Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be absolutely sick of hearing about the cost of living crisis

995 replies

Katypp · 22/05/2026 08:59

I surely can't be the only person sick to death of hearing about the cost of living crisis?
I am tired of reporters interviewing middle-class (usually) mothers inside paid activities such as soft play and hearing them moan about how they are struggling to make ends meet.
Have we completely lost the ability to cut our cloth according to our means or does 'struggling' now mean carrying on spending as usual then complaining when there's no money left?
There have never been as many massive new cars on the road, towns are full of hairdressers, nail bars, brow bars, tanning salons, soft play, play cafes, coffee shops, ice cream parlours, dog groomers, most of which didn't exist 25 years ago and are probably the recipients of the money of the families who say they can't keep up with spiralling costs.
Yes, some families will have been hard up before prices started to go up and will have nothing else to cut back on. They have my sympathy.
But i am utterly fed up of hearing how hard households ars being hit by the cost of living crisis when all that's needed is a few minor cutbacks which they don't want to make.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
EdithBond · 22/05/2026 19:05

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 18:58

Then who does the low-paid or public sector jobs in the expensive areas?
So you stayed because of your social conscience? Very noble of you, but you still had options, you just chose not to go with them.

No need to be rude and personal. Surely you can debate with reaching for insults.

I don’t work in public sector.

But I ask again, who does those jobs: in social care, childcare, healthcare, education in expensive areas, if everyone moves to cheaper areas? Not to mention shop workers, delivery drivers, hairdressers, cleaners, street sweepers?

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 19:05

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:56

Because they’re frittering money on other shit they don’t need!!!

Calm down, as others have said this is about the cost of living, which is no longer covered by average incomes to the degree that the government has to subsidise wages, or social problems will spiral, costing more money to mop up aka the poverty industry, because that's outsourced to private profit making sectors too.

You do realise that if people stop "frittering" when they do feel flush and able to have a short term fix of "luxury", like a nice coffee or a fake Barbie from Poundland, half the economy will eventually collapse?

BloominNora · 22/05/2026 19:02

Switcher · 22/05/2026 18:03

Yeah, but the crisis is very real, it's just that it's called low growth . As usual people keep saying the gap between rich and poor is widening. It isn't. What they mean is we've had so many years of low growth that an average wage feels poor, which is hugely exacerbated by the downward spiral of inflation. It would be helpful if the government could focus on growing the economy and not just union sound bites on who "deserves" more money.

As usual people keep saying the gap between rich and poor is widening. It isn't.

Yes it is - I posted this earlier but it bears repeating:

Post war wealth inequality reduced before starting to increase in the 1980s. In the 1970s CEOs earned around 20 times the amount of a median earner. Today CEOs earn almost 80 times the amount of a median earner.

Between the end of WW2 and the 1980s the top 10% share of income fell from 35% to 21%, it's 30% again now. The bottom 20% had and 8% share of income in 1979 - it is the same today.

Since 1981, the economy has grown 87% in productivity terms, yet median wages has only increased by 62%

The top 10% own over 50% of the countries wealth, the top 20% own 63% and the bottom 20% own just 0.5%!

All of these things are clear evidence that the gap between rich and poor is widening.

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 19:01

I honestly think we need to start issuing some benefits via food and electricity vouchers with a portion for spending on other things.

nearlylovemyusername · 22/05/2026 19:01

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 18:40

Oh blimey the racist "noble savage" trope. Romanticising people in that way is really not acceptable these days.

what do you mean?

The poster you quoted is correct. People in poorer countries don't have the same levels of obesity as here. In fact, I don't know any other country in Europe with the same levels of obesity. And food in the UK is much cheaper than in many European countries.

Badbadbunny · 22/05/2026 19:00

Monty36 · 22/05/2026 16:34

That is not how it is sold. For decades. In fact all my life it was a thing you paid in for. When you retired. Changing that message now is not okay. Technically correct, but morally not. You don’t invite people to pay in extra for their pension and then say ‘oh sorry, you won’t get a pension’.
The legal case will be huge. And more expensive !
It will not be a vote winner. Removing it or trying to. A more positive solution is needed.
I don’t think it should be lumped in with ‘welfare’ at all frankly. It is something quite different.

It was never "sold" as anything. It was never "sold" at all. It was never voluntary so why would they try to "sell" it - it was just another tax. I've been in the workplace for 45 years and never heard it being "sold" as any kind of savings scheme - it was just tax. The only minority it may have been "sold" to is where you can buy a few extra years you've missed to increase your state pension, but that's a completely different form of NIC and not linked to wages like the main NIC rates are. I'd love to know where you saw it as being "sold" as anything - I suspect you've just misunderstood and misremembered. They're not "changing the message" - the message was never that it was any kind of savings scheme.

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:59

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 18:55

Like a list of all the things that you think the plebs enjoy! Your snobbery is showing and it's not pretty.

Nope I like eating out and but rarely do and don’t go on holiday unless I can really afford it. Hence not having been on holiday the last few years. I’d love a better car but I have an older car I saved up for…. We’d all like to be able to waste money on luxuries and pay the bills but life means you have to wait for things and can’t have it all.

WanderingWellies · 22/05/2026 18:58

ladyrinths · 22/05/2026 09:49

Well get real, most folk are £30,000 or under and live fine. Do a lot of people on here just make it up.

How are most people on 30k paying housing & childcare costs?

With great fucking difficulty.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 22/05/2026 18:58

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:56

Because they’re frittering money on other shit they don’t need!!!

The "shit they don't need", lots of people don't do. My sister and her husband don't do any of them unless they've been gifted a meal out, which is often what they'll request as presents for occasions.

They're still struggling. They work in just over minimum wage jobs, and there is no prospect for progression unless they move away. But if they move away (as I did), the cost of living increases because housing costs are higher.

EdithBond · 22/05/2026 18:58

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 22/05/2026 18:53

Or people who bought a house 50 years ago who reckon that we just need to look at "cheaper" areas.

If we moved to a cheaper area we couldn't do these jobs. In those areas, our jobs don't exist so we take lower paying jobs. Probably with less benefits and flexibility, but more stress. But now the proportion of our income being spent on housing is exactly the same as it was when we lived in the more expensive area but had the better jobs. So we're in the same position financially but higher stress.

Whats the point?

100%

Not to mention needing to be near elderly parents (and other relatives without children), so we can care for them, as we should and want to.

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 18:58

Then who does the low-paid or public sector jobs in the expensive areas?
So you stayed because of your social conscience? Very noble of you, but you still had options, you just chose not to go with them.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 18:57

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:47

No we’re not we’re talking about people moaning about the cost of living whilst wasting money on shite.

Newsfalsh you aren’t the Kardashian's and life is tough. Nobody is entitled to anything.

And yet the content of the thread is about the cost of living! Seems like it's moved on without you.

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:56

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 18:55

And many adults have to resort to credit cards and loans to cover basics, and are encouraged to, because it's a lucrative industry.

Because they’re frittering money on other shit they don’t need!!!

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 18:55

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:43

Take aways, eating out, coffees out, endless tech, expensive phones for kids, cars on finance, nails and endless beauty shit, shopping hauls, holidays, theme parks, expensive days out, skincare for kids, piles of throw away toys …it goes on and on

Like a list of all the things that you think the plebs enjoy! Your snobbery is showing and it's not pretty.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 18:55

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:52

Oh for goodness sake we’re adults. Many people manage to not be parted from cash they don’t have.

And many adults have to resort to credit cards and loans to cover basics, and are encouraged to, because it's a lucrative industry.

Didimum · 22/05/2026 18:54

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 18:44

Because 99% of jobs in my industry are in central London. No point going somewhere cheaper to do a job I’m not qualified in to buy a flat somewhere I don’t want to live and that won’t make me any money. What would be the point?
You mean even first jobs?

My oh and I lived in London and could never have afforded to buy there. We did our research, I applied to every possible jobs closer to where we could afford to buy. He continued to travel daily to London, 2 hours each way, and I traveled 1:15 minutes mornings and evenings, 5 times a week, with a one year old baby....so that we can be house owners.

We never moaned. It was really tough but the price to pay. It was worth it as we gradually got jobs closer to home not poorly paid.

Sorry but if we did it, so could many.

Many industries are tied to London, even for a first job. Mine was. It's also not reasonable to expect people to move away from their friends, families and support networks.

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:54

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 18:51

I really hope you don't expect people to be grateful for what they get. That's a horrible attitude to bring to work. I don't think anyone needs to be grateful for the protection of the welfare state, especially now it's so piecemeal and inadequate. It's a social contract, not charity.

It isn’t inadequate.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 18:54

LarksAscending · 22/05/2026 18:40

My parents were never broke raising me. Not sure who ever said it was normal to struggle to raise your children…

Same. I wasn't broke but as I said, the priorities of the Labour government in the 2000s weren't the same as the subsequent coalition and Tory regimes. Labour at the time were committed to ending child poverty. A lot of the current crisis is caused by ideology - it's exactly what was intended.

ladyrinths · 22/05/2026 18:53

LarksAscending · 22/05/2026 18:47

Yes. Plus my husband had a job at a Big 4. Going elsewhere would have meant a huge drop in future income.

Also the cost of commuting from outside London into it for your job is ££££ now.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 22/05/2026 18:53

EdithBond · 22/05/2026 18:50

I’m always shocked by how much people who own their homes have no idea how savage the rental market is.

And I mean savage. £600-£1k per room per month savage. Try that with a couple of kids.

Or people who bought a house 50 years ago who reckon that we just need to look at "cheaper" areas.

If we moved to a cheaper area we couldn't do these jobs. In those areas, our jobs don't exist so we take lower paying jobs. Probably with less benefits and flexibility, but more stress. But now the proportion of our income being spent on housing is exactly the same as it was when we lived in the more expensive area but had the better jobs. So we're in the same position financially but higher stress.

Whats the point?

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:52

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 18:51

One could argue in that case that big corporations aren't entitled to apply every strategy in the book to part us from our money and avoid tax and offshore obscene profits while paying low wages for insecure job roles and expecting the government to make up any shortfall. But there we are.

Oh for goodness sake we’re adults. Many people manage to not be parted from cash they don’t have.

QuadrupleH · 22/05/2026 18:51

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 18:27

It is harder due to wage stagnation and housing costs. But honestly I am wasting my time, it’s like arguing with flat earthers
Because many don't agree that life is so much harder nowadays. It is in some ways but also much easier in others and all in all, it balances out.

I don't accept it balances out as being able to afford home and food trumps so much. I fully believe the change in the last 40 years between wages and house prices are the cause of so many of the problems the UK faces on a societal level. Sadly, nothing can be done about it - no one, myself included, would accept some kind of reset on house prices (although we could do better by building cheaper houses). No one likes admitting good fortune, I get it, but the generation who could buy houses 1950-2000 were much more fortunate than they realise (or admit).

Certainly, lots of aspects of life are easier these days, but not all related to CoL.

https://www.economicshelp.org/blog/5568/housing/uk-house-price-affordability/

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 18:51

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:47

No we’re not we’re talking about people moaning about the cost of living whilst wasting money on shite.

Newsfalsh you aren’t the Kardashian's and life is tough. Nobody is entitled to anything.

One could argue in that case that big corporations aren't entitled to apply every strategy in the book to part us from our money and avoid tax and offshore obscene profits while paying low wages for insecure job roles and expecting the government to make up any shortfall. But there we are.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 18:51

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 18:38

The people struggling in the cost of living crisis are struggling to afford basics
I also get to meet some of these people with my job. They are usually much less likely to moan and much more grateful for what they receive.

It's those like a few posters here who think that working hard gives them the instant rights to rewards, who then moan when they get their gas bill and there isn't much left to pay it...and then say they can't afford to heat their home.

I really hope you don't expect people to be grateful for what they get. That's a horrible attitude to bring to work. I don't think anyone needs to be grateful for the protection of the welfare state, especially now it's so piecemeal and inadequate. It's a social contract, not charity.

EdithBond · 22/05/2026 18:50

I’m always shocked by how much people who own their homes have no idea how savage the rental market is.

And I mean savage. £600-£1k per room per month savage. Try that with a couple of kids.

Swipe left for the next trending thread