To be increasung concerned about Restore Britain.

And that's the point
It's got out of hand
People are talking the piss
No one needs to bring 18 relatives over ..where in the world, except UK ,could we go and do the same ,then claim benefits when we get there ..the answer..is nowhere ...which is as it should be
We are such a bloody walk over the UK
I suspect the whole world is laughing at us
I don't want an extreme party in power
I want one of the main ones to grow a fucking backbone and actually bloody govern putting UK first

@friedaklein "Right. Because that's what high earning immigrants with Oxbridge or Yale degrees do. Bring their mummies over."

why not? That's exactly what my cousin did. They spent New Year's Eve at a party where she met lots of parents in the same situation and now has a whole social group based on that. It was a glamorous party in central London because of the nature of his job lots of international workers, not objecting to that at all and I don't think Restore are either

I fully appreciate that these people will often have got their jobs on merit, but perhaps we need to say they can only bring a spouse, not the whole family.

and of course, one refugee should not be allowed to bring 17 family members.

Have you missed the news this week? There is LITERALLY a case of a Gazan refugee being allowed to bring 18 family members here

You can debate the rights and wrongs of it but you can’t deny it’s happening

Right. Because that's what high earning immigrants with Oxbridge or Yale degrees do. Bring their mummies over.

We have 1 m NEETS who won't or can't work, entire generations on benefits, a rapidly aging population, but blaming immigrants is the easiest way out. And one that every political party resorts to when they can't solve bigger problems.

I’ve had a leaflet through from them.

6 policies .. including deporting people who are here legally (I’m pretty sure they don’t mean my Irish family). Anyway the final policy is about installing Christian Values, coming at the end of 5 of the least Christian policies you might see.

These people need to spend more time reading their Bible

As long as they pay their way and don’t expect the public purse to support 20 additional family members

My British born DS is doing the same job. They all had the same opportunity to apply and are paid the same. The job requires a high level of numeracy, several rounds of tests and in some cases, a masters. He's one of 3 British born who passed. The rest are from India, China, the EU and Singapore.

IMO they deserve to be here.

I get you OP.

Single mum with a biracial child.

This.
We need to prioritise the needs of British citizens over the needs of any random that chooses to rock up here.

We don't want them if there are any unemployed British graduates who could do their jobs and pay the same tax - which given their ages won't require any experience.

Yep. As usual first comment nailed t.

@OneAmberFinch that's a really interesting perspective, thank you

With regards to the jail thing, one problem is that some are going to opt to stay here in jail. They will, quite correctly, think that there is some hope of an amnesty. And they certainly wouldn't be kept in jail long. To be honest, that's something this country would never actually do anyway, so it's kind of a moot point.

The Rwanda scheme is nonsense though and assumes that we have to abide by the extremely outdated agreements about how refugees are treated now, where you can illegally cross a border but if you say some magic words then it's not illegal anymore. You can just... not do that. Fast, onshore processing, with a hard cap on acceptances based on resource availability rather than how sob the story is, and the swift default answer being "no, go home, or stay here in jail". No Rwanda required. Especially not reciprocal schemes!

I'm an immigrant from the Boriswave (very early). I have ILR now.

I'd be fine if they said all ILR was cancelled and everyone has to reapply to a new, much higher standard. Same as if they did it for acquired citizenship; it should be as trivial to lose as it is to acquire. I'm very confident I'd meet any standard that even Reform/Restore would care to impose. I'd actively like this to happen. I want people to think of immigrants as people who've come here with a lot to offer and who actively like this country/culture for more than just its benefits system!

I'd be upset and my life would need to change significantly if they blanket deported every one of us, but I'd make a plan. We have some options. A sovereign British government isn't obliged to make policy based on what upsets me, if they believe it would overall benefit the native British population who don't have other options.

If you cannot speak the King’s English you do not deserve to live in his land. Basic communication skills are sacrosanct and a minimum to live and work in this country. If a person does not have a basic standard of English, they cannot work at a normal level to be a functioning member of society. So they need to be deported. If no one will take them then send them to Rwanda and pay them to take our dregs. This is the only way that we can save our country. Deport deport. Should not matter what colour you are, deport. Rupert Lowe is the only one who will save this country by getting rid of the detritus of this country. Basic literacy and numeracy should be the minimum to be able to serve the country. I am sick of my money being given to people who cannot serve society and just take and take because they do not integrate or have a basic level of education. Why should we keep these people in our country?

Unless they live in social housing. Or if they have an accident or get cancer or give birth to a disabled child who needs care so they can't work.
Oh, and only as long as they're not a woman with a son, husband or brother who commits a crime. Though presumably if they're a man with a son, husband (would that still be allowed?) or brother who commits a crime, they're OK, as no mention of male family members of criminals. Which if you didn't know better, you might think was a bit on the misogynist side.

A lot of their fan base would fail that test. Where are the deported going? Have to send them somewhere. Any European country would refuse ships permission to enter their waters or aircraft to land. So now its Africa, Middle East or Sub Continent. Same will apply. Unless money changes hands and we commit to pay for the upkeep in eg Rwanda. Or is out of the country, out of mind?

you might do but she is replaceable if she falters or a better candidate comes along. Its the manifesto that counts not the personality

Simple. Confuse “Your” and “you’re” or “there” and “their” or “they’re”. Deport deport.

don’t be silly….

I think you made a mistake there ..your first word..
Reform are not bringing back capital punishment
But restore have said the members of parliament can vote on it
So even restore have not said they are bringing it back ,
they have just said they will offer a vote ..which obviously the members of parliament will all vote against

Reform are the only party solving the prison crisis by bringing back capital punishment. The way you see who to deport, just have a colour chart and if you pass this an English test. Simple. Confuse “Your” and “you’re” or “there” and “their” or “they’re”. Deport deport. Nowhere to go, bring back the Rwanda scheme. Only the hard left who hate the working classes would disagree with this policy. The working classes have been destroyed by the left in this country and I do not know why the working classes do not rise up against these people who want to destroy them. Only Restore can bring back common sense.

Exactly..you only have to look at the policy on line ,all clearly stated

Read their policies
I'm not their spokesman

Mass Deportations: Legitimacy, Legality, and Logistics

You posted their objective, not the policy.

No True Scotsman Fallacy