Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think divorce filings should trigger immediate temporary protections?

28 replies

ForEdgyShark · 14/05/2026 12:19

When divorces or separations are filed, I don’t think it makes sense for everything to be left so open and undefined in the early stages.
In situations where there’s tension, imbalance or potential vulnerability, it feels like there should be a clear, immediate default - for example, the husband moving out and some form of temporary protection being put in place where appropriate. At the moment it can feel like people are left to navigate a very unstable situation without any clear starting point, which can make things worse. I’m not saying every situation is the same but I do think a more structured, safety-first approach would make sense.

AIBU?

OP posts:
ColdAsAWitches · 14/05/2026 12:27

You're making a hell of a lot of assumptions! "The husband should move out?" Why him? Why not the person who wanted the divorce, or the other person? What if the house is in his name, what if it's not? What if he's a stay at home parent? You can't just declare "in any divorce you must immediately punish the man" without any consideration of the facts or consequences.

AmberTigerEyes · 14/05/2026 12:24

Can you explain more what this default would be?

decorationday · 14/05/2026 12:21

Protection from what?