Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Don't understand 100% joint finances

320 replies

Lorendo · 12/05/2026 21:45

I know I'll get flamed for this but I don't get it when couples only have joint finances and nothing separate.

Me and DH have a joint account to cover joint expenses (house, cars childcare) etc. We each put same in each month as earn similar.

We also have joint saving pots for certain things where we put certain amount into eg holiday, emergency fund, kids stuff.

That's it. Anything left stays in our separate personal accounts for whatever we please.

This seems like a logical way to do it. All joint obligations are sorted together but we still retain independence with what's left.

A friend of mine only does joint. She only works part time so a different situation to us but husband monitors every penny in and out. If she buys something he doesn't agree with or that she didn't clear with him first, he brings it up.

I told her my arrangement and she just said 'yes well we like to manage all the money together, as a team'. Right ok, sounds more like financial abuse than team work but hey ho

OP posts:
MyMilchick · 13/05/2026 13:05

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 12:54

There was somebody on a thread the other day that said that because I am a SAHM I should ask my husband before I spend a penny - but he should be able to spend what he wants without consultation.

And they were deadly serious.

Bloody hell, were they a woman?

Obimumkinobi · 13/05/2026 12:58

WonderingAboutThus · 13/05/2026 07:42

  1. My parents or siblings would immediately and without doubt lend me money, as I would to them.
  2. My work would be able to advance me three months wage for unexpected hardship.
  3. HIS parents would be so embarrassed about his behaviour that they would probably advance me the money.
  4. Presumably I could just put stuff on a credit card for the few weeks until I got paid.
  5. I make enough to finance our life so this would only be an issue for the three weeks till the next payday.

You're very fortunate to have such a strong support network, independent means and a salary that would solely fund your joint life. If the worse happened, you could utilise these "assets" to tide you over, so joint marital money surely doesn't pose the same potential risks to you as it does to some women? Either way, these assets are separate from your joint family money, which makes me wonder if they're really very different from someone whose 'escape/survival fund' is in her own account, only accessible by her?

Tessasanderson · 13/05/2026 12:55

Been joint finances for my entire adult life. I was struggling at 18 having used my entire savings to keep myself feed whilst doing ALevels. I had a long term partner and got my first job after finishing school. I havent had a single pay day that didnt go into that joint account we set up. I earn between 3 and 4 x my partners salary and recently inherited a 6 figure amount. Its all in there.

There hasnt been a single moment in the next 30+ years i have regretted or even had a single thought of changing it.

If i wanted to leave the relationship tomorrow i could easily leave with as much money as i needed without a single issue. As importantly, so could my partner.

So if i was independent of my partner i guess i would still be in the same position. BUT would they? Partner/Husband/Wife, whatever the relationship is in my eyes if you commit to each other you do not have any unequal sides to the relationship. That includes financially.

My partner has earnt 1/3 of what i have over the last 30 years. In reality its probably 1/5. Are they to have begged me for handouts when needed? Would i be accused of financial manipulation when they couldnt make life choices that they wanted to because i was sitting on a pot of money? Here is a biggie, would they still be with me if i didnt have such a financial hold over them?

I cant get my head around anyone openly expecting their partner to not have the same financial independence they have.

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 12:54

There was somebody on a thread the other day that said that because I am a SAHM I should ask my husband before I spend a penny - but he should be able to spend what he wants without consultation.

And they were deadly serious.

Cosimarocks · 13/05/2026 12:53

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 12:50

Otr both pay a % of what they earn into the bills account.

For example A earns 2k a month and B earns 4k.

Bills come to 1.5k.

So A pays £500 and B pays £1k.

Same percentage of income

Which, assuming there is any left over, still leaves the higher earner with more personal money after those costs…

MyMilchick · 13/05/2026 12:52

What works for one couple may not for another, is long as neither is being financially abusive every couple should just tailor the way they do things in a way that suits them best 💁

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 12:50

Cosimarocks · 13/05/2026 12:39

There is a common misunderstanding – in my opinion - that often comes up regularly on Mums Net around fairness in finances. It makes the mistake of mistaking equality and equity.

Equality states that the fair thing is to split things equally: bills, food, mortgage, etc. split down the middle. It’s fair surely as everyone is paying the same thing?!

The trouble is that doing that doesn’t allow for reality or nuance. It speaks only of money. It puts money up there as the most important, and really the only thing that counts. In doing that it puts the higher earning person in a relationship in a stronger, more powerful, and ultimately unfairly advantaged position.

Equity in a relationship understands that money is not the only thing: that some work less, earn less, but bring other things to a household, to a relationship and family. Childcare for example. It is about creating fairness and support. (It also realises, what many try to hide, that earning more doesn’t actually mean very much. It doesn’t elevate that person or mean that they work harder or are better than someone who earns less. Generally it isn’t a signifier of anything other than that that person is in a well-paid area).

Equity says that money should be pooled not split. Person A might earn £60k a year and person B £35k. But that shouldn’t mean that person B ends up with less. They both put in what they earn and then they decide how to manage that. You might save some jointly. And you might divvy up the rest and each take that as your own (to save or spend as you wish).

Here’s an example of each, (figures made up) with person A earning £3,500 a month after tax and person B £2,500, and their monthly outgoings on shared expenses (bills, mortgage, food etc.) being £3,500:
Equality: Both put in for half the bills, so £1,750. After shared expenses, Person A has £1,750 remaining and Person B has £750. Person A has an extra £1000 more each month to do with as they want than person B.
Equity: Both pool their money, with £6,000 going into a pot. From that pot £3,500 goes on fixed monthly outgoings. Of the remaining £2,500, £1000 goes into joint savings (holidays, house, etc.) or joint spending (days out etc.) and each then take £750 for their own.

I know which I think is fair.

I often wonder what happens in relationships when things are done based on equality (split half the bills and keep the remaining). Does the higher earner get to go on more expensive holidays? Do they wear better clothes and go out more, while the lower earner struggles? It seems bizarre. Surely a relationship and certainly a family is about love and support. Why create a divide? My money is something I earn for the family, as is my partners. We don’t view it separately, we work to survive and to have a shared and happy existence as a family. We share the joys and we share the burdens.

Otr both pay a % of what they earn into the bills account.

For example A earns 2k a month and B earns 4k.

Bills come to 1.5k.

So A pays £500 and B pays £1k.

Same percentage of income

coulditbeme2323 · 13/05/2026 12:50

Gamerlady · 13/05/2026 12:48

Always had joint account, it works for us. We're a family. We purchase what we need and neither myself or my hubby questions it. I dont understand relationships with separate money. Lending money off each other to pay back, now this baffles me completely.

It is bizarre.

Gamerlady · 13/05/2026 12:48

Always had joint account, it works for us. We're a family. We purchase what we need and neither myself or my hubby questions it. I dont understand relationships with separate money. Lending money off each other to pay back, now this baffles me completely.

Iloveagoodnap · 13/05/2026 12:45

Ours is 100% joint. It works fine because neither of us spend thousands without letting the other know but we wouldn’t quibble over one of us wanting to buy lunch out or new clothes or bits from Amazon etc. Basically I just spend what I like (within my means) and so does he.

Cosimarocks · 13/05/2026 12:39

There is a common misunderstanding – in my opinion - that often comes up regularly on Mums Net around fairness in finances. It makes the mistake of mistaking equality and equity.

Equality states that the fair thing is to split things equally: bills, food, mortgage, etc. split down the middle. It’s fair surely as everyone is paying the same thing?!

The trouble is that doing that doesn’t allow for reality or nuance. It speaks only of money. It puts money up there as the most important, and really the only thing that counts. In doing that it puts the higher earning person in a relationship in a stronger, more powerful, and ultimately unfairly advantaged position.

Equity in a relationship understands that money is not the only thing: that some work less, earn less, but bring other things to a household, to a relationship and family. Childcare for example. It is about creating fairness and support. (It also realises, what many try to hide, that earning more doesn’t actually mean very much. It doesn’t elevate that person or mean that they work harder or are better than someone who earns less. Generally it isn’t a signifier of anything other than that that person is in a well-paid area).

Equity says that money should be pooled not split. Person A might earn £60k a year and person B £35k. But that shouldn’t mean that person B ends up with less. They both put in what they earn and then they decide how to manage that. You might save some jointly. And you might divvy up the rest and each take that as your own (to save or spend as you wish).

Here’s an example of each, (figures made up) with person A earning £3,500 a month after tax and person B £2,500, and their monthly outgoings on shared expenses (bills, mortgage, food etc.) being £3,500:
Equality: Both put in for half the bills, so £1,750. After shared expenses, Person A has £1,750 remaining and Person B has £750. Person A has an extra £1000 more each month to do with as they want than person B.
Equity: Both pool their money, with £6,000 going into a pot. From that pot £3,500 goes on fixed monthly outgoings. Of the remaining £2,500, £1000 goes into joint savings (holidays, house, etc.) or joint spending (days out etc.) and each then take £750 for their own.

I know which I think is fair.

I often wonder what happens in relationships when things are done based on equality (split half the bills and keep the remaining). Does the higher earner get to go on more expensive holidays? Do they wear better clothes and go out more, while the lower earner struggles? It seems bizarre. Surely a relationship and certainly a family is about love and support. Why create a divide? My money is something I earn for the family, as is my partners. We don’t view it separately, we work to survive and to have a shared and happy existence as a family. We share the joys and we share the burdens.

Horses7 · 13/05/2026 12:22

We are 100% joint and have been since we married donkey’s years ago - it’s never been a problem.
Sometimes I earned more, mostly H earned more especially in later years. It still wasn’t a problem but then H is very easy going and financially astute.

ResultsMayVary · 13/05/2026 12:14

MidnightMeltdown · 12/05/2026 21:58

It harks back to the days when women didn’t work. Bit old fashioned these days, but I can see why it would be needed if one partner isn’t working.

I think in the old days it was more common for the woman to be given a household allowance.

I think joint money is more equitable given the gender pay gap and woman still often carrying more of the childcare and domestic load as well as care of elderly parent etc

We have joint finances.. Initially he earned about 4 times as much as me but I carried most of the domestic load including home renovation tasks.

Decades later I earn more and he carries more of the domestic load and household repairs.

We will share our retirement funds as well.

We have very similar values and spending styles so it's not an issue. We each contribute as much as we are able. We don't value money contributions over other contributions.

MsSquiz · 13/05/2026 11:33

And, FTR, I say this as a SAHM.

we have a joint account that DH transfers money into monthly to pay for household costs, living expenses, bills, child related costs. Larger purchases are always discussed as we are a couple, but not in a way where I’m “asking permission”, he also runs his “larger purchases by me in the same way, if they come out of this account.

he also transfers me an amount monthly, for my own costs, to spend how I like. He never questions what I spend this on.

MsSquiz · 13/05/2026 11:29

You don’t need to understand how other couples/families handle their finances.

The example you give isn’t them sharing joint finances though, this is your friend’s husband controlling their finances. That is a very different situation

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 11:28

TheRealMagic · 13/05/2026 11:10

Obviously whatever works for you - but just to note that if you have everything joint you don't get paid in two separate accounts and then move it all into the joint - that would indeed be a weird faff - you get paid into the joint too! One of the reasons I like it is because we do very little moving money around - money comes into one account, bills and spending go out of it, and then savings are moved out at the end of each month.

A faff? Moving money from one account to another takes seconds. And if it the same amount each month just set up a standing order

So very easy to get paid into your own account and transferred bills money to another

TheRealMagic · 13/05/2026 11:10

Rounder888 · 13/05/2026 10:53

Gosh I didn’t realise people had joint accounts for everything! Never even occurred to me to do with my husband. We have a joint account for all bills and the mortgage, and a joint credit card which we only use for holidays or large furniture purchases. I don’t see the point in putting our remaining money into the same account as well, I spend what I like, then put the remainder into my savings. My husband also gets paid weekly but I’m monthly, so not sure how that would work. Very interesting reading through how others do it though!

Obviously whatever works for you - but just to note that if you have everything joint you don't get paid in two separate accounts and then move it all into the joint - that would indeed be a weird faff - you get paid into the joint too! One of the reasons I like it is because we do very little moving money around - money comes into one account, bills and spending go out of it, and then savings are moved out at the end of each month.

Superscientist · 13/05/2026 10:59

Our finances are 95% joint and this works for us. Our joint account covers everything we need in a typical year but we are responsible for our own savings accounts, buying presents for our own family members and any big purchases that are just for ourselves.
We adjust how much we put into joint account based on our relative take home pays. When we were both working I earned a little less as I was doing 4 days Vs his 5 days and we split it 45:55. I'm not currently working so my partner is covering all of the joint account costs which now includes paying into my pension and a regular saver in my name.
We have a spreadsheet with all of our accounts so that we can make the big financial decisions based on money we have as a couple.
We never really criticise one anothers spending on the joint account. The most we do is ask whether a mid afternoon snack run was required yesterday if there's a £2 something payment at the co-op! 😁

Rounder888 · 13/05/2026 10:53

Gosh I didn’t realise people had joint accounts for everything! Never even occurred to me to do with my husband. We have a joint account for all bills and the mortgage, and a joint credit card which we only use for holidays or large furniture purchases. I don’t see the point in putting our remaining money into the same account as well, I spend what I like, then put the remainder into my savings. My husband also gets paid weekly but I’m monthly, so not sure how that would work. Very interesting reading through how others do it though!

MaryBeardsShoes · 13/05/2026 10:53

Halfblindbunny · 12/05/2026 21:47

We do 100% joint finances it works perfectly fine because neither of us is financially abusing the other.

Totally agree with this. Your friend is potentially being financially abused and you’re being smug about it. 👎

GoodkneeBadKnee · 13/05/2026 10:49

For me, it's not about not trusting my DH. It's about me having financial independence. I like having my own money to spend as I want. Simple as that really. It's never occurred to us to have a joint account because we don't need one.

Thechaseison71 · 13/05/2026 10:40

HoppingPavlova · 12/05/2026 23:15

No, there is literally no limit that we check with each other on. And we have never commented on the other’s spending.

It’s just about being an adult, you look at what’s in the accounts and if you can afford to spend then you do, if you can’t then you don’t.

Recent relevant examples, I spent a lot of money to pay for an extended overseas holiday. I don’t ‘agree’ that with DH. I had told him prior I was going on holiday so that he knew dates I’d be away out of courtesy (as would be weird to come home one day and find me gone for several weeks🤣), but I never discussed money with him or how much it would cost. A few months back I got a message from DH checking if I knew of any remaining work or invoices for some significant house repairs we were having. I responded ‘no, all paid, nothing further, why?’. He responded he was getting a computer (and anything like that he gets high end, top range) and looking at the account and with the huge chunk gone for repairs, was deciding whether to get it that month or the following month so wanting to know if I knew if there was any more bills to come or unpaid (as I was the one dealing with the repairs on that occasion). I didn’t ask cost of computer as it’s not my concern. Again, it’s just about being a financially responsible adult, which having joint accounts doesn’t prohibit.

Edited

That sounds as though you are quite comfortable financially though. It might be a bit different in one person spent freely not leaving enough to pay bills and eat

Mischance · 13/05/2026 10:30

Elsvieta · 13/05/2026 10:18

I don't understand it when people who are married DON'T have everything joint. I mean, if you co-own a house and you have children, your lives are, well, joint. That's what marriage means. Doing anything else seems to me like someone isn't really all in, like they don't trust their spouse. And if you don't, why marry? Why make someone you don't trust the other parent of your children, and take on a committment like a mortgage? If you're with the sort of man who's going to monitor and criticize your spending, or who you can't trust not to overspend himself, why marry him?

That is how I feel really - but I do recognise that some have been very unlucky in that the partner they trusted let them down. I never had any fear of that - but I would guess that neither did those to whom it happened.

Elsvieta · 13/05/2026 10:18

I don't understand it when people who are married DON'T have everything joint. I mean, if you co-own a house and you have children, your lives are, well, joint. That's what marriage means. Doing anything else seems to me like someone isn't really all in, like they don't trust their spouse. And if you don't, why marry? Why make someone you don't trust the other parent of your children, and take on a committment like a mortgage? If you're with the sort of man who's going to monitor and criticize your spending, or who you can't trust not to overspend himself, why marry him?

GHOSTTHINKER · 13/05/2026 09:55

Halfblindbunny · 12/05/2026 21:47

We do 100% joint finances it works perfectly fine because neither of us is financially abusing the other.

This 100% me and DH do the same.... never caused us any issue but I can see how it would with others. IMO it's about mutual respect and trust.