Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to tell DH to split his inheritance with his half siblings?

465 replies

hesbelleth · 17/05/2026 18:17

DH lost both of his parents quite young, when he was in his late 20s. His parents were both on their second marriage. He was adopted but only found out on his dad’s death.

His mum had two biological children with her first husband. They are in their late 50s, so much much older than DH. He sees them maybe 2-3 times a year, but growing up he didn’t really see them for a few years at a time. They’re both nice people.

When his mum died, she left his dad all of their property/money. She wanted her half to be split amongst her three children.

When DH’s dad died, he left everything to DH. It’s not an enormous sum but includes a very small flat in Kensington so it’s an estate of £1m+

DH’s siblings have now come to ask if he will be giving them their share of the estate. That is, for the mum’s half, split between them. DH doesn’t want to give them anything as it was left to him. He also says the money is more useful for him than them as they’re retired or about to and own their own houses outright.

OP posts:
WeAreNumpties · 17/05/2026 23:26

This is awful. I'd never see him in the same light again, it would give me the serious ick.

CuriousKangaroo · 17/05/2026 23:25

So he is willing to ignore his mum’s wishes? What a shitty thing to do.

Bumblebeeforever · 17/05/2026 23:24

Jewel52 · 17/05/2026 23:19

Can’t imagine why your parents are prioritising your brother over you when you seem like such a delightful person 🙄

They’re intelligent, professional
people with the means and ability to access legal advice. If they put their wishes in a legal document like I’ve encouraged them to then they will be followed, if they choose not to then I have to assume they don’t seriously want that to happen.

WiddlinDiddlin · 17/05/2026 23:21

When you say his mum left 'all her property and money' to his Dad... how much of the estate he's inherited was actually his Mums?

Legally - it was left to your DH, it is his.

Morally - sticking to that could cost him a relationship with his siblings - particularly if Mum was very clear about her wishes, and if a large proportion of the estate originated with her.

Was his Mum the sort to say one thing and mean another? I've met a lot of people who will tell all and sundry they're being left this/that/the other and are simply saying it to manipulate people, curry favour, or because they're too weak willed to be clear about what will happen, and have zero intention of actually doing what they say and leave it all to a partner/spouse in the end.

Jewel52 · 17/05/2026 23:19

Bumblebeeforever · 17/05/2026 22:35

I wouldn’t share it, he doesn’t have to, and if it’s what his mum wanted then she should have written her will to reflect that. I couldn’t justify giving away money to older relatives when I’ve got children that it would benefit.

My parent gave told me they want their entire estate to go to my brother once they’re dead as he needs it more than I do, but they’re too cheap to pay to have wills written to reflect their wishes, like fuck will I be giving up my share to him once they’re gone.

Can’t imagine why your parents are prioritising your brother over you when you seem like such a delightful person 🙄

OneFineDay22 · 17/05/2026 23:14

Yes, I think what you’re suggesting is fair. Your DH would still be getting 4/6 of the £1m+ so if we round it to £1.2 for the sake of easier maths, he would get £800k and his siblings would each get £200k. How is that not enough for him of someone else’s money?

AnneShirleyBlythe · 17/05/2026 23:08

Cheersminesalargeone · 17/05/2026 18:21

This is why everyone should make a will with a solicitor. I think it would only be fair to do as mum asked and split it 3 ways it’s still 300k plus which isn’t to be sneezed at.

If it’s only the mums half then he gets £500K from his dad & £500k from his mum is split 3 ways. OPs DH still gets over £600k( less any IHT due). He should do as his mum wished.

InterIgnis · 17/05/2026 23:02

godmum56 · 17/05/2026 22:48

sorry but not your inheritance not your to dispose of...BUT of course this will tell you something about what your OH is like......

That the DH is the type of person that will prioritize the family he has with OP over the half siblings he has little relationship with?

If his mother wanted all of her children to benefit from her share of the estate then she should have put that it her will.

godmum56 · 17/05/2026 22:48

sorry but not your inheritance not your to dispose of...BUT of course this will tell you something about what your OH is like......

ArtesianWater · 17/05/2026 22:40

I think a lot will go on IHT before anyone gets anything.

There are too few details to know the right reply to this but at face value, yes, I think he should give each of his half siblings 1/6 of the estate after IHT.

fabstraction · 17/05/2026 22:39

I would feel too guilty to ignore my mother's dying wish, unless there were some very unusual backstory to take into account. As you say he got on well enough with his mother's biological children and didn't have a problem with either parent, that doesn't seem to be the case. Surely he can honour his mother's wishes and still have enough left over to feel blessed and well provided for by his inheritance. It's his choice, legally, but I'd be morally repulsed if my husband was so selfish when he knows what his mother intended.

I'd also be wondering why his father chose to ignore his wife's wishes. Did he have a problem with his wife's other children?

Bumblebeeforever · 17/05/2026 22:35

I wouldn’t share it, he doesn’t have to, and if it’s what his mum wanted then she should have written her will to reflect that. I couldn’t justify giving away money to older relatives when I’ve got children that it would benefit.

My parent gave told me they want their entire estate to go to my brother once they’re dead as he needs it more than I do, but they’re too cheap to pay to have wills written to reflect their wishes, like fuck will I be giving up my share to him once they’re gone.

RedRock41 · 17/05/2026 22:28

Yes. He still gets the lion’s share. His Mum’s wishes not being carried out would be morally bankrupt.

BIossomtoes · 17/05/2026 22:21

If my bloke did this I’d never see him in the same way again.

Hedgehogbrown · 17/05/2026 22:21

Advocodo · 17/05/2026 22:14

But how can you protect your children?

Leave money to them in the will or given them a sum when she was still alive and when they probably needed it more.

Hedgehogbrown · 17/05/2026 22:19

These fucking selfish parents who remarry and leave everything to their new partner. What did she think would happen? That her husband would leave half his house to two kids he's not related to? These people make me annoyed

Papster · 17/05/2026 22:16

Friend of my mothers was in slightly analogous position. Her wealthy mother remarried. Made husband 2 heir with ‘understanding’ her d would get £ when he died. She predeceased husband 2. Husband 2 married his much younger cleaner. He dies shortly after. Cleaner scoops lot. Daughter gets zero.

Pistachiocake · 17/05/2026 22:16

CeciliaMars · 17/05/2026 18:21

I think it’s his decision. It really boils down to how much he values their relationship. I don’t agree that £1m is ‘not an enormous sum’ though!

Yes exactly. Round here, you could buy 3 houses for that. Or give up working! Probably not in London, though.

Advocodo · 17/05/2026 22:14

ParmaVioletTea · 17/05/2026 19:20

Agree with you. Your DH’s mother should have protected all her children, his father did the wrong thing, and your DH is being quite mean.

But how can you protect your children?

Oriunda · 17/05/2026 22:11

MsFogi · 17/05/2026 21:26

I hope everyone reading this thread is thinking about updating their will - the vast majority of people have mirror wills with everything going to the other if they die. Whilst great from a tax perspective it does mean that there is a significant chance that children get disinherited/end up with very little (particularly if the surviving partner marries again at some point in the future). At the very least anyone with teenagers/young adults should update their will - you cannot rely on 'wishes' being followed at some point in the future (eg here it would have needed the lady's husband or her son to implement her wishes and clearly the former didn't see fit to do so and the latter isn't keen either - shows you how people work once money is involved. I'd certainly prefer a portion to got to the taxman in order to ensure my dcs get their fair share rather than nothing to the taxman but potentially nothing to my dcs either.

This. I come on here every time to say this. All this ‘trusting OH to do the right thing’ bollocks. No mirror wills. Just proper wills, naming the children. You want your DC to inherit? Write them into the will.

OP, I absolutely feel for your husband’s siblings by adoption. How awful for them.

BananaPeels · 17/05/2026 21:58

i think he could argue that his mother’s share should be valued at the moment she died, not the value today. That is the point the liability was established. So you need to see how much it was worth then and divide that into 3. The rest is his dad’s share. I would definitely give them some of it.

10DegreesNorth · 17/05/2026 21:57

Even if they had mirror wills it's not bullet proof.

My parents in law had identical wills, leaving fair percentages to their various children. FIL died first and MIL then changed her will to cut out her step children. On her death my DH and BIL wanted to honour FIL's wishes and see the inheritance split fairly. My SIL (MIL's biological child) wanted to keep a greater share because that was MIL's wish. She relented but I thought it was outrageous that she would try and selfishly keep money which, morally, should have gone to her half siblings. I lost respect her which I've not regained. I'd think very poorly of your DH.

DurinsBane · 17/05/2026 21:56

Legally he doesn’t have to. Morally, different story. If he splits the estate in half, so into ‘mums share’ and ‘Dads share’, as his dad’s only child he keeps all of dad’s share. Mum’s share, he should split 3 ways as his mum wanted, so he still gets a 3rd of that. So let’s say the estate is worth 1m, he still gets 666k himself!

PyongyangKipperbang · 17/05/2026 21:54

InstantlyBella · 17/05/2026 21:22

In what world is 1 million an enormous sum? I had more than that in my trust fund and I am not exaclty the most well off within my social circle.

So you are a member of the travelling community with a trust fund worth several million?

Okaaaaay

Booboobagins · 17/05/2026 21:44

Oh that's a bit of a mess isn't it? His mum should have been more explicit in her will, but nonetheless, I agree with you, it's more appropriate he susses out how much of it is his mums and then splits that 3 ways. One third plus the rest is his. It'll still make you both much more comfortable and honestly it'll keep things wweet with his brothers - you ever know when you might need them.

If you can help him work out how much is theirs, he'll see at worst he'll retain £666.66k, his brothers will receive £166.66k each (assuming in total it's a million post taxes etc).