Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think USA has gone crazy - Karmelo Anthony is a murderer not a victim

258 replies

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 14:32

From what I have read, Karmelo Anthony (who is black African American) took a concealed knife to a track event. When it started raining he ran to another team's tent to shelter. He was told to leave by a white athlete called Austin Metcalfe. KA refused saying ' 'Touch me and see what happens', According to one account I read he was repeatedly told to leave and replied the same way each time. Austin Metcalfe then pushed KA to get him to leave and KA pulled out the knife and stabbed AM in the chest, killing him.

Apparently sections of America are outraged that KA has now been convicted of murder. Possible sentence range in America is 5 to 99 years for this offence and he got 35 years.

I don't understand how this is not murder. In UK law if you can run away you must, and he didn't. In UK law if you kill someone when you could have run, you will be tried for murder.

KA took a knife. He could have left (even if he thought it was a dick move to ask him to leave when it was raining - you can't murder people for being dickish about their gazebo) but chose to not to, escalating the situation with threatening language and then stabbed a young man in the chest.

I just think something has gone terribly wrong in USA society where this man is treated as a victim, not the person who he killed, and this case is regarded as an injustice against him. I hope the UK does not go down this route.

OP posts:
AmberTigerEyes · 11/06/2026 19:22

catspyjamas1 · 11/06/2026 19:11

Oh, lynchings still happening? Wow. Who knew?!!

They’re serious you know. Lynchings still happen.
https://www.axios.com/2026/03/07/lynching-south-black-americans-suicide-report

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 19:22

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 19:14

KA wasn’t chased. He was asked to leave. It doesn’t matter how much you pretend this difference is irrelevant, it isn’t. It’s crucial. KA could have walked away. And nothing would have happened. If R was chased, then he was trying to get away, and the chaser prevented that. Obviously, I was not on the juries but based on that fact alone, you can see how that crucial fact could lead to different jury decisions.

Ah Okay, so chased by an unarmed
person = shoot them at close range, pushed by an unarmed person = just walk off.

Oh, and Rittenhouse had an all white jury bar one (which caused a huge controversy) and he has gone on to say some awful stuff.

Honestly, quit pretending.

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 19:21

AmberTigerEyes · 11/06/2026 19:16

It is my opinion that if the races had been reversed, Texas probably would have ruled it to be involuntary manslaughter rather than 1st degree premeditated and planned murder. This would have resulted in a much shorter sentence.

The protesters don’t believe KA is ‘the victim’ they are pointing out the negative racial bias against Black men that numerous sociological studies on the American justice system have uncovered.

The protestors I have seen do think he was the victim. They may be extreme cases admittedly.

OP posts:
MissConductUS · 11/06/2026 19:20

AmberTigerEyes · 11/06/2026 19:16

It is my opinion that if the races had been reversed, Texas probably would have ruled it to be involuntary manslaughter rather than 1st degree premeditated and planned murder. This would have resulted in a much shorter sentence.

The protesters don’t believe KA is ‘the victim’ they are pointing out the negative racial bias against Black men that numerous sociological studies on the American justice system have uncovered.

Involuntary manslaughter requires a finding that the killing was unintentional. That clearly wasn’t the case in this instance.

SpudGunToo · 11/06/2026 19:18

AmberTigerEyes · 11/06/2026 19:16

It is my opinion that if the races had been reversed, Texas probably would have ruled it to be involuntary manslaughter rather than 1st degree premeditated and planned murder. This would have resulted in a much shorter sentence.

The protesters don’t believe KA is ‘the victim’ they are pointing out the negative racial bias against Black men that numerous sociological studies on the American justice system have uncovered.

Should the system let off a proportion of those guilty of murder to even things up a bit?

AmberTigerEyes · 11/06/2026 19:16

It is my opinion that if the races had been reversed, Texas probably would have ruled it to be involuntary manslaughter rather than 1st degree premeditated and planned murder. This would have resulted in a much shorter sentence.

The protesters don’t believe KA is ‘the victim’ they are pointing out the negative racial bias against Black men that numerous sociological studies on the American justice system have uncovered.

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 19:15

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 19:10

Okay, make assumptions about me all you want, but then you can’t shout when I make them about you. Only one side calls the left ‘nutty’ and says ‘being right wing is okay’ whilst pretending to be apolitical or centrist.

Yawn. It doesn’t matter how many times you say something, it doesn’t make it true. But lying about what your opponents say is a TM of the nutty side of the left 😁. Hope that helps 😂

OP posts:
SpudGunToo · 11/06/2026 19:15

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 18:51

And Kyle Rittenhouse murdered two. What difference does make if he was being chased or not? The premise was the same; they both took weapons out and when someone pushed back they murdered them. Why would you ask if he was being chased at all? Why would it matter? They both went out armed and murdered, but you automatically came up with an excuse for the white one (whose first victim was alone and unarmed).

And to say ‘being right wing is fine/nutty left’ in the same sentence is so telling, no matter how many fake flappy ‘oh my goodnesses’ you do. This whistle is so low people over 100 can hear it.

He was acquitted of murder, so no, he did not murder anyone.

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 19:14

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 19:09

Yes, he chased him and grabbed his gun. That’s still an alone and unarmed man. In this case, the victim pushed KA away and shouted at him.

The two are very similar, two armed men went out looking for trouble and When someone, unarmed, stood up to them, they murdered them, except one was convicted of murder and one was not, when they BOTH should have been. Rittenhouse being let off is me of the reasons for the unrest, so it’s important to understand the similarities.

KA wasn’t chased. He was asked to leave. It doesn’t matter how much you pretend this difference is irrelevant, it isn’t. It’s crucial. KA could have walked away. And nothing would have happened. If R was chased, then he was trying to get away, and the chaser prevented that. Obviously, I was not on the juries but based on that fact alone, you can see how that crucial fact could lead to different jury decisions.

OP posts:
catspyjamas1 · 11/06/2026 19:11

TomatoSandwiches · 11/06/2026 16:46

If you want to talk about cultures then lets talk about the fact that black people in America still get lynched and killed for simply existing....

You cannot discuss and dismiss the self defence aspect without firstly aknowledging the long term historical rascist culture black people and especially black males have to put up with, doubly so in a state like Texas.

This situation did not happen in a vacuum and people shouldn't be putting their hands on someone, that was very much a white male privelge thing to do.

Oh, lynchings still happening? Wow. Who knew?!!

Chimneyissues · 11/06/2026 19:10

Apparently his family spent all the money raised for his defence on themselves and left him with the public defender.

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 19:10

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 19:07

Oh and @MyTwinklyMoose I’ve only ever heard one political side throw around the term ‘dog whistle’ at others so it’s a pretty clear indication of your politics.

Okay, make assumptions about me all you want, but then you can’t shout when I make them about you. Only one side calls the left ‘nutty’ and says ‘being right wing is okay’ whilst pretending to be apolitical or centrist.

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 19:09

catspyjamas1 · 11/06/2026 19:06

No, but he did chase him and cornered him, then grabbed his gun.

Yes, he chased him and grabbed his gun. That’s still an alone and unarmed man. In this case, the victim pushed KA away and shouted at him.

The two are very similar, two armed men went out looking for trouble and When someone, unarmed, stood up to them, they murdered them, except one was convicted of murder and one was not, when they BOTH should have been. Rittenhouse being let off is me of the reasons for the unrest, so it’s important to understand the similarities.

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 19:07

Oh and @MyTwinklyMoose I’ve only ever heard one political side throw around the term ‘dog whistle’ at others so it’s a pretty clear indication of your politics.

OP posts:
catspyjamas1 · 11/06/2026 19:06

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 18:59

Because, and I don’t think I can make this any clearer, his first victim
wasnt part of a mob. He was alone and unarmed. He tried to grab Rittenhouse’s gun so Rittenhouse shot him and murdered him.

I cannot see how you think that is different when the two cases are extremely similar.

You don’t know my politics because I haven’t revealed them.

No, but he did chase him and cornered him, then grabbed his gun.

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 19:05

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 18:59

Because, and I don’t think I can make this any clearer, his first victim
wasnt part of a mob. He was alone and unarmed. He tried to grab Rittenhouse’s gun so Rittenhouse shot him and murdered him.

I cannot see how you think that is different when the two cases are extremely similar.

You don’t know my politics because I haven’t revealed them.

its taken a while for that detail to come out from you. And as I think I’ve made clear I don’t know much about this case, hence me asking ‘ wasn’t he being chased by a mob’?

But you’ve said yourself that this makes no difference as to whether he was being chased by a mob whereas most sane people can see the difference between the two.

I have no interest in the Ritten whatsoever his name case to be honest. It makes no difference to the fact that KA was not acting in self defence and there is no justification or excuse for what he did. It was cold blooded murder and he deserves to go to jail and the people reframing him as victim are terrible people.

OP posts:
catspyjamas1 · 11/06/2026 19:00

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 11/06/2026 18:24

When I lived in the US I found the race relations very hard to understand. There seemed so very often to be a simmering anger that was just waiting to be let out

So exactly what’s happening right now in the UK every time someone is attacked by an asylum seeker/an immigrant. The tensions are high and the anger simmering.

Edited

The UK is not the US and it's unhelpful in the UK context to compare the two. The history and current circumstances are completely different.

Tensions are high and anger is simmering, I 100% agree. But we are not the same by any stretch.

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 18:59

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 18:56

Why are you pretending you can’t see a difference between someone being chased by a mob intent on kicking the crap out of you, and someone between told to leave a gazebo and refusing to? I just don’t believe you can’t see that obvious difference. Your politics just aren’t allowing you to admit you can see it.

It’s unfortunate your black and white thinking doesn’t allow you to understand the rest of it. Thats on you, not me.

Because, and I don’t think I can make this any clearer, his first victim
wasnt part of a mob. He was alone and unarmed. He tried to grab Rittenhouse’s gun so Rittenhouse shot him and murdered him.

I cannot see how you think that is different when the two cases are extremely similar.

You don’t know my politics because I haven’t revealed them.

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 18:56

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 18:51

And Kyle Rittenhouse murdered two. What difference does make if he was being chased or not? The premise was the same; they both took weapons out and when someone pushed back they murdered them. Why would you ask if he was being chased at all? Why would it matter? They both went out armed and murdered, but you automatically came up with an excuse for the white one (whose first victim was alone and unarmed).

And to say ‘being right wing is fine/nutty left’ in the same sentence is so telling, no matter how many fake flappy ‘oh my goodnesses’ you do. This whistle is so low people over 100 can hear it.

Why are you pretending you can’t see a difference between someone being chased by a mob intent on kicking the crap out of you, and someone between told to leave a gazebo and refusing to? I just don’t believe you can’t see that obvious difference. Your politics just aren’t allowing you to admit you can see it.

It’s unfortunate your black and white thinking doesn’t allow you to understand the rest of it. Thats on you, not me.

OP posts:
CheerfulYank · 11/06/2026 18:55

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 11/06/2026 18:20

if a white teen had taken a knife to a sports event and stabbed a black kid during an argument, there would be riots in that state right now.

He will be eligible for parole in 17 years.

Again, I did not say I agreed. I was just explaining what the argument was.

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 18:52

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 18:49

Oh and by the way, if KA had been being chased by a mob of white men ( or men of any race) , I think he would have been reasonable to use a knife in self defence, and it’s likely a jury would too. Hope that helps.

Again, Rittenhouse shot an alone and unarmed man. That was his first victim. But he was white and he cried and everyone said ‘No worries’ and has gone on to say some horrific things in public. But of course these two cases are different.

And don’t bother with the ‘hope that helps’ stuff with me, it weakens your argument.

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 18:51

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 18:45

Oh my goodness, another poster with comprehension difficulties. I said the nutty side of the left. Have a think about what the phrasing means. Cos it sure as hell doesn’t mean what you conveniently misinterpreted it as.

I also didn’t defend Ritten whatever his name was. I asked ‘wasn’t he being chased by a mob?’. And the poster confirmed he was. The point being there were quite significant differences in those cases which makes it not very sensible to compare them. And certainly doesn’t take away from the fact that KA clearly murdered someone in a situation no sane person could think had justification.

And Kyle Rittenhouse murdered two. What difference does make if he was being chased or not? The premise was the same; they both took weapons out and when someone pushed back they murdered them. Why would you ask if he was being chased at all? Why would it matter? They both went out armed and murdered, but you automatically came up with an excuse for the white one (whose first victim was alone and unarmed).

And to say ‘being right wing is fine/nutty left’ in the same sentence is so telling, no matter how many fake flappy ‘oh my goodnesses’ you do. This whistle is so low people over 100 can hear it.

Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 18:49

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 17:58

So you’re apolitical but think the right wing are fine and the left wing are nuts? Not both parties can be nuts?

And you defended Rittenhouse after he took a gun out, got psyched up and wanted to join in the chaos? And that’s fine because he was being chased? So one guy takes out a knife, not okay, and one takes out a gun, okay. Not, both were looking for trouble and both should have been convicted?

Riiiiight.

Oh and by the way, if KA had been being chased by a mob of white men ( or men of any race) , I think he would have been reasonable to use a knife in self defence, and it’s likely a jury would too. Hope that helps.

OP posts:
Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 18:45

MyTwinklyMoose · 11/06/2026 17:58

So you’re apolitical but think the right wing are fine and the left wing are nuts? Not both parties can be nuts?

And you defended Rittenhouse after he took a gun out, got psyched up and wanted to join in the chaos? And that’s fine because he was being chased? So one guy takes out a knife, not okay, and one takes out a gun, okay. Not, both were looking for trouble and both should have been convicted?

Riiiiight.

Oh my goodness, another poster with comprehension difficulties. I said the nutty side of the left. Have a think about what the phrasing means. Cos it sure as hell doesn’t mean what you conveniently misinterpreted it as.

I also didn’t defend Ritten whatever his name was. I asked ‘wasn’t he being chased by a mob?’. And the poster confirmed he was. The point being there were quite significant differences in those cases which makes it not very sensible to compare them. And certainly doesn’t take away from the fact that KA clearly murdered someone in a situation no sane person could think had justification.

OP posts:
Neutralnames · 11/06/2026 18:39

SpidersAreShitheads · 11/06/2026 17:40

You do seem particularly keen to criticise the left though - both on this and other posts. I also seem to recall you being keen to chip in on a post criticising Muslim culture too.

I haven't seen you criticising right wing politics though. And now we have this post/your comments which are more than a tad goady in parts.

I rather suspect you're not as apolitical as you seem to think.

It’s true as someone who used to be formerly on the Left, I am appalled by what the Left has become ( particularly the progressive left). There is a sense of betrayal from those you thought were your own that has been hard to go through. I do find the left have embraced perhaps the most insane and some of the most intolerant ideas of the modern day. I don’t support right wing parties either though, though I am impressed by Kemi Badenoch.

As for criticizing aspects of Muslim culture. Yes, there are aspects of Muslim culture I criticize just as there are aspects of our modern Western predominantly white culture I have criticized on many posts, such as gender ideology ( regular name changer), and aspects of Christian culture. So sorry, am I meant to exclude Muslims from criticism because ( you see them as being) brown or because they are Muslim? Do you make pointed comments trying to catch people out who criticize aspects of Christianity too? Just trying to understand why you think Muslims are immune from any aspect of their culture being criticized. There are two billion of them so that’s an awful lot of diversity not to be allowed to criticize any of it.

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread