Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

And just like that... MAFS is over

462 replies

mumofoneAloneandwell · 18/05/2026 17:03

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8pz1k4r2lo

It was coming. You dont get good reality TV without people suffering.

This news however is awful. Bloody awful.

A groom dressed in a dark suit and a bride dressed in white walk hand in hand along a sunlit grassy path, surrounded by tall green trees. Bright sunlight filters through the leaves. A large green Channel 4 logo sits to the left.

Married at First Sight UK 'brides' say they were raped by onscreen husbands

Channel 4 was aware of one of the rape claims before broadcast, but the woman involved still featured in the show.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp8pz1k4r2lo

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Starlia · 19/05/2026 00:13

There have been MAFS Australia contestants speak about the effect of the show on their mental health. Some of them
have had their careers ruined and been stalked, their homes vandalised and publicly abused due to their appearance on the show.

The mainstream media cover all of this up because reality TV is the only way they make money. Each season becomes more and more extreme.

I also seem to remember that one of the relationship experts resigns after a few seasons due to ethical concerns.

It is a horrific show that exploits the weaknesses and vulnerabilities of the contestants. I remember saying after one of the recent seasons (the only one I’ve watched) that it’ll take something truly awful to stop the show, such as a rape or suicide.

I hate this show and others like it so much.

VivienneDelacroix · 19/05/2026 00:13

Parkingpermitfallout · 18/05/2026 18:00

I’m actually stunned at this attitude. Women were RAPED.

seriously?

On a programme where participants are coerced into intimacy?

Crikeyalmighty · 19/05/2026 00:10

NotAnotherScarf · 18/05/2026 17:27

Not a bad thing. Big Brother was meant to be a one off social experiment. Then someone realises what they could do with it... Normal people for the first couple then complete arseholes who just wanted to get on TV to show how "wacky" they were.

Married at first sight....give me strength...I'm surprised the churches haven't risen up about the abuse of the sanctity of marriage

As for love island etc....complete choreographed.

ben Elton wrote a brilliant book called dead famous about reality TV manipulation- ahead of its time

eastegg · 19/05/2026 00:04

mumofoneAloneandwell · 18/05/2026 21:47

Do calm down

Ive said throughout the thread that this is awful.

Hmm not really throughout. If it was throughout you wouldn’t be getting the comments. That second post for example was shit. Referencing rape allegations and then in the same breath bemoaning the end of ‘good’ reality tv. Terrible tone, so you’re going to get pulled up on it. Again and again, that’s how it works.

Lifeissodifficult · 19/05/2026 00:02

YooBlue · 18/05/2026 21:35

I am pretty sure that if I was an expert psychologist / therapist I would refuse to work on anything like MAFS on ethical grounds.

But then vets supervise abattoirs.

Vets supervise abbatoirs because it is their bloody job you idiot.

The role of a vet includes safeguarding the health and safety of the food chain … being a vet isn’t about holding fluffy animals 🙄

ImFinePMSL · 19/05/2026 00:00

MAFs along with Love Island are money making and for entertainment purposes only. Vile programmes.

I think all the contestants have some sort of vulnerability about them. As in they are genuinely desperate for love and affection, or they want to be famous and to be able to have a large social media following so they can quit their day jobs.

A “social media” career isn’t sustainable in the long run.

I really do feel for the contestants that have been violated and sexually abused. They were probably promised all sorts of perks for doing the show but they’re left with trauma and regret. Horrifying.

levitational · 18/05/2026 23:46

PleaseAccepyMyUserNames · 18/05/2026 21:27

It has really pissed me off, now I've watched the Panorama, that it has taken these ladies coming forward to start the wheels in motion.
My friend played me some catch up MAFS AUS once and I was genuinely horrified by

  • the blatant gaslighting of contestants
  • the aggression and violence
  • the vile misogyny that seemed to go unremarked and unchecked
  • the deliberate pairing of unsuitable couples
  • deliberate casting of seriously fucked up, disgusting individuals and the resultant abuse
  • the pandering to the 'experts' when they had a 'successful coupling' rate of <0.2% if my maths are correct (Seriously, those 'experts' are a bunch of self -serving souless you know whats).
And apparently this was all fine, just excellent TV,; it's just that now, 3 ladies are threatening C4 and CPL with lawyers and suddenly everyone sees the problem?!

Completely agree. It's been there in plain sight for a long time.

Stressmummy12 · 18/05/2026 23:45

BauhausOfEliott · 18/05/2026 17:43

I mean, I think my first thought would be 'This is horrific, multiple women were raped and abused' rather than 'Oh no, what am I going to watch on telly now?'

This!! I don’t watch it but my first thought in any case would be about the women not myself

oberuber · 18/05/2026 23:44

I know one of the past contestant for MAFS Australia in real life. It is a mock marriage.

Beachforever · 18/05/2026 23:43

TanquerayTickles · 18/05/2026 19:29

This is awful, those poor women!

I stopped watching MAFS a few seasons back when a lesbian couple were 'married' (Eve and Charlie). Eve was absolutely awful to Charlie, but she played the game so well that she, and the professionals, gaslit Charlie into thinking she was in the wrong and she kept apologising. It was deeply uncomfortable.

That’s the only series I watched and I was so shocked at the general abuse, gaslighting and forced intimacy. It made me feel ill. I couldn’t believe that C4 were getting away with airing it.

EdithBond · 18/05/2026 23:43

AlmostAJillSandwich · 18/05/2026 23:42

I've never watched it, but i did always wonder, were they proper, legal marriages? So any assets became joint assets that then get split in a divorce like owned houses, pensions etc?

No, fake marriages.

AlmostAJillSandwich · 18/05/2026 23:42

I've never watched it, but i did always wonder, were they proper, legal marriages? So any assets became joint assets that then get split in a divorce like owned houses, pensions etc?

oberuber · 18/05/2026 23:41

Look at us. Would we talking about the show without the drama?

levitational · 18/05/2026 23:35

Appalonia · 18/05/2026 20:07

The so called experts are rubbish at picking up on coercive control a lot of the time.

I think the 'experts' (and the production team) will have fully recognised the coercive control for what it was but left it til the last possible moment to intervene, because it made for good telly ('good' in the sense that the MAFSUK audience loves conflict and upset).

Popsicalpop · 18/05/2026 23:24

Wanttobefree2 · 18/05/2026 22:59

I’m glad I’m not the only one who was horrified by how Paul treated Sarah because she wasn’t attracted to Dean. I was surprised there was no online commentary about it at the time (I went looking for it as I thought it was so awful!)

There was on here, we were all saying how badly Paul treated her

oberuber · 18/05/2026 23:22

The women came for fame not for finding love. Fame was linked to remaining on the show even at the cost of their own safety so they would endure sexual abuse. Sex was expected as part of the show. As I said, trash tv.

levitational · 18/05/2026 23:20

Cookingandfoldingthings · 18/05/2026 18:13

Bloody hell. This is horrific. Those poor women; despite signing up for “reality” telly, there’s no way they could have had even an inkling that this was possible. Who are the producers of this sh@t? Surely they are complicit.

(I’ve never watched it or anything similar, and am so glad I haven’t - think I’d feel manipulated and tainted if I had.)

Everyone involved in the production is implicated, including the three bogus 'experts' – Paul C Brunson, Charlene Douglas and the late Mel Schilling – who frequently encouraged participants to ignore their own instincts and boundaries, putting pressure on them to have sexual contact with the person they'd been paired with even if they made it plain that they definitely didn't want it.

The show itself encouraged an atmosphere of coercion and duress. It's unsurprising that some participants with both hateful attitudes to women and poor impulse control took that cue and committed acts of sexual violence.

I hope the women who have had these awful experiences sue the production company, CPL, and Channel 4.

eastegg · 18/05/2026 23:18

ParmesanRealignment · 18/05/2026 18:06

I had to stop watching MAFS after the first couple of series. The across-the-board pressure to “be intimate” and the sofa tickings-off of the contestants (male and female) for “not taking things to the next level” (when they’re complete strangers on a game show and should be free to choose what level of intimacy to have with a fellow stranger)…. Well, I found all of that pretty morally and ethically dubious.

Aside from the blatantly obvious risk of plucking attractive randoms away from their usual support network, dazzling them with “telly life”, holding that over them as a carrot so that they don’t speak up about abuses and safeguarding concerns for fear of losing “the telly life”, plying them with free booze and then literally sending these strangers off to share a bed together…. What the fuck could possibly go wrong?!?!

I don’t want to come across as “I was right all along to see that this was all one MASSIVE red flag / shit-show / ethical black hole”, but…. 🤷‍♀️

Totally agree. Absolutely laughable to see the channel 4 execs trotting out how much they care about welfare and all the checks and support they had in place. Maybe you wouldn’t need to ‘worry’ about welfare if you chose to make a programme that didn’t depend on strangers sleeping with each other for entertainment. Just a thought.

Pineapplewhip · 18/05/2026 23:17

Although im really upset by this and feel incredibly sorry for the women... should the police not be investigating this? The panorama said that none of the women claiming to bs raped have gone to the police.

Surely panorama should not publish their claims as though they're fact - this will lead to a massive witch hunt/trial by social media.

oberuber · 18/05/2026 23:17

Drama is added and suggested to participants to increase views. Nobody wants boring, give me an affair, a fight, flirt with this husband, be confrontational with this wife, … everything is fake, the aim is to increase followers on Insta and a commercial value.

RobynRB · 18/05/2026 23:13

I really don't know how it would be possible to make a show where two people get 'married' and live together as a 'married couple' and it be 100% safe, unless you filmed them 24/7. That seems like the only way that everyone can be protected, and that includes the TV company and 'both' participants.

Pineapplewhip · 18/05/2026 23:11

I remember last series of the Australian one - there was a bride called Jacqui complaining her husband wouldnt have sex with her before he went to the gym. Everyone on the show made fun of this groom for having this reason and it was edited as a punchline. The expert Alessandra told him - "If you don't want to have sex - what about her needs - you could/should have still pleasured her, even if you dont want sex!"

The guy was totally shamed for not wanting to shag her, it was awful and at the time I remember being completely dumb founded over the double standards.

Sodthesystem · 18/05/2026 23:10

Let's be real, it's probably fair to say that one in every three or four men is coercive, or abusive in some other way, so I'm not in the least bit surprised.

It's awful but I'm pretty sure you could ask five friends and find at least one has been assaulted in a marriage. And there's probably a second that has been but downplays it and excuses it because she's still stuck with him.

The uk has a massive abuse problem.
I guess everywhere does, unfortunately.

BarrellChested · 18/05/2026 23:09

The early series seemed really serious, like they genuinely wanted to match compatible people and watch them make a go of it. The people on it were normal people. Subsequent series have just been about attention seekers being matched with other attention seekers, largely to make “good” television. It’s been a car crash for a while and I stopped watching.

3678194b · 18/05/2026 23:06

Yes I do remember the first couple of series as posters have mentioned. Very normal people, not getting glammed up for dinner parties. No dramatic music, no arguing with other couples or even meeting other strangers, very little drama.

But I guess at the end of the day it could still happen. Moving in together all the same and back then it was a legal marriage, not a pretend one.