Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

American Influencers who terminated for T21.

238 replies

ScaredButUnavoidable · 06/06/2026 14:11

Has everyone else seen all the hatred online for the social media influencers who have decided to terminate a pregnancy due to a diagnosis of T21?

I have no idea who the couple are but today my social media feed is full of really abhorrent articles, videos and posts aimed at them (and about termination in general) and I’m just horrified.

Unsurprisingly they are in America, but even so.

I’m assuming the couple have been streaming videos about the pregnancy since the start and this announcement seems to have sparked absolute outrage.

Ok, the Influencers must have realised that some people would be upset by their decision, but at the same time, those same people must understand that although couples choose to have terminations based on medical conditions it’s still usually a very difficult and upsetting decision for them to make.

Has anyone else seen it?
I’m deleting as much of it as I can from my timeline but it’s constant.
They are even getting death threats.

It’s like a witch-hunt, it’s disgusting 😢

OP posts:
ScaredButUnavoidable · 07/06/2026 10:40

OtterlyAstounding · 07/06/2026 10:08

This is what confuses me.

Women get abortions all the time - what's the difference between an abortion at 14 weeks for DS, vs any other reason? And yet as soon as a woman says she had an abortion for DS, suddenly it's terrible, unacceptable, and hurtful to people with DS or their parents.

It's very strange.

I suppose they see it as saying a person with DS isn’t worthy of life.

The problem though is that DS is such a spectrum…..and that’s there rhe problem lies. It’s such a huge risk. You may have a child who is minimally affected and can live a relatively normal and independent life, whereas the other end of the spectrum is a completely different story. Some people are happy to take that risk and others aren't, which is ok.

I imagine it’s usually the parents of those who aren’t significantly affected by their DS (i.e those who are able to live independently within society) that take the most offence to terminations for T21. They see their own teenager/adult with DS living normally and functioning in society without any extreme health or behavioural problems, and they can’t understand that for other families with severely affected DS children (and adults) it is a very different scenario.

OP posts:
Yetanotherone12 · 07/06/2026 10:33

OtterlyAstounding · 07/06/2026 10:08

This is what confuses me.

Women get abortions all the time - what's the difference between an abortion at 14 weeks for DS, vs any other reason? And yet as soon as a woman says she had an abortion for DS, suddenly it's terrible, unacceptable, and hurtful to people with DS or their parents.

It's very strange.

With Down’s syndrome I think it’s got the image of a happy child, living life without a care in the world, bringing joy to everyone…

people romanticise the perpetual childhood aspect of it.

in reality it can be as brutal as any other severe disability. On the child physically and mentally, as well as on the carers. This part they don’t show.

in the us there seems to be a cult of caring for a severely disabled child and advocating for medical intervention to keep them alive as long as possible, regardless of the child’s quality of life or suffering. There’s a fair few accounts on social media, with a lot of “god is good” and invoking Jesus that the child survived the last near death resuscitation.

Christianity in the states currently has a lot to answer for.

ScaredButUnavoidable · 07/06/2026 10:27

KittyTinker · 07/06/2026 10:02

There is no law that states a sibling must take over the care of a disabled child/adult when their parents are unable to do so, There are services in place in this country to take responsibility for seriously disabled people. I’m afraid I don’t know the American system but in the UK if you don’t feel you can care for a sibling then you don’t have to.

Of course it isn’t the law that they have to.

But people do it because they feel obligated to do it, the societal pressure they feel and receive, the fear of judgement if they don’t, a sense of expectation, to avoid feelings of guilt if their sibling ends up in a crappy care institution etc.

Being a carer for a disabled sibling is usually a role they find themselves in despite not wanting it bit because there’s no other realistic option.

It’s not as black and white as just “choosing not to do it”.

OP posts:
Esmeraldathe3rd · 07/06/2026 10:21

America is pretty much Gilead. I'm actually impressed they've been able to access a termination. But then disabled people are valued less than women so I guess that does make sense.

Anywhoo, it's obvious they would get this backlash. If they wanted to avoid it they could have lied and said they lost the baby, so they've obviously chosen to accept the backlash.

KittyTinker · 07/06/2026 10:19

Yetanotherone12 · 07/06/2026 10:07

No there is no law. There’s no law children must care for elderly parents. There’s no law anyone has to care for another adult person.

but we do it. Because there’s no one else. Because we’re expected to. Because there isn’t the money to pay for help.

obligation, societal judgement, not wanting to see a relative dumped in the care system- there are lots of unpaid carers in the UK. None are forced to, but that doesn’t mean they can just..not do it.

That’s exactly what it means there are choices there they may not be great choices but they exist.

OtterlyAstounding · 07/06/2026 10:08

ScaredButUnavoidable · 07/06/2026 08:43

It feels like the narrative of women having the right to choose a termination for any reason, and having the over her own body was really advocated….. until it comes to DS. If you have a termination because of a DS diagnosis suddenly you’re a bad person and all the ‘rights’ you supposedly have go out the window 🙄

This is what confuses me.

Women get abortions all the time - what's the difference between an abortion at 14 weeks for DS, vs any other reason? And yet as soon as a woman says she had an abortion for DS, suddenly it's terrible, unacceptable, and hurtful to people with DS or their parents.

It's very strange.

Yetanotherone12 · 07/06/2026 10:07

KittyTinker · 07/06/2026 10:02

There is no law that states a sibling must take over the care of a disabled child/adult when their parents are unable to do so, There are services in place in this country to take responsibility for seriously disabled people. I’m afraid I don’t know the American system but in the UK if you don’t feel you can care for a sibling then you don’t have to.

No there is no law. There’s no law children must care for elderly parents. There’s no law anyone has to care for another adult person.

but we do it. Because there’s no one else. Because we’re expected to. Because there isn’t the money to pay for help.

obligation, societal judgement, not wanting to see a relative dumped in the care system- there are lots of unpaid carers in the UK. None are forced to, but that doesn’t mean they can just..not do it.

Chimneyissues · 07/06/2026 10:06

It’s social pressure that makes people take on siblings and the fear they will be mistreated/unloved in care.

I know someone who is very religious and wants to take on her sister with DS. She is also autistic and has a multitude of health issues. She cannot be left alone and can rarely go out. Her parents are mostly housebound, but she can’t see what a negative effect it will have on her children.

Yetanotherone12 · 07/06/2026 10:04

Captainbird · 07/06/2026 09:09

I’m in a support group for adults whose siblings have medical problems. The term is glass child. We are the ignored children who are expected to look after our siblings when our parents die. Most our childhoods were ruined by multiple stays with relatives when the siblings were in hospital, they were constantly prioritised over us and we learned to squash our feelings and needs down. As adults we give up our careers, lose relationships or choose not to have children of our own. Often we have been attacked, one of my friends had her arm repeatedly broken by her brother.
We know we will never be free

This.

my sd learned at pre school age how to sit with the belongings and not move while everyone else rushed off to sort her severely autistic brother, who’d run off again.

she grew up with her brothers needs first and foremost. She’d be late for school. Hobbies, they didn’t want her to do them so db would be the excuse.

she lived at home until her late 20’s because she was guilt tripped into staying. Fortunately she met a man from another country 7 hours flight away and moved there. That actually contributed to breaking the whole family apart, for long and complicated reasons, including an inheritance they were never entitled to. Once you don’t have additional live in carers, you need money to pay for respite.

KittyTinker · 07/06/2026 10:02

ScaredButUnavoidable · 07/06/2026 09:37

I think this is an element that is frequently overlooked.

As part of this online hate campaign there are so many people posting videos of their eldest child (say 4 years of age) playing with and cuddling the younger sibling who has DS with quotes along the lines of how much happiness and joy the infant with DS brings to the family and how loved they are by thrir big brother/sister etc. I don’t doubt that’s true in that moment of time, but fast forward 5, 10, 20, 30 years etc and I’m sure the family dynamic is very different then, especially the sibling relationship.

Siblings of dependent adults with complex needs will typically fall into the role of carer, and be expected to take on that role, especially as the parents age and can no longer cope with the demands of the child with the disabilities. Nobody seems to want to think about the long-term implications on the siblings when it comes to
having children with disabilities, they are so often overlooked or not taken into consideration.

Many parents say, “We have made it clear that we will never expect our other child to take on caring responsibilities….” but realistically, it always happens, and I imagine a lot of it happens because the healthy siblings feels duty bound to do it (obviously this isn’t the case for all families). I imagine a lot of guilt is felt by the healthy siblings if they don’t take over the care when the parents age they are basically forced into situations where they have to sacrifice their own lives and freedoms to care for a disabled sibling they didn’t ask for. I know that sounds awful but I imagine it’s how a lot of people feel.

As another poster said, when thinking about bringing a disabled child into the world the parents need to seriously consider the implications of their decision long-term, not just whether they could cope with a disabled baby/child as it’s so much more complicated than that.

There is no law that states a sibling must take over the care of a disabled child/adult when their parents are unable to do so, There are services in place in this country to take responsibility for seriously disabled people. I’m afraid I don’t know the American system but in the UK if you don’t feel you can care for a sibling then you don’t have to.

DontBuyAnotherBook · 07/06/2026 09:43

I know an elderly lady who has a severely autistic son who is now in his late thirties. It looks so hard. I imagine it is similar to DS. He is in care for most of the week. If you can be forewarned of this level of disability I think that is good. I am sure the lady I talk of would probably have chosen an abortion if she could have.

ScaredButUnavoidable · 07/06/2026 09:41

Chimneyissues · 07/06/2026 09:17

Sally Phillips was married to someone very wealthy, I’m sure she doesn’t encounter half the issues most parents do.

my mum worked in respite care in the 80s. Children would regularly come for weekends and weeks. I’m guessing this doesn’t exist in the same now. My friend has money to pay for someone to help with her disabled daughter and has never been able to find anyone to do it.

I watched her documentary too, and I also felt it was easy for her to make her claims when she comes from a wealthy background and probably has absolutely no idea how ‘normal’ people struggle to cope when they have a disabled child and what battles they have to fight for even the most basic level of support.

OP posts:
ScaredButUnavoidable · 07/06/2026 09:37

Captainbird · 07/06/2026 09:09

I’m in a support group for adults whose siblings have medical problems. The term is glass child. We are the ignored children who are expected to look after our siblings when our parents die. Most our childhoods were ruined by multiple stays with relatives when the siblings were in hospital, they were constantly prioritised over us and we learned to squash our feelings and needs down. As adults we give up our careers, lose relationships or choose not to have children of our own. Often we have been attacked, one of my friends had her arm repeatedly broken by her brother.
We know we will never be free

I think this is an element that is frequently overlooked.

As part of this online hate campaign there are so many people posting videos of their eldest child (say 4 years of age) playing with and cuddling the younger sibling who has DS with quotes along the lines of how much happiness and joy the infant with DS brings to the family and how loved they are by thrir big brother/sister etc. I don’t doubt that’s true in that moment of time, but fast forward 5, 10, 20, 30 years etc and I’m sure the family dynamic is very different then, especially the sibling relationship.

Siblings of dependent adults with complex needs will typically fall into the role of carer, and be expected to take on that role, especially as the parents age and can no longer cope with the demands of the child with the disabilities. Nobody seems to want to think about the long-term implications on the siblings when it comes to
having children with disabilities, they are so often overlooked or not taken into consideration.

Many parents say, “We have made it clear that we will never expect our other child to take on caring responsibilities….” but realistically, it always happens, and I imagine a lot of it happens because the healthy siblings feels duty bound to do it (obviously this isn’t the case for all families). I imagine a lot of guilt is felt by the healthy siblings if they don’t take over the care when the parents age they are basically forced into situations where they have to sacrifice their own lives and freedoms to care for a disabled sibling they didn’t ask for. I know that sounds awful but I imagine it’s how a lot of people feel.

As another poster said, when thinking about bringing a disabled child into the world the parents need to seriously consider the implications of their decision long-term, not just whether they could cope with a disabled baby/child as it’s so much more complicated than that.

OP posts:
LettuceAndCarrots · 07/06/2026 09:37

I saw the statement and thought it was badly written. I'm not surprised it didn't impress people. Not deserving of death threats of course.

If I was them I would have just vaguely said we had to terminate for private medical reasons. The backlash in the USA is rather predictable.

Twisterlollies · 07/06/2026 09:36

OtterlyAstounding · 07/06/2026 08:59

So you're just misogynistic and anti-choice then. Well, that's good to know; the reasonable people can just ignore your opinion from here on out.

Why am I misogynistic? And I have no problem calmly and politely making my case. Why do you?

friedaklein · 07/06/2026 09:27

I recently read " Yesteryear", the new novel about a tradwife influencer. It's good reading on the stupidity of living your life on Insta.

Chimneyissues · 07/06/2026 09:17

Sartre · 07/06/2026 08:14

It’s likely due to the big pull from certain advocacy groups not to allow late terminations for DS, I know Sally Phillips has been particularly vocal in this remit. I watched her docu a few years ago and understood her points but I feel it’s always unfair to insist everyone else makes the same life choices as you because yours were definitely right.

Raising a child with any disability is far more difficult than an able bodied NT child, irrespective of how amazing the disabled child is. Terminating at such a late stage must be utterly harrowing, nobody is opting to do that for the hell of it.

Sally Phillips was married to someone very wealthy, I’m sure she doesn’t encounter half the issues most parents do.

my mum worked in respite care in the 80s. Children would regularly come for weekends and weeks. I’m guessing this doesn’t exist in the same now. My friend has money to pay for someone to help with her disabled daughter and has never been able to find anyone to do it.

OtterlyAstounding · 07/06/2026 09:10

ThejoyofNC · 07/06/2026 08:24

Define as late as necessary please? Would you support "abortion" at 39 weeks?,

Yes, I would. In the vanishingly unlikely circumstance that happened for any reason other than incompatibility with life, and the mother couldn't be convinced to opt for live birth and adoption instead, then abortion is probably preferable than a vulnerable child being given into the care of someone who is so deeply mentally disturbed.

Although I would of course rather see encouragement of the uptake of long-term contraceptives, early abortions, or adoption.

Captainbird · 07/06/2026 09:09

I’m in a support group for adults whose siblings have medical problems. The term is glass child. We are the ignored children who are expected to look after our siblings when our parents die. Most our childhoods were ruined by multiple stays with relatives when the siblings were in hospital, they were constantly prioritised over us and we learned to squash our feelings and needs down. As adults we give up our careers, lose relationships or choose not to have children of our own. Often we have been attacked, one of my friends had her arm repeatedly broken by her brother.
We know we will never be free

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 07/06/2026 09:00

BoulevardOfBrokenSleep · 07/06/2026 08:48

Everyone has discussed "parenting/raising a disabled child" through the thread

But more than that, it's about parenting a disabled adult

It's not like their need for you is going to magically disappear when they reach 18 - they're going to need you every day for the rest of your life (or their life)

That’s a bloody great point.

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 07/06/2026 09:00

BoulevardOfBrokenSleep · 07/06/2026 08:48

Everyone has discussed "parenting/raising a disabled child" through the thread

But more than that, it's about parenting a disabled adult

It's not like their need for you is going to magically disappear when they reach 18 - they're going to need you every day for the rest of your life (or their life)

That’s a bloody great point.

OtterlyAstounding · 07/06/2026 08:59

Twisterlollies · 07/06/2026 08:22

It’s not just her body though, it’s the baby’s body too. Nobody is forcing women to become pregnant unless they are raped but that is a very small minority. Therefore they ‘chose’ what to do with their body, and this is an unlikely but still not impossible consequence.

So you're just misogynistic and anti-choice then. Well, that's good to know; the reasonable people can just ignore your opinion from here on out.

CaesarAugusta · 07/06/2026 08:59

Twisterlollies · 07/06/2026 08:44

The baby doesn’t have more rights, it has equal rights, and didn’t ask to be conceived. This isn’t the same as enslaving somebody, or forcing them to donate a kidney. The majority of pregnancies come from ttc or being careless with regards to contraception.

I know it’s frowned upon to expect anyone to exercise a bit of care for their own life and be accountable for it, but here we are.

How can you "exercise a bit of care" or "be accountable" to prevent conceiving a severely disabled child?

CaesarAugusta · 07/06/2026 08:57

Have you reported the death threats and the really offensive posts to Instagram?

Vroomfondleswaistcoat · 07/06/2026 08:50

BoulevardOfBrokenSleep · 07/06/2026 08:48

Everyone has discussed "parenting/raising a disabled child" through the thread

But more than that, it's about parenting a disabled adult

It's not like their need for you is going to magically disappear when they reach 18 - they're going to need you every day for the rest of your life (or their life)

And it's parenting a child or adult with disabilities in America where the cost of even a small operation can bankrupt people. Having a child who might need recurrent heart or other surgeries throughout their life just might not be financially possible for many people.

Swipe left for the next trending thread