Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to stop therapy after learning my therapist’s husband is Reform?

812 replies

CanyonRider · 25/05/2026 18:20

I live in a small town. I started having therapy maybe a year ago. I feel it’s been working for me and I like my therapist. However I realised today that she is (very very recently) married to a man who recently stood and won as a reform councillor in our local election. I detest reform. I’m married to an immigrant (EU citizen) and am delighted that my kids are dual nationals and have the option of travelling, working and living in the EU should they desire. I’m also very pro the transition to green energy. I have solar and drive an EV. Finally I cannot stand Farage and the political grift embodied by people like him and Jenrick and am dismayed by the harms caused by Brexit.

My therapist is also an EU national and is here under indefinite leave to remain - as is my wife.
Read a few interviews with her husband today and he spouts the usual anti EU, anti immigration, anti green transition rhetoric you’d expect from Reform. I don’t feel comfortable continuing therapy with someone who’s married to a reform politician, and am very surprised that she is comfortable with his views and by extension those of Farage.

Am I overreacting?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Owly11 · 26/05/2026 07:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Seaitoverthere · 26/05/2026 07:46

Boomer55 · 26/05/2026 07:32

Seriously? Who votes what is not your business. 🤷‍♀️

When it is public it goes back to the fact there will be potentially be repercussions. I said above I take note of who is vocal about being pro Reform on my local Facebook page and won’t use them if looking for someone to do work on my house or use their shop if they have one as there are alternative options I would rather give my money to. Another poster says she does the same.

Other people I would think would be more likely to use them I would guess so assumably they aren’t out of pocket. If they aren’t vocal about their views I am none the wiser so there isn’t an issue. It’s only when people have put their political views out into the public domain.

DD has counselling. If she found out her counsellor was in the same situation as one in the OP I know she would quickly look for another.

ilovesooty · 26/05/2026 07:44

literallyevery · 26/05/2026 07:43

if you stop speaking to everyone who votes reform you’ll lose a lot of friends. The lefties are out of touch.

Where did the OP suggest that?

literallyevery · 26/05/2026 07:43

if you stop speaking to everyone who votes reform you’ll lose a lot of friends. The lefties are out of touch.

TheGreatDownandOut · 26/05/2026 07:40

Seriously? Grow up.

Wonderfulstuff · 26/05/2026 07:38

If it's going to make you less able to be open/honest/vulnerable with your therapist then yes it's time to move on. It's a waste of everyone's time to continue in a situation where you don't feel comfortable or safe.

Gofnfnf · 26/05/2026 07:38

TallSturdyGirl · 25/05/2026 23:08

Reform is run by Farage.
Over 20 of his school contemporaries said they remember him saying racist things. Im the same age. I can guarantee not one of my school contemporaries would say the same.

He has also linked HIV and immigration, saidnhe wouldnt want to live next door to Romanian men (I actually live two doors down from a lovely Romanian man), his awful poster of immigrants in around 2015/6 was awfully racist (as agreed by just about everyone but racists).

Tice is much better at hiding his views but his lack of commendation of some horrendous racism in his party shows his beliefs.
Yusuf is just plain stupid and after power over anything. He will soon leave.

Edited

Yeah they said some stuff that allegedly happened 50 years ago. Teenage boys have always said edgy things. You'd find no different today. What matters is how you treat people in actual adult life. Nigel's worry was about Romanian crime gangs and free movement.

ilovesooty · 26/05/2026 07:37

HelmholtzWatson · 26/05/2026 04:41

No wonder you're having therapy if this upsets you.

You have no idea what issues the OP is bringing to therapy. The repeated suggestions that her political views represent a therapeutic issue are highly unpleasant.

Boomer55 · 26/05/2026 07:32

Seriously? Who votes what is not your business. 🤷‍♀️

Mouche85 · 26/05/2026 07:31

Misnofitness · 25/05/2026 18:23

This has to be the ultimate Mumsnet pearl clutch

clearly you don’t believe women are capable of having their own opinions

She clearly shows disappointment from her therapist for married this man. You can disagree on many points but political general beliefs/ life values are pretty essential in a relationship, especially in a marriage.

5128gap · 26/05/2026 07:27

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 26/05/2026 03:04

You have quietly shifted from “Reform voters are not racist or stupid” to repeatedly implying they are gullible idiots voting on emotion because they cannot understand policy. That is exactly why people stop listening to this sort of argument.
Also, your numbers are selective. You originally implied the Greens did not have a serious extremism problem. They plainly do. Multiple Green councillors and candidates have already been suspended or forced out over antisemitism or offensive conduct, including the Makerfield candidate sharing “false flag” conspiracy material about an antisemitic attack. Pretending that is just an unfortunate coincidence while portraying Reform as uniquely toxic is partisan nonsense.
And yes, Reform policy is rough around the edges. They are a relatively new insurgent party, not a machine polished by decades in Westminster. But the core policies are actually very easy to understand:

  • Reduce immigration substantially
  • Leave the ECHR if necessary to deport foreign criminals and stop illegal entry
  • Increase domestic energy production
  • Cut bureaucracy and quangos
  • Lower taxes where possible
  • Challenge DEI and identity politics in public institutions
  • Tougher criminal justice and policing
You may dislike those policies, but claiming nobody can explain them is obviously false. The funniest bit is your migration comment. “It’s more complicated than I can be bothered to explain to you” is usually what people say when they do not actually have a clear argument themselves. Net migration hit nearly a million under the Conservatives. It has fallen from that peak, but remains historically extremely high. The public can see housing pressure, NHS pressure, school pressure and wage pressure with their own eyes. They do not need a lecture from Westminster or Mumsnet to notice it. And no, saying “people are angry about immigration and distrust mainstream parties” is not calling them stupid. It is describing political reality. Treating millions of voters as morally or intellectually defective because they disagree with you is exactly the mindset that created Reform in the first place.

The Greens stood down their candidate in Makerfield. Farage has publicly renewed support for his, despite Kenyons admittance he is sexist, and his demonstration of such with degrading, demeaning comments about women's abilities and bodies.
I'd have thought you, as someone so concerned with men respecting women that you started your thread accusing Andy Burnham of misogyny for one error in a comment about the trans issue, four years ago; would be highly concerned about what this says of the culture within Reform.
Because rogue candidates slipping through the net happens (Reform do seem to have a particularly loosely woven net, but, it happens to other parties too) its the response that speaks to the culture of the party.
Farage has given a clear message that misogyny is acceptable within Reform.
Does this not give you, who repeatedly frames himself as an advocate for women, pause for thought, and make you doubt your wisdom in being all over MN drumming up support for a party who would find it acceptable to speak about your daughter that way?

LuckyHazelFox · 26/05/2026 07:26

5128gap · 26/05/2026 07:09

Are we? I thought Reform were the future and Farage was going to be our next MP? How does that sit with Reform as persecuted potential victims of teachers who suddenly acquire the power to choose which children they teach on the basis of their parents support for Reform?
Choosing to boycott a business or service because you do not want it to profit from your custom on the basis of its political stance is a mainstream and perfectly acceptable personal protest.
Money to the therapist is indirect financial support of the Reform representative.
OP has as much legal and moral right to choose against this as you may have to boycott a company supporting something you disagreed with.
Supporting a highly controversial party will always have consequences. Reform voters can't expect to support things others believe are harmful and have those people carry on lining their pockets as though it was a neutral act or mild 'difference of opinion'.

It's as if therapists' husbands suddenly "have the power" to majorly impact their partners' clients.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 26/05/2026 07:24

Gofnfnf · 26/05/2026 07:14

Then those people should join Restore. Given Reform's policies are not to remove citizens at all.

That doesn't really address the question.

Do you think those members (more than half of them) are racist or not?

LiteraryBambi · 26/05/2026 07:23

I'm with you OP. You need to trust your therapist and be vulnerable with them. I don't blame you for not trusting the judgement of someone who chooses to be married to a man that is actively representing a racist and far right party.

dcthatsme · 26/05/2026 07:18

CaptainMyCaptain · 25/05/2026 21:15

I agree but I would not trust someone who could marry a man with views that are so repugnant and think it didn't matter.

😂 Yes!

DeathNote11 · 26/05/2026 07:15

Dexternight · 26/05/2026 06:20

Class

Here is the problem....

There's a 3rd flag for a military regiment & a small engraved plaque on the fence with the names of his fallen comrades engraved on it. Still "class" or understandable sentiment & respect for people who have given their lives, like he was fully prepared to do (as was I) for this country?

I ask again. Should I be fired?

Gofnfnf · 26/05/2026 07:14

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 25/05/2026 22:45

What do you think about the survey of Reform members which found that more than half of them want non-white naturalised British citizens to be forcibly removed or encouraged to leave the UK? And what about the 22% of members who want the same thing to happen to non-white British citizens who were born in the UK to UK-born parents? Is that not racist either?

They've already said that they want to get rid of indefinite leave to remain. More than half of their members want naturalised non-white citizens to leave. Nearly a quarter basically want all non-white people to leave. If they get into power, who knows what policies they will seek to implement.

Then those people should join Restore. Given Reform's policies are not to remove citizens at all.

5128gap · 26/05/2026 07:09

LuckyHazelFox · 25/05/2026 23:53

Does his wife not have agency or is she meant to mirror every particle of her husband? Who is the OP to judge her therapist's choice of partner? What next - teachers refusing to teach kids whose parents vote Reform? That's where we are heading.

Are we? I thought Reform were the future and Farage was going to be our next MP? How does that sit with Reform as persecuted potential victims of teachers who suddenly acquire the power to choose which children they teach on the basis of their parents support for Reform?
Choosing to boycott a business or service because you do not want it to profit from your custom on the basis of its political stance is a mainstream and perfectly acceptable personal protest.
Money to the therapist is indirect financial support of the Reform representative.
OP has as much legal and moral right to choose against this as you may have to boycott a company supporting something you disagreed with.
Supporting a highly controversial party will always have consequences. Reform voters can't expect to support things others believe are harmful and have those people carry on lining their pockets as though it was a neutral act or mild 'difference of opinion'.

Mummadeze · 26/05/2026 06:39

I think I would question her judgment now so would probably end the agreement and tell her why.

MrsBennetsPoorNervesAreBack · 26/05/2026 06:37

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 26/05/2026 03:00

No not in my opinion. Your smears only serve to further the cause of those you claim to want to keep from power. If you can’t have a grown up conversation - and you’ve shown you can’t - then any bastion of defence against the actual far right is gone

it will be the fault of people like you.

I've already addressed this illogical argument above. People are responsible for their own actions. If they choose to vote for the far right, then that is on them. Not me.

I've spent decades trying to have reasoned, grown-up conversations with people, but I've realised that it's sometimes just a waste of energy - people who are driven by hate and prejudice will never respond to reason. So I can't be arsed any more. I don't need to dignify their bigotry by engaging with it as if it were rational or reasonable. It is not.

The irony is, most of the idiots who vote Reform in will be amongst those who suffer the most as a result. Very few of them will be cr*pto billionaires etc. There is a kind of poetic justice to that, I suppose, but I feel immense pity for those who get dragged along with them into the abyss.

Dexternight · 26/05/2026 06:20

DeathNote11 · 26/05/2026 06:18

My fiancé has 2 flag poles in his garden. He's flying the Union & St George's cross. Should I be fired?

Class

DeathNote11 · 26/05/2026 06:18

My fiancé has 2 flag poles in his garden. He's flying the Union & St George's cross. Should I be fired?

Dexternight · 26/05/2026 06:08

Clavinova · 25/05/2026 23:29

Not controversial - I was asking Dexternight if she would employ a Polish tradesman in view of her post. She said there was a type to look out for.

This was a while ago, but nevertheless;

Tomas, 31, a builder who has lived in the UK for three years, said: 'It's true, most Polish people don't like Indians and black people.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2007/apr/15/asylum.raceintheuk

Would you hire a tradesman who was openly misogynistic while in your home?

I did once have a tradesman who commented 'are you sure - women always change their minds' - I wouldn't have him back.

How has the op's therapist been openly racist or anti-green energy etc.? Would you employ someone who was married to a Polish tradesman?

Yes, you can detect racist tradesmen or businesses and those who would vote Reform.
Yes, I would encourage all to avoid.
Far right views can appear everywhere.
Avoid them all.
Ps Not all other non British builders are Polish.
Also, not all Polish builders are racist.
Racist to assume that.
But then...
Trust u will recognise the reform/ far right racists tradespeople or businesses.
We want our country back and all that.
Too many of them here bla bla.
Avoid giving them your money. Ever.
Let their toothless fanclub hire them if they can afford to.

bigboykitty · 26/05/2026 05:43

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 26/05/2026 03:04

You have quietly shifted from “Reform voters are not racist or stupid” to repeatedly implying they are gullible idiots voting on emotion because they cannot understand policy. That is exactly why people stop listening to this sort of argument.
Also, your numbers are selective. You originally implied the Greens did not have a serious extremism problem. They plainly do. Multiple Green councillors and candidates have already been suspended or forced out over antisemitism or offensive conduct, including the Makerfield candidate sharing “false flag” conspiracy material about an antisemitic attack. Pretending that is just an unfortunate coincidence while portraying Reform as uniquely toxic is partisan nonsense.
And yes, Reform policy is rough around the edges. They are a relatively new insurgent party, not a machine polished by decades in Westminster. But the core policies are actually very easy to understand:

  • Reduce immigration substantially
  • Leave the ECHR if necessary to deport foreign criminals and stop illegal entry
  • Increase domestic energy production
  • Cut bureaucracy and quangos
  • Lower taxes where possible
  • Challenge DEI and identity politics in public institutions
  • Tougher criminal justice and policing
You may dislike those policies, but claiming nobody can explain them is obviously false. The funniest bit is your migration comment. “It’s more complicated than I can be bothered to explain to you” is usually what people say when they do not actually have a clear argument themselves. Net migration hit nearly a million under the Conservatives. It has fallen from that peak, but remains historically extremely high. The public can see housing pressure, NHS pressure, school pressure and wage pressure with their own eyes. They do not need a lecture from Westminster or Mumsnet to notice it. And no, saying “people are angry about immigration and distrust mainstream parties” is not calling them stupid. It is describing political reality. Treating millions of voters as morally or intellectually defective because they disagree with you is exactly the mindset that created Reform in the first place.

You have managed to mangle them into some kind of inaccurate list, but you claim you're not a Reform supporters. Mind you, being estranged from the truth seems to be a prerequisite.

bigboykitty · 26/05/2026 05:40

HelmholtzWatson · 26/05/2026 04:41

No wonder you're having therapy if this upsets you.

I like this post. It lays bare the issue nicely. Minimal understanding and bombastic,, uninformed slurs are all they have. Oh and clown emojis. Let's not forget those.

Swipe left for the next trending thread