Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to stop therapy after learning my therapist’s husband is Reform?

812 replies

CanyonRider · 25/05/2026 18:20

I live in a small town. I started having therapy maybe a year ago. I feel it’s been working for me and I like my therapist. However I realised today that she is (very very recently) married to a man who recently stood and won as a reform councillor in our local election. I detest reform. I’m married to an immigrant (EU citizen) and am delighted that my kids are dual nationals and have the option of travelling, working and living in the EU should they desire. I’m also very pro the transition to green energy. I have solar and drive an EV. Finally I cannot stand Farage and the political grift embodied by people like him and Jenrick and am dismayed by the harms caused by Brexit.

My therapist is also an EU national and is here under indefinite leave to remain - as is my wife.
Read a few interviews with her husband today and he spouts the usual anti EU, anti immigration, anti green transition rhetoric you’d expect from Reform. I don’t feel comfortable continuing therapy with someone who’s married to a reform politician, and am very surprised that she is comfortable with his views and by extension those of Farage.

Am I overreacting?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
bigboykitty · 26/05/2026 05:38

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · 26/05/2026 00:39

I liked my former GP. He was kind and reassuring and seemed to understand my mental health issues very well. A few years after meeting him, I was shocked to see on social media that he was into blood sports, but maybe I shouldn't have been, as he was a posh former public schoolboy from a fairly well-known family. I found it hard to reconcile his kind, caring behaviour towards humans with his indifference, some might say callousness, to animal welfare.

Still, I didn't change GPs as he was doing a good job for me. He was my doctor, not my friend. I also didn't want to start all over again with a new GP. When I moved to a different area, I was sad to have to change GPs (even though the surgery itself was a bit crap after Covid, as it was always short-staffed).

A GP is not a therapist and it's not comparable. A patient does not open up their inner world to a GP. They just need to be medically competent (and some of them are). A therapy relationship is about opening up your inner world and trusting the other person. It's very intimate. Perfectly legitimate to choose not to do that with a Reform voters or someone aligned with a Reform politician.

ifyourheart · 26/05/2026 05:04

Acommonreader · 25/05/2026 18:37

Would you tolerate a Nazi in your social circle because they had other pleasant qualities? What about a murderer, a pedophile or a child abuser? If not- why?

Exactly this. Get rid of her.

HelmholtzWatson · 26/05/2026 04:41

No wonder you're having therapy if this upsets you.

TempestTost · 26/05/2026 04:15

It's an important realisation as an adult that reasonable people support political ideas that seem crazy/bad to you, and that your ideas seem crazy/bad to them.

For example, that they might think that people who support EU membership so they can work anywhere are over-privaledged and selfish.

Flomingho · 26/05/2026 03:42

If the therapist is good, I see no reason to stop . You are only aware of her husband's politics because he is an elected councillor and I say this as a person with fairly left-wing ideals. When I meet people, I try to leave religion and politics out of discussions as it usually doesn't end well.

Flomingho · 26/05/2026 03:41

If the therapist is good, I see no reason to stop . You are only aware of her husband's politics because he is an elected councillor and I day this as a person with fairly left-wing ideals. When I meet people, I try to leave religion and politics out of discussions as it usually doesn't end well.

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 26/05/2026 03:04

Allisnotlost1 · 25/05/2026 23:26

From what I can find there are 15 Reform resignations and 3 Greens, one of which is because they were elected mayor somewhere else. There are awful people everywhere of course but there does seem to be a denser concentration in Reform.

I’m very familiar with the reasons people support Reform, but that doesn’t negate the inability of those voters to really explain what it is they think reform policy will do to change things. It’s impossible for them to do that, because reform policy is unclear, delivered on the hoof and changes depending on the day.

You seem to be saying ‘people are emotional about being called irrational, so they vote for a party that has no track record and no policies’. Sounds like you’re calling Reform voters stupid tbh.

The net migration figures and comparisons are more complicated than I can be bothered to explain to you, if you’re interested you can read about them. But I know you won’t, so I’m not going to waste my time.

You have quietly shifted from “Reform voters are not racist or stupid” to repeatedly implying they are gullible idiots voting on emotion because they cannot understand policy. That is exactly why people stop listening to this sort of argument.
Also, your numbers are selective. You originally implied the Greens did not have a serious extremism problem. They plainly do. Multiple Green councillors and candidates have already been suspended or forced out over antisemitism or offensive conduct, including the Makerfield candidate sharing “false flag” conspiracy material about an antisemitic attack. Pretending that is just an unfortunate coincidence while portraying Reform as uniquely toxic is partisan nonsense.
And yes, Reform policy is rough around the edges. They are a relatively new insurgent party, not a machine polished by decades in Westminster. But the core policies are actually very easy to understand:

  • Reduce immigration substantially
  • Leave the ECHR if necessary to deport foreign criminals and stop illegal entry
  • Increase domestic energy production
  • Cut bureaucracy and quangos
  • Lower taxes where possible
  • Challenge DEI and identity politics in public institutions
  • Tougher criminal justice and policing
You may dislike those policies, but claiming nobody can explain them is obviously false. The funniest bit is your migration comment. “It’s more complicated than I can be bothered to explain to you” is usually what people say when they do not actually have a clear argument themselves. Net migration hit nearly a million under the Conservatives. It has fallen from that peak, but remains historically extremely high. The public can see housing pressure, NHS pressure, school pressure and wage pressure with their own eyes. They do not need a lecture from Westminster or Mumsnet to notice it. And no, saying “people are angry about immigration and distrust mainstream parties” is not calling them stupid. It is describing political reality. Treating millions of voters as morally or intellectually defective because they disagree with you is exactly the mindset that created Reform in the first place.
SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 26/05/2026 03:00

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 25/05/2026 23:37

In your opinion.

I take a pretty dim view personally of those who seek to defend the indefensible. There are some subjects which are worthy of debate imo. And there are some things which should not be up for debate at all.

No not in my opinion. Your smears only serve to further the cause of those you claim to want to keep from power. If you can’t have a grown up conversation - and you’ve shown you can’t - then any bastion of defence against the actual far right is gone

it will be the fault of people like you.

Seaitoverthere · 26/05/2026 02:45

There is a high level of defensiveness on this thread . Also some people trying to draw parallels with GP, fire service and teachers which are very different relationships where usually no payment going direct to that person as is the case with a therapist.

Actions have consequences . Therapist has married someone who has views that some people find unacceptable, this won’t be news to her. This quite obviously will have financial consequences as some people will feel they won’t want to use them as a result of their choice of partner whereas others assumably will be more than happy to use them and see the partner as someone who aligns with their views .

I wouldn’t use OP’s therapist but others on here would so ultimately she won’t end up out of pocket as others will step in to fill the gap that the OP leaving will leave. Freedom of choice and all that. The post above me is totally right, you have to feel comfortable with a therapist. The OP no longer does so clearly needs to find another.

hellywelly3 · 26/05/2026 02:14

You’ve got to be very comfortable with your therapist. You no longer feel comfortable so change therapist

ilovesooty · 26/05/2026 02:05

LuckyHazelFox · 26/05/2026 01:57

She's sure alright. What detriment she thinks she is going to suffer I don't know. The therapist is held to a professional code of conduct which the OP seems ignorant of. All her surrounding events sound very contrived. I don't know why the left become so agitated when it's suggested fascism is no longer exclusive to the 'far' right.

So she's a fascist then?

LuckyHazelFox · 26/05/2026 01:57

ilovesooty · 26/05/2026 01:44

So she can't be unsure of whether she feels comfortable in a therapeutic relationship without being described as fascist?

She's sure alright. What detriment she thinks she is going to suffer I don't know. The therapist is held to a professional code of conduct which the OP seems ignorant of. All her surrounding events sound very contrived. I don't know why the left become so agitated when it's suggested fascism is no longer exclusive to the 'far' right.

Bikenutz · 26/05/2026 01:52

LuckyHazelFox · 26/05/2026 01:42

I hope her next therapist isn't married to a Green MP. This is nothing but rage bait anyway.

Why is it rage bait?

If the therapist is a member of the British Association of Counsellors and Psychotherapists, they are obliged to follow the code of conduct, which centres obligations around tackling bias and discrimination.

ilovesooty · 26/05/2026 01:44

LuckyHazelFox · 26/05/2026 01:40

Judging people because they don't think the way you want them to is intolerance. The hard left demand society conforms to their standards. So yes, fascism and I stand by that.

So she can't be unsure of whether she feels comfortable in a therapeutic relationship without being described as fascist?

LuckyHazelFox · 26/05/2026 01:42

Bikenutz · 26/05/2026 00:59

The therapist is closely associated with someone who is closely connected with a racist political party. It is reasonable to wonder how they ensure their practice remains inclusive and how they address any internal bias. It is also reasonable to ask them if they think that clients from certain backgrounds would feel safe in their hands.

In your shoes I would go to your next session and use it to question how they uphold equality and inclusion in their work. if they engage thoughtfully and non-defensively, that’s a good sign. But ultimately it is whether you still feel comfortable and can continue to benefit.

I hope her next therapist isn't married to a Green MP. This is nothing but rage bait anyway.

LuckyHazelFox · 26/05/2026 01:40

Allisnotlost1 · 26/05/2026 00:23

But OP isn’t doing that, she’s choosing her therapist. A few posts back you described that as fascism. Now you say making people feel bad for their voting preference is fascism - it isn’t. I haven’t described anyone as racist, You seem a bit confused.

Judging people because they don't think the way you want them to is intolerance. The hard left demand society conforms to their standards. So yes, fascism and I stand by that.

Bikenutz · 26/05/2026 00:59

The therapist is closely associated with someone who is closely connected with a racist political party. It is reasonable to wonder how they ensure their practice remains inclusive and how they address any internal bias. It is also reasonable to ask them if they think that clients from certain backgrounds would feel safe in their hands.

In your shoes I would go to your next session and use it to question how they uphold equality and inclusion in their work. if they engage thoughtfully and non-defensively, that’s a good sign. But ultimately it is whether you still feel comfortable and can continue to benefit.

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · 26/05/2026 00:39

I liked my former GP. He was kind and reassuring and seemed to understand my mental health issues very well. A few years after meeting him, I was shocked to see on social media that he was into blood sports, but maybe I shouldn't have been, as he was a posh former public schoolboy from a fairly well-known family. I found it hard to reconcile his kind, caring behaviour towards humans with his indifference, some might say callousness, to animal welfare.

Still, I didn't change GPs as he was doing a good job for me. He was my doctor, not my friend. I also didn't want to start all over again with a new GP. When I moved to a different area, I was sad to have to change GPs (even though the surgery itself was a bit crap after Covid, as it was always short-staffed).

UnaGatita · 26/05/2026 00:38

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 25/05/2026 20:13

You can't unite ordinary decent people with people who have been radicalised to the far right. Pretending that their repugnant views are valid or socially acceptable merely helps to normalise them.

If you have a centrist position it is equally challenging to engage with the far left. And I don’t believe they are at all virtuous, their misogyny and racism also shines through.

OtterandaRock · 26/05/2026 00:28

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · 26/05/2026 00:28

I would definitely lose respect for someone if I found out they'd recently married a Reform councillor. If they'd been married for years and the spouse's involvement with Reform had been a recent change, then well, that would be more complicated.

If your year of sessions with this counsellor gave you no clue that she was sympathetic to Reform, then she's probably able to keep her work separate from her personal views and do her job professionally. That said, you need to be able to trust your therapist and feel comfortable opening up to her. Only you can decide if you're able to maintain that therapeutic relationship. But there's no need to quit due to a moral principle - you've invested a lot of time in this therapy so please put yourself and your recovery first.

Depends on how much cognitive dissonance is tolerable...

EstoyRobandoSuCasa · 26/05/2026 00:28

I would definitely lose respect for someone if I found out they'd recently married a Reform councillor. If they'd been married for years and the spouse's involvement with Reform had been a recent change, then well, that would be more complicated.

If your year of sessions with this counsellor gave you no clue that she was sympathetic to Reform, then she's probably able to keep her work separate from her personal views and do her job professionally. That said, you need to be able to trust your therapist and feel comfortable opening up to her. Only you can decide if you're able to maintain that therapeutic relationship. But there's no need to quit due to a moral principle - you've invested a lot of time in this therapy so please put yourself and your recovery first.

Allisnotlost1 · 26/05/2026 00:23

LuckyHazelFox · 26/05/2026 00:20

The OP has a choice, to find a new therapist. After all, it defeats the object if she's not relaxed. Likewise, everyone else has choices and they don't have to justify or defend them, unless they want to. It's when people are made to feel like shit for exercising their vote which is fascist like. Just because you say something or someone is racist doesn't necessarily make it so.

But OP isn’t doing that, she’s choosing her therapist. A few posts back you described that as fascism. Now you say making people feel bad for their voting preference is fascism - it isn’t. I haven’t described anyone as racist, You seem a bit confused.

OtterandaRock · 26/05/2026 00:20

Is anyone planning to help friends, neighbours, relatives, and colleagues who would be at risk of deportation under a Reform government? Or will it be head down, business as usual, and post-pandemic-practised detachment?

Maybe the therapist will help her clients find resilience and self-respect no matter how complicit they are in persecution or cleansing.

How to Survive the Society my Husband Fucked Up, in 12 £90-pound sessions.

LuckyHazelFox · 26/05/2026 00:20

Allisnotlost1 · 26/05/2026 00:09

I assume she does have agency, yes, and that she willingly she chose to marry a Reform councillor. So I think it’s reasonable to consider that she is comfortable with that. And some people - OP included, apparently - are not comfortable with a therapist that feels that way. Why does the OP’s right to choose her therapist based on their perceived values offend anyone? Voting preference isn’t a protected characteristic. I thought Reform fans were all about free speech?

A better analogy would be parents refusing to have have their children be taught by teachers who vote Reform. And if that’s their choice and they can easily facilitate (bit harder than an adult finding a new therapist but possibly doable) then why would you want to deny them that choice?

Edited

The OP has a choice, to find a new therapist. After all, it defeats the object if she's not relaxed. Likewise, everyone else has choices and they don't have to justify or defend them, unless they want to. It's when people are made to feel like shit for exercising their vote which is fascist like. Just because you say something or someone is racist doesn't necessarily make it so.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 26/05/2026 00:12

You can do whatever you like.

Swipe left for the next trending thread