Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Uncomfortable with new manager but colleague disagrees

84 replies

MManchesterrain · 11/06/2026 21:04

We’re getting a new manager next week. I’m a manager myself, working alongside 7/8 others, and we will be reporting in to him.

He is moving across from another part of the business. There is always gossip in our company and it’s a fairly small town we work in so lots of people know each other.

Anyway, it’s known that he went through a disciplinary process recently during which he was suspended, and people were surprised he kept his job. What happened is something people are aware of, and he is being moved across not through his choice.

4 of us are women and would feel uncomfortable being managed by him. 3 of us want to speak to our senior manager to see explain this and that we are uncomfortable being managed by him, but the other is strongly against this and thinks it will mark our cards and make us appear difficult.

Would it be wrong to proceed against her wishes?

OP posts:
Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 12/06/2026 04:01

I’m concerned that a woman left the company not the man. I would be having a chat with the manager who is moving him over. Leopards do not change their spots.

VashtaNerada · 12/06/2026 03:22

This is gossip. Unless you know all the details of his disciplinary and have clear evidence that it wasn’t managed appropriately, you don’t have a leg to stand on. Leave him alone and let him do his job.

amylou8 · 12/06/2026 02:32

MManchesterrain · 11/06/2026 21:24

Sexual relations with a direct report (who appears to have left the company, unsure if by her own accord or dismissed)

Well as long as you don't start shagging him there shouldn't be an issue??!

BrokenWingsCantFly · 12/06/2026 02:28

They are aware of the issue if there has been a dissaplinary. What new information are you wanting to present the boss with?

Assume this was a consenting relationship. Otherwise he would not still be there. What are your concerns? That he will lure any of you in to another affair? Just don't do that. Problem solved. He is a shit man for what he has done to his wife, but that doesn't mean he will be a shit manager.

Boreded · 12/06/2026 02:27

MManchesterrain · 11/06/2026 21:24

Sexual relations with a direct report (who appears to have left the company, unsure if by her own accord or dismissed)

Then don’t have sexual relations with him and all will be well ffs

BudgetBuster · 12/06/2026 01:46

MManchesterrain · 11/06/2026 22:55

They were at it in the office which is why there was a disciplinary. A bit different to happening in hotels etc.

Are you expecting him to want to sleep with all of you too or something?

I'm just struggling to see what your actual grievance is

Whatado · 12/06/2026 00:25

As a manager Im surprised your asking, however the fact you know about the details of the disciplinary and you and a group of other managers are discussing and potentially co ordinating regarding it tells me none of you are partially HR or employment law savy

I ll tell you what I would tell you if you came to as a manager - Thanks for letting me know your concerns. However I would like to take an opportunity to direct you to our internal processes including disciplinary which includes confidentiality. My expectations for the management team is XXX.

If there are specific issues in the day to day interactions or instructions provided that are not inline with said policies and procedures you can raise them via x.

Then I would expect you to get on with it.

MoleskineNotebooks · 12/06/2026 00:12

Well, speak up if you like, obviously, but if there’s no suggestion of coercion or abuse of power and it was a consensual relationship, I’m not sure where the discomfort lies?

WilfredsPies · 11/06/2026 23:43

StrictlyCoffee · 11/06/2026 23:18

Even if it was consensual it can still be inappropriate/an abuse of power in the workplace

It could be, but she’s said she doesn’t know any more than there was an age gap.

StrictlyCoffee · 11/06/2026 23:18

Even if it was consensual it can still be inappropriate/an abuse of power in the workplace

WilfredsPies · 11/06/2026 23:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I’ve either forgotten or didn’t see the other thread, have you reported it Roo?

What’s making you think it’s the same poster? Was talking to her like pulling hen’s teeth as well?

WilfredsPies · 11/06/2026 23:15

MManchesterrain · 11/06/2026 22:55

They were at it in the office which is why there was a disciplinary. A bit different to happening in hotels etc.

Again, what’s making you and the other two women uncomfortable about him managing you? If you can’t articulate your concerns here, what are you going to say to your current manager that’s going to make them take you seriously? His lack of morals and his behaviour are reasons not to be friends with him, but they are not reasons not to be managed by him.

Rooroobear · 11/06/2026 23:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

MManchesterrain · 11/06/2026 22:55

They were at it in the office which is why there was a disciplinary. A bit different to happening in hotels etc.

OP posts:
Xkk · 11/06/2026 22:51

His sexual relations outside his marriage have nothing to do with you. He is a manager in the organisation where you work, not your child's godfather.

BudgetBuster · 11/06/2026 22:28

MManchesterrain · 11/06/2026 21:31

I don’t know. There was an age gap and he was married.

So what exactly are you uncomfortable with? What would your complaint / worry actually be?

Arlanymor · 11/06/2026 22:08

What are you uncomfortable about exactly? You seem to know bits of whispers.

JohnnyMcGrathSaysFuckOff · 11/06/2026 22:05

Yeah, I am not sure what you are uncomfortable about.

It sounds like he had a questionable but consensual relationship, was investigated, and allowed to stay employed but not in that area. Which suggests there wasn't untoward behaviour.

If you were say, gay, and he had a history of homophobic remarks - I'd say you had cause for anticipatory concern.

But there is nothing to suggest he has a general issue managing women.

k1233 · 11/06/2026 22:01

I think you are overreacting. I'm not sure why you're uncomfortable being managed by him unless he has history of sexual harassment. Sexual relationships are rife in organisations. Unless you are suggesting he will use his position to coerce you to provide sexual favours. In which case report it when it happens.

ScholesPanda · 11/06/2026 21:59

YABU. Your opinions on age gap relationships, affairs or workplace romances are immaterial. We all have to work with people we don't like or have very different values to us and it's unprofessional to pretend otherwise.

And the 4th member of your group is wrong about one thing if I've understood you correctly. If you are the manager under him and the other women report to you it will be you who will be seen to have encouraged gossip and you will be seen as the ringleader. It's your card that will be marked.

Goditsmemargaret · 11/06/2026 21:46

FFS just mind your own business and wait to see what he's like as a manager.

SequinsandSolerosInTheSummertime · 11/06/2026 21:45

So future boss has had a morally questionable but not illegal relationship at work. What has that got to do with the three of you, exactly?

WilfredsPies · 11/06/2026 21:42

So what’s making you uncomfortable with being managed by him? If there was no suggestion of coercion or harassment and everything was entirely consensual, he’s just your standard grubby little sleazeball. Are you expecting your manager to go to his managers and tell them that you feel uncomfortable because the new bloke has the morals of a Tom cat? What are they supposed to do with that? Have you thought about the likely outcomes of this scenario?

airportfloor · 11/06/2026 21:40

It is possible that he could manage another team in another part of the business? Is that what you're hoping for?

ACynicalDad · 11/06/2026 21:37

I'd think it's perfectly reasonable for you to say us three are concerned, but very unreasonable to say us four are or we all are, or the department is.

Swipe left for the next trending thread