Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To have done a job interview at 20 weeks pregnant and not disclosed

532 replies

Kinekia · 29/05/2026 18:47

I’m 25 weeks pregnant.

My original manager knew from 6 weeks in January as HG (severe morning sickness) kicked in at 6 weeks and I ended up on the sick for 2 months. After 2 months I returned as I’d found a medication protocol that allowed
me to get back to normality. I worked in an entry level customer service role. They have dozens of staff so my pregnancy didn’t really affect the team that much.

An internal role came up within the business in March. It would essentially be a promotion. Pay rise, more responsibilities (but generally nicer hours and less front-line customer contact, which is a huge bonus), no weekends, smaller team. I applied expecting nothing to come of it. I surprisingly got invited for an interview in April. I was 20 weeks when I interviewed. I had pondered over whether to disclose the pregnancy at the interview. This internal department is in a different part of the building to where I worked so they don’t know me at all. And my line manager at the time confirmed they wouldn’t tell them about the pregnancy and that it was up to me when I disclose. This job role that had come up was something I’ve desired to get into ever since joining the company, and I really wanted to give it my best shot, so I decided not to disclose, as was my legal right.

I interviewed at 20 weeks in April and felt I hid the bump well. We clicked really well at interview and they really liked me. They asked about pre-booked holidays etc. they then asked “Is there anything else we need to know about?” and I cheerfully said “no”. I felt awful about this at the time but on the other hand, as I said, I wanted them to review me as a candidate fairly without just being seen as “the pregnant candidate”.

Middle of May I got offered the role and accepted. The call where they offered the role was very rushed as they were snowed under, and I didn’t get chance to disclose the pregnancy as she said “Right I’ll be in touch when I’ve got a start date I need to go now, take care!” and abruptly hung up.

The next day (my final day before 17 days of annual leave) I messaged the new manager asking if she had time for a call and she never replied. I wanted to disclose the pregnancy then. I then went on the pre-booked
holiday and still didn’t have a start date.

Came back from my holiday and returned to work 26th May after the bank holiday and went to sit in my usual part of the office and got pulled away by my new manager, taken to their department and told I’m starting straight away. By this point I’m 25 weeks so I had to tell them. It was all quite rushed and they’ve been off with me ever since. Nobody has said anything but they aren’t friendly with me like they have been prior and at one point I was asked why I hadn’t disclosed at interview. They exclude me from friendly chat and I have to ask them what they want me to be doing with my time and my training.

I do feel awful for inconveniencing them but I don’t think I did anything wrong by not disclosing at interview. I had intended to tell them earlier than when I did but I just never got the right moment. I thought we’d have a time to sit down together and go through contracts etc and I would’ve mentioned it then but this never happened.

I have seen there is another woman on the team who is pregnant and due to go on leave so I suspect they had intended me to take over from her and that is why they are pissed off. They hadn’t told me this at interview though. Ironically I’m actually due before this other woman so I can see why they are fuming but legally I’ve not done anything wrong. It does prove that if I’d have disclosed at interview they probably would’ve not hired me and would’ve made up a non-pregnancy related reason to justify it.

Am I am awful employee? I’m concerned that my relationship with my managers will never recover from this and it’s a shame as I really have a huge interest in this role and have every intention of going back full-time after mat leave.

OP posts:
Kinekia · 31/05/2026 15:37

ZanyUmberNewt · 31/05/2026 15:36

Yeah we get it.

You pretended to be feeling bad but we all know you planned it.

Enjoy getting paid for work that you've never actually done and you fucked people over in the process.

Yay!

Never denied that I planned it. Why else would I go for the interview if I didn’t intend to get the role?

Green eyed monster comes to mind.

OP posts:
ZanyUmberNewt · 31/05/2026 15:36

Kinekia · 31/05/2026 15:29

Quite. And now there is a poster saying they don’t think I deserve enhanced mat pay at all. Despite my employer offering it and encouraging me to take it! Complete fucking madness.

I tend to enjoy every single penny of that enhanced mat pay which will land in my bank account each month. I may even use it to travel for a month with my baby whilst I have the time off work. That’ll really piss these posters off

Edited

Yeah we get it.

You pretended to be feeling bad but we all know you planned it.

Enjoy getting paid for work that you've never actually done and you fucked people over in the process.

Yay!

BruFord · 31/05/2026 15:36

Kinekia · 29/05/2026 22:06

I agree with you to be honest. However legally I’ve acted I do need to accept I’ve started off my employment with them on the wrong foot. Unless their behaviour becomes actively harmful or bullying, I will be accepting it. At this stage it’s pretty much just not being chatty with me anymore. Not worth going to HR about.

I want to use my remaining 3 months there to try and rectify things as much as possible. I don’t intend to start leave until my due date for starters. Now my morning sickness is under control it’s an otherwise very manageable and easy pregnancy. Hopefully it remains that way and I can stay as long as possible. Obviously I’ll put mine and baby’s health first if need be but for now the plan is to stay until I’m due to drop

Edited

I think this is the best approach @Kinekia as long as you're not compromising your/your baby's health. Just get on with the job and demonstrate that you do really want it.

Longterm, this will all blow over.

BananaPeels · 31/05/2026 15:31

ZanyUmberNewt · 31/05/2026 14:12

Nope.

But equally don't think any organisation should be paying MAT leave for someone that hasn't had a significant work history and then the employee thinking they're being victimized.

OP worked for 13 months and had 2 months sick and a month A/L and now just about to go on MAT leave for months in 10 weeks as OP says she thinks she'll work till then. Though she likely will not.

Lets say she comes back early, at 9 months post-partum but part-time as OP intends.

So in 2 years of paid employment she works for less than a year as AL accrues on MAT leave.

She's been employed for 2 years and paid for more than a year she didn't work.

If you don't see why that would be a problem for any employer, and think that's pregnancy discrimination, I don't know what to say to convince you how that is a huge problem.

You know that the government pays for maternity not the employer (barring a very little amount at the start). It is for a company to decide if it wants to pay enhanced maternity but it isn’t obligatory

Kinekia · 31/05/2026 15:29

Random321 · 31/05/2026 15:18

If a business can't manage due maternity leave or any other leave, it's an unviable business.

If employees, have to do extra work as a result of any other employees' absense, that's the fact of the business, not the employee.

The nastiest and attitudes on this thread only confirm the OPs decision was the right one.

On a site which is so scathing of those who don't work, claim benefits, don't maximise their income for theor families, the hypocrisy is unbelievable.

Quite. And now there is a poster saying they don’t think I deserve enhanced mat pay at all. Despite my employer offering it and encouraging me to take it! Complete fucking madness.

I tend to enjoy every single penny of that enhanced mat pay which will land in my bank account each month. I may even use it to travel for a month with my baby whilst I have the time off work. That’ll really piss these posters off

OP posts:
Kinekia · 31/05/2026 15:22

ZanyUmberNewt · 31/05/2026 14:12

Nope.

But equally don't think any organisation should be paying MAT leave for someone that hasn't had a significant work history and then the employee thinking they're being victimized.

OP worked for 13 months and had 2 months sick and a month A/L and now just about to go on MAT leave for months in 10 weeks as OP says she thinks she'll work till then. Though she likely will not.

Lets say she comes back early, at 9 months post-partum but part-time as OP intends.

So in 2 years of paid employment she works for less than a year as AL accrues on MAT leave.

She's been employed for 2 years and paid for more than a year she didn't work.

If you don't see why that would be a problem for any employer, and think that's pregnancy discrimination, I don't know what to say to convince you how that is a huge problem.

Well I’m getting the 6 months of enhanced pay whether you like it or not so go and cry about it. HR cheerily told me how great their maternity policy is when I had my initial maternity meeting, and they also cheerfully told me about how they want to be a welcoming workplace for women and about how I can discuss flexible working after maternity leave. As it stands, my previous role couldn’t have accommodated flexible working but many other departments in this business can - I don’t intend to request flexible working, but I could if I wanted to. Not everyone in corporate is an arsehole.

Also you’re making stuff up, I never said I’m going part-time. You’re talking complete and utter bollocks.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 31/05/2026 15:21

bevelino · 31/05/2026 12:25

This

I hired a woman who was 36 weeks pregnant. She didn’t disclose her pregnancy during the interview process and I thought good for her. We hired a temp to cover her maternity leave. The employee is back now and is excellent at her job and the right decision was made.

i feel very strongly about protecting all employees in the workplace and treating them fairly; and in accordance with the law.

To be fair she wouldn’t have had to disclose it, it would have been abundantly obviously to anyone looking at her that she was pregnant!

Random321 · 31/05/2026 15:18

If a business can't manage due maternity leave or any other leave, it's an unviable business.

If employees, have to do extra work as a result of any other employees' absense, that's the fact of the business, not the employee.

The nastiest and attitudes on this thread only confirm the OPs decision was the right one.

On a site which is so scathing of those who don't work, claim benefits, don't maximise their income for theor families, the hypocrisy is unbelievable.

ZanyUmberNewt · 31/05/2026 15:13

Mischance · 31/05/2026 14:59

One important factor here is that the OP is already working for the company and that job and the associated maternity rights would still have stood. She would not have been unemployed or not covered for maternity leave.
There is no way of knowing whether she would or would not have been offered the promotion if she had disclosed at interview. We all suspect not, but cannot know for sure.
If she had declared at interview and not been offered it, for whatever reason, the company would have noted her honesty and integrity, as I said upthread and this can only be to her benefit. As it is her card is marked in a negative way.

OP made it clear that in her original role, she would not have been able to do that after MAT leave as it involved hours she felt she would not be able to fulfil after having a baby.

And the employer could have ended her contract because of that. Legally.

MAT rights didn't apply after OP returned to work and said the job no longer worked for her. Legally.

compactmotif · 31/05/2026 15:05

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Hey, you are aware you are talking to a real person?

Why do you feel the need to be nasty to someone who asked for support with a difficult situation?

compactmotif · 31/05/2026 15:03

Mischance · 31/05/2026 14:59

One important factor here is that the OP is already working for the company and that job and the associated maternity rights would still have stood. She would not have been unemployed or not covered for maternity leave.
There is no way of knowing whether she would or would not have been offered the promotion if she had disclosed at interview. We all suspect not, but cannot know for sure.
If she had declared at interview and not been offered it, for whatever reason, the company would have noted her honesty and integrity, as I said upthread and this can only be to her benefit. As it is her card is marked in a negative way.

"If she had declared at interview and not been offered it, for whatever reason, the company would have noted her honesty and integrity"

Give over. No, they wouldn't. A business that didn't appoint because she was pregnant would have gone, "phew, what a lucky escape" and carried on discriminating.

ZanyUmberNewt · 31/05/2026 15:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

compactmotif · 31/05/2026 15:01

Rpop · 31/05/2026 13:48

That’s pretty black and white. I’m speaking from the perspective of a wonderful business owner with excellent mentoring and support for all. Surprisingly, they prefer all knowledge at interview. Then perhaps they can offer job shares / short term contracts whilst the pregnant person is away / offering the job to several people. It’s called being open and mutually respectful.

You didn't answer my questions. I assume your reply to me is not intended to be an example of respectful communication.

What you describe, at interview stage, is called unlawful. A wonderful business owner would be cognisant of that.

https://www.acas.org.uk/recruitment/follow-discrimination-law

Following discrimination law - Recruitment - Acas

How employers must follow the law on discrimination when advertising, interviewing and deciding on new staff.

https://www.acas.org.uk/recruitment/follow-discrimination-law

Mischance · 31/05/2026 14:59

One important factor here is that the OP is already working for the company and that job and the associated maternity rights would still have stood. She would not have been unemployed or not covered for maternity leave.
There is no way of knowing whether she would or would not have been offered the promotion if she had disclosed at interview. We all suspect not, but cannot know for sure.
If she had declared at interview and not been offered it, for whatever reason, the company would have noted her honesty and integrity, as I said upthread and this can only be to her benefit. As it is her card is marked in a negative way.

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 31/05/2026 14:52

What’s the point of your AIBU? You clearly don’t think you’ve done anything wrong.

bellsofnorwich · 31/05/2026 14:52

Morally you are fine

Legally, and morally, she did the right thing by not telling them

The OP did exactly the right thing legally morally whatever perspective you care to take

Quite a few comments along these lines. I don't think people saying such things understand what morals are.

Mischance · 31/05/2026 14:43

Only one solution for it - women go back to the home- no work for you if you are of child bearing age.
Shall I leave the workforce completely and go and live on a commune with my baby and spend my days milking cows and making sourdough?

These extrapolations do not help the debate!

Clearly neither is being advocated by anyone on this thread.

It is a dilemma there is no doubt about that, and the OP has to make her own decisions about right and wrong, but it is clear she is not entirely happy about this or would not have posted her original question.

Acting within the law dioes noit always mean doing something that feels morally comfortable.

Maternity leave is a hard won right, but exploiting it in this way does not add to the sum of women's security in employment as it puts employers off employing women of child-bearing age, especially small employers.

The OP has achieved what is in her best interests, but at the price of her conscience, and potentially has contributed to the unattractiveness of women to employers.

Personally I could not have made a statement at interview that I knew to be on the edge of honesty (to put it kindly) and in a big organisation it may have been that honesty would have paid off in some way - they would mark her card as being a person of integrity and keep her in mind for promotions etc. As it is she will sadly be starting off with an uncomfortable sense of having pulled the wool over people's eyes and of people feeling wary of her.

PeoplesNet · 31/05/2026 14:30

Kinekia · 29/05/2026 18:47

I’m 25 weeks pregnant.

My original manager knew from 6 weeks in January as HG (severe morning sickness) kicked in at 6 weeks and I ended up on the sick for 2 months. After 2 months I returned as I’d found a medication protocol that allowed
me to get back to normality. I worked in an entry level customer service role. They have dozens of staff so my pregnancy didn’t really affect the team that much.

An internal role came up within the business in March. It would essentially be a promotion. Pay rise, more responsibilities (but generally nicer hours and less front-line customer contact, which is a huge bonus), no weekends, smaller team. I applied expecting nothing to come of it. I surprisingly got invited for an interview in April. I was 20 weeks when I interviewed. I had pondered over whether to disclose the pregnancy at the interview. This internal department is in a different part of the building to where I worked so they don’t know me at all. And my line manager at the time confirmed they wouldn’t tell them about the pregnancy and that it was up to me when I disclose. This job role that had come up was something I’ve desired to get into ever since joining the company, and I really wanted to give it my best shot, so I decided not to disclose, as was my legal right.

I interviewed at 20 weeks in April and felt I hid the bump well. We clicked really well at interview and they really liked me. They asked about pre-booked holidays etc. they then asked “Is there anything else we need to know about?” and I cheerfully said “no”. I felt awful about this at the time but on the other hand, as I said, I wanted them to review me as a candidate fairly without just being seen as “the pregnant candidate”.

Middle of May I got offered the role and accepted. The call where they offered the role was very rushed as they were snowed under, and I didn’t get chance to disclose the pregnancy as she said “Right I’ll be in touch when I’ve got a start date I need to go now, take care!” and abruptly hung up.

The next day (my final day before 17 days of annual leave) I messaged the new manager asking if she had time for a call and she never replied. I wanted to disclose the pregnancy then. I then went on the pre-booked
holiday and still didn’t have a start date.

Came back from my holiday and returned to work 26th May after the bank holiday and went to sit in my usual part of the office and got pulled away by my new manager, taken to their department and told I’m starting straight away. By this point I’m 25 weeks so I had to tell them. It was all quite rushed and they’ve been off with me ever since. Nobody has said anything but they aren’t friendly with me like they have been prior and at one point I was asked why I hadn’t disclosed at interview. They exclude me from friendly chat and I have to ask them what they want me to be doing with my time and my training.

I do feel awful for inconveniencing them but I don’t think I did anything wrong by not disclosing at interview. I had intended to tell them earlier than when I did but I just never got the right moment. I thought we’d have a time to sit down together and go through contracts etc and I would’ve mentioned it then but this never happened.

I have seen there is another woman on the team who is pregnant and due to go on leave so I suspect they had intended me to take over from her and that is why they are pissed off. They hadn’t told me this at interview though. Ironically I’m actually due before this other woman so I can see why they are fuming but legally I’ve not done anything wrong. It does prove that if I’d have disclosed at interview they probably would’ve not hired me and would’ve made up a non-pregnancy related reason to justify it.

Am I am awful employee? I’m concerned that my relationship with my managers will never recover from this and it’s a shame as I really have a huge interest in this role and have every intention of going back full-time after mat leave.

This site and the vote outcomes are fascinating for judging who uses this site / bots / job types / working / non-working etc.

THIS IS WHY THE EQUALITY ACT EXISTS!!! You have done NOTHING wrong and anyone who suggests you should have disclosed or complains your pregnancy 'inconvenienced' an employer, is the reason we need these laws.

I wouldn't have told them until I legally had to in order to be paid maternity / any other requirement.

You have every right to not be set back in your career, financial circumstances, pension impacted, bonuses, sick pay etc - it's all impacted by your salary. Mental health from doing a role involving more front-line contact and so on.

Humans have to reproduce or we die out. But we're put off because 'it will inconvenience employers'. If that's the case then the system needs to change, not us.

You carry on as you are and don't feel one second of guilt.

Kinekia · 31/05/2026 14:14

ZanyUmberNewt · 31/05/2026 13:01

Don't be ridiculous.

You know that's a straw man argument.

I was simply stating the challenges for employers and for employees who have to cover.

OP isn't 'wrong'. But lets not pretend that there aren't issues where people can be legitimately pissed off regardless.

OP was very open in stating she went for this job because she wouldn't have been able to continue in her previous job as a new Mum. And she has savings so she wouldn't be able to access UC straight away.

And now she's got them over a barrel legally.

It's legal but it doesn't mean people can't be pissed off by it.

In the course of my work which is NHS i've had people like OP take jobs while pregnant and not made that clear which causes problems.

Also had a colleague have 3 kids in 5 years. Twice coming back from MAT leave pregnant. Completely legal but also f-ed over the NHS and her colleagues.

She wasn't wrong in doing what she wanted but also, none of her colleagues were wrong in being pissed off.

What are you suggesting I should’ve done? Doesn’t everyone make choices based on their own personal circumstances and what’s best for them? I’m genuinely curious as to what you think I should have done here because you sound like you’d have also disapproved if I’d have left work and gone on UC.

Shall I leave the workforce completely and go and live on a commune with my baby and spend my days milking cows and making sourdough?

OP posts:
stichguru · 31/05/2026 14:13

Legally you are fine
Morally you are fine
Personally you gave them a good reason to be pissed off, but heck if you are a manager part of the skill is working well and nicely with people who piss you off without showing it, because that's your job.

Zov · 31/05/2026 14:12

bevelino · 31/05/2026 12:25

This

I hired a woman who was 36 weeks pregnant. She didn’t disclose her pregnancy during the interview process and I thought good for her. We hired a temp to cover her maternity leave. The employee is back now and is excellent at her job and the right decision was made.

i feel very strongly about protecting all employees in the workplace and treating them fairly; and in accordance with the law.

How on EARTH did someone who was 8 MONTHS pregnant manage to hide her 'bump?'

ZanyUmberNewt · 31/05/2026 14:12

BananaPeels · 31/05/2026 13:46

So you wanted the Op to be unemployed as a result of having a baby?

Nope.

But equally don't think any organisation should be paying MAT leave for someone that hasn't had a significant work history and then the employee thinking they're being victimized.

OP worked for 13 months and had 2 months sick and a month A/L and now just about to go on MAT leave for months in 10 weeks as OP says she thinks she'll work till then. Though she likely will not.

Lets say she comes back early, at 9 months post-partum but part-time as OP intends.

So in 2 years of paid employment she works for less than a year as AL accrues on MAT leave.

She's been employed for 2 years and paid for more than a year she didn't work.

If you don't see why that would be a problem for any employer, and think that's pregnancy discrimination, I don't know what to say to convince you how that is a huge problem.

WhatAMarvelousTune · 31/05/2026 14:02

Nah you’re fine. I wouldn’t have told either. I once had to get a bit arsey with an internal recruiter who invited me for interview for an internal role saying I met all the criteria, and then was silly enough to retract it over email citing my pregnancy as the reason (I guess she found out internally somehow). I emailed back asking her to confirm that the job was not open to pregnant women and got a slightly grovelling email from her manager apologising for the “miscommunication”. I got the job, and subsequent promotions in that role, and have been doing it for 5 yrs now.
In your case OP, I get that they didn’t want someone who was going to go on maternity leave, but tough. You only have to tell by 25 weeks anyway, so any manager, at any time, could be given just a few months notice of a maternity leave.

Petrolitis · 31/05/2026 13:51

Fortysevenpl · 29/05/2026 19:10

Of course they did - because they specifically asked about holidays booked, clearly indicating that they wanted to know if there were absence periods coming. Maternity leave is just that. Whilst you might not have done anything wrong legally, you have fucked them over - they hired you because they needed an employee to work soon, that’s kind of the point of hiring.

They aren’t being friendly to you. Seeing as you are obsessed with legalities, do they have a legal obligation to make chit chat with you? No. would you make chit chat with someone who deceived you? You hid the bump deliberately and you said there was nothing else for them to be aware of so I would say thats
deception , even if legally you’ve done nothing wrong.

Wrong

If they deliberately bully her because she us pregnant then that is illegal.

OP we all know they wouldn't have given you the job if you'd have told them and that is discriminatory

Chewbecca · 31/05/2026 13:51

It's a huge company, it doesn't actually make that much difference which dept you are in when you go on mat leave. Yes to the dept management but not the overall company.

I would work really hard for the remainder of your pregnancy and hopefully they will think that you were a good hire, they just need to wait a little longer for you. Your career is much more than the next year or so.

Good luck!