Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think it is acceptable to smack someone if they touch your body, even if they have dementia? Part 2

213 replies

haleey · 27/05/2026 17:00

Continuing from previous thread:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5534178-to-think-it-is-acceptable-to-smack-someone-if-they-touch-your-body-even-if-they-have-dementia

I visit my grandad in a care home regularly and sometimes male residents will touch women unexpectedly. I’ve had my waist touched, boobs grabbed and one man touched my privates while smiling at me. I know they are ill and confused, but honestly I think people act as though women are supposed to just tolerate it because “they can’t help it”.

Part of this for me is that I have been assaulted before, so my reflex when someone suddenly touches me unexpectedly is to hit out before I even properly think. It is an automatic panic response.

Recently one resident suddenly grabbed me and I instinctively smacked his hand away. One of the staff immediately told me off and said “he can’t help it”. I understand that dementia affects behaviour and judgement, but I found it upsetting that the focus instantly became about him rather than acknowledging that I had just been touched without consent and panicked.

I’m not talking about beating vulnerable elderly people or deliberately hurting confused residents. But I also don’t think women should be expected to quietly accept unwanted touching because the person is elderly or cognitively impaired.

to think it is acceptable to smack someone if they touch your body, even if they have dementia? | Mumsnet

I visit my grandad in a care home regularly and sometimes male residents will touch women unexpectedly. I’ve had my waist touched, boobs grabbed and o...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5534178-to-think-it-is-acceptable-to-smack-someone-if-they-touch-your-body-even-if-they-have-dementia

OP posts:
haleey · 28/05/2026 12:32

Notmyreality · 28/05/2026 12:23

Yep I would also swat their hand away. What exactly do you understand the action “swat” to mean?

Apparently it depends who is doing it. If they have dementia or a disabled child then there should be no reflexive reaction.

OP posts:
Differentforgirls · 28/05/2026 12:31

Notmyreality · 28/05/2026 12:23

Yep I would also swat their hand away. What exactly do you understand the action “swat” to mean?

Hit.

Notmyreality · 28/05/2026 12:23

CaesarAugusta · 28/05/2026 08:48

What if, say, a two year old non-disabled child touched your breast or something similar?

Yep I would also swat their hand away. What exactly do you understand the action “swat” to mean?

WhatNoRaisins · 28/05/2026 11:25

The OP is visiting a family member who she has some concerns about due to where they are living. She's not going into an unsafe situation for shits and giggles. It might be worth a try to see if the staff can arrange a safe space for her to sit with her family member but that depends on how competent they are.

haleey · 28/05/2026 11:24

Watch out everyone - visiting a nursing home is like getting out of your car for a stroll round the lions enclosure.

OP posts:
Seeingadistance · 28/05/2026 11:15

Every so often I see news reports of visitors to safari parks who choose to get out their car for a stroll round the lions’ enclosure. Before this thread I wondered what kind of person would do that.

Seeingadistance · 28/05/2026 11:12

InSpainFallsMainlyOnThePlane · 28/05/2026 10:45

@Seeingadistance I am saying it is a poor analogy.

British visitor to Spain - best to modify their behaviour to avoid harm and inconvenience/discomfort.

Visitor to nursing home - best to modify their behaviour to avoid harm and inconvenience/discomfort.

InSpainFallsMainlyOnThePlane · 28/05/2026 10:45

Seeingadistance · 28/05/2026 08:40

You are missing the point.

It’s an analogy.

The OP is refusing to accept that she would be prudent and sensible to modify her behaviour when she’s visiting the nursing home. She seems to expect that people who are cognitively impaired, often severely, will behave as if they are not.

Edited

@Seeingadistance I am saying it is a poor analogy.

plasticplate · 28/05/2026 10:37

If your reflex action is to hit then you need to do all you reasonably can to not put yourself in that situation. You are not doing that.

My severely disabled adult son can hit when in distress. For example by the sound of screaming babies. He would be extremely unlikely to hit a member of the public, in fact he would hurt himself first, but we make sure that he is out of reach of members of the public when in situations where triggers are likely.

WhatNoRaisins · 28/05/2026 10:18

As for disabled children, in my experience most parents of disabled children do watch and step in when it comes to their interactions with others. If you know someone is vulnerable and you are caring for them then this is part of keeping them safe.

haleey · 28/05/2026 10:13

LordofMisrule1 · 28/05/2026 10:05

YANBU.

A lot of people would reflexively slap someone's hand away. Some may even do more (hit or punch someone).

People have different backgrounds and prior experiences. Someone that has been assaulted previously or has trauma due to non consensual touch might hit out before they even realise they've done it. It's absolutely natural instinct that if someone sexually assaults you you hit back.

In terms of touching other parts of your body, I can understand why somebody might react similarly. If someone is willing to grab or touch your stomach, legs, it's not a stretch to imagine they might be willing to breach your bodily boundaries/consent in other ways. But of course there is context. Someone tapping you on your arm is very different to grabbing the top of your arm hard in a way that means you can't easily get away.

Women are constantly told they should just smile and let it go, question their own actions, what did they do to deserve it? Don't risk upsetting the aggressor further.

Reminders me of a Reddit post recently where a woman had been at a park with her baby when a large man with two care workers with him with apparently a learning disability had come over and grabbed them by the hair and yanked. They had a really sore neck, but it was the absolute terror of being assaulted in public while responsible for their baby that traumatised them. So many responses were 'he can't help it, it's unfair to expect him not to go to the park, have some empathy for him'. It was quite scary to see inside the minds of how some people think.

What is scary is that it is women criticising me for my reflex action due to PTSD from a sexual assault.

Even some of those who have been sexually assaulted themselves have been critical as well.

OP posts:
BringBackCatsEyes · 28/05/2026 10:07

haleey · 28/05/2026 09:54

No point asking this:

Where has anyone said you enjoy hitting disabled people?

If you can't be bothered to read the past posts.

You’re only responding to the post which suit you.

I can respond to what I want, that is how discussion forums work. Maybe this is not the place for you if you don't get that?

Discussion "a conversation or exchange of ideas and opinions between two or more people aimed at understanding a specific subject, exploring solutions, or reaching a decision"

I don't think you are doing that. You are right though, this particular 'discussion' is not for me.

I am only glad you are not visiting the care home my FIL lives in.

LordofMisrule1 · 28/05/2026 10:05

YANBU.

A lot of people would reflexively slap someone's hand away. Some may even do more (hit or punch someone).

People have different backgrounds and prior experiences. Someone that has been assaulted previously or has trauma due to non consensual touch might hit out before they even realise they've done it. It's absolutely natural instinct that if someone sexually assaults you you hit back.

In terms of touching other parts of your body, I can understand why somebody might react similarly. If someone is willing to grab or touch your stomach, legs, it's not a stretch to imagine they might be willing to breach your bodily boundaries/consent in other ways. But of course there is context. Someone tapping you on your arm is very different to grabbing the top of your arm hard in a way that means you can't easily get away.

Women are constantly told they should just smile and let it go, question their own actions, what did they do to deserve it? Don't risk upsetting the aggressor further.

Reminders me of a Reddit post recently where a woman had been at a park with her baby when a large man with two care workers with him with apparently a learning disability had come over and grabbed them by the hair and yanked. They had a really sore neck, but it was the absolute terror of being assaulted in public while responsible for their baby that traumatised them. So many responses were 'he can't help it, it's unfair to expect him not to go to the park, have some empathy for him'. It was quite scary to see inside the minds of how some people think.

haleey · 28/05/2026 09:55

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 09:54

That’s not how assault is defined

I never said it was 🙄

OP posts:
haleey · 28/05/2026 09:54

BringBackCatsEyes · 28/05/2026 09:49

ALL of them? Nah.
You’re only responding to the post which suit you.
I ask again…..have you had treatment for your PTSD?

No point asking this:

Where has anyone said you enjoy hitting disabled people?

If you can't be bothered to read the past posts.

You’re only responding to the post which suit you.

I can respond to what I want, that is how discussion forums work. Maybe this is not the place for you if you don't get that?

OP posts:
SockPlant · 28/05/2026 09:54

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 07:10

It’s not sexual assault when the person doesn’t have capacity

Like the low IQ lads who raced those girls?

Swatting a hand away is fine.
Being aware of your surroundings is also fine.
Putting up with inappropriate touching "because dementia" is not fine but see above for situational awareness.

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 09:54

haleey · 28/05/2026 09:37

People are determined it is assault even though the staff at the care home have not involved the police on any occasion.

That’s not how assault is defined

Differentforgirls · 28/05/2026 09:53

Flunkit · 28/05/2026 08:24

So dies this mean that elderly women in a mixed sex residential home are constantly at risk of assault ?

As are the elderly men. From the women.

MrsShawnHatosy · 28/05/2026 09:50

Seeingadistance · 28/05/2026 09:42

This.

Here’s another analogy for the OP and those who don’t think she should change her behaviour in response to what has happened to her no less than 4 times.

Last year I was walking on a public foothpath when I was attacked by dogs. I was dragged to the ground and bitten. I was treated at hospital for my injuries, I reported the attack to Police and Dog Warden, I asked local people about the dogs and discovered that these dogs have a history of aggression and being allowed to foam freely.

Have I modified my behaviour as a result? Yes. I have not walked on that footpath again and when walking elsewhere, if I see unrestrained dogs, I can choose to change route and sometimes abandon my walk altogether.

If I were to adopt the OP’s approach to a known risk, I would have been back on that path the next day - got bitten, and the next day - got bitten etc.

If you have experienced any kind of harm, and you do not have the power to eliminate the cause of the harm, it makes sense to change your behaviour to avoid it happening again.

In my situation it was unrestrained dogs with an irresponsible owner. In the OP’s situation it’s a nursing home with residents whose impulse control has been destroyed by dementia.

Now that it has been explained to the OP that people with dementia are in the nursing home she visits, it is her responsibility to use her wits to avoid harm to herself.

Absolutely. This is not victim blaming, it’s sheer common sense.

BringBackCatsEyes · 28/05/2026 09:49

haleey · 28/05/2026 09:35

Look at the previous posts.

ALL of them? Nah.
You’re only responding to the post which suit you.
I ask again…..have you had treatment for your PTSD?

Differentforgirls · 28/05/2026 09:48

frumpydump · 28/05/2026 06:54

So what? Does the discussion need to keep going until you’re told you were in the right?

I asked her to start a new one as I thought it was interesting. So blame me!

haleey · 28/05/2026 09:47

Malasana · 28/05/2026 09:40

Oh my I didn’t read the entire previous post. Thats wild.
I was asked if I was happy to hit disabled children because the poster wanted to work out what I was happy with!
No one is on about children and in any case I’m sure you aren’t happy about the situation as whole.
I know exactly what you mean by smacking the hand away - I refer to it as swatting or batting - but I know exactly what you mean and I don’t think it’s an unreasonable reaction when there’s been unwanted and inappropriate touching.

It is wild!

The post is not about disabled children but people are determined to make it sound like people are intentionally hitting disabled people.

Thank you for understanding what I meant by smacking - it was a a reflex action to stop the unwanted and inappropriate touching which did make it stop.

OP posts:
Seeingadistance · 28/05/2026 09:45

haleey · 28/05/2026 09:37

People are determined it is assault even though the staff at the care home have not involved the police on any occasion.

People have also pointed out that this indicates a badly managed home and are surprised that you aren’t worried about your grandfather living in such a chaotic environment.

In the last thread one poster described a similar incident and that had been reported by the nursing home to the Police and other outside agencies which have oversight of nursing homes.

Seeingadistance · 28/05/2026 09:42

MrsShawnHatosy · 28/05/2026 09:21

This. It is absolutely no use hoping the culprits will change their behaviour. They can’t.

This.

Here’s another analogy for the OP and those who don’t think she should change her behaviour in response to what has happened to her no less than 4 times.

Last year I was walking on a public foothpath when I was attacked by dogs. I was dragged to the ground and bitten. I was treated at hospital for my injuries, I reported the attack to Police and Dog Warden, I asked local people about the dogs and discovered that these dogs have a history of aggression and being allowed to foam freely.

Have I modified my behaviour as a result? Yes. I have not walked on that footpath again and when walking elsewhere, if I see unrestrained dogs, I can choose to change route and sometimes abandon my walk altogether.

If I were to adopt the OP’s approach to a known risk, I would have been back on that path the next day - got bitten, and the next day - got bitten etc.

If you have experienced any kind of harm, and you do not have the power to eliminate the cause of the harm, it makes sense to change your behaviour to avoid it happening again.

In my situation it was unrestrained dogs with an irresponsible owner. In the OP’s situation it’s a nursing home with residents whose impulse control has been destroyed by dementia.

Now that it has been explained to the OP that people with dementia are in the nursing home she visits, it is her responsibility to use her wits to avoid harm to herself.

Malasana · 28/05/2026 09:40

haleey · 28/05/2026 09:34

People prefer to think I got the cricket bat out of my bag and hit them several times on the head. Hence that is why they said on the last thread that I should be barred from the home and arrested.

Surprisingly the care managers or staff did not call the police on me for assault.

Oh my I didn’t read the entire previous post. Thats wild.
I was asked if I was happy to hit disabled children because the poster wanted to work out what I was happy with!
No one is on about children and in any case I’m sure you aren’t happy about the situation as whole.
I know exactly what you mean by smacking the hand away - I refer to it as swatting or batting - but I know exactly what you mean and I don’t think it’s an unreasonable reaction when there’s been unwanted and inappropriate touching.