Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is Germany being unreasonable? Childfree adults paying more for elder care

355 replies

Fauxlein · 27/05/2026 10:44

"Childfree adults to pay more in elder care contributions — report
According to a report from German media group RND, federal Health Minister Nina Warken has prepared a draft bill that would have adults without children pay a higher percentage of taxes towards publicly-funded elder care.
The bill would have contributions from childfree adults increase by 0.7% over a period of years, meaning they would pay 2.5% of their income each month. Their employer will be expected to pay 1.8%. For adults with children the rates will remain the same: 1.8% for people with one child, 1.55% for people with two children, and 1.3% for people with three or more children.
Under the proposal, all adults over the age of 23 who are working full-time would be affected.
It is unclear when Warken, a member of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's center-right Christian Democrats (CDU), will submit the draft to the cabinet. Her ministry had originally said it would present a proposal for elder care reform in mid-May. With a long-stagnating birthrate mildly buoyed by immigration, Germany needs to act fast to make sure older generations can be taken care of without placing an undue burden on young people."

YABU - German Health Minister is being unreasonable, it's not kids responsibility to look after elderly parents and is unfair to penalise child free people
YANBU - this seems like a fair counterbalance to increasing costs to the state of elder care

Friedrich Merz

Friedrich Merz is the 10th chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany. He is also the chairman of Germany's center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU).

https://www.dw.com/en/friedrich-merz/t-60575802

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
igelkott2026 · 03/06/2026 12:49

Faultierchen · 03/06/2026 09:03

In true German fashion, it’s a bit more complex than that. You automatically pay 0.6% less ‘care insurance‘ for being a parent, and that’s for life. Then you also pay an extra 0.25% less per child if you have at least 2 DC under 25 (max 5 kids). So parents of younger kids and those who might still be in education pay even less because they will probably still have active costs of raising those children. But you also get the basic 0.6% less as an acknowledgment of having had kids in the first place.
And a reminder that this is only the tiny amount of money people pay for their care insurance. Nobody is particularly bothered by it because the amounts involved are so low.
There are other things to get really exercised about in German society, but not this. Like, for instance, the fact that every household is obliged to have a TV licence, whether they watch tv or even have a tv - and the content of German public tv is just terrible. My tv licence costs me more than I save through this care insurance ‘discount’. It’s just one of those things.

The TV licence is a massive topic here as well. But we do have somewhat better TV.

igelkott2026 · 03/06/2026 12:47

JHound · 01/06/2026 17:08

That sounds like a ponzi scheme. Those children also get old and we cannot have neverending population growth. Lower birthrates are the new norm and it’s time we accepted that and planned for the new normal.

I agree 100% with this.

I read today that up until 1979 a husband had to give permission for his wife to work! Why on earth did anyone get married! I know we had equally outrageous laws here like needing permission to have a bank account etc. But ultimately there are a lot of people in society who want women at home looking after kids and this is a policy which pushes us back in that direction.

IVFbabyanyday · 03/06/2026 10:27

BiteSizedLife · 02/06/2026 23:14

Hmmm but I am doing the bulk of the caring for my parent as a single childfree person, because my siblings who do have children dont have as much time as me. (Allegedly)

Would I get a reduction in % for that?

Edited

Excellent point!

Faultierchen · 03/06/2026 09:03

Mumsntfan1 · 28/05/2026 16:06

You get the discount for life when you become a parent.

In true German fashion, it’s a bit more complex than that. You automatically pay 0.6% less ‘care insurance‘ for being a parent, and that’s for life. Then you also pay an extra 0.25% less per child if you have at least 2 DC under 25 (max 5 kids). So parents of younger kids and those who might still be in education pay even less because they will probably still have active costs of raising those children. But you also get the basic 0.6% less as an acknowledgment of having had kids in the first place.
And a reminder that this is only the tiny amount of money people pay for their care insurance. Nobody is particularly bothered by it because the amounts involved are so low.
There are other things to get really exercised about in German society, but not this. Like, for instance, the fact that every household is obliged to have a TV licence, whether they watch tv or even have a tv - and the content of German public tv is just terrible. My tv licence costs me more than I save through this care insurance ‘discount’. It’s just one of those things.

garlictwist · 03/06/2026 08:40

Faroutin · 27/05/2026 11:18

This, I pay for others chuff monkeys,so I should get care later on ,just yet another way of stigmatising me , I would imagine the percentage of childfree is quite low anyway I don't know many people without children, even though I actively seek them out. The societal pressure to have children is still very high.

I also don't have children and it does seem unfair on the surface.

However, I don't begrudge paying tax for schools, maternity etc as a) I went to school as a child so arguably I'm "paying back" for that and also we are educating our adults of tomorrow in whatever jobs they may choose for society so it's a cyclical thing.

Faultierchen · 03/06/2026 08:33

JHound · 01/06/2026 17:01

The idea of people being required to contribute financially to the care of abusive parents is truly batshit.

There was a notorious case some years back of a woman being prosecuted for the funeral costs of her estranged father, who had abused her as a child. People were horrified - it’s really not like everyone thinks that’s ok. I think there are now exemption clauses for when the parent has committed certain crimes, but it’s tricky if they weren’t convicted for it.
Remember the responsibility cuts both ways: children have certain financial obligations to parents, but it’s also virtually impossible to disinherit children altogether.

Igneococcus · 03/06/2026 08:04

Theeyeballsinthesky · 03/06/2026 07:47

Thank you :) - I shall go and find out more! I'm always interested in how other countries solve the problems we have too

There is a care crisis in Germany as well and it will get only worse. It's an important conversation to have.

Newsenmum · 03/06/2026 07:49

AlcoholicAntibiotic · 27/05/2026 11:26

People who don't have children, have more disposable income.

Depends how much they earn and how much their essential bills are. A single person without children on NMW is likely to have less disposable income than a two-parent household with a household income of £250k.

Also children don’t stay financially dependent on their parents forever.

Your last sentence made me laugh

Newsenmum · 03/06/2026 07:48

There is a bit cultural effort to support aging parents in Germany so I can see why it might work there. In the UK it might seem unfair. They do have a birthratw problem though.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 03/06/2026 07:47

Igneococcus · 03/06/2026 07:19

Old people without family (or with useless family) will have a case worker from the Sozialamt (might depend on the Land what it is actually called) who are in charge making sure they receive the care they need.

Edited

Thank you :) - I shall go and find out more! I'm always interested in how other countries solve the problems we have too

Theeyeballsinthesky · 03/06/2026 07:45

Mumsntfan1 · 03/06/2026 07:06

The social system and health care is vastly better here than in the UK.

I kind of assumed it was - whereas here....

MotherOfCrocodiles · 03/06/2026 07:37

It is not parents using education etc though, it’s children.

All of us adults have had an education each, it allows us to be productive tax paying members of society.

Similarly my kids will grow up to pay tax- no education, no future taxpayer.

Igneococcus · 03/06/2026 07:19

Theeyeballsinthesky · 03/06/2026 07:02

Yes it's not new - been happening for ages. As a childless person I'm not opposed per se but i would be interested to know how Germany guarantees that older ppl without children actually get the help they need. We know in the UK that getting social care is incredibly difficult because the threshold to qualify is so high and that perversely those without adult children despite being more reliant on it, are less likely ti get it because they lack someone to advocate ie battle the system for them.

does the state in Germany guarantee a certain level of care and support and proactively identify ppl who are old and without children?

Old people without family (or with useless family) will have a case worker from the Sozialamt (might depend on the Land what it is actually called) who are in charge making sure they receive the care they need.

Mumsntfan1 · 03/06/2026 07:06

Theeyeballsinthesky · 03/06/2026 07:02

Yes it's not new - been happening for ages. As a childless person I'm not opposed per se but i would be interested to know how Germany guarantees that older ppl without children actually get the help they need. We know in the UK that getting social care is incredibly difficult because the threshold to qualify is so high and that perversely those without adult children despite being more reliant on it, are less likely ti get it because they lack someone to advocate ie battle the system for them.

does the state in Germany guarantee a certain level of care and support and proactively identify ppl who are old and without children?

The social system and health care is vastly better here than in the UK.

Theeyeballsinthesky · 03/06/2026 07:02

BiteSizedLife · 03/06/2026 06:50

I was surprised to learn that this is not new and taxing the childless more is already in place in Germany and has been for many years.

For example, Germany’s current system already has a childlessness surcharge. A childless employee typically pays 2.4% of relevant income towards long-term care insurance, compared with 1.8% for someone with one child, and less still for those with multiple children.

This new bill is proposing to increase the current childless surcharge.

Absolutely shocking. What is this Distopian shit from Germany?!

Edited

Yes it's not new - been happening for ages. As a childless person I'm not opposed per se but i would be interested to know how Germany guarantees that older ppl without children actually get the help they need. We know in the UK that getting social care is incredibly difficult because the threshold to qualify is so high and that perversely those without adult children despite being more reliant on it, are less likely ti get it because they lack someone to advocate ie battle the system for them.

does the state in Germany guarantee a certain level of care and support and proactively identify ppl who are old and without children?

BiteSizedLife · 03/06/2026 06:50

I was surprised to learn that this is not new and taxing the childless more is already in place in Germany and has been for many years.

For example, Germany’s current system already has a childlessness surcharge. A childless employee typically pays 2.4% of relevant income towards long-term care insurance, compared with 1.8% for someone with one child, and less still for those with multiple children.

This new bill is proposing to increase the current childless surcharge.

Absolutely shocking. What is this Distopian shit from Germany?!

Strawberriesandpears · 03/06/2026 00:01

How does it work for parents of children who grow up to be criminals? Do they still get the benefit of their 'contribution to society'?

nomas · 02/06/2026 23:37

Credittocress · 27/05/2026 11:21

How does this work for parents who are named on a birth certificate but don’t live with the child and pay maintenance for example?

Good point. So those men (as it is mostly men) would get the benefit of having had kids without doing any of the work.

BiteSizedLife · 02/06/2026 23:19

I am also absolutely disgusted at the poll outcome.

What have we become

BiteSizedLife · 02/06/2026 23:14

ToffeeCrabApple · 27/05/2026 10:52

I don't see why its unfair?

Every single person I know has done years of free caring for their elderly parents & saved the state a fortune, whereas the childfree older relatives have had to go into state funded care earlier. There has to be a way to incentivise people to have enough children to provide the workforce (including careworkers) of the future.

Hmmm but I am doing the bulk of the caring for my parent as a single childfree person, because my siblings who do have children dont have as much time as me. (Allegedly)

Would I get a reduction in % for that?

IVFbabyanyday · 02/06/2026 22:58

Focacciaisyum · 02/06/2026 22:12

Agree. I keep reading that its more expensive to be single. Its OBVIOUS that the DINK households have the most disposable income, but a family with 2 adults and 2 or more kids is definitely going to have less money spare on average than a single person alone

A single person doesn't necessarily have more disposable income than a couple with two kids. It depends whether the costs that are shared (bills, rent/mortgage, council tax) save more money than is spent on kids.

For example, where I live there is not a huge difference in price between a 1 bed and 3 bed rental property, and most are band A for council tax. A couple sharing a 3 bed make a significant saving over a single person in a 1 bed. Enough to fund two children!

In the UK, at a lower income level it's even less likely, due to UC top ups, council tax discounts and so on.

Portakalkedi · 02/06/2026 22:37

Sounds appalling. Those without children, at least if they have worked and paid tax, have already greatly subsidised the education, medical care and much more, of those who do have children.

Samysungy · 02/06/2026 22:27

So long as those with kids paid for the education system and those without paid 0% of tax towards that as they do not use it - same for kids healthcare etc.

Spongeboobs · 02/06/2026 22:20

ToffeeCrabApple · 27/05/2026 10:52

I don't see why its unfair?

Every single person I know has done years of free caring for their elderly parents & saved the state a fortune, whereas the childfree older relatives have had to go into state funded care earlier. There has to be a way to incentivise people to have enough children to provide the workforce (including careworkers) of the future.

I don’t want children on the off chance that they may look after me in years to come.

i have also not drawn down on how many thousands of pounds it would cost for me to have NHS care whilst being pregnant multiple times, giving birth, any costs of schooling, caring etc etc etc, so I’m sure it will balance out if I do need care in the future

SnoringLabradors · 02/06/2026 22:13

Jellyjellyonaplate · 27/05/2026 10:57

How about when all those children grow up and need care? Seems like in the long term it will be more expensive for the state

Yes and what happens if you have children or are estranged or they die before you / do you get taxed in lieu of it after (?)