Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think a junior probationer’s month abroad request is unreasonable?

516 replies

estrogone · 16/05/2026 12:43

We have a junior in our office who’s only been with us about three months and is still on probation, where the expectation is mostly office-based work. They briefly mentioned in passing at one point that they might travel overseas, but there was never any proper discussion or approval before the trip was booked.

They’ve now come back and advised the trip is already booked and confirmed for nearly a month overseas, in a time zone 10 hours away. They proposed a range of adjusted working arrangements, including shortened hours and overnight work, so they can continue working remotely while away.

I haven’t approved the shortened hours or alternative arrangements and have asked them to demonstrate how they realistically intend to maintain service levels and cope with working nights while effectively on holiday overseas.

I am a lot WTAF Confused to four weeks of leave for someone who has only been with the business a matter of months and is still in probation.

AIBU to think this is request is out of order?

OP posts:
SoScarletItWas · 16/05/2026 18:10

Hallamule · 16/05/2026 17:02

It's pretty normal for employers to honour holidays that are already booked when new employees start. It's generally something that gets sorted out during the recruitment process and Id expect the employer to make their position clear at that point.

yes, but OP has said it wasn’t booked beforehand, or mentioned as a ‘might’ until they’d joined.

ParmaVioletTea · 16/05/2026 17:52

Whyherewego · 16/05/2026 12:47

Well if it doesn't work it doesn't work. In this circumstance I'd tell them to take leave for the 4 weeks (either paid or unpaid) and then extend probation by a month to cover the absence

This.

And the behaviour - booking a month away on the assumption that the proposed arrangements would be approved - needs to be raised in the probation meeting as a first red card, and reason for the probation to be extended for at least a month (if not longer).

The employee needs to know that this is not appropriate professional behaviour. And if repeated, could lead to disciplinary action, all the way up to dismissal.

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 16/05/2026 17:39

Imdunfer · 16/05/2026 16:19

It won't be a month. If they are cheeky enough to do this now it will be the start of their general approach to their job.

They’ll expect the same month off wfh 10 hours away every year, because, it’s to see family isn’t it?

Gonnagetgoingreturnsagain · 16/05/2026 17:38

Soulstirring · 16/05/2026 15:51

This sounds cultural. A lot of employees in my work expected the same, to go to their home country and work remotely whilst visiting family/holidaying and then working nights/evenings. It very rarely works well. I wouldn’t approve it and would be prepared to replace. Lessons learned.

Cultural is all well and good but you have to look at your employees who quite rightly will think these colleagues have special treatment in being allowed to do this. There was an ex boss of mine a director who was allowed to do this, work early and late and get afternoons off, but his wife was Slovakian and they were on holiday there.

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 16/05/2026 17:28

TheKeatingFive · 16/05/2026 16:44

That's nonsense. Holiday / working remotely needs to be signed off. There are procedures. If the employee didn't realise that, it's entirely on them.

Disagree. Its the company's responsibility to induct your people properly so that tgey are fully aware of procedures.

ParmaVioletTea · 16/05/2026 17:11

At the very least I’d be extending their probation period by the month they’re away

But what blows my mind is they’re proposing shortened hours - for the same pay?!!!

I think this person needs a bit of a lesson in what working for your salary means …

Puzzledandpissedoff · 16/05/2026 17:08

Spicysirracha · 16/05/2026 14:50

The could have very easily lied and made out it was for a family related issue

they didn’t. They were absolutely upfront.., this is a holiday.

So that is a positive

Up to a point, yes - except that was when they expected to go right ahead without any consequences

Now that there are - and if the "holiday" remark wasn't in writing - the story could easily change, along with an insistence that OP "must have misunderstood"

Fortunately, being very new, there shouldn't be any issues with simply getting rid - unless visiting family in the middle east means a racial aspect could be brought to bear, in which case good luck with that

TheKeatingFive · 16/05/2026 17:06

Hallamule · 16/05/2026 17:02

It's pretty normal for employers to honour holidays that are already booked when new employees start. It's generally something that gets sorted out during the recruitment process and Id expect the employer to make their position clear at that point.

If that was the case it would be agreed in the recruitment process. But I cannot imagine a sane employer who would agree a month long 'work from another country' stint while still in a probation period.

Hallamule · 16/05/2026 17:02

SoScarletItWas · 16/05/2026 12:52

The first response is ‘You should ensure all leave requests are approved before you book anything.’

The second response is: ‘A destination 10 hours away isn’t compatible with our service hours. And we wouldn’t approve working overseas except in exceptional circumstances and if it met the needs of the business.’ Quote relevant IT security policy as needed.

Their options are:
Cancel the trip
Take the trip either as paid or unpaid leave.

And absolutely extend their probation by the month. They don’t seem to understand how work ‘works’ yet!

It's pretty normal for employers to honour holidays that are already booked when new employees start. It's generally something that gets sorted out during the recruitment process and Id expect the employer to make their position clear at that point.

ByQuaintAzureWasp · 16/05/2026 16:53

Give them a month off without pay a d extend their probation. Or decline.

GreenCaterpillarOnALeaf · 16/05/2026 16:53

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 16/05/2026 16:49

Well they’ve been there a couple of months and think this is acceptable and think they can be on holiday all day and work a full day through the night so they are not showing themselves to be that good a worker. Maybe they didn’t realise if this is their first job but ot does suggest difficulties going forward

To be fair this is true. DH doesn’t hire anyone who’s not had a job before for reasons like this. Even if it’s a couple of years at maccies while you do your degree they tend to come out equipped and with an understanding of the world of work.

I would want to sort something if I really liked them, and I would feel bad if they lost money - but that’s probably why I don’t do much hiring and firing 😂.

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · 16/05/2026 16:49

GreenCaterpillarOnALeaf · 16/05/2026 15:57

Personally, if I could accommodate it I would. Especially if they’re a good worker. We’d be having a stern word about what I expect and not to do it again, but if it was possible and they seemed trust worthy I would see what I can do.

I’m not a hard arse though I’m soft.

Well they’ve been there a couple of months and think this is acceptable and think they can be on holiday all day and work a full day through the night so they are not showing themselves to be that good a worker. Maybe they didn’t realise if this is their first job but ot does suggest difficulties going forward

CuntOfTheLitter · 16/05/2026 16:49

I’d get rid of them now , this is a massive red flag

Pistachiocake · 16/05/2026 16:48

A lot depends on what the job is-and obviously you can't give all the details we'd need to make an informed decision.
But most workers do expect flexibility now, and most won't work for organisations with dated views. Those who came to the workplace after 2020 say they find it weird their parents used to actually travel in daily, so depending on your service, you will find it almost impossible to retain decent staff. Before anyone accuses me of bias, I can't wfh in my job-I'm just saying that it's a fact many younger workers put flexibility above pay and progression, if they're in a job where it's possible.

Grizelina · 16/05/2026 16:48

As well as the potential tax implications for the employee the country they are going to may not permit visitors working without appropriate visas. In addition taking the Company onshore in a foreign country may well be a breach of regs for the Company itself and could well create huge issues for them depending on their ownership/tax structure. IMO they would have to take unpaid leave, not be permitted to work for the Company during the period they are away and have probation extended. You may well also run the risk of them deciding to continue travelling and not come back. If you feel that’s all ok then sit them down and explain everything to them clearly. If not then just tell them that there won’t be a job to come back to ensuring first of all you won’t be doing anything that could constitute an unfair/constructive dismissal claim.

TheKeatingFive · 16/05/2026 16:44

Mustreadabook · 16/05/2026 16:40

It depends what they briefly mentioned. If they said ‘I’d like to go away to x country for a month and work remotely from there’ and you didn’t reply with ‘that would be against company policy’ then I think you have implicitly agreed that is a thing that can happen.

That's nonsense. Holiday / working remotely needs to be signed off. There are procedures. If the employee didn't realise that, it's entirely on them.

rookiemere · 16/05/2026 16:41

I had a similar situation many years ago as a young manager. We needed someone to support our trainer who was overwhelmed with work when a business merger occurred. An internal candidate was recruited into the position which was a considerable promotion for them. Within a week of being told she had the job she requested a 3 week holiday with a friend to help said friend get over a bad break up. I got her manager to tell her no as the whole point of her role was to reduce pressure by picking up the role and being away for 3 weeks was not acceptable. I said that she could take 2 weeks leave as that didn’t require senior level approval.
Well she went ahead and booked the holiday and I had no option but to ask her to resign. My one regret was I should have had the conversation myself, but instead the direct line manager had it. I felt bad, of course I did, and some of the other managers thought I overreacted, but I still think I made the right call. Once you’re a wage earning adult, sometimes you have to make adult decisions and that involves not booking holidays on a whim.

Mustreadabook · 16/05/2026 16:40

estrogone · 16/05/2026 13:21

We have two offices and have to walk between the buildings for meetings. This person mentioned it in passing on a walk. I thought it was a pie in the sky idea given ME flight issues and brushed it off.

I do not think for a second that I gave the slightest hint it was approved. They must have taken my lack of response as some sort of go ahead.

I am leaning towards letting go. Nobody is irreplaceable. If I give the option of them cancelling there would only be bad feeling. If I keep them on, I have to piss about training a temp.

They are otherwise very promising, great with their allocated client. Balls, bugger, shit, fuck. Three months of training down the swannie. People suck.

It depends what they briefly mentioned. If they said ‘I’d like to go away to x country for a month and work remotely from there’ and you didn’t reply with ‘that would be against company policy’ then I think you have implicitly agreed that is a thing that can happen.

Millytante · 16/05/2026 16:40

cubistqueen · 16/05/2026 13:30

I’d say tough. It’s a hard lesson but they need to learn it.

A person would have to spectacularly oblivious/ narcissistic/ dense to imagine a month’s PAID leave could be envisaged when she’s barely in with door with you. She’d not be ‘losing thousands’ at all; do not think in such terms.
She’d be entitled to almost nothing even had she made a professional request for the month when she started. .
She made a plan to be absent from work, which is bad enough. Expecting to be paid is utter lunacy.
This one sounds like an utter nightmare, OP. This is her presumably on her best behaviour. Just you wait.

Northermcharn · 16/05/2026 16:27

YANBU. This would 100% annoy me in every way. Annoy being a massive understatement of course. I cannot deal with the sheer self-entitlement and underhandedness of this persons (obviously pre-planned) approach. If you can sack them / give them notice without them having grounds for any kind of come back, I would. No doubt. I cannot work with people like this - never mind mind employ them. I'm agitated for you!

Imdunfer · 16/05/2026 16:19

DoAWheelie · 16/05/2026 12:47

The trip is booked and paid for so they are not going to cancel it.

You need to decide if sacking them and starting recruitment training over again is more of a hassle than a month's sub par performance. Only you know your job well enough to answer that.

It is a bit CF of them to do it, but it's done now so it's down to how you respond.

It won't be a month. If they are cheeky enough to do this now it will be the start of their general approach to their job.

YorksMa · 16/05/2026 16:16

estrogone · 16/05/2026 12:43

We have a junior in our office who’s only been with us about three months and is still on probation, where the expectation is mostly office-based work. They briefly mentioned in passing at one point that they might travel overseas, but there was never any proper discussion or approval before the trip was booked.

They’ve now come back and advised the trip is already booked and confirmed for nearly a month overseas, in a time zone 10 hours away. They proposed a range of adjusted working arrangements, including shortened hours and overnight work, so they can continue working remotely while away.

I haven’t approved the shortened hours or alternative arrangements and have asked them to demonstrate how they realistically intend to maintain service levels and cope with working nights while effectively on holiday overseas.

I am a lot WTAF Confused to four weeks of leave for someone who has only been with the business a matter of months and is still in probation.

AIBU to think this is request is out of order?

In any company I've ever worked for, extended leave like that is only permissible after a certain number of years service and by special arrangement. I would say no and query this person's commitment to the role. Also, beware that if you say yes, you are setting a precedent for all other members of staff.

Daisymail · 16/05/2026 16:12

Needtosoundoffandbreathe · 16/05/2026 14:22

I'd be calling them to a meeting on Monday morning (even though you are on holiday) where you verbally tell them you are terminating their employment. Followed up in writing. Kick start the recruitment process as I guarantee this person will not work their notice (there may be no notice period during probation), but will leave instead. Record the meeting if using Teams.

This.

ImFinePMSL · 16/05/2026 16:11

If you let this person do it then all your employees will want to do it.

“Oh I’m going to Thailand for 2 weeks but instead of requesting annual leave I’ll just work remotely, that’s fine isn’t it?”

“I’m going to my holiday home in the Canaries for 6 months. Wait what’s that? I don’t have to quit? I can take my laptop and work from Tenerife? Great!”

You’d be absolutely crazy if you let this new employee take the sheer piss out of you and the company.

AgnesMcDoo · 16/05/2026 16:10

What are your workplace policies on annual leave requests, working remotely / overseas and probation periods?

that is what should govern your response to this - not your personal opinion as to whether the request is reasonable or not.

and if you don’t have policies on these matters it’s time to get them into place pronto

Swipe left for the next trending thread