Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think a junior probationer’s month abroad request is unreasonable?

516 replies

estrogone · 16/05/2026 12:43

We have a junior in our office who’s only been with us about three months and is still on probation, where the expectation is mostly office-based work. They briefly mentioned in passing at one point that they might travel overseas, but there was never any proper discussion or approval before the trip was booked.

They’ve now come back and advised the trip is already booked and confirmed for nearly a month overseas, in a time zone 10 hours away. They proposed a range of adjusted working arrangements, including shortened hours and overnight work, so they can continue working remotely while away.

I haven’t approved the shortened hours or alternative arrangements and have asked them to demonstrate how they realistically intend to maintain service levels and cope with working nights while effectively on holiday overseas.

I am a lot WTAF Confused to four weeks of leave for someone who has only been with the business a matter of months and is still in probation.

AIBU to think this is request is out of order?

OP posts:
YankTank · 18/05/2026 14:06

Sounds like they are from the “it’s better to ask for forgiveness than to ask for permission” camp.

AnnaQuayRules · 18/05/2026 14:05

@estrogone for future reference, as part of our offer we ask people to confirm if they have any holidays booked, as we will honour them (assuming they are under 3 weeks). If someone doesn't state that they have, then they need to apply for leave like everyone else.

estrogone · 18/05/2026 14:00

Update: I have professionally and respectfully let this person know that this won't fly (wfh from their home country). I have been clear on the reasons why and also added in my overall concerns (wtaf face ConfusedConfusedConfused) in my written correspondence. They have responded to day that they assumed a passing comment was implicit approval. I am bemused to say the least but still considering unpaid leave (definitely not going to approve their mad ass wfh proposal).

Lesson learned. Do not look for logic where none exists.

Ho hum. Another day of small business jiggery pokery. It is never dull.

OP posts:
DeposedPresident · 18/05/2026 13:44

It;s probably been already mentioned, but Australian working visas are quite hard to come by. Vanishing after a tiny period of actual work might be in breach of a visa rule also.

ParmaVioletTea · 18/05/2026 13:15

She said I was old fashioned and her boss was cool about it and told her to have a good time. Then she got her probation extended and was told one of the reasons was due to her disappearance for a month and not showing commitment to the job. She was genuinely stunned. She has grown up since then and knuckled down.

I work with undergraduates, and some try this sort of thing - asking "Can I do the module remotely as my parents have booked a holiday for that month? (when it's not an online module) or "there's a wedding in Hong Kong I need to go to" etc etc etc

My point of view is that they're adults, and I can't actually stop them from doing what they think they want to or need to.But that, as adults, they have to live with the consequences of their choices.

Stoicandhappy · 18/05/2026 12:41

How have they responded?

acheekyNandys · 18/05/2026 12:19

Yep too cheeky to assume they can work remotely in a different time zone to the client they are facing for a month.

I think a kind but frank discussion is needed about how any changes in working will be fairly considered but that business needs are also considered. The lack of notice that was given (the 'heads up' is not the same), booking a holiday without prior agreement, the deciding on other ways of working without discussion with manager and the security policy around taking IT devices abroad are all factors that would need much more time and planning. That they have not accrued enough paud holiday, but that you will kindly offer them unpaid leave and a months extension of their probation.

whynotwhatknot · 18/05/2026 12:05

whats the point of training someone else for a months work? just gt rid of the emplyee they;ll take the p even mor if you let them

Manthide · 18/05/2026 07:52

Ds22 has almost finished his probation period with his first job and would definitely not behave that way. He has already had a £500 bonus for his work. I think his job would actually allow him to take it unpaid (he wouldn't be allowed to work from abroad) as he does have specialised skills but there would probably be something put on his record. I know when he got the job he had to tell them any holidays etc already booked.

JulietteHasAGun · 18/05/2026 07:11

I think the ultimate question is do you want this person working for your company longer term? I would not be impressed and I’d be having a serious conversation with them. Their attitude in that conversation would decide whether I terminated their contract, or let them have some unpaid leave to go. I would not be letting them “work” on holiday at all.

Maybe they thought if they get x amount of holidays a year they could just take them straight away. Have to say I have worked for organisations that would allow you to do that. If someone left and they’d taken too much holiday that year their last pay cheque would just be calculated accordingly.

i do think there is something about this generation which thinks it’s acceptable. My Dd is the same age and pulled a very similar stunt in her first job. Slight difference though is that she asked her boss before booking anything (he said yes and she worked while on a different continent for about 3 weeks). I cringed for her and said she should never have asked. She said I was old fashioned and her boss was cool about it and told her to have a good time. Then she got her probation extended and was told one of the reasons was due to her disappearance for a month and not showing commitment to the job. She was genuinely stunned. She has grown up since then and knuckled down.

ShetlandishMum · 18/05/2026 07:04

My work had laughed and asked you to find the door out and goodbuy! Have a nice life in another setting.

Needtosoundoffandbreathe · 18/05/2026 07:01

I agree. This person thinks the rules don't apply to them and they've sufficiently got their feet under the table to not be replaced.

ClayPotaLot · 18/05/2026 02:10

Now days, companies aren’t willing to invest in good people anymore, as demonstrated by the fact OP would rather sack them and start again.

I think OP's inclination to get rid of them and hire someone else was a desire to invest in good people not poor ones.

TwinklyGoldPeer · 18/05/2026 01:21

They were testing how weak you are when they first mentioned it to you. It should have been put to bed there and then.

EmmaInScotland · 17/05/2026 23:12

scoopsahoooy · 16/05/2026 13:58

Tough one. We've had two members of staff go back to their country of origin soon into working with us - one after 3 months (for 5 weeks) and one did 2 weeks probation and then went away for a month. Both times we were fairly happy to accommodate because we knew it must be hard living a long way from home and that visits tended to be rare therefore long, etc. The first person worked three of the five weeks he was away and took two as holiday, the second just took it unpaid. So I don't think wanting to go is that much of a pisstake - presumably it's visiting family so they might not have had much say in when it was but also (given the current job market, although maybe not in Aus) be desperate to have a job and just hoping it works out. Their mistake was not being upfront about it in the first place, I think - but while it looks sneaky or deliberate it could just as easily be youthful overconfidence, being terrified to tell you, family pressure and triyng to do both, etc etc. I wouldn't immediately assume malice over idiocy.

If it were me I'd probably give them a stern warning about communicating properly instead of hoping everything works out and say we could trial 2 weeks of it working and 2 weeks unpaid, but if I noticed a drop in standards then they would have to take it all unpaid. Or just offer it unpaid and see what they say.

I think I’d take this type of approach, OP. Given then unpaid leave, but be really clear it’s a one off
You’ve noted they’ve only been in Australia for 7 months - is your job the first they’ve had outside their home country?
It sounds as if they’re trying to pull a fast one, but they maybe totally naive about Western work places.
As you’ve said it’s a small company, I’m guessing you might not have anyone else from their home country - but if you do, would they be able to explain (weird) Australian work habits ?
Who knows this young person might turn out to be awesome when they understand the work place …

Doubledutchbus · 17/05/2026 21:51

Can you try and get cover for the month and then tell the employee to take it unpaid, extend their probation by the month. They won’t get any work done, you’ll regret allowing them to attempt to work with such a difference in the time zones.

Genevieva · 17/05/2026 21:17

They can’t fulfill the terms of their contract so they need to hand in their notice with immediate effect or face being sacked and having that on their employment record.

HelenaWilson · 17/05/2026 21:15

offered to work nights to suit the business.

But it doesn't suit the business, quite apart from any legal issues. The person won't be available to the client in their normal working hours, and their probation can't be overseen as it would if they were in the office.

They would have likely started their career during Covid - so had limited actual work experience to see what is done/not.

Lockdowns - in the UK at least - ended in spring 2021. This person has had five whole years since then to learn what is done or not done in a work environment.

It's about bloody time people stopped using Covid as an excuse for everything.

HaveYouFedTheFish · 17/05/2026 21:04

ConstanzeMozart · 17/05/2026 21:02

And then what would people without children/not needing childcare say about this special treatment? And would those people be expected to just cover for their colleague and bollocks to any hopes of a summer holiday for themselves?

deleted because I thought I was posting on a batshit economy thread - agree in the context of this thread tge straw man and entire scenario is equally daft.

ConstanzeMozart · 17/05/2026 21:02

ElBandito · 17/05/2026 14:00

But they aren't.

And what if it was for child care, would they want a month off every summer? Would everyone with children then want a month off in the summer? Should they all get it?

I mean, what if the probationer needs a month off to build a straw man one blade of straw at a time...

And then what would people without children/not needing childcare say about this special treatment? And would those people be expected to just cover for their colleague and bollocks to any hopes of a summer holiday for themselves?

Needtosoundoffandbreathe · 17/05/2026 20:03

TwinklySquid · 17/05/2026 19:39

They would have likely started their career during Covid - so had limited actual work experience to see what is done/not.
Your brain also isn’t formed until 25

At 16 I knew I had to do everything according company policy in my Saturday job. Being under 25 is not an excuse to be a pillock at work.

This person needs a reminder who the manager is. They do not call the shots because it suits them. This is definitely a case of they feel comfortable enough to ask forgiveness instead of having had permission beforehand.

noctilucentcloud · 17/05/2026 19:55

TwinklySquid · 17/05/2026 16:57

I think a lot of people are being very harsh.
The employee didn’t say they were going away for a months holiday. They are going to see family and offered to work nights to suit the business.

People are entitled to a life outside of their work. Now days, companies aren’t willing to invest in good people anymore, as demonstrated by the fact OP would rather sack them and start again. Employees don’t feel loyal anymore because they are seen as disposable .

Let’s be honest: if the company was failing you’d leave it to the last minute to tell people so you could keep making money . Bugger people needing the chance to find new jobs to pay the bills.

Did they make a silly mistake? Yes. But they are young. A better lesson would be to make it unpaid and tell them how this isn’t acceptable in the future.

It's not a realistic option to work nights for 3-4 weeks whilst being away and seeing family and friends, and being productive and maintaining standards. And that's true for any employee let alone one new to the job. You also have a duty of care to an employee and them working like that without adequate rest isn't good. As well as the issues re IT equipment overseas. I also think there's OP is being very fair, they have thought about it and haven't imediately jumped to sacking them.

TwinklySquid · 17/05/2026 19:39

B1anche · 17/05/2026 18:52

They're not that young, they're 25!

They would have likely started their career during Covid - so had limited actual work experience to see what is done/not.
Your brain also isn’t formed until 25

GoogolB · 17/05/2026 19:24

estrogone · 16/05/2026 13:21

We have two offices and have to walk between the buildings for meetings. This person mentioned it in passing on a walk. I thought it was a pie in the sky idea given ME flight issues and brushed it off.

I do not think for a second that I gave the slightest hint it was approved. They must have taken my lack of response as some sort of go ahead.

I am leaning towards letting go. Nobody is irreplaceable. If I give the option of them cancelling there would only be bad feeling. If I keep them on, I have to piss about training a temp.

They are otherwise very promising, great with their allocated client. Balls, bugger, shit, fuck. Three months of training down the swannie. People suck.

Do it. This is absolutely grounds to fail a probation period. Cut your losses and move on.

B1anche · 17/05/2026 18:52

TwinklySquid · 17/05/2026 16:57

I think a lot of people are being very harsh.
The employee didn’t say they were going away for a months holiday. They are going to see family and offered to work nights to suit the business.

People are entitled to a life outside of their work. Now days, companies aren’t willing to invest in good people anymore, as demonstrated by the fact OP would rather sack them and start again. Employees don’t feel loyal anymore because they are seen as disposable .

Let’s be honest: if the company was failing you’d leave it to the last minute to tell people so you could keep making money . Bugger people needing the chance to find new jobs to pay the bills.

Did they make a silly mistake? Yes. But they are young. A better lesson would be to make it unpaid and tell them how this isn’t acceptable in the future.

They're not that young, they're 25!

Swipe left for the next trending thread