Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Anyone else a bit sick of every single weight loss discussion immediately turning into “Have you tried Mounjaro?”

207 replies

toonoisie · 25/05/2026 09:51

Before anyone says it, no, I don’t qualify for it, and even if I did, I personally wouldn’t take it. I completely accept that these medications have been genuinely life changing and incredibly helpful for a lot of people, and I’m not denying that at all.

But sometimes it feels like the idea of losing weight the old fashioned way, changing habits, eating differently, exercising, being consistent, is almost treated as outdated now. As if nobody wants to even attempt it anymore without medication being suggested within five seconds.

Surely not every conversation about weight loss has to involve injections?

OP posts:
montysmaw · 25/05/2026 18:50

ChunkyMonkey36 · 25/05/2026 18:46

I felt the absolute spite in “Bully for you though and your non cheating weightloss”!

I said it works for some people. People who therefore don’t see the value in a WLI. If when used properly they lead to 1-2lb a week loss, and a person feels they can do that without them, why would they spend their money on them?

They’re not always the answer - that doesn’t mean they’re not the answer to you.

Just that some people see absolutely no value in taking them, and don’t require the sales pitch, or list of benefits for others, to change their minds.

Like I said previously, no is a complete sentence.

And other people get sick of the list I gave. I
ncluding the "cheating" guff. Which I would suggest contains more spite than anything I said .

IceColdTruth · 25/05/2026 18:49

It’s definitely like a cult.

And the reactions of people when the prices went up, where people were trying to stockpile, source emergency tablets and discussing suppliers was strongly reminiscent of the behaviours of drug addicts.

Wickedlittledancer · 25/05/2026 18:48

ChunkyMonkey36 · 25/05/2026 18:46

I felt the absolute spite in “Bully for you though and your non cheating weightloss”!

I said it works for some people. People who therefore don’t see the value in a WLI. If when used properly they lead to 1-2lb a week loss, and a person feels they can do that without them, why would they spend their money on them?

They’re not always the answer - that doesn’t mean they’re not the answer to you.

Just that some people see absolutely no value in taking them, and don’t require the sales pitch, or list of benefits for others, to change their minds.

Like I said previously, no is a complete sentence.

Are you ok. No one is selling them and no one gives a crap if you take them. Genuinlh not one person. Why on earth do you think people are trying to sell you medication. That’s the oddest thing I’ve ever read.

and as for cheating, no one cares if you think it’s cheating, it it’s cheating sign me up,and brand me a cheater. I’m all for modern medicine.

ChunkyMonkey36 · 25/05/2026 18:46

montysmaw · 25/05/2026 18:04

Its cheating............I wasnt aware that losing weight was competitive. Who is being cheated exactly?
Makes it easier? Of course it does. Its kind of the point. If it was easy the population would not be obese.

Move more eat less, because its that simple. Except its not. Bully for you though and your non cheating weightloss .

Pile it back on......like virtually any other diet.

Willpower, again, not that simple.

Danger outweighing benefits? Actually the benefits not just in terms of weight loss are continually stacking up.
Decreased cardiovascular events being just one. My blood pressure is now healthy, due to the dru, nit weightloss.
Anti inflamitory effects being another ........I am now completely free of the genuinely dangerous toxic organ destroying immunosupressant I was on for years.

I felt the absolute spite in “Bully for you though and your non cheating weightloss”!

I said it works for some people. People who therefore don’t see the value in a WLI. If when used properly they lead to 1-2lb a week loss, and a person feels they can do that without them, why would they spend their money on them?

They’re not always the answer - that doesn’t mean they’re not the answer to you.

Just that some people see absolutely no value in taking them, and don’t require the sales pitch, or list of benefits for others, to change their minds.

Like I said previously, no is a complete sentence.

montysmaw · 25/05/2026 18:04

ChunkyMonkey36 · 25/05/2026 16:07

It’s cheating - it’s certainly apparently easier, or else what’s the point?

Move more eat less - that does work for some people (I’m one of them, so far)

You will pile it back on - most will, unless they stay on them forever, which isn’t an option financially for everyone.

Use some will power - again, that’s enough for some, but not for everyone.

These are dangerous drugs - the side effects don’t weigh up to making them worthwhile for everyone (I’m one of those too!)

The others are just outright nonsense, you’re right.

Its cheating............I wasnt aware that losing weight was competitive. Who is being cheated exactly?
Makes it easier? Of course it does. Its kind of the point. If it was easy the population would not be obese.

Move more eat less, because its that simple. Except its not. Bully for you though and your non cheating weightloss .

Pile it back on......like virtually any other diet.

Willpower, again, not that simple.

Danger outweighing benefits? Actually the benefits not just in terms of weight loss are continually stacking up.
Decreased cardiovascular events being just one. My blood pressure is now healthy, due to the dru, nit weightloss.
Anti inflamitory effects being another ........I am now completely free of the genuinely dangerous toxic organ destroying immunosupressant I was on for years.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 25/05/2026 16:38

Now you know what people who don’t need to diet go through, having to listen to endless diet chatter, new fads, calorie counting, watching what others eat, commenting on slim people. If I had a €1 for the amount of diet chatter I’ve had to
listen to over 20 years I’d be loaded. Colleagues are the worst.
They’re just the opposite of you, same chat, different methods. Boring.

Boomer55 · 25/05/2026 16:20

toonoisie · 25/05/2026 09:51

Before anyone says it, no, I don’t qualify for it, and even if I did, I personally wouldn’t take it. I completely accept that these medications have been genuinely life changing and incredibly helpful for a lot of people, and I’m not denying that at all.

But sometimes it feels like the idea of losing weight the old fashioned way, changing habits, eating differently, exercising, being consistent, is almost treated as outdated now. As if nobody wants to even attempt it anymore without medication being suggested within five seconds.

Surely not every conversation about weight loss has to involve injections?

Well, yes there other ways to lose weight. We all did it for decades. But if jabs work, the fine.

Wickedlittledancer · 25/05/2026 16:19

Ponoka7 · 25/05/2026 16:08

Then you read around it and you are looking at 8-10% increase. It'sHRT dependantand higher BMI in pre menopausal women is a protective factor. . Lack of breastfeeding and alcohol consumption puts you at higher risk. The gall bladder etc doesn't go away as soon as the weight is lost, a lot of people during the crash weight loss stage, need their gall bladder removing. Although the research is going to be interesting if we lower the rates of obesity, women insist on HRT etc. If everyone stopped smoking, a lot of health issues were supposed to dissappear, including those from passive smoking. It hasn't quite happened.

I think you’ve misinterpreted the results. It’s not hrt dependent. Hrt can increase the risk of cancer, unless you’re saying that your sentence is hard to understand due to the grammar composition.

And a higher bmi, yes, can reduce the risk of breast cancer in pre menopausal women but give you a higher risk of 13 other cancers, hence why no one recommends being a higher bmi to reduce cancer risk.

once yoh become menopausal then the risks increase inc breast cancer.

Ponoka7 · 25/05/2026 16:08

TakeMeToTheWest · 25/05/2026 13:25

This is incorrect as a 10 second google will tell you. Obesity in itself causes cancer

Then you read around it and you are looking at 8-10% increase. It'sHRT dependantand higher BMI in pre menopausal women is a protective factor. . Lack of breastfeeding and alcohol consumption puts you at higher risk. The gall bladder etc doesn't go away as soon as the weight is lost, a lot of people during the crash weight loss stage, need their gall bladder removing. Although the research is going to be interesting if we lower the rates of obesity, women insist on HRT etc. If everyone stopped smoking, a lot of health issues were supposed to dissappear, including those from passive smoking. It hasn't quite happened.

ChunkyMonkey36 · 25/05/2026 16:07

montysmaw · 25/05/2026 15:49

not as annoying as

Its cheating
Move more eat less
I am concerned.......
There will be hell to pay
You will pile it back on
Use some will power
These are dangerous drugs

It’s cheating - it’s certainly apparently easier, or else what’s the point?

Move more eat less - that does work for some people (I’m one of them, so far)

You will pile it back on - most will, unless they stay on them forever, which isn’t an option financially for everyone.

Use some will power - again, that’s enough for some, but not for everyone.

These are dangerous drugs - the side effects don’t weigh up to making them worthwhile for everyone (I’m one of those too!)

The others are just outright nonsense, you’re right.

montysmaw · 25/05/2026 15:49

not as annoying as

Its cheating
Move more eat less
I am concerned.......
There will be hell to pay
You will pile it back on
Use some will power
These are dangerous drugs

MyLimeGuide · 25/05/2026 15:26

Wickedlittledancer · 25/05/2026 13:14

I don’t think any one is offended, the whole point of the drugs is to make if possible when it was previously impossible.

A lot of people on mumsnet get very offended.

MyLimeGuide · 25/05/2026 15:25

ChunkyMonkey36 · 25/05/2026 13:11

I don’t know why WLI users would be offended that some people think it’s a shortcut, or at least an easier way out, when it evidently is.

I agree!! Im not offended if someone noticed I have had botox on my forehead to cheat my wrinkles away!!😂

Dontlletmedownbruce · 25/05/2026 15:11

@mindutopiai think maybe you aren't having the conversations because you are over weight and you don't initiate them. Many years ago I lost a lot of weight and found that weight management comes up quite a lot of normal chat among slim people or people who manage their weight well. General discussions about calories or how much they gained on holiday. I always thought no one ever talked about their weight and I realised they didn't do it in front of me because I was overweight. Sadly I regained it all and noticed the topic stopped coming up

BlueMouseMat · 25/05/2026 14:33

Why do you need the drugs then if you have to do all the work anyway? Both physically and phycologically? Seems like a right rip off!!

One thing it does is reduce 'food noise' by keeping blood sugar levels steady.
Fasting really isn't suitable for some people who are genetically disposed to drops in blood sugar when they haven't eaten for several hours.
A drop in blood sugar can make you feel sick and ill and shaky. Not everyone's body responds this way and some can simply decide not to eat even if they're hungry. The people with low blood sugar just need to eat to stop feeling like crap - not 'just' because they're hungry.

I don't use wli btw, this was explained to me by a HCP and it really does fit the situation I occasionally find myself in. I don't mind being hungry but when it turns into sweaty nauseous shaking I have to eat. It's a big part of how they help, so I'm told.

narkyspirit · 25/05/2026 13:55

I began WLI with a BMI of 37.2, 161cm height at 96.2 KG

medical issues, High Blood pressure, high Cholesterol, pre diabetic, along with IBS. 17 months later height is the same sadly weight is 76.4 KG BMI at 29.5 everything is back at normal levels and IBS has sorted itself out

Whilst I haven't dropped as much weight as some on WLI I am comfortable where I am now

prior to WLI I had tried the usual diet etc been on a residential bootcamp always shifted a few KG but never for long!

Don't judge people on WLI, you do need to put some effort in with the diet but I never seem as hungry these days and I am slowly reducing the dose to come off WLI due to cost

Nickyknackered · 25/05/2026 13:39

shuffleofftobuffalo · 25/05/2026 12:17

I know what you mean @toonoisie - it does feel like every weight loss thread descends into an infomercial for WLI. I get that people are having great success with them, but either you have to be half dead to get them on the NHS or have a decent disposable income - it’s not helpful to constantly recommend things that are out of reach for a lot of people.

I also notice no one talks about the side effects - only the weight loss ….. and I’m not sure how WLI look in the longer term, it seems people more often than not gain most of the weight back when they stop. So it’s not the panacea it is evangelised as.

How can a drug work when you arent taking it? Surely its more proof that it does if you gain weight when you aren't on it?? It doesn't flip your body to stay slim even if you stopping taking it. Do you expect other drugs to work for life without taking them?

Wickedlittledancer · 25/05/2026 13:38

Bulbsbulbsbulbs · 25/05/2026 13:24

I think this is what a lot of people think and that's why people are so sniffy about them. They think it's a magic potion and it isn't.

You still need to diet to lose the weight. You still need to choose healthy food not calorie dense food. It's just loads easier to make those choices. Exercise is great, it doesn't make you do that but with increased energy and mobility obese people can start.

Yes, people get confused between the words easy and easier.

something being easier doesn’t mean it is easy. It simply means it is easier than something else, more achievable.

this forum is littered with people losing weight v slowly or plateauing. Or having side effects due to poor diet. Not eating enough or the wrong things.

weight loss is very complex, the drugs curb your appetite yes, they fix many mentabolic issues that prevent weight loss long term successfully. But that doesn’t mean it’s easy for most. You still need to proactively chose to eat a healthy diet, most calorie count, to ensure a defecit, and you should strenght train, ensure adequate hydration and eat your macros correctly, ie enough protein. It’s not we inject and the fat melts off as we sit eating pizzas, or starving ourselves.

it’s still work, and a lot still fail. They come off early, diet fatigue sets in, or thru take breaks so they can eat more, or they push through , eat too much and don’t lose, or they eat the wrong things, get gastro effects and say look they don’t work and stop, because it is mentally complex.

so yes absolutely it is easier, it’s the whole point, as for many it is impossible. But that doesn’t mean it’s easy, it just means it’s now achievable.

TakeMeToTheWest · 25/05/2026 13:25

Ponoka7 · 25/05/2026 12:33

The obesity and cancer isn't clear cut, it's lifestyle and cancer. If you take WLI and eat a pizza a day, it doesn't matter that you have lowered your body weight, your risk will be the same. Likewise if you haven't stopped drinking, or aren't moving at all. Both I've seen once people start WLI.

This is incorrect as a 10 second google will tell you. Obesity in itself causes cancer

How does obesity cause cancer? | Cancer Research UK

Overweight and obesity is the second biggest cause of cancer in the UK. Keeping a healthy weight reduces the risk of 13 types of cancer.

https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/obesity-weight-and-cancer/how-does-obesity-cause-cancer

Bulbsbulbsbulbs · 25/05/2026 13:24

MyLimeGuide · 25/05/2026 12:57

Why do you need the drugs then if you have to do all the work anyway? Both physically and phycologically? Seems like a right rip off!!

I think this is what a lot of people think and that's why people are so sniffy about them. They think it's a magic potion and it isn't.

You still need to diet to lose the weight. You still need to choose healthy food not calorie dense food. It's just loads easier to make those choices. Exercise is great, it doesn't make you do that but with increased energy and mobility obese people can start.

Aspoonofsolver · 25/05/2026 13:20

toonoisie · 25/05/2026 11:56

That’s not what I said at all. I literally acknowledged that these medications have been incredibly helpful for a lot of people.

My point was more that it now feels like WLIs get mentioned instantly in almost every weight loss conversation, even when someone is simply talking about trying to improve their habits themselves.

It’s not just the fact it’s mentioned it’s the fact some people on here are like a dog with a bone about it. No matter how many times the poster says they’re not interested they’ll keep pushing and just won’t drop it.

Not everyone of course but I’ve seen this happen too often.

I have lost 3 stone, currently 3 pounds
to go before I am back within a healthy BMI and one stone away from my goal weight.

I had some arsehole I was casually dating ask if I would take WLI, after mentioning some female childhood friends have taken it and he “can see why as weight loss is hard for women and this works”.

It took a day or so for it to sink in that it was pretty rude of him to ask me that and with hindsight wished I’d turned the question back on him as he was fatter than me!!

What I actually said to him was - no clearly my system is working since I’ve lost 3 stone so I’m happy to achieve the remainder of the weight loss the same way.

He just went silent but didn’t seem satisfied with my answer, who knows why - but I chose not to see him or talk to him again after that weekend. 😆

Wickedlittledancer · 25/05/2026 13:14

ChunkyMonkey36 · 25/05/2026 13:11

I don’t know why WLI users would be offended that some people think it’s a shortcut, or at least an easier way out, when it evidently is.

I don’t think any one is offended, the whole point of the drugs is to make if possible when it was previously impossible.

WildLeader · 25/05/2026 13:14

WalterMittysPuppet · 25/05/2026 10:13

Funny, I'm obese and I feel GUILTY that I'm too afraid to try WLIs! I'm embarrassed that with already slow gastric emptying, gut dysmotility and emetophobia, I am not strong enough to ride out the (potential) side effects - the pay off of weight loss can't justify an endlessly miserable feedback loop which would distract me from work and affect my mental health.

But here I am, still fat whilst it feels like the rest of the world's fat people are joyously casting off fat suits as I get left behind.

Love, new meds will come that will be easier for you to take. Don’t give up on yourself, your time will come when you’re ready 😊

Zempy · 25/05/2026 13:14

A lot of these people have spent decades trying and failing to lose weight the “traditional” way. So it’s logical to suggest WLI

Wickedlittledancer · 25/05/2026 13:13

ChunkyMonkey36 · 25/05/2026 13:04

It is not impossible to do it without.

People can do it and maintain without.

I appreciate it’s not possible for everyone, but that’s much the same as WLI not being appropriate for everyone.

Part of the issue though is this idea that everyone cannot lose weight without WLI. Many people can, and do, manage a calorie deficit to lose weight and maintain a changed, healthier lifestyle to keep it off.

It is not universally impossible.

I would have thought it obvious I didn’t mean universally. Good grief. Thr question was why do people need the drugs if they still need to do the work. And the answer is for those people it is impossible to do it without.

i have never ever once ever heard of a fat person, unless one of those super feeder types who haven’t tried every single diet there is before trying the drugs. It is the last resort, not the first.