Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To have done a job interview at 20 weeks pregnant and not disclosed

532 replies

Kinekia · 29/05/2026 18:47

I’m 25 weeks pregnant.

My original manager knew from 6 weeks in January as HG (severe morning sickness) kicked in at 6 weeks and I ended up on the sick for 2 months. After 2 months I returned as I’d found a medication protocol that allowed
me to get back to normality. I worked in an entry level customer service role. They have dozens of staff so my pregnancy didn’t really affect the team that much.

An internal role came up within the business in March. It would essentially be a promotion. Pay rise, more responsibilities (but generally nicer hours and less front-line customer contact, which is a huge bonus), no weekends, smaller team. I applied expecting nothing to come of it. I surprisingly got invited for an interview in April. I was 20 weeks when I interviewed. I had pondered over whether to disclose the pregnancy at the interview. This internal department is in a different part of the building to where I worked so they don’t know me at all. And my line manager at the time confirmed they wouldn’t tell them about the pregnancy and that it was up to me when I disclose. This job role that had come up was something I’ve desired to get into ever since joining the company, and I really wanted to give it my best shot, so I decided not to disclose, as was my legal right.

I interviewed at 20 weeks in April and felt I hid the bump well. We clicked really well at interview and they really liked me. They asked about pre-booked holidays etc. they then asked “Is there anything else we need to know about?” and I cheerfully said “no”. I felt awful about this at the time but on the other hand, as I said, I wanted them to review me as a candidate fairly without just being seen as “the pregnant candidate”.

Middle of May I got offered the role and accepted. The call where they offered the role was very rushed as they were snowed under, and I didn’t get chance to disclose the pregnancy as she said “Right I’ll be in touch when I’ve got a start date I need to go now, take care!” and abruptly hung up.

The next day (my final day before 17 days of annual leave) I messaged the new manager asking if she had time for a call and she never replied. I wanted to disclose the pregnancy then. I then went on the pre-booked
holiday and still didn’t have a start date.

Came back from my holiday and returned to work 26th May after the bank holiday and went to sit in my usual part of the office and got pulled away by my new manager, taken to their department and told I’m starting straight away. By this point I’m 25 weeks so I had to tell them. It was all quite rushed and they’ve been off with me ever since. Nobody has said anything but they aren’t friendly with me like they have been prior and at one point I was asked why I hadn’t disclosed at interview. They exclude me from friendly chat and I have to ask them what they want me to be doing with my time and my training.

I do feel awful for inconveniencing them but I don’t think I did anything wrong by not disclosing at interview. I had intended to tell them earlier than when I did but I just never got the right moment. I thought we’d have a time to sit down together and go through contracts etc and I would’ve mentioned it then but this never happened.

I have seen there is another woman on the team who is pregnant and due to go on leave so I suspect they had intended me to take over from her and that is why they are pissed off. They hadn’t told me this at interview though. Ironically I’m actually due before this other woman so I can see why they are fuming but legally I’ve not done anything wrong. It does prove that if I’d have disclosed at interview they probably would’ve not hired me and would’ve made up a non-pregnancy related reason to justify it.

Am I am awful employee? I’m concerned that my relationship with my managers will never recover from this and it’s a shame as I really have a huge interest in this role and have every intention of going back full-time after mat leave.

OP posts:
Workisntworking · 29/05/2026 22:45

You were absolutely within you'r rights not to tell them during the interview process. They wouldn't have offered it to you.

But I understand that they are annoyed by the inconvenience.

Just don't be an arse when you go back and it will be water under the bridge.

My colleague was offered the job next to me the day before she started her maternity leave. It's the civil service so they do that. Then they had to readvertise for the ML cover so i was on my own fir months and now she's coming back she won't come in on the normal office days and she can't work the usual hours so I'll never be able to leave early (flexible hours only available for her, not me, due to her nursery issues). I'm cheesed off with her already although everything she's done is legally correct.

plsdontlookatme · 29/05/2026 22:40

ClematisBirdbath · 29/05/2026 19:56

Short answer: you were well within your rights and women should never be asked about or forced to reveal information about pregnancy at interview. If you decide to tell them, you should wait until after you have signed an employment contract. That's the only way you can look out for yourself and that's the way it is. It's business. They will cope.

Other perspective, which does not in anyway cancel out what I've said above:

I worked for the same public sector provider for three years. There was one member of staff who I met on my first day. I didn't see her after that because she went on maternity leave the next day. And, aside from occasional visits to the office to introduce us to her latest baby, I never saw her again.

She remained employed with us through three more babies, each maternity leave morphing into the next. Her work was spread out among the other employees in the office, the employer had to keep paying her, and we were not allowed to hire anyone to replace her (we had a couple of temps in at peak times such as end of the financial year).

It's the way it is. It's the nature of the beast. We were all pretty f-ed off about it, but there's nothing we could do. It's the law.

And if one of us had decided to "game the system " we could have done that as well. There's nothing wrong with it, it's legal.

And I would rather put up with that than that women should have no rights. If we were forced to reveal pregnancy, we'd never be hired anywhere, despite the law.

Agree - this massively pisses me off, but the alternative is worse.

WhatWouldTheDoctorDo · 29/05/2026 22:38

I don’t think you did anything wrong OP. Not for an internal promotion. Presumably your company know you are pregnant, but your HR team clearly didn’t let them know (quite rightly) that an internal candidate was pregnant. Is it a pain for the manager of the team? Yes. But the alternative would have been for them to discriminate against you, and that’s just the law that they have to work within, same as any other business.

I’d go to the manager, say, I know the team might be p’d off that I didn’t disclose the pregnancy, but I didn’t want to put anyone in the position of subconsciously discriminating against me. You obviously thought I’d be a good fit for the role, I’ll work my socks off over these next few months, and you can expect the same after my mat leave. And point out that you’re getting the sense that people are being off with you about being pregnant and say you hope this can draw a line under. Then, if things don’t improve follow your complaints procedure.

plsdontlookatme · 29/05/2026 22:37

Papyrophile · 29/05/2026 20:40

You have just explained why very small businesses don't bother to interview women between 25 and 45. They can't accommodate the disruption.

Self-pity from small business owners who are unwilling to comply with equality law is very unattractive

Krobus · 29/05/2026 22:36

You protected yourself from discrimination. Don't feel bad. It is annoying for them but they will get through it and when you've been back from mat leave for a bit it'll be forgotten (and other staff will have come and gone). I feel this would be more of a grey area if we were talking about a small business but as it is far from that I feel you protected yourself and the big corporation will cope.

plsdontlookatme · 29/05/2026 22:36

The problem is that they will find ways to punish you for it. Workplace discrimination is rarely outright and usually takes the form of being sabotaged/picked on in some way

Pigtailsandall · 29/05/2026 22:35

Kinekia · 29/05/2026 19:02

I feel like this question is a roundabout way of asking a female interviewee if they are pregnant or not. They’d already asked about pre-booked holidays and noted them and we’d already discussed that I was planning a long-term career within the organisation. We’d already discussed my entire employment history and education so they knew I wasn’t about to swan off to go to uni or take a career break etc. So what else could they have been fishing for with that question right at the end of the interview? But of course they can’t legally ask if I’m pregnant so they have to just ask it generically.

But then of course I’m going to look like a twat for answering “no” to such a question. And feel like a twat as well.

Edited

No you absolutely do not need to disclose that. Pregnancy is a protected characteristic and no one needs to know - same way as you wouldn't disclose having adhd, a prosthetic leg or back problem

Mischance · 29/05/2026 22:34

No you did nothing wrong. Women should not be penalised and miss out on opportunities because they are pregnant

But they should be honest. Answering a question that was related to availability with a no was not honest.

I am all for womens rights, but actions like this put employers off women as employees and do us no favours in the long run.

Picity · 29/05/2026 22:32

I’m astounded at some of the responses on here. You have done absolutely nothing wrong! It’s not great for the company, but that’s not your fault AT ALL. Who asked you why you had not disclosed at interview? That is the bit that is probably discrimination. If the person who asked you was one of the interviewers, it is implying that you SHOULD have disclosed at interview. If it is someone who wasn’t on the interview panel, how do they know that you didn’t disclose it? Honestly, you have absolutely done the right thing for you and your family. You were clearly the right person to do the job and hopefully they’ll come to realise that in the future.

plsdontlookatme · 29/05/2026 22:30

What are pregnant women who need a job actually supposed to do, then? Purposefully sabotage their own interviews for the benefit of a corporation?

BillieWiper · 29/05/2026 22:29

Maraudingmarauders · 29/05/2026 19:00

Agree! If anyone mentions it again you say “because in many cases pregnancy is seen as a reason not to hire somebody and I didn’t want that being used against me, even subconsciously.”

Yeah I agree. If there's any implications they wouldn't have hired you because of it they know they're breaking employment law. So they have to accept it.

BananaPeels · 29/05/2026 22:28

NowImMrCharisma · 29/05/2026 22:23

Haven't RTFT but OP I dont think I could have done what you did 🙈 I applied for a job in my mat leave with DD1 and got it, found out I was pregnant with DD2 whilst still in my mat leave and arranged an appointment to speak to my manager soon after my 12 week scan to inform them as I felt that was the least I could do. Doesn't matter if I was obliged to or not, I just thought of it as common courtesy.

But you already had the job though so there was nothing for you to lose by telling them. Whether you told them at 12 or 20 weeks made very little difference I suspect.

the Op almost certainly wouldn’t have got the job had she disclosed it when she interviewed.

CoffeeCakeAndALattePlease · 29/05/2026 22:28

You did nothing wrong and there was no obligation to, legally or morally to tell them.

I hire and manage staff and yes it would cause a massive inconvenience and I wouldn’t deny that. But it’s also not for you to worry about that, that’s the job of line managers. You have every right not to disclose.

covering pregnancy and maternity is just part and parcel of working life and needs to be taken in everyone’s stride.

Papyrophile · 29/05/2026 22:26

That is somewhat different. They should have greater capacity to accommodate a variety of situations than a small business. We can cope with an outbreak of measles for a week or 10 days, but 10 months of maternity leave would break everything. Hence, we would give another perfectly plausible reason that you weren't hired for the office manager job. For clarity, I was a sole trader but my OH has a small business. So two different situations.

cucumber4745 · 29/05/2026 22:24

This is discrimination. You have no obligation to disclose prwgnancy at interview. It has to be done by 25 weeks to qualify for material pay if other criteria is met. You have done nothing wrong - it is on them. I think we all have exactly like this and it makes me sad!

mumumental · 29/05/2026 22:23

It’s difficult because it’s not good to lie but if you’d told the truth I doubt they would have appointed you. Everyone knows that. Sì you were in a no win situation.

NowImMrCharisma · 29/05/2026 22:23

Haven't RTFT but OP I dont think I could have done what you did 🙈 I applied for a job in my mat leave with DD1 and got it, found out I was pregnant with DD2 whilst still in my mat leave and arranged an appointment to speak to my manager soon after my 12 week scan to inform them as I felt that was the least I could do. Doesn't matter if I was obliged to or not, I just thought of it as common courtesy.

Besidemyselfwithworry · 29/05/2026 22:20

BatshitIsTheOnlyExplanation · 29/05/2026 19:00

they then asked “Is there anything else we need to know about?” and I cheerfully said “no”

This part is the problem.

this
and ultimately they can’t discriminate because you’re pregnant
the issue you’ve now got is that you lied to them which is never good
if speak to the new manager and apologise and say you didn’t want it to affect your chances, I would also engage in the 10 KIT days and make an effort to keep in touch with the team

Trustwithboudaries · 29/05/2026 22:20

Ponderingwindow · 29/05/2026 18:57

I think the spot where this went wrong was leaving on holiday and delaying the disclosure. Even if it meant interrupting your break, i would have gotten in contact with your new manager as early as possible at that point.

I agree with this and I think you were right not to disclose before you had the job. Discriminating againt someone in the grounds of pregnancy and maternity is illegal so by not telling them you kindly prevented them from doing something illegal. Which is sounds like they absolutely would have done if you had told them and indeed they are doing now.

Zov · 29/05/2026 22:19

Kinekia · 29/05/2026 22:16

The poster’s contribution to this thread has all been about how maternity leave screws over small businesses and people who hire nanny’s who then start a family themselves. I did start this thread to discuss my situation and not a general “what’s your opinion on mat leave” thread so I did want to make the clarification.

Edited

Oh, sorry I didn't realise. I didn't realise you were answering a particular poster and their points.

Zov · 29/05/2026 22:18

shuggles · 29/05/2026 22:14

Well, I am a childless person. And this is what I see. I always feel like I'm treated as being less than working parents.

I'm sorry to hear that. Flowers

Kinekia · 29/05/2026 22:16

Zov · 29/05/2026 22:15

And?

The poster’s contribution to this thread has all been about how maternity leave screws over small businesses and people who hire nanny’s who then start a family themselves. I did start this thread to discuss my situation and not a general “what’s your opinion on mat leave” thread so I did want to make the clarification.

OP posts:
Zov · 29/05/2026 22:15

Kinekia · 29/05/2026 22:14

You’ve raised some very fair points on this thread but I do want to clarify my role is with one of the biggest health insurance companies in the UK. They aren’t hard up

Edited

And?

Zov · 29/05/2026 22:14

BIossomtoes · 29/05/2026 22:11

It’s not true anyway.

I agree.

Kinekia · 29/05/2026 22:14

Papyrophile · 29/05/2026 21:50

I wouldn't disagree with any of your examples BananaPeels. But I already know that you work for a big company, with an HR department. I work for a tiny SME, that doesn't. There's no HR at all here. The office manager does some of the procurement and the invoicing; she books all the accommodation for onsite projects, organises all the training, and deals with the payroll and pension fund and and and ad infinitum. Our office is one person who organises everything for the four people who bring in the bacon.

You’ve raised some very fair points on this thread but I do want to clarify my role is with one of the biggest health insurance companies in the UK. They aren’t hard up

OP posts: