Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to ask current or former GCSE examiners what happens with illegible handwriting?

183 replies

Hadsuchahardday · 20/05/2026 14:59

My son is currently doing his GCSEs. Although his handwriting is joined and cursive it is truly illegible and no doubt will be worse under time pressure. It is just a series of loops; letters such as a do not join at the top, tall letters are not particularly tall, r veers off at a diagonal. His spelling is also terrible which makes deciphering even harder. We’ve been told that exam papers are scanned and blown up and that different examiners mark each question. If the writing cannot be read, it is passed on to somebody more senior but what happens then? What if 4 people look at it and no one can read it? Will he be marked on what can only be read? He is a bright boy and could verbally answer the questions well, his predicted grades are generally 7-8 with a 6 and 9 for some. Answers from examiners greatly appreciated.

OP posts:
BauhausOfEliott · 21/05/2026 15:52

I wouldn't put that writing anywhere near the category of 'illegible'. What you've shared is a blurry photo of a snippet in isolation, but I don't think most examiners would struggle to read an essay written like that as when you're reading actual sentences, your eye makes sense of it much better than it would from the picture you've posted out of context.

Lurkingonmn · 21/05/2026 15:44

Don't worry. The teachers have said they can read it. He will have had several teachers across his subjects and if they couldn't read it (in mocks, for example) he would have been referred to use a laptop in lessons as a normal way of working so he could use one or a scribe in his exams.
Think of exam boards as having different tiers of examiners. If examiner 1 can't read it,it would be passed to a group leader, then someone else. Once, in my 20 years of teaching thousands of students, I had the exam board (for English) contact our school and ask if anyone at our school could read the handwriting of a student. Their English teacher could and was asked to transcribe the student's papers and submit them.

UnintentionalArcher · 21/05/2026 15:13

Hadsuchahardday · 20/05/2026 15:06

Photo example

Hi. As someone else said, the examiner flags it to the board and someone else with experience of deciphering poor handwriting looks at it. At a very quick glance, however, I can decipher at least some of this so I think your son will be fine.

Onbdy · 21/05/2026 01:17

CaesarAugusta · 21/05/2026 00:21

It really is worth trying to make writing reasonably legible. Some years ago I examined for a different type of exam. When I had to decipher bad writing I could feel myself getting progressively more bad tempered, and I had to work hard to tell myself that it mustn't affect my attitude to the final mark I awarded. But I wouldn't like to swear that I completely succeeded.

Definitely this! 😂
A few ‘Oh FFS’ have been uttered from my office during exam season. The more grumpy it has made me, the less inclined I am to be generous.

Onbdy · 21/05/2026 01:14

HedyPrism · 20/05/2026 18:38

Science marker here too. There is no referring to anyone. We mark what we can read and anything illegible is ignored.

Yep! Science marker here too. I have never passed on something I can’t read, they just don’t get the mark. Exam marking is very time consuming and pretty poorly paid for the hours we put in. Also we don’t mark full papers these days, just individual questions which are uploaded so each exam paper can potentially be marked by several different examiners. I have seen much worse than your son’s handwriting so I wouldn’t worry too much. I’m sure the school would have sorted alternative arrangements if they had been concerned.

Notyouagaindear · 21/05/2026 00:35

Did you know Occupational Therapists can assess handwriting? I didn’t until my eldest was seen at the age of 16. I honestly thought she was just being careless and had messy handwriting, until she had a formal OT handwriting assessment and scored very poorly on the DASH test. In her case it had been flagged up by the school though. She ended up being allowed to use a word processor (laptop) for her exams on the advice from OT. Some areas allow self-referral which makes access a bit easier too.

CaesarAugusta · 21/05/2026 00:21

It really is worth trying to make writing reasonably legible. Some years ago I examined for a different type of exam. When I had to decipher bad writing I could feel myself getting progressively more bad tempered, and I had to work hard to tell myself that it mustn't affect my attitude to the final mark I awarded. But I wouldn't like to swear that I completely succeeded.

WearyAuldWumman · 20/05/2026 23:42

MrsHamlet · 20/05/2026 22:58

I did too when I had a kid whose writing looked like knitting and I had to transcribe it before it was sent off. It was a gruesome experience!
I refer everyone with tricky handwriting for handwriting support in year ten when I start teaching them.

We had some cases where the problem didn't show up until the candidate reached the stage of having to write under pressure in their first prelim/mock.

I did have one awful case with a junior pupil that I can't go into in full. Suffice to say that I put piece of imaginative writing to the bottom of my marking pile because the handwriting was so bad. When I finally deciphered it, I took it to the pupil's pastoral teacher, so disturbing was the content.

The pupil is now an adult and unlikely to see the light of day again.

noblegiraffe · 20/05/2026 23:40

Jamesblonde2 · 20/05/2026 23:30

Fascinating the vast majority of replies relate to boys.

They have crap handwriting because their fine motor skills develop later than girls which is later than they learn handwriting. Also girls tend to care more about presentation.

Jamesblonde2 · 20/05/2026 23:30

Fascinating the vast majority of replies relate to boys.

SapphireSteel28 · 20/05/2026 23:06

I am a senior examiner. I can read his writing-I’ve seen far worse. I’ll always try my best to decipher-but not all examiners will take the time.

This should have been sorted out a couple of years ago really.

girljulian · 20/05/2026 23:03

Hadsuchahardday · 20/05/2026 15:06

Photo example

As a former examiner, this is far from the worst I’ve seen! It’s not illegible.

vanillasugar2 · 20/05/2026 23:02

My writing is awful and they didn’t seem to have any issues when I was at school. I don’t have any diagnosed conditions other than my brain works faster than my hand so I am trying to get stuff on paper as fast as I can! I think like I read, at warp speed and my handwriting goes downhill

MrsHamlet · 20/05/2026 22:58

WearyAuldWumman · 20/05/2026 22:55

Thank you.

I know that SLTs in Scotland prefer the option of allowing the candidate to type.

I did too when I had a kid whose writing looked like knitting and I had to transcribe it before it was sent off. It was a gruesome experience!
I refer everyone with tricky handwriting for handwriting support in year ten when I start teaching them.

WearyAuldWumman · 20/05/2026 22:55

MrsHamlet · 20/05/2026 22:53

Transcriptions were removed as an option some time ago in JCQ regulated exams

Thank you.

I know that SLTs in Scotland prefer the option of allowing the candidate to type.

MrsHamlet · 20/05/2026 22:53

WearyAuldWumman · 20/05/2026 22:29

I can read some of that. I suspect that I'd manage better if the focus was a bit sharper and I could see the entire page.

I was in the secondary sector in Scotland, but sometimes had to transcribe papers for pupils.

Transcriptions were removed as an option some time ago in JCQ regulated exams

MrsHamlet · 20/05/2026 22:51

kezzieeve · 20/05/2026 20:07

I mark English exam papers. There is a lot of emphasis in training on reading the work however bad the handwriting. If it really is illegible I am not sure what happens but I have never come across something I literally couldn’t read at all.

I have. But it's very very rare. Maybe one or two scripts a year out of literally hundreds.

WearyAuldWumman · 20/05/2026 22:44

Ineffable23 · 20/05/2026 22:36

I think it's in the "mere mortals struggle, teachers will be fine" category. Just make sure he spaces things out if he can - but ultimately his focus needs to be on the exams not his handwriting. They won't be worried because if they were they would have brought it up. If the thing about a known teacher deciphering is true I guess that could be worth enquiring about but I've never heard of it.

It used to happen in Scotland - transcription could be put in place. It was supposed to be someone who knew the pupil's handwriting but had no interest in whether or not they passed that particular exam.

If the pupil concerned had dyslexia, then the accommodation might be transcription with correction, but that's a different scenario.

WearyAuldWumman · 20/05/2026 22:42

WearyAuldWumman · 20/05/2026 22:29

I can read some of that. I suspect that I'd manage better if the focus was a bit sharper and I could see the entire page.

I was in the secondary sector in Scotland, but sometimes had to transcribe papers for pupils.

Just to add an explanation: my difficulty is because the picture is a wee bit blurred, not because of the handwriting.

Ineffable23 · 20/05/2026 22:36

I think it's in the "mere mortals struggle, teachers will be fine" category. Just make sure he spaces things out if he can - but ultimately his focus needs to be on the exams not his handwriting. They won't be worried because if they were they would have brought it up. If the thing about a known teacher deciphering is true I guess that could be worth enquiring about but I've never heard of it.

neilyoungismyhero · 20/05/2026 22:33

A friend"s son used a laptop as already mentioned.

Sartre · 20/05/2026 22:33

latetothefisting · 20/05/2026 18:08

sounds obvious but is it any better if he doesn't write in cursive? I know it takes longer but better to write something legible slowly than long answers that can't be deciphered. Otherwise he can at least make an effort to space his words out, leave a line between sentences etc. They can always ask for more paper.

While people are saying it's the examiners job to decipher bad writing, in reality they are paid per paper, so it's really not worth them going above and beyond to puzzle out every single word. My friend's mum used to pay her to do her exam marking for her when she was 14! Examiners are human like everyone else - some are conscientious, others will do the least they can get away with. There are so many examples about papers being regraded and marks changing, often spanning multiple grade boundaries (a friend went from a D to an A on her A level re-mark but missed out on her uni place in the meantime).

Do you really want to risk it when sometimes one or two marks can make all the difference?

I dropped cursive naturally in secondary. I never understood why on earth they forced us to learn that in primary because by secondary nobody gives a shit how you write! Then you go to uni and everything is typed… Cursive is just a waste of everyone’s time.

boredwithfoodprob · 20/05/2026 22:30

My son’s writing was deemed not legible (I thought it was fine 🤷‍♀️) but it meant he got 25% extra time in exams - so GCSEs and now A levels which has been a godsend, not necessarily just for handwriting but for everything! Has your son been assessed?

WearyAuldWumman · 20/05/2026 22:29

I can read some of that. I suspect that I'd manage better if the focus was a bit sharper and I could see the entire page.

I was in the secondary sector in Scotland, but sometimes had to transcribe papers for pupils.

Hadsuchahardday · 20/05/2026 22:07

He is doing the exams now. As I said earlier I have consistently asked teachers if they can read his writing and they all said yes. I feel reassured by most of the answers on here so thank you.

OP posts: