Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to find a girl's comment about social media quite sad

289 replies

FelicityShagsWell · 15/06/2026 08:05

I just heard the story on the radio about Kier Starmer wanting to tighten up access to social media for under 16s. A few sound bites from some children followed. One girl said it's unfair because there's nothing else to do. Am I unreasonable to find that utterly sad?

OP posts:
Badbadbunny · 15/06/2026 17:08

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:56

Anyway I have worked with the parents of children who were so badly bullied on social media that they threw themselves in front of trains.

Those parents would rather their kid was bored.

I was suicidal as a teenager due to serious "in person" bullying at our secondary school. Bullies will always find a way to bully!

superspideysense · 15/06/2026 17:07

i wonder how this will be monitored and policed? There are plenty of parents who don’t care. So will happily lets their kids continue.

Badbadbunny · 15/06/2026 17:07

I agree with the girl mentioned. Unless you're in a big city, there's often very little "to do" in the smaller towns and rural areas. Made worse by there being no "communities" anymore with families broken up and spread around the country and of course "broken families" where children seem to be absent from their "home" at weekends and don't have a community where their "weekend parent" lives. Also, the way that kids are split and spread over many different schools means often they don't have school friends close to where they live. My son's primary school leavers class were split over around 7 secondary schools and no one from our village went to the same secondary school as DS. Uni leavers often never return home to "live" due to having to move away for jobs, so their children aren't "local" enough to hang out with cousins etc. Also, very little in the way of youth clubs, junior discos, etc nor clubs/societies for youngsters.

If we want kids off social media, we need to think about modern fragmented society.

When I was young we just "played out" with whoever was playing on our street - we all went to the same primary school, then we all went to the same secondary school, our cousins lived nearby, as did Aunts/Uncles, etc. There was a real community and lots of things to do, i.e. scouts/brownies every week, junior disco in our church hall every month, always a football match on the junior school field where everyone joined in, etc. Nowadays, the scouts have closed down, no junior discos in the church hall (in fact the only church hall events are for old people!), and the school field is fenced in and you can't get in to play on it!!

superspideysense · 15/06/2026 17:06

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 15/06/2026 11:16

My DS's secondary school doesn't even have a library. I get the impression that so many schools and facilities for young people have been based around the assumption of them having ready access to phones and the Internet... and now they're trying to take them away without maybe considering all of the ramifications.

Even before the government-level ban, the school had decided to ban all mobiles on the premises - and apparently hadn't even stopped to realise that they are an essential lifeline for kids with diabetes and other disabilities and serious health conditions.

I do think that, if this is enforced strictly and young people are effectively severed from modern technology, in a few years, there will be alarm and cries about a widespread lack of technical skills amongst young adults - especially compared with people of the same generation in China and other countries.

Unless I’m wrong it’s not a phone ban. But a social media ban?

so they can still research and use apps for safety etc.

tiramisugelato · 15/06/2026 17:04

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:54

I’m suggesting people who cannot think of anything to do that is free and requires no resources are lacking creativity somewhat. Critical thinking was the wrong term, I admit. But the brain is an amazing thing and humans have entertained themselves in poverty without screens for millennia.

In saying she let herself down, she’s not a child now… I said that to her as an adult who is saying she was bored and had nothing to do and so would children now because that was her experience. She is the one who says she had a shit time because she didn’t think of doing other things.

Where did I say I had a shit time, exactly? Hmm

I did all the free things you talk about in your posts but there was still a lot of time where I was sitting around doing very little, and yes, I was bored. My parents were at work all day and I didn't have unlimited access to money or public transport to get myself around.

With one exception, my friends didn't live within walking distance so I spent a lot of time on my own. I'm not sure my experience is particularly unique either Confused

mcmuffin22 · 15/06/2026 16:57

TheChosenTwo · 15/06/2026 08:14

It’s just the way they’ll feel for now.
My then teen dc said the same when their school banned the use of phones during lunch/break times. Within about 2 weeks they were sitting playing card games etc with their friends instead of sat side by side noses in phones.
they’ll get used to it and find there’s LOADS to do!

I agree. They are thinking about it from their own point of view. But then they'll realise that with everyone in the same boat, there will be more opportunities to socialise irl.

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:56

Anyway I have worked with the parents of children who were so badly bullied on social media that they threw themselves in front of trains.

Those parents would rather their kid was bored.

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:55

Ihateboris · 15/06/2026 16:51

I've already heard some under 16s laughing about this as they're savvy enough to use a VPN.

There are ways for SM companies to detect VPN use if they want to implement that.

Ihateboris · 15/06/2026 16:55

EstoyLocaPorTi · 15/06/2026 16:54

Just like some under 18s figure out how to get alcohol bought for them. Doesn’t mean the ban isn’t worthwhile.

Oh I completely agree...they have to start somewhere. I'm just saying that the majority will still find a way

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:54

Batties · 15/06/2026 16:47

So now you’re suggesting that I have a lack of critical thinking because I disagree with you? You were unnecessarily harsh. You should be able to make a point without saying that a poster let herself down when she was a child.

Some people grow up in stable, loving environments where the things you describe are realistic and achievable.

But not every child has that experience. Some grow up in difficult or chaotic households where there isn’t always enough food, where parents may be dealing with serious mental health problems, addiction, poverty, or other struggles, or where they are emotionally or physically absent. Some children may be facing their own challenges, whether that’s illness, disability, trauma, or difficulties with their mental health.

Neither of us know whether that applies to the pp, but I would suggest that a lack of consideration of those facts is what actually shows a lack of critical thinking skills.

I’m suggesting people who cannot think of anything to do that is free and requires no resources are lacking creativity somewhat. Critical thinking was the wrong term, I admit. But the brain is an amazing thing and humans have entertained themselves in poverty without screens for millennia.

In saying she let herself down, she’s not a child now… I said that to her as an adult who is saying she was bored and had nothing to do and so would children now because that was her experience. She is the one who says she had a shit time because she didn’t think of doing other things.

EstoyLocaPorTi · 15/06/2026 16:54

Ihateboris · 15/06/2026 16:51

I've already heard some under 16s laughing about this as they're savvy enough to use a VPN.

Just like some under 18s figure out how to get alcohol bought for them. Doesn’t mean the ban isn’t worthwhile.

Ihateboris · 15/06/2026 16:51

I've already heard some under 16s laughing about this as they're savvy enough to use a VPN.

Batties · 15/06/2026 16:47

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:30

This is what I’m saying though… it doesn’t cost money to make up dances, take online quizzes, read a book from the library or school, listen to music, make up songs, write poems or stories. It costs a couple of quid to buy a notebook and pen and write or draw. People acting like kids need access to money to entertain themselves are being ridiculous and show a real lack of critical thinking imo.

They can also go for a walk or take up running or practice yoga or reorganise their rooms or volunteer somewhere.

Edited

So now you’re suggesting that I have a lack of critical thinking because I disagree with you? You were unnecessarily harsh. You should be able to make a point without saying that a poster let herself down when she was a child.

Some people grow up in stable, loving environments where the things you describe are realistic and achievable.

But not every child has that experience. Some grow up in difficult or chaotic households where there isn’t always enough food, where parents may be dealing with serious mental health problems, addiction, poverty, or other struggles, or where they are emotionally or physically absent. Some children may be facing their own challenges, whether that’s illness, disability, trauma, or difficulties with their mental health.

Neither of us know whether that applies to the pp, but I would suggest that a lack of consideration of those facts is what actually shows a lack of critical thinking skills.

Dontlletmedownbruce · 15/06/2026 16:44

I imagine kids will loiter a bit more, the chats on the footpath after school or near bus stops were a big part of my socialising as a teen. We were probably half blocking the path and possibly annoying neighbours but it was harmless banter, having a laugh or sometimes a bit of a flirt. I hope people are open minded to this and don't see this as a new negative phenomenon.

Also they can still phone each other, it used to be normal for teens to chat for hours or make multiple phone calls. It doesn't have to be socially isolating.

Jellycat1313 · 15/06/2026 16:44

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:36

Anyway all of this is a bit moot because even if there are some poor children who are unable to access any resources whatsoever and have no friends and no library and can’t go outside for some reason and the only good entertainment they have is social media…. That still doesn’t mean it’s good for them and they wouldn’t be better off watching shit TV than scrolling constantly taking in unmoderated, unvetted often untrue and dangerous material.

Edited

I do agree with you these though.

I grew up poor I was lucky that I had friends to play outside with, but I also visited the library every week and read for hours, I watched crap TV for hours when I was bored or on rainy days but imo it was better than the doom scrolling. Better in terms of mental health and for concentration, wellbeing.

WongKarWaiFan · 15/06/2026 16:43

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:41

That’s watercolours. Not normal paper and normal pencils. They don’t cost more than a smartphone and internet.

I buy pencils and paper too obviously and they do cost more than a cheap phone contract if you’re using them regularly. They really do, and of course, if you buy the cheapest possible pencils and paper, it’s not much fun because you don’t get good results and the pencils need to be replaced even more often because they’re not great.

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:43

Jellycat1313 · 15/06/2026 16:40

The internet is essential for households these days though.

And phone contracts can cost as little as a few pounds a month.

Having a smartphone and the Internet are essential these days as literally everything is done online.

But people are saying these children’s parents won’t even buy them basic supplies like paper, pens books. So why would they ensure they had a phone and contract even if it’s necessary for most modern life? Either their parents give a shit or they don’t.

EstoyLocaPorTi · 15/06/2026 16:42

Chimneyissues · 15/06/2026 16:24

Those are still lone activities though. The attraction of SM and phones is contact with others.
DD has always been very good at doing things, she’s off to do art at uni. Children need more than sitting at home doing things on their own.

They’re not banning phones though? Teens will still be able to message their friends/phone them/FaceTime them. None of that is being banned. How does Tik Tok/YouTube etc mean that they’re being more sociable than they could be by FaceTiming someone?

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:41

WongKarWaiFan · 15/06/2026 16:39

I usually read an lot and I paint watercolours. I’ve definitely spent way more money in the last year on books and paint/paper than. I have on my smartphone contract.

I agree with this ban, but I don’t see why people are pretending that all kid everywhere have access to better alternatives on a lot of cases they really don’t, especially when kids aren’t allowed to just hang out in lots of places anymore.

Edited

That’s watercolours. Not normal paper and normal pencils. They don’t cost more than a smartphone and internet.

Jellycat1313 · 15/06/2026 16:40

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:32

But there’s money for phone contracts, smart phones and internet?

Those aren’t cheaper than books or paper.

Edited

The internet is essential for households these days though.

And phone contracts can cost as little as a few pounds a month.

Having a smartphone and the Internet are essential these days as literally everything is done online.

EstoyLocaPorTi · 15/06/2026 16:40

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:36

Anyway all of this is a bit moot because even if there are some poor children who are unable to access any resources whatsoever and have no friends and no library and can’t go outside for some reason and the only good entertainment they have is social media…. That still doesn’t mean it’s good for them and they wouldn’t be better off watching shit TV than scrolling constantly taking in unmoderated, unvetted often untrue and dangerous material.

Edited

100% agree.

WongKarWaiFan · 15/06/2026 16:39

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:32

But there’s money for phone contracts, smart phones and internet?

Those aren’t cheaper than books or paper.

Edited

I usually read an lot and I paint watercolours. I’ve definitely spent way more money in the last year on books and paint/paper than. I have on my smartphone contract.

I agree with this ban, but I don’t see why people are pretending that all kid everywhere have access to better alternatives on a lot of cases they really don’t, especially when kids aren’t allowed to just hang out in lots of places anymore.

Dontlletmedownbruce · 15/06/2026 16:36

I think and hope the knock on effect will be similar to the smoking ban. I remember being at a house party only months after the ban and everyone went outside to smoke. I had been at many house parties and people always smoked indoors, in some cases there was a room assigned as the smoking room but it was mostly free for all. A law empowered people to self police in other circumstances. Maybe in a few years it will be socially acceptable to ask an adult to turn the volume off when watching videos in public or to tell someone to not cross the road while staring at their phone.

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:36

Anyway all of this is a bit moot because even if there are some poor children who are unable to access any resources whatsoever and have no friends and no library and can’t go outside for some reason and the only good entertainment they have is social media…. That still doesn’t mean it’s good for them and they wouldn’t be better off watching shit TV than scrolling constantly taking in unmoderated, unvetted often untrue and dangerous material.

oliviaAustin · 15/06/2026 16:32

MrsMurphyIWish · 15/06/2026 16:31

Some of the comments on here come from a great place of privilege. I grew up in a house that didn’t have books - they were an expense. There was no library in my area. There are children who I teach today who don’t have books. I can very well imagine had SM been around when I was a teen I would have been on it endlessly as it would have provided an escape. There was no money for games or paper to draw on - again, all privileged comments. I just watched shit TV.

Now I’m not advocating for endless SM - I have a 15 year old and 12 year old but they only have WhatsApp and phones are given to me at 8pm - but the idea that a SM ban will change teen behaviour is naive.

But there’s money for phone contracts, smart phones and internet?

Those aren’t cheaper than books or paper.