Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be absolutely sick of hearing about the cost of living crisis

995 replies

Katypp · 22/05/2026 08:59

I surely can't be the only person sick to death of hearing about the cost of living crisis?
I am tired of reporters interviewing middle-class (usually) mothers inside paid activities such as soft play and hearing them moan about how they are struggling to make ends meet.
Have we completely lost the ability to cut our cloth according to our means or does 'struggling' now mean carrying on spending as usual then complaining when there's no money left?
There have never been as many massive new cars on the road, towns are full of hairdressers, nail bars, brow bars, tanning salons, soft play, play cafes, coffee shops, ice cream parlours, dog groomers, most of which didn't exist 25 years ago and are probably the recipients of the money of the families who say they can't keep up with spiralling costs.
Yes, some families will have been hard up before prices started to go up and will have nothing else to cut back on. They have my sympathy.
But i am utterly fed up of hearing how hard households ars being hit by the cost of living crisis when all that's needed is a few minor cutbacks which they don't want to make.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Purpl · 22/05/2026 19:28

TheKittenswithMittens · 22/05/2026 09:21

As an aside. In my local Waitrose, the shoppers put a disc in boxes to vote on 3 charity donations. The dog refuge came in top and the food bank came last. So Waitrose shoppers prefer to help dogs than humans.

Well the government does help the poorest humans not animals so why not use tokens for dogs.

Badbadbunny · 22/05/2026 19:26

measuretwicecutonce · 22/05/2026 19:20

The gap between those working full time and those on benefits has shrunk. Before everyone shouts but those on UC work, evidently most work part time.

People aren’t stupid, if you get up day in day out and hardly see your children as they are in clubs and then your pay is eroded so much that it seems those on benefits are better off than you especially given all the extra stuff they get, of course they are pissed of and so they should be. People tend to be around people like them, when they see others have a lifestyle similar and not working they annoyed and blame col.

Nail on the head again.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 19:25

measuretwicecutonce · 22/05/2026 19:20

The gap between those working full time and those on benefits has shrunk. Before everyone shouts but those on UC work, evidently most work part time.

People aren’t stupid, if you get up day in day out and hardly see your children as they are in clubs and then your pay is eroded so much that it seems those on benefits are better off than you especially given all the extra stuff they get, of course they are pissed of and so they should be. People tend to be around people like them, when they see others have a lifestyle similar and not working they annoyed and blame col.

That makes literally no sense. What are you trying to say?

Badbadbunny · 22/05/2026 19:25

BloominNora · 22/05/2026 19:13

In the 80's and 90's it was perfectly possible to buy a house on a single, blue collar job salary and to be able to afford for one parent to stay at home with the children or to work part time in evenings and weekends which meant no childcare costs.

If both parents did need to work and they couldn't afford to buy, they could generally find social housing or cheap rentals in the areas where they grew up which means they had help with childcare.

Today we have a housing crisis, people have to move away from their family networks for jobs or to get affordable housing. There is virtually no chance of raising a family on a single, low wage income which means both parents have to work, but having moved away from their network they are reliant on expensive childcare.

Add to that comparatively more expensive travel, a lack of public transport and more expensive utilities.

What about that is so difficult to understand that makes it impossible for you to understand how hard today's low and middle income families have things compared to the 80s and 90s?

Nail on the head. In the late 80's my sister who was in a menial low paid job bought herself a flat when she was 20. That's impossible to do today. As you rightly say, it's not just house prices that have gone insane compared with wages, it's other things like crap/expensive public transport meaning a car is more of a necessity these days (especially when lots of employers have moved from town centres to out of town retail/office parks with no bus service!).

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 22/05/2026 19:24

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 19:15

Many industries are tied to London, even for a first job. Mine was. It's also not reasonable to expect people to move away from their friends, families and support networks
See I call that entitlement. We did. We didn't question it. It was that or continue renting and never being able to save for a deposit. We moved where I didn't know a soul. We both commutated daily. It was the price to pay.

So I don't really want to hear how much easier I had it because I could afford to buy from people who wouldn't consider for a second the sacrifices that we made to be able to do so.

How much did childcare cost you? Having no support network around you to help with that? Because I know how much it costs us, as we don't have family who could help.

I note you said you commuted 2.5/4 hours each, every day. How did you feel being away from your child for that long every day? Who actually raised them while you did that?

You were very lucky not to have family who needed your support too. Or, the fact you valued buying a house over being there for them speaks to your character.

Sacrifices are different for different circumstances, you were able to do what you did but not everyone can. And commuting costs might make a move further away from work pointless these days.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 19:24

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 19:15

Yes, the agenda is becoming clearer by the minute..

People who say stuff like that offend me with their stupidity. They're so transparent. Vouchers would be way more costly and inefficient, plus open to abuse, but it's the thought of stigmatisation and punishment of those on benefits that gets these people salivating. Grim.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 19:20

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 19:05

I really hope you don't expect people to be grateful for what they get. That's a horrible attitude to bring to work. I don't think anyone needs to be grateful for the protection of the welfare state, especially now it's so piecemeal and inadequate. It's a social contract, not charity
I am grateful. Grateful for my health, grateful for the opportunities that I chased but ultimately we're there, grateful I was able to work FT as a single mum and managed to raise two great kids who are now independent and happy.

Gratefulness goes a long way towards happiness.

Nobody needs to be grateful for what they receive as part of the welfare state. Counting your individual blessings is another matter entirely. I'm thankful everyday that I have a job and a roof over my head and nobody monitoring what I spend my money on or where I live. I wish the same for the people I encounter and it's grossly unfair that they don't have the bare minimum.

measuretwicecutonce · 22/05/2026 19:20

The gap between those working full time and those on benefits has shrunk. Before everyone shouts but those on UC work, evidently most work part time.

People aren’t stupid, if you get up day in day out and hardly see your children as they are in clubs and then your pay is eroded so much that it seems those on benefits are better off than you especially given all the extra stuff they get, of course they are pissed of and so they should be. People tend to be around people like them, when they see others have a lifestyle similar and not working they annoyed and blame col.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 19:17

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 19:15

Many industries are tied to London, even for a first job. Mine was. It's also not reasonable to expect people to move away from their friends, families and support networks
See I call that entitlement. We did. We didn't question it. It was that or continue renting and never being able to save for a deposit. We moved where I didn't know a soul. We both commutated daily. It was the price to pay.

So I don't really want to hear how much easier I had it because I could afford to buy from people who wouldn't consider for a second the sacrifices that we made to be able to do so.

And how much did commuting cost you?

QuadrupleH · 22/05/2026 19:17

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 19:15

Many industries are tied to London, even for a first job. Mine was. It's also not reasonable to expect people to move away from their friends, families and support networks
See I call that entitlement. We did. We didn't question it. It was that or continue renting and never being able to save for a deposit. We moved where I didn't know a soul. We both commutated daily. It was the price to pay.

So I don't really want to hear how much easier I had it because I could afford to buy from people who wouldn't consider for a second the sacrifices that we made to be able to do so.

But many didn't have to make any sacrifice.

Blisteringlycold · 22/05/2026 19:17

OneMoreTimeBaby · 22/05/2026 09:07

As the GC said “don’t worry”

And children will get free bus travel in August!

free bus in July and August would save me around £50, that would be more useful!

but who cares!

if everyone could just stop moaning so the OP can keep themselves oblivious please!

I shall go cut some more of my cloth…..

Yes!

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 19:15

Many industries are tied to London, even for a first job. Mine was. It's also not reasonable to expect people to move away from their friends, families and support networks
See I call that entitlement. We did. We didn't question it. It was that or continue renting and never being able to save for a deposit. We moved where I didn't know a soul. We both commutated daily. It was the price to pay.

So I don't really want to hear how much easier I had it because I could afford to buy from people who wouldn't consider for a second the sacrifices that we made to be able to do so.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 22/05/2026 19:15

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 19:13

Oh I bet you do!

Yes, the agenda is becoming clearer by the minute..

Parcelpass · 22/05/2026 19:14

I havent voted because its not one particular group per say that springs to my mind per say. Its a little depressing to constantly hear about the COL but it is true! I can see it from both sides.

Thisisit26 · 22/05/2026 19:14

Also when I say financial support, I also mean living in a house free of charge (not booted out at 18) , getting a house /flat etc from family. Any financial help at all.

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 19:13

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 19:01

I honestly think we need to start issuing some benefits via food and electricity vouchers with a portion for spending on other things.

Oh I bet you do!

BloominNora · 22/05/2026 19:13

Katypp · 22/05/2026 18:06

No I don't. Don't be so silly.
I have no idea where this conviction that today's young families have a uniquely difficult time comes from.
the years of raising children has always been the most expensive years of your life and there's no reason why today's parenting years should be any different - a concept some find difficult to grasp evidently.

In the 80's and 90's it was perfectly possible to buy a house on a single, blue collar job salary and to be able to afford for one parent to stay at home with the children or to work part time in evenings and weekends which meant no childcare costs.

If both parents did need to work and they couldn't afford to buy, they could generally find social housing or cheap rentals in the areas where they grew up which means they had help with childcare.

Today we have a housing crisis, people have to move away from their family networks for jobs or to get affordable housing. There is virtually no chance of raising a family on a single, low wage income which means both parents have to work, but having moved away from their network they are reliant on expensive childcare.

Add to that comparatively more expensive travel, a lack of public transport and more expensive utilities.

What about that is so difficult to understand that makes it impossible for you to understand how hard today's low and middle income families have things compared to the 80s and 90s?

nearlylovemyusername · 22/05/2026 19:13

This parallel thread is very indicative of the topic we're discussing

To ask if you could make this amount of money last 3 weeks and how? | Mumsnet

OP is questioning if £540 is enough for 1 adult and one 6yo to live for three weeks after bills paid, so basically food and fuel. If people believe that's not enough then of course they'd moan about COL crisis.

Thisisit26 · 22/05/2026 19:12

Katypp · 22/05/2026 08:59

I surely can't be the only person sick to death of hearing about the cost of living crisis?
I am tired of reporters interviewing middle-class (usually) mothers inside paid activities such as soft play and hearing them moan about how they are struggling to make ends meet.
Have we completely lost the ability to cut our cloth according to our means or does 'struggling' now mean carrying on spending as usual then complaining when there's no money left?
There have never been as many massive new cars on the road, towns are full of hairdressers, nail bars, brow bars, tanning salons, soft play, play cafes, coffee shops, ice cream parlours, dog groomers, most of which didn't exist 25 years ago and are probably the recipients of the money of the families who say they can't keep up with spiralling costs.
Yes, some families will have been hard up before prices started to go up and will have nothing else to cut back on. They have my sympathy.
But i am utterly fed up of hearing how hard households ars being hit by the cost of living crisis when all that's needed is a few minor cutbacks which they don't want to make.

A few questions op and really genuine questions , do you have children ? Have you received any financial support at all from family ever ? Have you had practical support with childcare? Have you ever had to not eat due to waiting for payday ?

EdithBond · 22/05/2026 19:10

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 19:06

If that's what you think then sorry, you have no idea what you're talking about. Our residual welfare regime provides some of the lowest benefits in Europe and they're reactive, doing nothing to prevent poverty before it takes hold. We had no strategy on child poverty for a decade and a half and policies literally designed to increase child poverty. There are very few boroughs in England and Wales where LHA will fully cover rents so people are having to use subsistence level benefits to cover their private rents. I could continue but your views are likely to be entrenched.

100% this.

Frozen local housing allowance doesn’t cover rents in most of the country. It’s wholly inadequate.

Badbadbunny · 22/05/2026 19:08

EdithBond · 22/05/2026 18:50

I’m always shocked by how much people who own their homes have no idea how savage the rental market is.

And I mean savage. £600-£1k per room per month savage. Try that with a couple of kids.

I agree. DS is having to pay circa £1k per month for a dingy basement box room size bedroom in a HMO. It's utterly obscene. OK, that's London (not Central either), but that's where the jobs in his profession are located since the push for centralisation closed huge numbers of regional offices and concentrated everything in London and a handful of other large cities.

Even 1 bedroom flats in our run down regional town are averaging £800-£900 per month these days and are heavily sought after due to lack of supply and lots of people needing homes.

I really don't think the older people who are sitting pretty in houses/flats bought a few decades ago have the faintest idea of the current state of the housing market.

If you're paying £800-£1000 in rent alone, plus utilities etc plus commuting costs, plus subsistence level foods, you've bugger all left if you're on minimum wage, and virtually no chance at all of saving anything towards the deposit needed to buy your own flat/house.

Wonderfrau · 22/05/2026 19:08

Bushmillsbabe · 22/05/2026 09:20

I think the frustration is that people are working harder and harder but not seeing ant benefit from it. DH is on the highest salary he has ever been (my nhs salary has stayed fairly static in real terms) but we have no money left at end of each month, whereas a few years ago we had some spare money for a yearly holiday even though he was earning less. We drive 2 x 10 year old cars - essential to get to work as live semi rural, can't afford any holidays, are having to top up our daughters schooling with tutoring as her class is so disrupted by poor behaviour and cuts means no TA's, paying for private dentists as can't get an nhs one.

Yes, I fully appreciate we are in a privileged position compared to many as can pay our bills each month - but that should be a given for a home with 2 professional full time working parents.
I have a progressive disability, can still work as have a very supportive employer. But if a few years I won't be able too, and then we are going to be stuffed. We wanted to save some money as a cushion for when this happens, but thats impossible right now, which is a bit scary.

I am assuming that two professionals working full time will bring in at least 70k per annum? Your essential outgoings surely do not take the majority of this income? 😬

Some regular outgoings are used to support a privileged standard of living, but are not necessarily essential, e.g, extra curricular clubs, tutoring, paid family days out/activities, pre-prepared meals, Netflix, disposable mop heads, etc. Many people are voicing that they are not willing to give these up, because they work hard. People worked equally hard in the 90s. Why is there a presumption that living standards (aka consumerism) should just increase year on year, without consequence?

The cost of living ‘crisis’ has been a real crisis for some low income households that had no wiggle room to reduce their costs and were struggling already.

However, many posters claim to be ‘struggling’ when what they actually mean is they are unable to maintain their privileged standard of living to the same degree, but they are still pretty privileged.

We are allowed to grumble about it, but I think it’s important to not be disingenuous and use the phrase ‘struggling,’ like those in actual poverty. I agree we can moan that we haven’t eaten out or had a take away all month, but please be careful who your audience is.

The older generations sometimes scoff at the moans, as their lived experience was very different when living standards were much lower. They are accused of begrudging standards improving. I think we miss the point that increased happiness has not matched increased living standards.

If you are currently ‘struggling’ (but not actually), just imagine you are living in the 90s… you will have just one house phone between you, will have painted your own nails and box dyed your hair - you won’t feel like you are missing out at all!

The 90s were great, btw

ForWittyTealOP · 22/05/2026 19:06

MugSh0t · 22/05/2026 18:54

It isn’t inadequate.

If that's what you think then sorry, you have no idea what you're talking about. Our residual welfare regime provides some of the lowest benefits in Europe and they're reactive, doing nothing to prevent poverty before it takes hold. We had no strategy on child poverty for a decade and a half and policies literally designed to increase child poverty. There are very few boroughs in England and Wales where LHA will fully cover rents so people are having to use subsistence level benefits to cover their private rents. I could continue but your views are likely to be entrenched.

Papoy · 22/05/2026 19:05

I dont want to get on board with this "cloth cutting" mentality, because it makes me feel like I am personally responsible for the shortcoming of an economic system that is badly managed by a handful of people and companies.... I don't want to stop doing nice things for my children because some Orange man decided to have a power trip and cover up for his friends dirty deeds....

I refuse to cut my cloth in the way goverment wants me to cut it... I will moan and voice my displeasure with this system forcing me to give up few nice extras ( a soft play for a 5ver) while we can't have a comfortable life or holidays and days out with kids.

Also all those businesses you seen on the high street are small businesses basically all struggling to feed their own families in those times.

I am sure your heart is in the right place, but conforming and surviving in this broken system is not an achievement and we will keep on moaning and pointing the widening gap between poor and rich.

Passaggressfedup · 22/05/2026 19:05

I really hope you don't expect people to be grateful for what they get. That's a horrible attitude to bring to work. I don't think anyone needs to be grateful for the protection of the welfare state, especially now it's so piecemeal and inadequate. It's a social contract, not charity
I am grateful. Grateful for my health, grateful for the opportunities that I chased but ultimately we're there, grateful I was able to work FT as a single mum and managed to raise two great kids who are now independent and happy.

Gratefulness goes a long way towards happiness.