

You are asking if I have had a house fire three times should I install a smoke detector? And others are quite rightly responding Yes. But why do you keep having house fires?

It's not about blame but identifying a pattern which you seem closed to exploring.

PP is correct though, if the abuse happened just due to bad luck then there's no need to use them as a basis of requesting a CL check. Everyone should submit one on every male in that case because it's luck of the draw.

With respect you don’t have a clue what I have explored, I don’t owe anyone here an insight into anything beyond the very simple question I asked.

OP posts:
Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 07:52

icannotlivelaughloveintheseconditions · 19/06/2026 05:35

Yes I agree it would be a good idea to do it. But also not every assault gets reported so it’s not foolproof. Have you had any counselling or done the freedom cause to help you spot early signs

The three incidents happened a while ago (years) and I’m well versed in spotting signs now. My tolerance for idiots is very low these days.

OP posts:
FollowingSpiders · 19/06/2026 07:16

Do these requests show up everything? Would they show up cautions that have ‘expired’ for common assault/ threats to kill ?

MulberryFresser · 19/06/2026 07:13

Clonakilla · 19/06/2026 07:12

There’s been some really dangerous advice given on here. First a post suggesting you need to show cause, then suggestions that it can give you peace of mind (no - it’s the lowest possible bar if it comes back negative and doesn’t give you any actual assurance the person hasn’t been violent), then suggesting that you tell the person first, risking them being violent towards you or towards a former partner they belive may disclose against them when faced with the threat of discovery.

Agree - never tell the person that you will be checking if you are scared of them.

Clonakilla · 19/06/2026 07:12

There’s been some really dangerous advice given on here. First a post suggesting you need to show cause, then suggestions that it can give you peace of mind (no - it’s the lowest possible bar if it comes back negative and doesn’t give you any actual assurance the person hasn’t been violent), then suggesting that you tell the person first, risking them being violent towards you or towards a former partner they belive may disclose against them when faced with the threat of discovery.

MulberryFresser · 19/06/2026 07:12

Pineapplewhip · 19/06/2026 06:55

As long as you would actually dump him if it came back with anything bad. Otherwise its a waste of police time.

In your position OP I would apply - although have you tried a general Google of his name with police and hometown in the sentence? It usually brings up any court dates or news articles about them if there are any.

Ie: "Phillip Holder AND police AND Derby"

I've done this for friends in the past and on 3 occasions realised this information about 3 separate men for them:

  1. Convicted as stalking (article's in the local news paper). We searched him up when he sent my friend over 4000 texts after meeting her once.

  2. Convicted of stalking and harassment and vandalism (stalking + smashing up her car). Searched after he took unhealthy interest in her daughter after 2 dates. He was love bombing by purchasing holidays and expensive day trip tickets. We googled and saw the history.

  3. Took a machete to her house and attacked her new boyfriend, smashed up her house and battered her. This was not a surprise to be honest - but our friend didnt listen to these warnings and got married to him. 1 year later he was threatening to kill her grown up kids and smacking her around. He ended up with a restraining order.

Sensible idea - I have had suspicions about people who have started shouting at me after a few dates. I had resolved not to meet the men again. I have spoken to the police about them - they gave me the impression that they will only do a Clare’s Law if you are not going to dump them on the basis of bad behaviour - they wouldn’t check for me because I had already decided not to see the guys.

OP by all means ask for the CL but you might not get it. The other thing I wanted to say is that my brother did one and was falsely reassured because the woman hadn’t been convicted yet.

Pineapplewhip · 19/06/2026 06:55

As long as you would actually dump him if it came back with anything bad. Otherwise its a waste of police time.

In your position OP I would apply - although have you tried a general Google of his name with police and hometown in the sentence? It usually brings up any court dates or news articles about them if there are any.

Ie: "Phillip Holder AND police AND Derby"

I've done this for friends in the past and on 3 occasions realised this information about 3 separate men for them:

  1. Convicted as stalking (article's in the local news paper). We searched him up when he sent my friend over 4000 texts after meeting her once.

  2. Convicted of stalking and harassment and vandalism (stalking + smashing up her car). Searched after he took unhealthy interest in her daughter after 2 dates. He was love bombing by purchasing holidays and expensive day trip tickets. We googled and saw the history.

  3. Took a machete to her house and attacked her new boyfriend, smashed up her house and battered her. This was not a surprise to be honest - but our friend didnt listen to these warnings and got married to him. 1 year later he was threatening to kill her grown up kids and smacking her around. He ended up with a restraining order.

tiramisugelato · 19/06/2026 06:46

You should.

But I also agree with PP’s that you should explore why you’ve been in three violent relationships - not because you’re at fault but because it’s incredibly unlikely to be just “bad luck”.

WonderingWanda · 19/06/2026 06:38

Yes I think I would.

Flailingaroundatlife · 19/06/2026 06:29

Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 01:31

Thank you for your advice and kind comments, greatly appreciated.

Sorry you're getting so many unqualified armchair psychologists giving you stick. I'd ignore their ignorance.

In answer to your simple question. Yes, I'd 100% check. I hope it works out well

TigTails · 19/06/2026 06:17

You have absolutely nothing to lose by applying. You gut instinct is to do it, so you should listen.

icannotlivelaughloveintheseconditions · 19/06/2026 05:35

Yes I agree it would be a good idea to do it. But also not every assault gets reported so it’s not foolproof. Have you had any counselling or done the freedom cause to help you spot early signs

ktopfwcv · 19/06/2026 01:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

That is not an acceptable way to speak to someone.

ktopfwcv · 19/06/2026 01:46

Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 00:28

See my response above.

You keep using the word blame and that's a key takeaway here.

You are asking if I have had a house fire three times should I install a smoke detector? And others are quite rightly responding Yes. But why do you keep having house fires?

It's not about blame but identifying a pattern which you seem closed to exploring.

PP is correct though, if the abuse happened just due to bad luck then there's no need to use them as a basis of requesting a CL check. Everyone should submit one on every male in that case because it's luck of the draw.

Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 01:31

greenied · 19/06/2026 00:34

It seems the right thing to do at this point in your relationship. More people should do this. I know it’s not fool proof but it’s definitely there to help and thank goodness it is. I hope this fella is as good as he sounds, you deserve to be treated respectfully and enjoy your life.

Thank you for your advice and kind comments, greatly appreciated.

OP posts:
Latteapparel · 19/06/2026 01:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.