Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is Germany being unreasonable? Childfree adults paying more for elder care

355 replies

Fauxlein · 27/05/2026 10:44

"Childfree adults to pay more in elder care contributions — report
According to a report from German media group RND, federal Health Minister Nina Warken has prepared a draft bill that would have adults without children pay a higher percentage of taxes towards publicly-funded elder care.
The bill would have contributions from childfree adults increase by 0.7% over a period of years, meaning they would pay 2.5% of their income each month. Their employer will be expected to pay 1.8%. For adults with children the rates will remain the same: 1.8% for people with one child, 1.55% for people with two children, and 1.3% for people with three or more children.
Under the proposal, all adults over the age of 23 who are working full-time would be affected.
It is unclear when Warken, a member of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's center-right Christian Democrats (CDU), will submit the draft to the cabinet. Her ministry had originally said it would present a proposal for elder care reform in mid-May. With a long-stagnating birthrate mildly buoyed by immigration, Germany needs to act fast to make sure older generations can be taken care of without placing an undue burden on young people."

YABU - German Health Minister is being unreasonable, it's not kids responsibility to look after elderly parents and is unfair to penalise child free people
YANBU - this seems like a fair counterbalance to increasing costs to the state of elder care

Friedrich Merz

Friedrich Merz is the 10th chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany. He is also the chairman of Germany's center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU).

https://www.dw.com/en/friedrich-merz/t-60575802

OP posts:
Jellyjellyonaplate · 27/05/2026 10:57

How about when all those children grow up and need care? Seems like in the long term it will be more expensive for the state

Fauxlein · 27/05/2026 10:55

It's interesting that the voting is currently 50/50 but the only comments so far think it's a good idea.

I have no problem in increased taxes to help support elders, but as someone with DC I am also biased as I wouldn't be affected by it.

OP posts:
GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 27/05/2026 10:55

I think it’s very difficult to comment on another country’s tax and benefits system, or not without a lot of expertise, because there will be nuances we don’t know or factor in.

That said, it doesn’t seem that unfair knowing the amount of free (to the state) care alot of people provide their elderly parents.

ToffeeCrabApple · 27/05/2026 10:52

I don't see why its unfair?

Every single person I know has done years of free caring for their elderly parents & saved the state a fortune, whereas the childfree older relatives have had to go into state funded care earlier. There has to be a way to incentivise people to have enough children to provide the workforce (including careworkers) of the future.

InOverMyHead84 · 27/05/2026 10:48

As people have less children, placing the onus of caring for the elderly onto the state, the money to pay for it needs to come from somewhere.