Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think it is acceptable to smack someone if they touch your body, even if they have dementia? Part 2

213 replies

haleey · 27/05/2026 17:00

Continuing from previous thread:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5534178-to-think-it-is-acceptable-to-smack-someone-if-they-touch-your-body-even-if-they-have-dementia

I visit my grandad in a care home regularly and sometimes male residents will touch women unexpectedly. I’ve had my waist touched, boobs grabbed and one man touched my privates while smiling at me. I know they are ill and confused, but honestly I think people act as though women are supposed to just tolerate it because “they can’t help it”.

Part of this for me is that I have been assaulted before, so my reflex when someone suddenly touches me unexpectedly is to hit out before I even properly think. It is an automatic panic response.

Recently one resident suddenly grabbed me and I instinctively smacked his hand away. One of the staff immediately told me off and said “he can’t help it”. I understand that dementia affects behaviour and judgement, but I found it upsetting that the focus instantly became about him rather than acknowledging that I had just been touched without consent and panicked.

I’m not talking about beating vulnerable elderly people or deliberately hurting confused residents. But I also don’t think women should be expected to quietly accept unwanted touching because the person is elderly or cognitively impaired.

to think it is acceptable to smack someone if they touch your body, even if they have dementia? | Mumsnet

I visit my grandad in a care home regularly and sometimes male residents will touch women unexpectedly. I’ve had my waist touched, boobs grabbed and o...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5534178-to-think-it-is-acceptable-to-smack-someone-if-they-touch-your-body-even-if-they-have-dementia

OP posts:
SmashySmash · 28/05/2026 08:33

Malasana · 28/05/2026 08:26

Can we use the word swat as this is what OP is saying she did. It’s not hitting someone, it’s batting their hand away. Fulling expecting at this point to be asked if I’m happy to hit a disabled person with a bat…….

No one thinks hitting a disabled person is acceptable. However some of us think if we are grabbed by the breasts, swatting the hand away is fine.

The OP says smack. Most people these days class smacking as a bad thing. Most people in fact would say smacking and hitting are the same thing. Smacking children is seen as bad. No one would argue that if you smack a child you are hitting the child.

Edited to add, the OP also says she “hits out” as a reflex. So she uses both the words smack and hit. Not swat or swipe.

Malasana · 28/05/2026 08:32

MissMoneyFairy · 28/05/2026 08:30

She posted she smacked them and fully intends to in the future if it happens again

Well I’m taking that as a swat - regardless it’s not a full on hit she’s talking about. It’s quite clear what she means.

BringBackCatsEyes · 28/05/2026 08:32

OP, on your last thread I asked twice whether you had received therapy or counselling when you were diagnosed with PTSD.
I don't believe you've responded.
I ask because this would help manage your response to unwanted and unexpected behaviour from others.
Not just from vulnerable unwell people in nursing homes, but from e.g a toddler that brushes your bottom in the supermarket, or someone accidentally touches you in the swimming pool, or in any very busy place really.

MissMoneyFairy · 28/05/2026 08:30

Malasana · 28/05/2026 08:26

Can we use the word swat as this is what OP is saying she did. It’s not hitting someone, it’s batting their hand away. Fulling expecting at this point to be asked if I’m happy to hit a disabled person with a bat…….

No one thinks hitting a disabled person is acceptable. However some of us think if we are grabbed by the breasts, swatting the hand away is fine.

She posted she smacked them and fully intends to in the future if it happens again

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 08:30

Boxoffrogs21 · 28/05/2026 08:29

Not if there is no intent…

But there is intent from the OP.

Boxoffrogs21 · 28/05/2026 08:29

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 08:27

It’s assault, legally.

Not if there is no intent…

BIossomtoes · 28/05/2026 08:29

Malasana · 28/05/2026 08:26

Can we use the word swat as this is what OP is saying she did. It’s not hitting someone, it’s batting their hand away. Fulling expecting at this point to be asked if I’m happy to hit a disabled person with a bat…….

No one thinks hitting a disabled person is acceptable. However some of us think if we are grabbed by the breasts, swatting the hand away is fine.

The thread title doesn’t say swat, it says smack. 🤷‍♀️

Malasana · 28/05/2026 08:28

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 08:27

It’s assault, legally.

Then I’d deal with that if the situation arose.

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 08:27

Malasana · 28/05/2026 08:26

Can we use the word swat as this is what OP is saying she did. It’s not hitting someone, it’s batting their hand away. Fulling expecting at this point to be asked if I’m happy to hit a disabled person with a bat…….

No one thinks hitting a disabled person is acceptable. However some of us think if we are grabbed by the breasts, swatting the hand away is fine.

It’s assault, legally.

Malasana · 28/05/2026 08:26

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 08:15

SHE IS NOT A VICTIM!!! That implies there is intent. I’m disgusted that some of you think it’s okay to hit a disabled person.

Can we use the word swat as this is what OP is saying she did. It’s not hitting someone, it’s batting their hand away. Fulling expecting at this point to be asked if I’m happy to hit a disabled person with a bat…….

No one thinks hitting a disabled person is acceptable. However some of us think if we are grabbed by the breasts, swatting the hand away is fine.

Flunkit · 28/05/2026 08:24

So dies this mean that elderly women in a mixed sex residential home are constantly at risk of assault ?

saveforthat · 28/05/2026 08:23

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 08:15

SHE IS NOT A VICTIM!!! That implies there is intent. I’m disgusted that some of you think it’s okay to hit a disabled person.

Of course she is a victim if someone has touched her without consent. If someone with dementia picks up a knife and fatally stabs a person. Would that person be a victim?

haleey · 28/05/2026 08:20

Madthings · 28/05/2026 08:16

Wow are we seriously saying its ok to hit people with dementia and learning difficulties? What about people with neurological conditions where they have involuntary body movements such as tics which mean they might accidentally touch/hit, is it ok to hit them back?!

I never cease to be amazed by attitudes towards disabled on mnet.

Is it ok that someone was touched inappropriately no? And they can absolutely be upset, hurt, feel aggrieved etc. But no we dont get to hit back or lash out. I can understand an impulsive shock reaction almost, but not saying you would do it again. And generally most adults with capacity can override that shock reaction.

As someone that works with children and young adults with learning difficulties, and has friends and family members with various conditions that can result in unwanted behaviour i can assure you the answer is NEVER hit them back or 'swot them away'.

There are ways of dealing with it, which vary depending on the behaviours and what could be causing them but lashing out at them is not the answer.

Obviously you might be shocked especially if its unexpected ie in public but if you choose to enter their home in this case, knowing the residents may have dementia or LD and therfore behave in unpredictable ways it should be something to be aware off. This doesnt mean you cant be upset by it, but its also not totally unexpected.

Anyway reading through, this is the 2nd thread on this subject, glad i missed the first. Its rather depressing to read such ignorant and harmful attitudes towards those with dementia, learning disabilities etc.

Is it ok that someone was touched inappropriately no? And they can absolutely be upset, hurt, feel aggrieved etc. But no we dont get to hit back or lash out. I can understand an impulsive shock reaction almost, but not saying you would do it again. And generally most adults with capacity can override that shock reaction.

You can't always override a reflex action because of PTSD from sexual assault. It is not that simple.

OP posts:
Malasana · 28/05/2026 08:19

haleey · 28/05/2026 08:08

Women have far too long been encouraged to be kind or think of others, to our own detriment.

Unwanted touching is being described as unpleasant by a poster repeatedly here.

Unpleasant is a ridiculous way to describe it.
A long hot train journey with no seat is unpleasant.
Being touched inappropriately is way further than unpleasant - it can be psychologically damaging - and like you I would swat away the hand of someone who does it regardless of dementia.
I think people think when we use the word swat that it’s a full on punch or slap - a swat is not that.
You’ve had a bit of an unfair pile on here OP.

haleey · 28/05/2026 08:19

Branleuse · 28/05/2026 08:13

If someone touches you inappropriately and you hit out, that isn't something you can always help.
Care home staff will absolutely know which clients are a bit too handsy and should absolutely be keeping an eye on him for his safety as much as yours because if you aren't the one that smacks him, someone will.

People expect women to put up with a lot of things and it's not on. We DO put up with a lot of unwanted touching and attention our whole lives. God forbid we actually have a reflex action about it

People expect women to put up with a lot of things and it's not on. We DO put up with a lot of unwanted touching and attention our whole lives. God forbid we actually have a reflex action about it

The reflex action is being criticised and people are making out like it is just going round hitting people with dementia. I didn't know they had dementia until the staff told me after they had inappropriately touched me.

OP posts:
Madthings · 28/05/2026 08:16

Wow are we seriously saying its ok to hit people with dementia and learning difficulties? What about people with neurological conditions where they have involuntary body movements such as tics which mean they might accidentally touch/hit, is it ok to hit them back?!

I never cease to be amazed by attitudes towards disabled on mnet.

Is it ok that someone was touched inappropriately no? And they can absolutely be upset, hurt, feel aggrieved etc. But no we dont get to hit back or lash out. I can understand an impulsive shock reaction almost, but not saying you would do it again. And generally most adults with capacity can override that shock reaction.

As someone that works with children and young adults with learning difficulties, and has friends and family members with various conditions that can result in unwanted behaviour i can assure you the answer is NEVER hit them back or 'swot them away'.

There are ways of dealing with it, which vary depending on the behaviours and what could be causing them but lashing out at them is not the answer.

Obviously you might be shocked especially if its unexpected ie in public but if you choose to enter their home in this case, knowing the residents may have dementia or LD and therfore behave in unpredictable ways it should be something to be aware off. This doesnt mean you cant be upset by it, but its also not totally unexpected.

Anyway reading through, this is the 2nd thread on this subject, glad i missed the first. Its rather depressing to read such ignorant and harmful attitudes towards those with dementia, learning disabilities etc.

Madthings · 28/05/2026 08:16

Wow are we seriously saying its ok to hit people with dementia and learning difficulties? What about people with neurological conditions where they have involuntary body movements such as tics which mean they might accidentally touch/hit, is it ok to hit them back?!

I never cease to be amazed by attitudes towards disabled on mnet.

Is it ok that someone was touched inappropriately no? And they can absolutely be upset, hurt, feel aggrieved etc. But no we dont get to hit back or lash out. I can understand an impulsive shock reaction almost, but not saying you would do it again. And generally most adults with capacity can override that shock reaction.

As someone that works with children and young adults with learning difficulties, and has friends and family members with various conditions that can result in unwanted behaviour i can assure you the answer is NEVER hit them back or 'swot them away'.

There are ways of dealing with it, which vary depending on the behaviours and what could be causing them but lashing out at them is not the answer.

Obviously you might be shocked especially if its unexpected ie in public but if you choose to enter their home in this case, knowing the residents may have dementia or LD and therfore behave in unpredictable ways it should be something to be aware off. This doesnt mean you cant be upset by it, but its also not totally unexpected.

Anyway reading through, this is the 2nd thread on this subject, glad i missed the first. Its rather depressing to read such ignorant and harmful attitudes towards those with dementia, learning disabilities etc.

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 08:15

haleey · 28/05/2026 08:08

Women have far too long been encouraged to be kind or think of others, to our own detriment.

Unwanted touching is being described as unpleasant by a poster repeatedly here.

Because that’s what it is.

It is not sexual assault. Legally or morally.

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 08:15

saveforthat · 28/05/2026 08:10

It may not be sexual assault in the eyes of the law but the victim will certainly feel that she has been sexualy assaulted.

SHE IS NOT A VICTIM!!! That implies there is intent. I’m disgusted that some of you think it’s okay to hit a disabled person.

Branleuse · 28/05/2026 08:13

If someone touches you inappropriately and you hit out, that isn't something you can always help.
Care home staff will absolutely know which clients are a bit too handsy and should absolutely be keeping an eye on him for his safety as much as yours because if you aren't the one that smacks him, someone will.

People expect women to put up with a lot of things and it's not on. We DO put up with a lot of unwanted touching and attention our whole lives. God forbid we actually have a reflex action about it

Malasana · 28/05/2026 08:11

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 07:58

It’s been explained why it’s not sexual assault. If you want to believe it is, that’s your prerogative but you won’t find many sympathetic people.

Well I’m sympathetic.

saveforthat · 28/05/2026 08:10

It may not be sexual assault in the eyes of the law but the victim will certainly feel that she has been sexualy assaulted.

haleey · 28/05/2026 08:08

Malasana · 28/05/2026 06:30

I would absolutely swat away the hand if I was inappropriately touched.

While I understand that the other person may have dementia or learning difficulties, my body remains my own regardless.

If I appear heartless, so be it.

Women have far too long been encouraged to be kind or think of others, to our own detriment.

Women have far too long been encouraged to be kind or think of others, to our own detriment.

Unwanted touching is being described as unpleasant by a poster repeatedly here.

OP posts:
haleey · 28/05/2026 08:07

Notmyreality · 28/05/2026 07:18

As above, if the disabled child touches me inappropriately I would also swat their hand away.

Watch out. You will get told you enjoy hitting disabled children.

OP posts:
frumpydump · 28/05/2026 08:06

haleey · 28/05/2026 08:05

so you just want to admit you enjoy hitting disabled adults and children?

Yes, You are so clever. That is exactly what I want to admit. 🙄

You’ve been told why it’s wrong to hit them. Been told why it’s not sexual assault. Yet you’re still here arguing till you’re blue in the face that you’re right.