Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Have you ever met a child psychopath?

522 replies

TheJuryIsOut · 17/05/2026 16:23

There's some debate about whether psychopaths are born like that or made as a consequence of their environment/upbringing. If they are born that way (which I believe they are) have you ever met one? What were the signs?

I say this because there is a child in my wider family who I think may be a psychopath, there has been signs from when he was very very young and as he moves through his teenage years things have only got worse. I can't get on board with it being an environment thing as no one else in the family behaves the way he does, it's quite terrifying to think that no matter what you do your child could still go on to do horrific things and not feel a jot of guilt.

What do you think? Are they born or made?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Paytovote · 17/05/2026 19:14

Everyone is talking about murderers.

I thought psychopathy was more akin to they would run you over because your in the way and they dont care.

But they wouldnt run you over in a rage thing because they care too little about you to be bothered to do that.

The latter being a ‘psycho’ person but not actually a psychoPATH

TheCatSitterDM · 17/05/2026 19:13

I thought it was a fact that psychopaths were born without empathy?
I'm not an expert but I think we only ever here about the psychopaths so are violent, there are psychopaths who don't act violently even through they lack empathy.
A lot of children grow out of seemingly having no empathy as they did have empathy just a lack of impulse control

PumpkinPieAlibi · 17/05/2026 19:11

Samysungy · 17/05/2026 17:03

Nope I do not think it exists. I think it is a way to excuse, minimise and explains away violent behaviour which someone chooses to do.

A person can be mean, nasty, violent, manipulative etc but framing them as mentally ill and not in control of their behaviour is excusing it away. Everyone makes a choice on how to behave.

The assessment criteria for psychopathy is hit by over 50% of the population and as there is no test to prove it exists at all do we believe that 50% of the population are psychopaths? Nah.

Where does the 50% figure come from? From everything I've read, anywhere between 1-5% of the general population meets the criteria for psychopathy...no where near 50%.

If you include sociopathy the population percentage is higher, but even combined, it doesn't come close to 50%.

PurpleFlower1983 · 17/05/2026 19:10

Definitely met a few with potential to become one.

Igiveuponusernames · 17/05/2026 19:09

Feis123 · 17/05/2026 19:06

She never self-harmed!

Harm OCD is not self- harm, though i can see the confusion. It’s when you have unwanted thoughts about harming others that you would never do. It’s a very distressing disorde

FieldInWhichFucksAreGrownIsBarren · 17/05/2026 19:09

I work in education and have unfortunately met quite a few concerning children.

likelysuspect · 17/05/2026 19:08

Feis123 · 17/05/2026 19:06

She never self-harmed!

No it means intrusive thoughts about harming others. But thats all they are, just intrusive thoughts, not desires.

TheIceBear · 17/05/2026 19:07

sunnydisaster · 17/05/2026 17:32

You should read Sociopath by Patric Gagne. Although she’s a sociopath, the two disorders are very similar.

I tried to read this and I have to say I found it really really disappointing and boring

Feis123 · 17/05/2026 19:06

Igiveuponusernames · 17/05/2026 19:01

I think that sounds like ‘harm ocd’

She never self-harmed!

PrincessASDaisy · 17/05/2026 19:06

55notout · 17/05/2026 16:31

I know a 15yo who seems to be well on their way. Have known them since being a toddler

terrible behaviour
cruel to animals and siblings
out of mainstream education
no interest outside the home
loads of time on computer

I might get slated but honestly they are a horrible child.

I don't think anything is wrong with calling a child horrible. Horrible adults didn't just appear out of thin air

gotmyknickersinatwist · 17/05/2026 19:05

Stompythedinosaur · 17/05/2026 17:04

Do you honestly believe children commit horrendous offences out of the blue and with no explanation behind it?

What do you suggest we do with children who commit offences of you don't believe the staff and therapists working with them should try to understand them?

@stompythedinosaur I remember reading aboutsome sort of rehabilitation programme that therapists attempted with psychopaths. It backfired and made them 'better' at offending because they learned about their behaviours that were deemed unacceptable and marked them out, so they learned how to more effectively mask and manipulate, because they were, y'know, psychopaths who couldn't be rehabilitated.

autumn1638 · 17/05/2026 19:03

Psychopathy is only diagnosed after age 18 as it is a personality disorder and personality has not developed until adulthood. There would be an argument for delaying this diagnosis until 25 for this reason. That doesn’t mean that signs are not there it’s just termed differently as emergent personality disorder. Often goes alongside attentional difficulties, attachment difficulties, callous and unemotional traits. These young people are often vulnerable and come from chaotic backgrounds. It would be wrong to saddle them with quite a damning diagnosis so early in life when they have so much growing to do, but that doesn’t mean that their vulnerabilities are not acknowledged by mental health professionals.

Igiveuponusernames · 17/05/2026 19:01

Feis123 · 17/05/2026 17:05

Of course they are born. But some can thankfully control their impulses, if not get rid of them. I had a school mate, who used to confide, to my horror, her feelings - like 'when I am walking with my nan, i have this urge to trip her up and see if she cracks her head open when she falls. I know it is a bad, wicked thought, but I am still having it'. She controlled her impulses well when I knew her. She was saying she felt like placing a pillow over her baby brother's head, an urge, she said. She said she had this urge, that she suppressed, to hurt animals and people and see what happens. As I said, she controlled these urges well, she recognised them as evil and she confessed to our priest, who I think had talks with her and she never harmed anyone. But she was definitely born a psychopath and she knew it.

I think that sounds like ‘harm ocd’

TheJuryIsOut · 17/05/2026 18:59

JennieTheZebra · 17/05/2026 17:22

I work with adults with severe mental illness, many of which have also committed terrible crimes and/or have diagnoses of personality disorders. IME, true psychopathy-that is, the inherent inability to feel empathy for others due to a neurological defect-is incredibly rare. I’ve been in this field a long time and I don’t think I’ve actually ever met one. Everybody else is a combination of neurodivergence, trauma, deprivation, poor parenting, poor education, mental illness, drug use and desperation. That doesn’t mean they’re not responsible for their actions. Except for the most seriously mentally unwell, they knew what they were doing and should be held to account-but psychopaths they are not. Just sad, desperate flawed humans. Often thoroughly unpleasant and criminal people but not evil.

Surely it's likely that you've never met one because they wouldn't be in your remit? Violent psychopaths won't usually display severe mental health issues, they are usually very clever at masking their psychopathy, they don't feel remorse so probably won't end up spiralling because of what they've done.

OP posts:
itsgettingweird · 17/05/2026 18:58

PinkyFlamingo · 17/05/2026 17:04

I do not believe the child perpetrators were simply "born evil". No child I have worked with in twenty years has been. Their behaviour has always been understandable (though awful) in the context of the experiences they had themselves been subjected to

And no wonder so many children grow up to be rapists and killers etc with attitudes like this. "There theye you've had a crappy childhood so it's perfectly understandable you tortured a toddler to death". That's disgusting.
Lots of children live through abusive childhoods and don't murder people.

Edited

its actually proven.

children who suffer frequent and/or severe ACEs (adverse childhood experiences) at a young age develop differently neurologically. Their brain is different and that can lead to some of the behaviours that cause violence.

It’s not an excuse - nothing excuses violence etc.

but it’s a reason/ explanation.

Just because you don’t like it doesn’t make it untrue!

Strikingitlucky · 17/05/2026 18:54

Childrent cannot have a diagnosis of a physcopath until they reach adulthood. Can they show traits as they are younger? Absolutely. To initiate a diagnosis, professionals need to carry out assessments and find out their history which goes back to birth. It is very difficult to get a diagnosis of a physcopath, as the professionals will need to be certain the individual meet the requirements of the diagnosis. Physcopath symptoms can collerate with another mental healh disorder/illness.

DidIJustHearWhatIThinkYouSaid · 17/05/2026 18:54

Well maybe just ‘a school’ then. But I see what you mean .

Monty36 · 17/05/2026 18:50

DidIJustHearWhatIThinkYouSaid · 17/05/2026 18:32

So they only attend a ‘comprehensive school or similar’?
I’ll think you’ll find that they’re represented across all schools 🙄

Which is what I meant. A comprehensive school or school similar in size.
Similar can be private, public, college, any educational institution of the same size.

DidIJustHearWhatIThinkYouSaid · 17/05/2026 18:48

We need to talk about Kevin
by
Lionel Shriver

DidIJustHearWhatIThinkYouSaid · 17/05/2026 18:48

This was the most shocking nature/nurture book I’ve ever read. My eyes were popping. (The film of the book was rubbish IMO)

likelysuspect · 17/05/2026 18:43

user9764325677 · 17/05/2026 18:38

Except that ALL psychiatric diagnoses are a matter of opinion. None of them are diagnosed by biological tests, only by observation of behaviour.

And all the diagnostic criteria in the DSM is a matter of a collective opinion.

And the diagnositc criteria has changed over time and will change again.

Runnersandtoms · 17/05/2026 18:42

Maybe not a psychopath but I've seen very young children with behaviours that make me believe they could be serious offenders as teens/adults. Maybe a product of their poor upbringing, maybe something innate in them, maybe a bit of both.

One 6 year old boy that showed clear misogyny and sexualised language, talking about 'suck my dick' and constantly swearing/using insulting language towards female school staff. Also very violent behaviour towards children and staff and an absolute disregard for any rules. Very very worrying, I hate to think what was going on in his home life. But I remember thinking I will not be remotely surprised if by the time he's 16 he's a rapist.

Namechangee11 · 17/05/2026 18:41

I do know someone who committed a series of terrible crimes who was all but called a psychopath by the judge who sentenced him. He has a 'normal' childhood, although his Father and one of his brothers were sociopaths in corporate way, they had no empathy and cared for noone except themselves. His father had been in the army and regaled everyone with tales of how many people he'd killed so I wonder if outside of that institution he may have harmed someone.. this person committed enough rapes to gain five life sentences and he'd previously been convicted of sexually abusing a child and was on licence at the time of the rapes. He had also planned to kill this victim and had planned it minutely. There is a huge blank about his childhood, he seems to have been in 'alternative' and not mainstream school for a while... All of that information and anything he may have done was not released to the public. We don't know what he'd done before, but there's a chunk missing. On sentencing, the Judge declined to give him place at a mental health facility because despite all the really awful things he told the psych, the probation service etc, they didn't feel he could be treated. This says to me psychopathy. He had killed a family cat and other neighbours cats and at least two dogs before and during his sexual abuse. He has sexually attacked a man, several women and even a trans sex worker, he also raped a mentally impaired woman but wasn't charged with this is as she wasn't competent to be a witness. The judge deemed him to be a danger to all people of all genders and ages, which is highly unusual. He was sentenced to five life sentences at just 25, so he had been at this a very long time. I think he was born that way, he was just so incredibly evil, so devoid of empathy and after his sentencing, there were a few comments online from people who'd been to college with him. People knew, they just couldn't believe what they were feeling about him. He'll be out in about 9 years barring any interventions to keep him there.

Allonthesametrain · 17/05/2026 18:40

kkloo · 17/05/2026 18:19

Not sure if it's been said but in the U.S there are early intervention programmes in some juvenile detention and psychiatric centres. The children don't have the formal diagnosis but they are exhibiting high levels of the traits. I'm sure that people who work with them would confidently state (about some of them) that they have met a child psychopath even if they are under 18.

So you mean they haven't been able to be assessed as one, this doesn't mean they aren't.

user9764325677 · 17/05/2026 18:38

Stompythedinosaur · 17/05/2026 16:55

But this isn't a matter of opinion - psychopathy had a route of diagnosis which specifies it is not a legitimate diagnosis for a child. A child cannot meet criteria for a diagnosis of psychopathy.

Except that ALL psychiatric diagnoses are a matter of opinion. None of them are diagnosed by biological tests, only by observation of behaviour.

And all the diagnostic criteria in the DSM is a matter of a collective opinion.

Swipe left for the next trending thread