Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think DM is unfair to ban the twins from visiting?

487 replies

timetoban · 29/05/2026 14:27

My sister has four children: an 6-year-old, a 5-year-old and 2-year-old twins.
The older two are easy visitors. They tend to sit quietly, chat a bit and spend a lot of time on their screens. The twins, however, are typical two-year-olds. They run around, make noise, have the occasional tantrum and create a bit of mess.
DM is very house-proud and likes everything neat, tidy and pristine.

She has become increasingly irritated by the twins whenever they visit. She complains that they don't sit nicely, don't behave properly and are too noisy. Personally, I think her expectations of two-year-olds are unrealistic.

The latest development is that she has told DSis that the twins are no longer welcome at her house. She says DSis can bring the older two, but not the younger ones.

The problem is that DSis's husband works long hours and isn't always available to stay home with the twins. So in practice, this means DSis often can't visit at all, or has to choose between seeing DM and staying with her younger children.

DM says it's her house and she's entitled to decide who comes into it. DSis feels hurt that two of her children have effectively been singled out and excluded.

OP posts:
Contrarymary30 · 03/06/2026 20:23

How long do the children visit for ? If it's a normal visit of a couple of hours then she's being unreasonable. If it's a daily visit where Dsis let's the toddlers run wild for hours then I can understand .

croydon15 · 03/06/2026 20:19

thing47 · 03/06/2026 18:54

She gives them screens so they don't interrupt her conversation?!? WTAF.

She sounds absolutely vile, I'm so sorry @timetoban. If I were your DSIS I would take this as the perfect opportunity to end the relationship entirely - she can simply say that if her twins aren't welcome then she won't be able to visit. The end.

This l agree

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 20:16

timetoban · 03/06/2026 18:44

The grandmother wants them on screens. She gives them screens.

So why is your sister letting this happen? Is it because it gives her a break from the older ones? You said she has her hands full with all four of them

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 20:15

timetoban · 03/06/2026 18:41

she has just chosen not to want to spend time with twin toddlers

You mean banned the twin toddlers from her home?

Its the same thing ultimately but if you want to use emotive language, you go for it. She presumably didn’t sit the twins down and tell them they were banned from ever crossing her threshold ever again.

likeafishneedsabike · 03/06/2026 20:09

On the plus side, these kids have a loving set of grandparents from the other side of the family. This woman will have to accept that she will see her adult daughter a couple of times a year child free (which is probably the amount of time a mother of four young children can afford in time).

likeafishneedsabike · 03/06/2026 20:06

sprigatito · 03/06/2026 14:08

That would be a reasonable approach if we were talking about learning Mandarin or scuba diving. Not so much when the activity is “having a relationship with your daughter and two of your grandchildren”.

Absolutely this but let’s also remember that she doesn’t have a relationship with the other two grandchildren either. She tolerates them by giving them screens. It’s not as if she’s actually engaging with the older two just by letting them cross the threshold.

Okiedokie123 · 03/06/2026 18:58

Tbh Id rather have visiting kids (of any age) playing, running about/games/activities than glued to screens
But…. All siblings visit or none at all.

thing47 · 03/06/2026 18:54

She gives them screens so they don't interrupt her conversation?!? WTAF.

She sounds absolutely vile, I'm so sorry @timetoban. If I were your DSIS I would take this as the perfect opportunity to end the relationship entirely - she can simply say that if her twins aren't welcome then she won't be able to visit. The end.

timetoban · 03/06/2026 18:44

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 17:33

Is that the choice of the mother or grandmother though? And who provides those screens?

She wants a relationship with her adult daughters but as they won’t meet with her without the children then she has had to make the choice not to meet at all. It must have been pretty bad to get to this point

The grandmother wants them on screens. She gives them screens.

OP posts:
timetoban · 03/06/2026 18:41

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 08:37

If they are your own kids I imagine that could work. I couldn’t cope with it inside or out.

I think ‘rotten’ is a bit strong, she has just chosen not to want to spend time with twin toddlers

she has just chosen not to want to spend time with twin toddlers

You mean banned the twin toddlers from her home?

OP posts:
Goodnessyoualldashoffdontyoureppies · 03/06/2026 18:17

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Goodnessyoualldashoffdontyoureppies · 03/06/2026 18:15

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

WhatNoRaisins · 03/06/2026 18:07

I've got some sympathy for childless friends not liking your kids or wanting to spend time socialising with you without them. I don't think it unreasonable to have higher expectations for your own parents. I didn't get a lot of time to see friends without my DC as toddlers so I wouldn't be impressed if my parents expected me to use this precious little time to see them too.

thing47 · 03/06/2026 18:01

Or she is just a deeply unpleasant person. We have no way of knowing which of those is true. But OP says that her nieces just make a normal level of noise and mess for their age, and that her DM was a terrible mother so it seems, on the balance of probabilities, that the.DM has an unusually low tolerance cor young children.

Of course she can make that choice, but it appears that a natural consequence is going to be seeing her own DCs much less and to have no relationship with any of her grandchildren. I don't think I'm alone in finding this sad, and quite unusual.

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 17:33

WhatNoRaisins · 03/06/2026 17:07

I don't know I'm not there. The fact that the older ones are expected to sit quietly on screens makes me think it's her threshold that's low rather than the toddlers being particularly bad but who knows.

Is that the choice of the mother or grandmother though? And who provides those screens?

She wants a relationship with her adult daughters but as they won’t meet with her without the children then she has had to make the choice not to meet at all. It must have been pretty bad to get to this point

WhatNoRaisins · 03/06/2026 17:07

I don't know I'm not there. The fact that the older ones are expected to sit quietly on screens makes me think it's her threshold that's low rather than the toddlers being particularly bad but who knows.

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 17:01

WhatNoRaisins · 03/06/2026 16:56

People don't always. Some people believe in the power of familial relationships regardless of whether there's a real relationship between the people. The toddlers won't be toddlers forever, these kids will grow up and it could be that this woman will expect a family relationship with them because of the shared genetics but these people will see her as a stranger.

There is no reason to assume that to be the case though. And shared genetics don’t mean a thing. She has no bond and struggles to spend time with them so why would she suddenly want to bother when they get older?

For it to have come to an actual ban, it must have been pretty bad. She has taken the nuclear option and that isn’t something people do lightly.

WhatNoRaisins · 03/06/2026 16:56

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 16:44

Why would she feel hard done by? She has clearly come to the decision that she doesn’t want to see the toddlers, not sure why people think she won’t have considered the consequences

People don't always. Some people believe in the power of familial relationships regardless of whether there's a real relationship between the people. The toddlers won't be toddlers forever, these kids will grow up and it could be that this woman will expect a family relationship with them because of the shared genetics but these people will see her as a stranger.

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 16:44

WhatNoRaisins · 03/06/2026 15:17

I mean she might think she's found a solution but will she be ok with her grandchildren having no relationship with her as she gets older or will she feel hard done by?

Why would she feel hard done by? She has clearly come to the decision that she doesn’t want to see the toddlers, not sure why people think she won’t have considered the consequences

WhatNoRaisins · 03/06/2026 15:17

I mean she might think she's found a solution but will she be ok with her grandchildren having no relationship with her as she gets older or will she feel hard done by?

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 14:40

StarlingTheConqueror · 03/06/2026 14:01

In some ways, yes you’re right.

But then what if people were only doing what they can(easily?) handle?
Like I have 2 kids but I can’t handle the noise they make so …. I give up? I I get away from their life? Give them up for adoption?

What is this woman going to say in 20 or 30 years time when she needs support herself? That her two daughters should help regardless even if they struggle to handle it? (Let’s be honest here. The mum isn’t an easy woman and it’s not Gou going to get better as she gets older). That her grand children should visit so she isn’t as lonely? Or no she’ll just do with carers and/or a care home. Never mind that at that age, with no one to oversee what’s going on, she is likely to get crap support. And that’s without talking about the fact that support will at least be partially state funded. Another one of those support imposed on us even when we can’t handle it easily .

It’s back to a reality many people don’t want to acknowledge. We’re dependent on each other. We’re all interconnected. It is not possible to live your life, esp not living it well, wo being in contact with other people.
And that means you can’t only acceotable things you ‘can handle’ wo a secong thought. Sometimes it means making an effort, compromising, finding solutions. That’s part of living in society.

We do all have to do things we can’t handle, I agree. However she has found a solution. Compromise doesn’t work in general because at least one party gets a crap deal.

She had made an effort by having the children round, despite it being problematic. However the situation has clearly spiralled and she doesn’t feel able to continue to do that.

She wants to spend time with her daughters so she compromised by spending time with their children too.

She is entitled to make her choices, just as the OP and her sister are entitled to make theirs

sprigatito · 03/06/2026 14:08

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 08:49

She had tried and had realised she can’t handle it. Why put yourself through something time and again when it’s not working?

That would be a reasonable approach if we were talking about learning Mandarin or scuba diving. Not so much when the activity is “having a relationship with your daughter and two of your grandchildren”.

StarlingTheConqueror · 03/06/2026 14:01

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 08:49

She had tried and had realised she can’t handle it. Why put yourself through something time and again when it’s not working?

In some ways, yes you’re right.

But then what if people were only doing what they can(easily?) handle?
Like I have 2 kids but I can’t handle the noise they make so …. I give up? I I get away from their life? Give them up for adoption?

What is this woman going to say in 20 or 30 years time when she needs support herself? That her two daughters should help regardless even if they struggle to handle it? (Let’s be honest here. The mum isn’t an easy woman and it’s not Gou going to get better as she gets older). That her grand children should visit so she isn’t as lonely? Or no she’ll just do with carers and/or a care home. Never mind that at that age, with no one to oversee what’s going on, she is likely to get crap support. And that’s without talking about the fact that support will at least be partially state funded. Another one of those support imposed on us even when we can’t handle it easily .

It’s back to a reality many people don’t want to acknowledge. We’re dependent on each other. We’re all interconnected. It is not possible to live your life, esp not living it well, wo being in contact with other people.
And that means you can’t only acceotable things you ‘can handle’ wo a secong thought. Sometimes it means making an effort, compromising, finding solutions. That’s part of living in society.

Ishouldgotobowes · 03/06/2026 09:49

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Anarchy99 · 03/06/2026 09:33

WhatNoRaisins · 03/06/2026 09:07

When you love someone and care about someone you try different things. She won't consider meeting elsewhere. Even with the older ones she expects them to go on screens and be quiet. She doesn't give a toss about these people.

She doesn’t like the noise and mess that children create. Plenty of people don’t. Even removing the issue of how she apparently treated her own kids, it’s okay not to want to be around a situation like this.

She wants to spend time with her adult daughters and it’s a shame that, as they clearly want to see their mother, this isn’t possible,

Sometimes there is no compromise.

Swipe left for the next trending thread