Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To not let DH go to this woman’s house?

413 replies

Fellohesh · 27/05/2026 15:39

A couple of months ago, we went out with some friends who all met up at our house before leaving together to go to town. Before they arrived, DH put his jacket on but I didn’t think it matched the outfit and I also just didn’t think it was very nice in general. I told him so but he said he likes it so he’s wearing it.

When everyone arrived, one of the women said “what’s going on with your outfit?” to DH, and he asked why she didn’t like it. She said something about the jacket and DH disappeared upstairs and came down wearing a new one and said “is that better?”. I felt hurt at the time that he didn’t value my opinion but cared about what she thought of him. The next day I asked if he fancied her, to which he replied “she’s attractive” I said if we weren’t together would he ask her out and he said maybe (the convo was longer of course but I’m trying to keep this short and give the gist).

He came home from work yesterday saying this same woman is training to be a hairdresser and has offered to cut his hair for free while she practices. He has thick wavy hair and gets a scissor cut so it’s not just a simple trim with the clippers. However, she doesn’t have a salon or anything as she isn’t qualified so it would be at her house. AIBU to say no to this?

OP posts:
Thepeopleversuswork · 30/05/2026 07:58

ForeverTheOptomist · 30/05/2026 06:58

What I'm getting at is that I see OPs repeatedly being told that their marriage is over when little information is apparent.

I don't agree that working on a marriage is reflective of being used as a doormat. Some couples who are having problems can survive it and go go forwards in a stronger position. And continue to love one another.

I do accept that there are times when it's blindingly obvious that couples should split, and always when the relationship is abusive,

... and on that note, and for info, I divorced my abusive ex-husband and took the fucker to the cleaners.

Edited

I’m not necessarily saying OP’s marriage is over. There’s not enough to go on and we don’t know what the DH’s intentions are.

But the phrase “work on the marriage” (see also “fight for the marriage/fight for love”) is in my experience a sign of someone who is sacrificing their self respect trying to hold onto something that is long dead.

A marriage should be naturally supportive, loving and based on trust and respect. When you get to the point of having to “work on it” it’s no longer worth keeping.

I don’t believe you can or should come back from infidelity. When someone has shat on you from a great height (or tried to), going back to them and trying to “fix” things is simply debasing yourself. You will not be able to recover the previous relationship and only make them have contempt for you. And its a terrible example to set children.

When its gone, its gone.

ForeverTheOptomist · 30/05/2026 07:11

Anarchy99 · 29/05/2026 22:34

Not necessarily for the OP as she seems more rational than most,

Clearly some posters can’t live with their husbands without controlling them or looking through their own phone or recording their conversations. Is that a happy way to live? i mean each to their own and all that but it sounds bloody grim!

I know someone whose husband cheated decades ago but she was determined to stay in her marriage even though they are both hideously unhappy - that’s no way to live!

Totes agree with you. You need to know when things become unreconcilable.

Sartre · 30/05/2026 07:06

Broken down, he fancies her and wants to go to her house on his own to have her touch his hair for a while, of course nothing else could potentially happen in this scenario!

I’d also argue she perhaps likes him back, the jacket comment is oddly familiar for someone you’ve just met. I certainly wouldn’t comment on a man’s jacket unless it was particularly nice perhaps.

ForeverTheOptomist · 30/05/2026 06:58

Thepeopleversuswork · 29/05/2026 22:01

”working on the marriage” is a euphemism for being a doormat.

If there’s no trust or respect there’s no marriage.

What I'm getting at is that I see OPs repeatedly being told that their marriage is over when little information is apparent.

I don't agree that working on a marriage is reflective of being used as a doormat. Some couples who are having problems can survive it and go go forwards in a stronger position. And continue to love one another.

I do accept that there are times when it's blindingly obvious that couples should split, and always when the relationship is abusive,

... and on that note, and for info, I divorced my abusive ex-husband and took the fucker to the cleaners.

Aboutreadytogiveup · 29/05/2026 23:44

Hope all stays innocent op x

Anarchy99 · 29/05/2026 22:34

ForeverTheOptomist · 29/05/2026 21:21

The marriage is over? What the hell? I see on MN constantly that woman are being told that their marriage is 'over'. Does no-one try to work on their marriages any more?

Not necessarily for the OP as she seems more rational than most,

Clearly some posters can’t live with their husbands without controlling them or looking through their own phone or recording their conversations. Is that a happy way to live? i mean each to their own and all that but it sounds bloody grim!

I know someone whose husband cheated decades ago but she was determined to stay in her marriage even though they are both hideously unhappy - that’s no way to live!

Thepeopleversuswork · 29/05/2026 22:01

ForeverTheOptomist · 29/05/2026 21:21

The marriage is over? What the hell? I see on MN constantly that woman are being told that their marriage is 'over'. Does no-one try to work on their marriages any more?

”working on the marriage” is a euphemism for being a doormat.

If there’s no trust or respect there’s no marriage.

TrishM80 · 29/05/2026 21:57

It could be worse, she could have invited him over for a free back, sac and crack wax...

ForeverTheOptomist · 29/05/2026 21:21

Anarchy99 · 29/05/2026 19:14

Then the marriage is over regardless. She will be watching him like a hawk and that isn’t healthy

The marriage is over? What the hell? I see on MN constantly that woman are being told that their marriage is 'over'. Does no-one try to work on their marriages any more?

ForeverTheOptomist · 29/05/2026 21:19

What's wrong with being an 'outspoken' woman? The comments on here are going from the sublime to the ridiculous. 'Nip it in the bud?' Yes. Why on earth would she want to encourage her husband to spend time with a woman who is clearly challenging her marriage?

Silverbirchleaf · 29/05/2026 21:03

Probably if the jacket incident hadn’t happened, then op woujdn’t think twice about the haircut appointment (and my dh goes to a private house for his hair cut). However, the fact that dh immediately responded to friends criticism about his jacket, but had ignored op, his wife, has made op’s senses tingle. Also, this woman is a virtual stranger, a barmaid in the pub, so why was her opinion so important? A line has been crossed somewhere.

cloudtreecarpet · 29/05/2026 20:54

BIossomtoes · 29/05/2026 18:42

Absolutely. I can’t imagine being in a marriage where all this is necessary. And then people complain about the mental load.

Apparently it's "naïve" to expect a married man to have the self control to not cheat on his wife.
Honestly, it's depressing 🙄

Anarchy99 · 29/05/2026 19:14

Popdropper · 29/05/2026 19:10

I don't think OP will need to, it will be obvious if his attention is being taken elsewhere over the next few days/weeks. He no doubt doesn't even realise it but he's already damaged OP's trust purely by asking the question about the haircut and seeming disappointed when she said she wasn't ok with it so she will be hyper-alert to anything even slightly out of the ordinary now. He knew before he asked that it wasn't ok but hoped OP would be naive enough to sanction him (at the very least) flirting with this woman in plain sight so she will (rightly) not trust him fully anymore.

Then the marriage is over regardless. She will be watching him like a hawk and that isn’t healthy

Popdropper · 29/05/2026 19:10

Anarchy99 · 29/05/2026 18:00

Okay well the next advice you will get is to monitor his phone - this is a BAD idea

I don't think OP will need to, it will be obvious if his attention is being taken elsewhere over the next few days/weeks. He no doubt doesn't even realise it but he's already damaged OP's trust purely by asking the question about the haircut and seeming disappointed when she said she wasn't ok with it so she will be hyper-alert to anything even slightly out of the ordinary now. He knew before he asked that it wasn't ok but hoped OP would be naive enough to sanction him (at the very least) flirting with this woman in plain sight so she will (rightly) not trust him fully anymore.

BIossomtoes · 29/05/2026 18:42

Thepeopleversuswork · 29/05/2026 18:40

We do and the thing I find most depressing about all the “nip it in the bud” shit is the idea of the woman having to be the moral policeman in the marriage.

a) because who has time to have their husband under surveillance
b) because it assumes men have the self control of toddlers who have to constantly be pulled back from sticking their dicks into other women
c) because who could respect or be attracted to a man who is constantly trying to put his hands in the proverbial candy jar

And it baffles me that most people on this thread seem to think this is either achievable or sustainable in a marriage.

Life is too short.

Absolutely. I can’t imagine being in a marriage where all this is necessary. And then people complain about the mental load.

Thepeopleversuswork · 29/05/2026 18:40

cloudtreecarpet · 29/05/2026 16:54

Really? We do set low bars for men don't we?

We do and the thing I find most depressing about all the “nip it in the bud” shit is the idea of the woman having to be the moral policeman in the marriage.

a) because who has time to have their husband under surveillance
b) because it assumes men have the self control of toddlers who have to constantly be pulled back from sticking their dicks into other women
c) because who could respect or be attracted to a man who is constantly trying to put his hands in the proverbial candy jar

And it baffles me that most people on this thread seem to think this is either achievable or sustainable in a marriage.

Life is too short.

Fellohesh · 29/05/2026 18:33

Littledogball · 29/05/2026 18:26

But where did she get a man’s jacket your husbands size if she’s single? She took him upstairs and just had it hanging around? That’s odd. (Unless he already been and left it there!!!)

No we were in our own house, she came to ours, so he just got a different jacket from his wardrobe

OP posts:
Littledogball · 29/05/2026 18:26

But where did she get a man’s jacket your husbands size if she’s single? She took him upstairs and just had it hanging around? That’s odd. (Unless he already been and left it there!!!)

Anarchy99 · 29/05/2026 18:00

Fellohesh · 29/05/2026 17:40

He showed me the message she sent him and that was the only one on there, there were no prior messages to that. However, I don’t know what he has responded to her with and don’t know if they’ve continued messaging

Okay well the next advice you will get is to monitor his phone - this is a BAD idea

Fellohesh · 29/05/2026 17:40

Gateappreciation · 29/05/2026 16:19

“People are not generally stupid though - they are well aware of what they are doing and the risks attached to it.”

i don’t totally agree with this. I wasn’t actually aware of the emotional affair concept until mn, but can see how it happens. How many times on mn have we seen dh’s argue that it’s only ‘platonic’, despite messaging said woman several times during the day etc. To dh, it’s only a haircut, but this friend is already targeting and singling him out - comments about the jacket, haircut etc. I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a request to fix the toilet, mow the lawn etc coming soon either ( or another emergency).Some Men like playing the hero, and some women like playing helpless.

op - do you know if they message each other a lot?

Edited

He showed me the message she sent him and that was the only one on there, there were no prior messages to that. However, I don’t know what he has responded to her with and don’t know if they’ve continued messaging

OP posts:
QuintadosMalvados · 29/05/2026 17:37

DinoDoughnut81 · 29/05/2026 14:30

I think lots of people are capable of cheating. Sometimes it's just a couple of bad circumstances and wrong decisions away. "Sliding Door" moments if you like. I tend to think most people exist in these murky grey waters, rather than good and bad, black and white. Often people who cheat don't wake up in the morning and think that they are going to shag another person. But they make a series of shit choices first.
You will fancy other people in a long relationship, sometimes they will fancy you. You might have a weird life circumstance that makes you weaker to the boost an affair gives. You have to be a self aware person to try and avoid doing damaging things.
I think op is getting a hard time due to language used, not let, nip in the bud etc. Of course you can never control another person but you can explain that making unwise decisions can set you on a path you can't return from. Sometimes people need a bit of a wake up call to see this.
Personally I think he shouldn't have asked and put the onus on op to make the decision. It is dangerous territory, when there's mutual attraction, and a keen, single person. If it was me I wouldn't be messaging on insta with a person who I fancied and fancied me because I wouldn't want to mess my relationship up.

I totally agree. 100%.

Of course some men are ardent philanderers. Absolutely no point trying to stop them.
You really have to decide to leave or live with it.
Someone close to me (not dh or father) was like this. He was no doubt an attractive man and women would be swarming around him.
He just went with it.
The final straw for his dw was when he was named as the other man in a divorce.

But, you know what, I think a lot of the time, it's just a series of bad decisions men make until they're in too deep.

It's a nuanced issue.

I do find this 'trust him or not' stance simplistic.

As is the idea she's actually going to somehow physically restrain him or control him.
It's just hogwash. Surely everybody knows she can't actually control him, only make strong suggestions not to do things that may be detrimental to the marriage. And nothing wrong with that.

DreadRess · 29/05/2026 17:37

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

PinkEasterbunny · 29/05/2026 17:34

DinoDoughnut81 · 29/05/2026 14:30

I think lots of people are capable of cheating. Sometimes it's just a couple of bad circumstances and wrong decisions away. "Sliding Door" moments if you like. I tend to think most people exist in these murky grey waters, rather than good and bad, black and white. Often people who cheat don't wake up in the morning and think that they are going to shag another person. But they make a series of shit choices first.
You will fancy other people in a long relationship, sometimes they will fancy you. You might have a weird life circumstance that makes you weaker to the boost an affair gives. You have to be a self aware person to try and avoid doing damaging things.
I think op is getting a hard time due to language used, not let, nip in the bud etc. Of course you can never control another person but you can explain that making unwise decisions can set you on a path you can't return from. Sometimes people need a bit of a wake up call to see this.
Personally I think he shouldn't have asked and put the onus on op to make the decision. It is dangerous territory, when there's mutual attraction, and a keen, single person. If it was me I wouldn't be messaging on insta with a person who I fancied and fancied me because I wouldn't want to mess my relationship up.

Excellent post - you put this better than I could

PinkEasterbunny · 29/05/2026 17:34

DinoDoughnut81 · 29/05/2026 14:30

I think lots of people are capable of cheating. Sometimes it's just a couple of bad circumstances and wrong decisions away. "Sliding Door" moments if you like. I tend to think most people exist in these murky grey waters, rather than good and bad, black and white. Often people who cheat don't wake up in the morning and think that they are going to shag another person. But they make a series of shit choices first.
You will fancy other people in a long relationship, sometimes they will fancy you. You might have a weird life circumstance that makes you weaker to the boost an affair gives. You have to be a self aware person to try and avoid doing damaging things.
I think op is getting a hard time due to language used, not let, nip in the bud etc. Of course you can never control another person but you can explain that making unwise decisions can set you on a path you can't return from. Sometimes people need a bit of a wake up call to see this.
Personally I think he shouldn't have asked and put the onus on op to make the decision. It is dangerous territory, when there's mutual attraction, and a keen, single person. If it was me I wouldn't be messaging on insta with a person who I fancied and fancied me because I wouldn't want to mess my relationship up.

Excellent post - you put this better than I could

PinkEasterbunny · 29/05/2026 17:34

DinoDoughnut81 · 29/05/2026 14:30

I think lots of people are capable of cheating. Sometimes it's just a couple of bad circumstances and wrong decisions away. "Sliding Door" moments if you like. I tend to think most people exist in these murky grey waters, rather than good and bad, black and white. Often people who cheat don't wake up in the morning and think that they are going to shag another person. But they make a series of shit choices first.
You will fancy other people in a long relationship, sometimes they will fancy you. You might have a weird life circumstance that makes you weaker to the boost an affair gives. You have to be a self aware person to try and avoid doing damaging things.
I think op is getting a hard time due to language used, not let, nip in the bud etc. Of course you can never control another person but you can explain that making unwise decisions can set you on a path you can't return from. Sometimes people need a bit of a wake up call to see this.
Personally I think he shouldn't have asked and put the onus on op to make the decision. It is dangerous territory, when there's mutual attraction, and a keen, single person. If it was me I wouldn't be messaging on insta with a person who I fancied and fancied me because I wouldn't want to mess my relationship up.

Excellent post - you put this better than I could