Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

If you support Reform, Restore, Greens and similar far right/left parties

243 replies

Yellownotblue · 15/06/2026 22:45

How do you feel about the fact that your support is being whipped up by Russia, in concerted attacks, for the specific purpose of sowing division and political instability in Britain? Is this giving you any pause for thought? Do you think you will go back to supporting traditional parties?

Do you think the party you support has a strong platform to defend the country against clear and present danger from very powerful nations which are taking active measures to harm us? Or put another way, are you prepared to entertain the very real possibility that the party you support is propped up by foreign influence and money that are actually using you as pawns in a political game that will destroy all of us, including yourself?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8r2l352z2do

A composite image with a picture of Sir Keir Starmer on the left and on the right, a still from a video showing a car on fire, which was one of the arson attacks on property linked to him. Behind the image of Sir Keir is a Russian flag.

Russia was behind arson attacks targeting PM, BBC reveals

Evidence shows Russians directing the plot and stoking tensions with fake far-right and Muslim groups.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8r2l352z2do

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
itsnotfairisit · 16/06/2026 13:12

hay5689 · 15/06/2026 22:55

I don’t believe a word the BBC says anymore.

Who DO you believe?

This is a report of a court case. Everything that was said was said in open and public court (you or I could have attended, and many members of the public probably did) so, sorry to disappoint your preconceptions, but this a ringer for being accurate.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/06/2026 13:09

TemperanceWest · 16/06/2026 13:05

As a pp said (not sure it was you?) SM has to be held accountable in the same way the press is. It is the only way.

Yes, we do need to hold social media accountable for the material that they publish. I'm just not sure that I see anyone with the courage to take on that fight?

LuckyHazelFox · 16/06/2026 13:09

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:05

Ah another ‘if you support a party I disapprove of, justify your decision although you will be called a bigot or stupid’ thread. Is it that time already?

It certainly is. @CornishDaughteroftheDawn I really wouldn't waste any more time on this. When you read that we fellow citizens need to behave in a certain way, you just laugh and say yeah right. Hilarious.

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:08

TemperanceWest · 16/06/2026 13:07

Have you bothered to read the thread at all?

Yes thanks but these threads always end up the same way

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/06/2026 13:07

TooBigForMyBoots · 16/06/2026 12:59

I think you should look at the Russia Report and what the security services and analysts are saying.

I can't access the Telegraph article, its behind a paywall but if they did say Serco wouldn’t co operate with instructions from a Reform government then they were lying. I don't think they said that though. Do you have a quote?

Edited

I've read the Telegraph article.

They did not report that Serco wouldn't cooperate with a Reform government.

They reported that Serco, like the other companies that they had contacted to ask about potential collaboration with Reform, had declined to comment.

And they reported that Serco would not be bidding for a mass deportation contract.

@CornishDaughteroftheDawn is either deliberately seeking to spread disinformation about what was reported or else she has a serious problem with her reading comprehension.

TemperanceWest · 16/06/2026 13:07

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:05

Ah another ‘if you support a party I disapprove of, justify your decision although you will be called a bigot or stupid’ thread. Is it that time already?

Have you bothered to read the thread at all?

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:05

Ah another ‘if you support a party I disapprove of, justify your decision although you will be called a bigot or stupid’ thread. Is it that time already?

TemperanceWest · 16/06/2026 13:05

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/06/2026 13:02

Sadly, yes, I think we're totally fucked. I actually can't see any way back to a world in which facts matter.

I fear for the younger generation and what kind of world we have created for our children and our grandchildren.

The idea of integrity in public life is gone. The notion of truth is gone. Democracy, as we knew it, is gone. We are going to need to figure out a different way of being in this new reality. I don't know what that looks like yet, but I'm starting to realise that we simply cannot rely on our fellow citizens to behave like decent, reasonable or rational human beings.

As a pp said (not sure it was you?) SM has to be held accountable in the same way the press is. It is the only way.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/06/2026 13:02

Firetreev · 16/06/2026 12:49

We're utterly fucked, aren't we? I read many of the posts on here and just despair. People's world views are so warped by misinformation and propaganda on social media. It really is a cancer. They don't believe reputable journalists, but believe faceless accounts on X. The security services need to have the power to expose and shut down foreign interference online and in our press. Putin must be laughing.

Sadly, yes, I think we're totally fucked. I actually can't see any way back to a world in which facts matter.

I fear for the younger generation and what kind of world we have created for our children and our grandchildren.

The idea of integrity in public life is gone. The notion of truth is gone. Democracy, as we knew it, is gone. We are going to need to figure out a different way of being in this new reality. I don't know what that looks like yet, but I'm starting to realise that we simply cannot rely on our fellow citizens to behave like decent, reasonable or rational human beings.

TemperanceWest · 16/06/2026 13:02

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 12:54

Do you have specifics about it is actually affecting people though?

The report that was made in the Telegraph that they wouldn’t co operate with instructions from a Reform government. Presumably some grown ups have stepped in.

It is affecting you. You are swallowing disinformation whole and then repeating it on here.

TooBigForMyBoots · 16/06/2026 12:59

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 12:54

Do you have specifics about it is actually affecting people though?

The report that was made in the Telegraph that they wouldn’t co operate with instructions from a Reform government. Presumably some grown ups have stepped in.

I think you should look at the Russia Report and what the security services and analysts are saying.

I can't access the Telegraph article, its behind a paywall but if they did say Serco wouldn’t co operate with instructions from a Reform government then they were lying. I don't think they said that though. Do you have a quote?

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 12:54

TooBigForMyBoots · 16/06/2026 12:23

I'm not claiming it. Our security services are claiming it.

Have you found what Serco backtracked on?

Edited

Do you have specifics about it is actually affecting people though?

The report that was made in the Telegraph that they wouldn’t co operate with instructions from a Reform government. Presumably some grown ups have stepped in.

Firetreev · 16/06/2026 12:49

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 15/06/2026 23:55

Honestly, I think we're witnessing the death of democracy. There is foreign interference on a scale that we've never seen before, and yet people simply won't acknowledge the extent to which they are being manipulated. The facts don't seem to matter any more, either, as some of the posts on this thread demonstrate - anything that doesn't support someone's particular world view is merely dismissed as fake news.

I really don't see how we can come back from this as a society.

We're utterly fucked, aren't we? I read many of the posts on here and just despair. People's world views are so warped by misinformation and propaganda on social media. It really is a cancer. They don't believe reputable journalists, but believe faceless accounts on X. The security services need to have the power to expose and shut down foreign interference online and in our press. Putin must be laughing.

TooBigForMyBoots · 16/06/2026 12:46

The Telegraph reported that Serco, a private sector company, would not be bidding for mass deportation contracts in the UK.

Zia claimed Serco had taken a decision to oppose Reform's plans. He said the only reasonable interpretation of Serco’s position is that it now believes itself to be an alternative power base to the duly elected government of the United Kingdom, and is willing to act contrary to the interests of the British electorate. And made some crazy, vague threats.🤯

Responding, Serco said it “does not take political positions, nor do we comment on the policy programmes of political parties”.

This is a case of an unelected member of Reform UK who seems to think he can dictate to and threaten a private sector company that has the right to bid or not bid on contracts. Not some conspiracy or activism.🤷‍♀️

TemperanceWest · 16/06/2026 12:44

Whammyammy · 16/06/2026 12:34

Does anyone? I don't even trust bbc weather

The FT has a good article on the Russian involvement in the case, if that's more your thing. The Telegraph has covrred it too. And other media outlets.

NorthXNorthWest · 16/06/2026 12:40

TallSturdyGirls · 16/06/2026 11:28

Its not really extreme, rather just a bit bleugh. They are doing some decent stuff but its not part of a clear and cohesive plan.
Back to the actual purpose of thia thread. The Russia interference has been working very hard to push an anti Labour theme and drive people to dangerous extremes. Creating fear and division. Im amazed I survive walking to the shops in my very diverse area.

Whilst people should be aware of international bad actors, Labour are doing a sterling job of self sabotage, all on their own.

Whammyammy · 16/06/2026 12:34

hay5689 · 15/06/2026 22:55

I don’t believe a word the BBC says anymore.

Does anyone? I don't even trust bbc weather

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/06/2026 12:31

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 11:59

It’s not ‘spreading information from an unreliable source’ although I’m sure you’d love to smear the Telegraph as an unreliable source.

It was reported in the Telegraph and by Zia Yusuf that Serco was not intending to abide by instructions from a Reform government.

Just because Serco is now backtracking on what appears to be an activist that has got way above themselves doesn’t mean this is all made up. I’ll take no lessons from you.

Of course it is spreading mis/disinformation.

You claimed that there were reports that "Serco, the vast prisoner and immigrant accommodation management company would refuse to follow instructions by a Reform government".

That was not true. As such, you were spreading mis/disinformation.

You cited Zia Yusuf's Facebook page as your source. That is not a reliable source of information.

You have since stated that Serco's refusal to follow instructions from a Reform government was reported in the Telegraph. I've checked. All I could find were reports on Zia Yusuf's letter (which obviously pushed his narrative) and a report that Serco "is understood to have ruled out involvement in an ICE-style deportation campaign".

Serco has referred to inaccuracies in the Telegraph reporting, but even if it were true, a private company deciding that it would not be interested in tendering for a future contract in a hypothetical procurement exercise that a hypothetical Reform government might or might not choose to run is categorically not the same as the incumbent holder of an existing government contract to provide migrant accommodation stating that it would refuse to follow instructions from any future government.

Perhaps you have no idea how public sector procurement works in the UK, but for your information, all private companies are free to choose which tender opportunities they wish to respond to and which they do not, because they are private companies. The fact that they may hold an existing contract to provide one kind of service in relation to our immigration system does not create any obligation on them to provide other services which are outside the scope of their existing contracts.

Anyway, before you posted your mis/disinformation, you clearly did not bother checking your facts, as Serco had in fact already issued a statement clarifying its position and confirming that it does not comment on the policy programmes of political parties.

I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you were spreading misinformation due to ignorance/poor critical thinking skills, but the fact that you're digging in your heels on this one makes me lean more towards the view that you're deliberately spreading disinformation.

randomchap · 16/06/2026 12:24

So again you're making assertions without any substance or evidence.

TemperanceWest · 16/06/2026 12:24

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 11:59

It’s not ‘spreading information from an unreliable source’ although I’m sure you’d love to smear the Telegraph as an unreliable source.

It was reported in the Telegraph and by Zia Yusuf that Serco was not intending to abide by instructions from a Reform government.

Just because Serco is now backtracking on what appears to be an activist that has got way above themselves doesn’t mean this is all made up. I’ll take no lessons from you.

It was reported in the Telegraph and by Zia Yusuf that Serco was not intending to abide by instructions from a Reform government

No. This is what the Telegraph article said about SERCO. You are not being truthful.

If you support Reform, Restore, Greens and similar far right/left parties
If you support Reform, Restore, Greens and similar far right/left parties
If you support Reform, Restore, Greens and similar far right/left parties
TooBigForMyBoots · 16/06/2026 12:23

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 12:20

So why does the Prime Minister and much of his government feel the need to participate in spreading fear and division then? Is he trying to compete with the Russians to scare us more?

Out of interest, what exactly are you claiming that the Russians are trying to do and how have they influenced me?

I'm not claiming it. Our security services are claiming it.

Have you found what Serco backtracked on?

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 12:20

TooBigForMyBoots · 16/06/2026 11:50

That's the point of these Russian campaigns, to make people feel threatened, to spread fear and division.

So why does the Prime Minister and much of his government feel the need to participate in spreading fear and division then? Is he trying to compete with the Russians to scare us more?

Out of interest, what exactly are you claiming that the Russians are trying to do and how have they influenced me?

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 12:15

randomchap · 16/06/2026 10:38

Feel free to back up your claims with evidence. Everything I posted can be linked back to a parliamentary bill.

The assisted dying bill was a private members bill, not a government one. What precisely did they do to ram it through? You do know the difference between a private members bill and a government one don't you?

Yes, thanks for the unnecessary condescension. One of the 1000+ objections to it was that it was not the right subject for a PMB.

I’m not going to list a whole load of links and documents because a) most people who follow current affairs are very aware of these things and b) if you want to prove anything I’ve said as being incorrect, feel free.

I don’t care if you believe me or not as it doesn’t change the facts that everyone else can see. People who are interested in what I say can do their own research and make up their own minds. In fact I’d rather they did that.

TooBigForMyBoots · 16/06/2026 12:10

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 11:59

It’s not ‘spreading information from an unreliable source’ although I’m sure you’d love to smear the Telegraph as an unreliable source.

It was reported in the Telegraph and by Zia Yusuf that Serco was not intending to abide by instructions from a Reform government.

Just because Serco is now backtracking on what appears to be an activist that has got way above themselves doesn’t mean this is all made up. I’ll take no lessons from you.

Back tracking on what?

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 16/06/2026 11:59

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 16/06/2026 10:21

No, the report that I read regarding Serco's response was published yesterday.

Perhaps you will take this as a lesson next time not to blindly trust what you read on Facebook. And certainly not to spread information from an unreliable source without doing some basic fact checking first?

It’s not ‘spreading information from an unreliable source’ although I’m sure you’d love to smear the Telegraph as an unreliable source.

It was reported in the Telegraph and by Zia Yusuf that Serco was not intending to abide by instructions from a Reform government.

Just because Serco is now backtracking on what appears to be an activist that has got way above themselves doesn’t mean this is all made up. I’ll take no lessons from you.