Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to be dubious about AI?

30 replies

BlueSherbet · 10/06/2026 22:04

I wonder what to make of all these AI chatbots etc?

I didn't really understand the point of it at first, but sometime last year I tried it and asked a question about software I use at work - and, shut my mouth, it was able to help me. Really impressed.

I have since found it is a great tool to use in work - really useful - but you have to be careful and still "know" the subject you are engaging about because (as their disclaimers say) it can make mistakes.

Using a free version, I found it could even get basic sums wrong - I challenged it on this and it said "oh yes, my mistake, you are quite right" I was like "FFS".

I wondered about taking a subscription and, as a test, I asked it to list all the cup finals my team played in, in a certain decade. It missed one out. Poor i thought, it could have just lifted it from wikipedia, but no. Again it was saying "silly me, my error" etc when challenged.

In the end I did take a subscription and use it mainly as an aide memoir, info gopher or tool to help develop and expand my own thoughts. I wonder if the free version makes basic mistakes on purpose?

The most concerning incident was when I was researching news incidents / local licensing laws - and it actually made things up and presented it as fact. when asked to provide links, it eventually had to admit there as "no evidence" for the things it was telling me.

I said "why are you lying to me?" and it said it wasn't lying, and when pushed said this false info was akin to AI having (quote) "hallucinations" when researching my questions.

That was chatgpt. DuckAi did the same thing, but refused to admit it was lying and kept claiming it could not present evidence due to "problems with its search engine, try later" which I found really sinister.

So my experience is a mixed bag, useful at times, but unreliable and even misleading at others.

AIBU to wonder if there is something policy or deliberate aim behind these basic errors and misleading results?

Where do we see AI going in future? Apparently everyone under a certain age has a CV written by it!

OP posts:
readingmakesmehappy · 10/06/2026 22:13

I don’t use it. The large language models like ChatGPT are all based on theft. Those companies knowingly stole the work of thousands and thousands of writers, unpublished, academics, researchers and they don’t give a shit. I can’t support that. Their founders are amoral, mostly psychopathic, men I do not want to enrich further.
I hope I never have to use these tools. The cognitive impact of outsourcing basic things like writing a text message is going to be enormous. The environmental impact of these data centres is enormous and unjustifiable.
I get using AI for medical research and large data analysis that humans can’t do, but I think open access to AI tools for anything has the potential to be a civilisation ending disaster.

CombatBarbie · 10/06/2026 22:11

At least it admits whenever it's wrong......

BeingATwatItsABingThing · 10/06/2026 22:11

What would be the benefit of deliberate misinformation? I wouldn’t pay for premium for something that had proven it didn’t work properly.

I use AI to give me day out suggestions or tell me close restaurants to where we’re going. At work, I use it to waffle into and make coherent sentences for me or summarise meeting notes. I tried to use it today to create a staff schedule but there were too many factors for it to get it right. I don’t think it was deliberately wrong though. Just using the information it had without human ability to be logical.

PrizedPickledPopcorn · 10/06/2026 22:10

I wouldn’t use it for things that subtle or complicated- for a start from scratch job. I give it the information and get it to tidy it up- to polish what I’ve begun, basically.

Boxiboxi21 · 10/06/2026 22:08

I dont think it deliberately makes mistakes, it is just a sophisticated algorithm which outputs the most predictable next word, so those predictions may not be 100% accurate as we're finding.

If i could change anything about it I'd rather it flagged to me when it wasn't 100% confident about an answer. But that may be quite hard to program in currently, and maybe it can't analyse its own answers accurately enough to flag that.