Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think dismissal during probation was unfair given autism adjustments?

585 replies

SereneRoseRobin · 03/06/2026 15:37

I’m looking for honest views because I’m not sure whether I’m being unreasonable or whether this was genuinely unfair.

I was recently dismissed from a graduate/analyst role after my probation was extended. I am autistic, and my employer knew this. I had raised the need for clear written instructions, defined objectives, examples of similar work, timelines, and timely/direct feedback. Some support was put in place, including coaching, but I don’t feel the actual adjustments were properly embedded or reviewed before the decision was made.

The difficult part is that the concerns raised about me seemed mainly to focus on communication style, professional behaviour, asking for clarification, Teams messages, and quality assurance under pressure — rather than on whether I could actually do the analytical work. Some recent written feedback said my analytical skills were good, that my work did not contain relevant errors, that I was taking ownership, and that I sought support appropriately. Another person said I had picked up on a complex project well.

The project I was criticised on was not straightforward. I was a first-year graduate with no prior experience in that sector, and I was assigned open-ended/data-heavy modelling work with a lot of ambiguity and short deadlines. Some outputs were expected within hours or by the next day, so there was not much time for structured review. I also didn’t always get timely feedback while I could still act on it. Some feedback came months after the work had ended.
My probation extension was meant to allow support and coaching to take effect, but I was dismissed before the extension period had fully ended. I had submitted evidence of improvement the day before the decision, but I don’t feel it was properly discussed or considered.
The coaching report apparently said the benefit of coaching should be assessed after a longer period, because performance can dip while new strategies embed.

I’m appealing because I think they didn’t properly separate disability-related communication issues from actual capability, didn’t give recent improvement enough weight, and didn’t consider alternatives such as letting the extension run, providing clearer QA/communication frameworks, assigning more standard analyst work, or redeploying me to a more suitable team.

I’m not saying I was perfect. I know there were areas to improve. But I feel like I was assessed against unclear expectations, on complex work, without the timely feedback and structure that had already been identified as necessary for me.

AIBU to think this was unfair and potentially linked to disability discrimination/failure to make reasonable adjustments? Or is this just how probation works, and I should accept it and move on?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Taztoy · 03/06/2026 21:14

noctilucentcloud · 03/06/2026 21:10

I always feel very uneasy when someone posts on fb pages along the lines of I'm looking for so and so, does anyone know them. It could be entirely innocent but it could be putting someone in danger when people reply. (I'm also amazed people still think it's ok to reply / allow those sort of posts).

Yip. Im not on any social media that identifies me now it’s too risky.

Stoneycold12 · 03/06/2026 21:10

daisychain01 · 03/06/2026 20:58

This is just one example of the shocking levels of discrimination on here.

Sorry there are a gazillion grads out there looking for jobs, why would anyone want anyone in their team that creates so much extra work for them

Because employers and society at large need to accommodate diversity and consider that people with neuro diverse conditions such as autism are human beings having to survive and adapt in a world of neuro typical people. Your assertion "why would anyone want anyone on their team that creates so much extra work for them" is a disgusting and dehumanising thing to say.

The OP doesn't sound like she's making any effort to 'adapt in a world of neuro typical people' though - nearly nine months into the job and she's still looking for a huge amount of support and feedback.

She has had significant accommodations, but won't apologise to the colleague she recorded, as she believes she should have been able to. We all of us have to curb our natural impusles in the workplace, and try to play nicely. OP sounds as if she believes this doesn't apply to her.

She's unsuitable for her role, and repeatedly asking for advice on MN isn't going to change that. She can of course bring a discrimination case, or she could look for a job that suits her better, and try to understand the social norms of the next workplace.

noctilucentcloud · 03/06/2026 21:10

Taztoy · 03/06/2026 21:01

It could be both.

I have had to leave a meeting in the past - external folk and I didn’t want to take the risk. Plus it’s easy to say anonymously but it’s harder face to face.

im sure there’s people like me in every big org - I worked somewhere else where there was a young woman who had family trying to trace her and our security were made aware.

Edited

I always feel very uneasy when someone posts on fb pages along the lines of I'm looking for so and so, does anyone know them. It could be entirely innocent but it could be putting someone in danger when people reply. (I'm also amazed people still think it's ok to reply / allow those sort of posts).

noctilucentcloud · 03/06/2026 21:05

Preppyprepper · 03/06/2026 20:49

I would also consider moving on by applying for the civil service, as I have never met a neurotypical civil servant

I work in job with a fairly high neurodiverse workforce and where there is a lot of flexibility and reasonable adjustments. However, there's still professional standards wrt conduct and communications to be met. I think unless the OP reflects on what has gone wrong and her part in it, and tries to remedy that by learning some strategies, then she is likely to find similar struggles in future employment.

Happytaytos · 03/06/2026 21:03

daisychain01 · 03/06/2026 20:58

This is just one example of the shocking levels of discrimination on here.

Sorry there are a gazillion grads out there looking for jobs, why would anyone want anyone in their team that creates so much extra work for them

Because employers and society at large need to accommodate diversity and consider that people with neuro diverse conditions such as autism are human beings having to survive and adapt in a world of neuro typical people. Your assertion "why would anyone want anyone on their team that creates so much extra work for them" is a disgusting and dehumanising thing to say.

How is it dehumanising?

Newsflash, businesses aren't there for social good, they're there to make a profit.

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 03/06/2026 21:03

It sounds like this probably isn’t the right environment for you. Consulting involves complex projects and tight deadlines. There’s a limit to how much hand holding you can receive - it’s hard to know whether you got the sufficient coaching/ feedback that you deserved or whether you expected too much.

LIZS · 03/06/2026 21:02

TeenLifeMum · 03/06/2026 20:48

I’d say about 70% of our data analysts are autistic.

They can sack you within 2 year for anything so you need to move on.

Not quite true if the reason for termination is discriminatory as those rights (disability, pregnancy etc) start on day 1. However it seems ops dismissal was unrelated to their nd or failure to provide their suggested “reasonable adjustments. These are issues about breaches of conduct and policy which taken with less than ideal progress during probation left the employer with little alternative.

IMightMentionGriddlebone · 03/06/2026 21:01

OneCoralGoose · 03/06/2026 20:37

Its gross misconduct and is a usually would be grounds for dismissal outside probation. Your company will have a code of conduct for meeting and use of recording equipment that you will have had to have signed which will say recording or photographs without express permission is not allowed and will be a risk of been dismissed. The fact you were asked to say sorry and didnt is really bad

I wonder how gracious the OP would be if the positions were reversed and she had been the one recorded without permission.

I doubt she'd be satisfied with honest mistake, won't do it again.

Taztoy · 03/06/2026 21:01

noctilucentcloud · 03/06/2026 20:58

Completely, I may well work along side someone in your position and never know. We all have a responsibility to make sure we don't compromise anyone's safety or well-being. (My organisation has turned off the ability to record, I think from a GDPR point of view, but it could be to safeguard someone)

It could be both.

I have had to leave a meeting in the past - external folk and I didn’t want to take the risk. Plus it’s easy to say anonymously but it’s harder face to face.

im sure there’s people like me in every big org - I worked somewhere else where there was a young woman who had family trying to trace her and our security were made aware.

daisychain01 · 03/06/2026 20:58

MsFogi · 03/06/2026 16:55

Sorry there are a gazillion grads out there looking for jobs, why would anyone want anyone in their team that creates so much extra work for them. There is no way anyone in a normal company these days has time to provide written instructions and so much feedback - you'd be a nightmare. I know this sounds cruel/very direct but it is the reality of the world - other team members can't be adding time to their working day to accommodate adjustments.

This is just one example of the shocking levels of discrimination on here.

Sorry there are a gazillion grads out there looking for jobs, why would anyone want anyone in their team that creates so much extra work for them

Because employers and society at large need to accommodate diversity and consider that people with neuro diverse conditions such as autism are human beings having to survive and adapt in a world of neuro typical people. Your assertion "why would anyone want anyone on their team that creates so much extra work for them" is a disgusting and dehumanising thing to say.

noctilucentcloud · 03/06/2026 20:58

Taztoy · 03/06/2026 20:31

Thank you. The thing is, the op might not know that there’s someone with an adjustment on the call.

and yes, it restricts my life professionally and in my personal life.

Completely, I may well work along side someone in your position and never know. We all have a responsibility to make sure we don't compromise anyone's safety or well-being. (My organisation has turned off the ability to record, I think from a GDPR point of view, but it could be to safeguard someone)

StrictlyCoffee · 03/06/2026 20:57

The aim of reasonable adjustments is to reduce or remove the disadvantage caused by your disability so you can do the job. If you still can’t do it, then it’s hard to see what else they can do. It was 9 months, sounds like they gave you a chance

Stoneycold12 · 03/06/2026 20:53

Dollysleftnip · 03/06/2026 18:31

The recruitment teams for graduate early careers at the “big four” are usually outstanding.
Something has gone wrong here

It sounds like they were box-ticking for diversity- easy to do when you're not going to line managers an applicant, as that list of accommodations was never going to be met in a fast moving work environment.

OP needs to change her attitude rather than blame her colleagues for not supporting her, and find a different field - local government maybe?

Preppyprepper · 03/06/2026 20:49

TeenLifeMum · 03/06/2026 20:48

I’d say about 70% of our data analysts are autistic.

They can sack you within 2 year for anything so you need to move on.

I would also consider moving on by applying for the civil service, as I have never met a neurotypical civil servant

TeenLifeMum · 03/06/2026 20:48

I’d say about 70% of our data analysts are autistic.

They can sack you within 2 year for anything so you need to move on.

Besafeeatcake · 03/06/2026 20:41

So just so I’m clear I would say these are the reasons.

  1. An employer can let you go for any reason during probation and indeed before two years employment. Even if you did an outstanding job. They don’t owe you this job. No detail, no excuses. They can just decline your probation.
  2. You asked your employer for reasonable adjustments for your ND. It sounds like the did a lot and were overly reasonable. What you asked for in this role wasn’t reasonable. You demanded it anyway and when you didn’t get it you felt entitled and said they were being discriminatory.
  3. You don’t seem to want to listen to anyone who says you aren’t right for the eoke. You don’t accept nor see any fault in your actions.
  4. You appealed a probation? Well thats new. Take the hint. They don’t want you and you aren’t right for the role.
  5. Most companies cannot engage is continual feedback, rock solid boundaries, no scope creep and clear objectives 100% of the time. You are there and pad to do a job. You aren’t there for the company to be dictated to by your unreasonable demands.
  6. This isn’t school. You can’t always have more time. Or work alone. Or do something over. It’s the real world and they are paying you. Time to wake up.

YABVU

IamNotaMerryMan · 03/06/2026 20:41

It sounds like you have been done a disservice during your education. The adjustments that were made for you at school, college and uni and any pastoral support you receives are not replicated in the real world. This has left you with a huge sense of entitlement.

While employers are required to make reasonable adjustments, you also need to adjust to the workplace. You aren't entitled to a job. There are many other graduates out there who will be chosen over you if they fit in the company better than you.

Fighting this won't serve you, you need to work on yourself

Ladygregory1 · 03/06/2026 20:37

@SereneRoseRobin this is layout third or fourth thread today on this whole job thing! You need to stop!

OneCoralGoose · 03/06/2026 20:37

SereneRoseRobin · 03/06/2026 19:46

i didnt argue. i jsut told her i wouldnt do it again and it was an honest mistake

Its gross misconduct and is a usually would be grounds for dismissal outside probation. Your company will have a code of conduct for meeting and use of recording equipment that you will have had to have signed which will say recording or photographs without express permission is not allowed and will be a risk of been dismissed. The fact you were asked to say sorry and didnt is really bad

Preppyprepper · 03/06/2026 20:34

Op, did you use AI to write your OP? Your writing style in your OP and in your replies do not really match.

Did you use AI in your role? Do you rely on it to communicate?

It sounds like they gave you a lot of support and you still did not perform. It sounds like you need to be told what to do, rather than being able to work independently. This is fine in some roles, but it may be the role was not suitable for you.

You can expect reasonable adjustments, i.e. adjustments that are reasonable for the employer to accommodate. Having to dedicate staff to telling you how to do your job day to day in the long term is not reasonable.

Happytaytos · 03/06/2026 20:33

SereneRoseRobin · 03/06/2026 19:06

I dont need to answer you... u arent helping my situation.

It's becoming quite clear why they don't want to keep you.

Your attitude is rude, you can't do the job and you think the world owes you a favour.

chirrupybird · 03/06/2026 20:33

Was it extended to give you another chance to meet expectations? And you still didn't. Isn't that the point of a probation to see if you fit and if you don't they can get rid? Otherwise many people wouldn't get a chance at all.

Taztoy · 03/06/2026 20:31

noctilucentcloud · 03/06/2026 20:22

Shit OP, I am so sorry. That must have been terrifying. A very salient point to why people should not be recorded without permission, or photographed, or have names etc given out. It must be so much harder now to be and feel safe with everything online and people sharing photo's / video's from everywhere.

Thank you. The thing is, the op might not know that there’s someone with an adjustment on the call.

and yes, it restricts my life professionally and in my personal life.

Magpiegrave · 03/06/2026 20:25

You’ve responded quite bluntly and unhelpfully to questions in this thread OP, questions that people have asked to help them understand the issue.

Did you respond like this in the workplace? In a somewhat argumentative/closed manner?

When you responded “wdym” to a detailed and reasonable question from a PP I thought blimey I hope she didn’t respond like that in the workplace. The question was detailed and said what it meant. It suggested that you hadn’t actually read the question properly.

In the workplace, if you do something wrong or against policy, even if you didn’t realised it was the wrong thing to do - you apologise.

The way you’ve responded to people in this thread show that you may be quite difficult to communicate with.

If you don’t understand something, re-read it. Re-read it again. Try to process and understand it independently.

The kind of adjustments you’ve asked for would not be possible in my job. The people training and helping you also have their own jobs to do. They will not have time to take away from their own days to constantly give you very specific targeted and curated support and feedback.

If you’re not sure how to do something, do you google it? Search YouTube? Independently look for your own examples and research? Are there no examples of similar work that you could find on the work database?

IMightMentionGriddlebone · 03/06/2026 20:25

OP, I was diagnosed with Asperger's syndrome as a female teenager, back when it was accepted wisdom that Asperger's syndrome mostly affected males. In retrospect, I was diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome despite my sex, because my social skills were simply that bad and my male-typical special interests made me a walking caricature of AS.

With all that in mind, are you flipping kidding me? Your posts are coming across as socially inappropriate to me, the worst masker ever! If I am not on your side reading your posts, that says it all.

As for your insistence that you deserved better/more detailed instructions at your workplace, what on earth would be the point? People on mumsnet have given their time up for free to post advice, and you visibly failed to engage by replying with one line answers. In one case, you responded with a single initialism. It's incredibly disrespectful. If that's how you treat people volunteering their free time, I rather suspect you came across as entitled to colleagues who were supporting you during their working hours, and technically being paid to mentor you.

There is a difference between reasonable adjustments and expecting to be babysat while being paid the same as your babysitter.

Have some dignity and look up the term self-improvement. Then engage in some. If you need detailed instructions on how to do that, start by researching where the shift button on your keyboard is. Then use it to consistently capitalise the beginning of your sentences. Do you see many other people in this thread abbreviating you to "u"? It's clearly a social norm on MN to type our words out in full, and you're not picking up on that. If you're missing that, what subtle social cues are you missing in the workplace? What social norms are you breaking there that you haven't noticed?

Oh, and work on developing the stamina to type multiple paragraphs without using AI to write for you.

Swipe left for the next trending thread